Abstract
The Coping Power Program is an evidence-based intervention for children identified to be at risk for developing externalizing behavioral problems. The Coping Power Program has been adapted to universally prevent behavioral problems in school-aged children. This study sought to test the efficacy of this adaptation, the Coping Power Universal program, on preschoolers' behavioral difficulties and pre-academic skills. Teachers delivered the intervention in their classes. The study included a sample of Italian children (N = 250, 125 boys) with a mean age of 4.50 years (SD = .50) at the beginning of the study. Classrooms of these children were randomly assigned to receive either the intervention or the Italian preschool standard curriculum. Measures included a questionnaire and objective and standardized measures for numerical intelligence and metaphonological skills delivered by a psychologist to the preschoolers. Classes in which teachers applied the Coping Power Universal program showed lower problematic behaviors and higher pre-academic skills than those in which teachers followed the standard curriculum only. Although further studies are still needed, the current findings showed that the Coping Power Universal program can be adapted for preschoolers with good results. Implications for practice, methodological limitations, and directions for future research are reviewed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data are freely available from the corresponding author.
References
Anders, Y., Grosse, C., Rossbach, H. G., Ebert, S., & Weinert, S. (2012). Preschool and primary school influences on the development of children’s early numeracy skills between the ages of 3 and 7 years in Germany. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24, 195–211.
Barnett, W. S., Jung, K., Yarosz, D. J., Thomas, J., Hornbeck, A., Stechuk, R., & Burns, S. (2008). Educational effects of the Tools of the Mind curriculum: A randomized trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 299–313.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Bierman, K. L., Nix, R. L., Heinrichs, B. S., Domitrovich, C. E., Gest, S. D., Welsh, J. A., & Gill, S. (2014). Effects of Head Start REDI on children’s outcomes 1 year later in different kindergarten contexts. Child Development, 85, 140–159.
Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2014). Closing the achievement gap through modification of neurocognitive and neuroendocrine function: Results from a cluster randomized controlled trial of an innovative approach to the education of children in kindergarten. PLoS ONE, 9, e112393.
Blewitt, C., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., Nolan, A., Bergmeier, H., Vicary, D., Huang, T., McCabe, P., McKay, T., & Skouteris, H. (2018). Social and emotional learning associated with universal curriculum-based interventions in early childhood education and care centers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open, 1(8), e185727–e185727.
Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., & White, J.-S.S. (2009). Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 127–135.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge Academic.
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2013). 2013 CASEL guide: Effective social and emotional learning programs—preschool and elementary school. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2015). 2015 CASEL guide: Effective social and emotional learning programs—middle and high school edition. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.
Corcoran, R. P., Cheung, A. C., Kim, E., & Xie, C. (2018). Effective universal school-based social and emotional learning programs for improving academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Educational Research Review, 25, 56–72.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140.
Denham, S. A., & Brown, C. (2010). “Plays nice with others”: Social–emotional learning and academic success. Early Education and Development, 21(5), 652–680.
Domitrovich, C. E., Cortes, R. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (2007). Improving young children’s social and emotional competence: A randomized trial of the preschool “PATHS” curriculum. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 28, 67–91.
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.
Giuli, C., Bertacchi, I., & Muratori, P. (2017). Coping Power nella Scuola dell’Infanzia: Gestire le Emozioni e Promuovere i Comportamenti Prosociali. Edizioni Centro Studi Erickson.
Howard, S. J., & Williams, K. E. (2018). Early self-regulation, early self-regulatory change, and their longitudinal relations to adolescents’ academic, health, and mental well-being outcomes. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 39, 489–496.
Howse, R. B., Calkins, S. D., Anastopoulos, A. D., Keane, S. P., & Shelton, T. L. (2003). Regulatory contributors to children’s kindergarten achievement. Early Education and Development, 14(1), 101–120.
Joo, Y. S., Magnuson, K., Duncan, G. J., Schindler, H. S., Yoshikawa, H., & Ziol-Guest, K. M. (2020). What works in early childhood education programs?: A meta-analysis of preschool enhancement programs. Early Education and Development, 31, 1–26.
Kemple, K. M., Lee, I., & Ellis, S. M. (2019). The impact of a primary prevention program on preschool children’s social-emotional competence. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47, 641–652.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software. https://doi.org/10.18637/JSS.V082.I13.
Leerkes, E. M., Paradise, M., O’Brien, M., Calkins, S. D., & Lange, G. (2008). Emotion and cognition processes in preschool children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 54, 102–124.
Lochman, J. E., Boxmeyer, C. L., Powell, N. P., Qu, L., Wells, K., & Windle, M. (2012). Coping Power dissemination study: Intervention and special education effects on academic outcomes. Behavioral Disorders, 37, 192–205.
Lochman, J. E., Powell, N. P., Boxmeyer, C. L., Ford, H. L., & Minney, J. A. (2014). Beyond disruptive behaviors: Applications of the Coping Power program. In J. Ehrenreich-May, & B. Chu (Eds.), Transdiagnostic mechanisms and treatment for youth psychopathology (pp. 293–312). Guilford Press.
Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2002). Contextual social–cognitive mediators and child outcome: A test of the theoretical model in the Coping Power program. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 945–967.
Lonigan, C. J., Phillips, B. M., Clancy, J. L., et al. (2015). Impacts of a comprehensive school readiness curriculum for preschool children at risk for educational difficulties. Child Development, 86(6), 1773–1793.
Mackintosh, B. B., & McCoy, D. C. (2019). Exploring social competence as a mediator of head start’s impact on children’s early math skills: Evidence from the Head Start Impact Study. Early Education and Development, 30, 655–677.
Marotta, L., Trasciani, M., & Vicari, S. (2004). CMF. Valutazione delle Competenze Metafonologiche. Erickson.
McClowry, S. G., Snow, D. L., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., et al. (2010). Testing the efficacy of INSIGHTS on student disruptive behavior, classroom management, and student competence in inner city primary grades. School Mental Health, 2, 23–35.
Meador, D., Nesbitt, K., & Farran, D. (2015). Experimental evaluation of the tools of the mind Pre-K Curriculum. Fidelity of Implementation Technical Report. Working Paper. Peabody Research Institute.
Melhuish, E., Quinn, L., Sylva, K., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Taggarat, B. (2012). Preschool affects longer term literacy and numeracy: Results from a general population longitudinal study in Northern Ireland. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24, 234–250.
Molin, A., Poli, S., & Lucangeli, D. (2006). BIN 4–6. Batteria per la Valutazione dell'Intelligenza Numerica in Bambini dai 4 ai 6 anni. Edizioni Erickson.
Morris, P., Millenky, M., Raver, C. C., & Jones, S. M. (2013). Does a preschool social and emotional learning intervention pay off for classroom instruction and children’s behavior and academic skills? Evidence from the foundations of learning project. Early Education & Development, 24, 1020–1042.
Muratori, P., Bertacchi, I., Giuli, C., Lombardi, L., Bonetti, S., Nocentini, A., & Lochman, J. E. (2015). First adaptation of Coping Power program as a classroom-based prevention intervention on aggressive behaviors among elementary school children. Prevention Science, 16, 432–439.
Muratori, P., Bertacchi, I., Giuli, C., Nocentini, A., & Lochman, J. E. (2017a). Implementing coping power adapted as a universal prevention program in Italian primary schools: A randomized control trial. Prevention Science, 18, 754–761.
Muratori, P., Bertacchi, I., Giuli, C., Nocentini, A., Ruglioni, L., & Lochman, J. E. (2016). Coping Power adapted as universal prevention program: Mid term effects on children’s behavioral difficulties and academic grades. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 37, 389–401.
Muratori, P., Bertacchi, I., Giuli, C., Pisano, S., Guarguagli, E., Lochman, J. E., & Mammarella, I. C. (2019a). Universal Coping Power for pre-schoolers: Effects on children’s behavioral difficulties and pre-academic skills. School Psychology International, 40, 128–144.
Muratori, P., Bertacchi, I., Masi, G., Milone, A., Nocentini, A., Powell, N. P., Lochman, J. E., Jones, S., Kassing, F., & Romero, D. (2019b). Effects of a universal prevention program on externalizing behaviors: Exploring the generalizability of findings across school and home settings. Journal of School Psychology, 77, 13–23.
Muratori, P., Giuli, C., Bertacchi, I., Orsolini, L., Ruglioni, L., & Lochman, J. E. (2017b). Coping power for preschool-aged children: A pilot randomized control trial study. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 11, 532–538.
Nix, R. L., Bierman, K. L., Domitrovich, C. E., & Gill, S. (2013). Promoting children’s social-emotional skills in preschool can enhance academic and behavioral functioning in kindergarten: Findings from Head Start REDI. Early Education & Development, 24(7), 1000–1019.
Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects Models in S and S-PLUS. . Springer.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/
Raver, C. C., Jones, S. M., Li-Grining, C., Zhai, F., Bub, K., & Pressler, E. (2011). CSRP’s impact on low-income preschoolers’ preacademic skills: Self-regulation as a mediating mechanism. Child Development, 82, 362–378.
Rivers, S. E., Tominey, S. L., O’Bryon, E. C., & Brackett, M. A. (2013). Developing emotional skills in early childhood settings using Preschool RULER. The Psychology of Education Review, 37, 19–25.
Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Smith, V., Zaidman-Zait, A., & Hertzman, C. (2012). Promoting children’s prosocial behaviors in school: Impact of the “Roots of Empathy” program on the social and emotional competence of school-aged children. School Mental Health, 4, 1–21.
Steed, E. A., & Shapland, D. (2020). Adapting social emotional multi-tiered systems of supports for kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48, 135–146.
Tobia, V., Gabriele, M. A., & Marzocchi, G. M. (2011). Italian norms of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire – SDQ. Difficoltà di Attenzione e Iperattivita, 6, 15–22.
Trentacosta, C. J., Izard, C. E., Mostow, A. J., & Fine, S. E. (2006). Children’s emotional competence and attentional competence in early elementary school. School Psychology Quarterly, 21(2), 148.
Waschbusch, D. A., Breaux, R. P., & Babinski, D. E. (2019). School-based interventions for aggression and defiance in youth: A framework for evidence-based practice. School Mental Health, 11, 92–105.
Funding
Grant RC 2016-2018 funded by the Italian Ministry of Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
John E. Lochman is the co-developer of the Coping Power program and receives royalties from the Oxford University Press for the Coping Power Implementation Guides for the Child Group Program and the Parent Group Program. He is also the PI on grants from NICHD and NIDA, which provide funding for intervention, research on the Coping Power program. Pietro Muratori, Iacopo Bertacchi and Consuelo Giuli are the developers of the CPU and receive royalties from Erikson press for the CPU manuals. All the other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Muratori, P., Giofrè, D., Bertacchi, I. et al. Testing the Efficacy of Coping Power Universal on Behavioral Problems and Pre-academic Skills in Preschoolers. Early Childhood Educ J 50, 613–625 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01179-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01179-0