Abstract
Populations of Reeves’ muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) have become well established in central, southern and eastern England as a result of introduction and colonisation. Although it is widely acknowledged as a species capable of damaging conservation woodland, information on its impacts has often been difficult to unravel because of the presence of other species of deer. In the county of Cambridgeshire, however, it is the most abundant and widespread species, allowing the nature and extent of its impacts to be described in woods where other deer are absent or rare. This article reviews published information and presents new analysis of data. The muntjac has significantly impacted a substantial proportion of conservation woodlands in the county, forming especially high densities in larger woods which are often designated as Sites of Special Scientific Interest. Management by means of fencing and particularly by culling has proved effective in reducing impacts by muntjac in individual woods and in the county as a whole. Timescales of colonisation leading up to causing impacts are also discussed to provide information to assist decision making in other regions or countries where muntjac are currently colonising or may colonise in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Not applicable as this is a review paper.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Bacon L (2005) Cambridgeshire and Peterborough provisional mammal atlas. Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Biological Records Office, Cambourne
Banham T (2003) In the public eye. Deer 12(9):18–20
Bray DW (1980) Taking muntjac seriously. Q J For 74:229–232
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Biodiversity Group (2008) Habitat Action Plan: Woodland. www.cpbiodiversity.org.uk. Accessed 12 Feb 2020
Chapman NG (2011) Muntiacus reevesi. Report to GB non-native organism risk assessment scheme, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London
Chapman NG (2021) History of Reeves’ muntjac in Great Britain and ecological characteristics facilitating expansion of feral populations. Eur J Wildl Res
Chapman NG, Harris S (1996) Muntjac. Mammal Society, London and British Deer Society, Fordingbridge
Chapman NG, Harris S, Stanford A (1994) Reeves’ muntjac Muntiacus reevesi in Britain: their history, spread, habitat selection and the role of human intervention in accelerating their dispersal. Mammal Rev 4:113–160
Cooke AS (1996) Conservation, muntjac deer and woodland reserve management. J Pract Ecol Cons, Spec Pub 1:43–52
Cooke AS (2006) Monitoring muntjac deer Muntiacus reevesi and their impacts in Monks Wood National Nature Reserve. English Nature Research Report 681. English Nature, Peterborough
Cooke AS (2009) Classifying the impact of deer in woodland. Deer 14(10):35–38
Cooke AS (2011) Deer in Huntingdonshire and the Soke of Peterborough. Ann Rep Huntingdon Fauna Flora Soc 6:51–61
Cooke AS (2013) Muntjac deer in Cambridgeshire. Nat Cambs 59:57–63
Cooke AS (2014) Outfoxing the muntjac. Deer 17(2):30–35
Cooke AS (2019a) Muntjac and water deer. Natural history, environmental impact and management. Pelagic Publishing, Exeter
Cooke AS (2019b) Woodland recovery in the absence of deer management. Deer 19(1):12–15
Cooke AS, Farrell L (2001) Impact of muntjac deer (Muntiacus reevesi) at Monks Wood National Nature Reserve, Cambridgeshire, eastern England. Forestry 74:241–250
Cooke AS, Lakhani K (1996) Damage to coppice regrowth by muntjac deer Muntiacus reevesi and protection with electric fencing. Biol Conserv 75:231–238
Dansie O (1983) Muntjac, 2nd edn. British Deer Society, Warminster
Deer Initiative (2012) Woodland impact survey. www.thedeerinitiative.co.uk/monitoring/activity-and-impact.php. Accessed 25 Mar 2020
Dolman P, Fuller R, Gill R, Hooton D, Tabor R (2010) Escalating ecological impacts of deer in lowland woodland. Brit Wildlife 21:242–254
Downing G (2014) Stalking muntjac. Quiller Publishing, Shrewsbury
Langbein J, Chapman N (2003) Fallow deer. The Mammal Society, London and The British Deer Society, Fordingbridge
Nentwig W, Bacher S, Kumschick S, Pyšek P, Vilà M (2018) More than ‘100 worst’ alien species in Europe. Biol Invasions 20:1611–1621
Nichols RV, Cromsigt JPGM, Spong G (2015) DNA left on twigs uncovers bite-scale resource use patterns in European ungulates. Oecologia 178:275–284
Niemann D (2016) A tale of trees. The battle to save Britain’s ancient woodland. Short Books, London
Patmore DW (1995) Reeves’ muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) in Northamptonshire. In: Mayle BA (ed) Muntjac deer: their biology, impact and management in Britain. Forestry Commission, Farnham and British Deer SocietyTrentham, pp 44–47
Putman R, Langbein J, Green P, Watson P (2011) Identifying threshold densities for wild deer in the UK above which negative impacts may occur. Mammal Rev 41:175–196
Rackham O (2003) Ancient woodland: its history, vegetation and uses in England. Castlepoint Press, Colvend
Tabor RCC (1999) The effects of muntjac deer, Muntiacus reevesi, and fallow deer, Dama dama, on the oxlip, Primula elatior. Deer 11:14–19
Tabor RCC (2006) Woodland plants and deer – the potential for damage to plant biodiversity by deer and the use of plant indicators to monitor and predict this damage. Essex Nat 23:65–76
Trout R, Pepper H (2006) Forest Fencing. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh
Ward AI, Richardson S, Mergeay J (2021) Reeves' muntjac populations continue to grow and spread across Great Britain and are invading continental Europe. Eur J Wildl Res
White PCL, Smart JCR, Böhm M, Langbein J, Ward A (2004) Economic impacts of wild deer in the east of England. www.woodlandforlife.net/PDFs/DEERstudyExecutive_Summary. Accessed 24 Mar 2020
Wilson K (1995) The impact of muntjac in woodlands. In: Mayle BA (ed) Muntjac deer: their biology, impact and management in Britain. Forestry Commission, Farnham and British Deer Society, Trentham, pp 40–43
Worden A (1960) Mammals. Ann Rep Huntingdon Fauna Flora Soc 12:3–4
Acknowledgements
I thank Natural England, the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, the Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Northamptonshire (and the bodies these organisations succeeded), and the Woodland Trust for their interest, help and support over many years. I also acknowledge the enormous dedication displayed by staff of these organisations and by the deer stalkers to the conservation of woodland reserves in the county. My thanks are due to Professor Rory Putman and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on the manuscript.
Funding
Some funding for studying impacts on National Nature Reserves was provided by English Nature.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
The article reports deer management undertaken to appropriate UK standards by certificated hunters.
Consent to participate
The author agrees.
Consent to publication
The author agrees.
Conflicts of interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Management of Reeves’ muntjac, an invasive alien game species
Guest Editor: Rory Putman
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cooke, A.S. Colonisation, impacts in conservation woodland and management of Reeves’ muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) in an English county. Eur J Wildl Res 67, 35 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-021-01480-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-021-01480-8