Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Colonisation, impacts in conservation woodland and management of Reeves’ muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) in an English county

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Populations of Reeves’ muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) have become well established in central, southern and eastern England as a result of introduction and colonisation. Although it is widely acknowledged as a species capable of damaging conservation woodland, information on its impacts has often been difficult to unravel because of the presence of other species of deer. In the county of Cambridgeshire, however, it is the most abundant and widespread species, allowing the nature and extent of its impacts to be described in woods where other deer are absent or rare. This article reviews published information and presents new analysis of data. The muntjac has significantly impacted a substantial proportion of conservation woodlands in the county, forming especially high densities in larger woods which are often designated as Sites of Special Scientific Interest. Management by means of fencing and particularly by culling has proved effective in reducing impacts by muntjac in individual woods and in the county as a whole. Timescales of colonisation leading up to causing impacts are also discussed to provide information to assist decision making in other regions or countries where muntjac are currently colonising or may colonise in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not applicable as this is a review paper.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Bacon L (2005) Cambridgeshire and Peterborough provisional mammal atlas. Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Biological Records Office, Cambourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Banham T (2003) In the public eye. Deer 12(9):18–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray DW (1980) Taking muntjac seriously. Q J For 74:229–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Biodiversity Group (2008) Habitat Action Plan: Woodland. www.cpbiodiversity.org.uk. Accessed 12 Feb 2020

  • Chapman NG (2011) Muntiacus reevesi. Report to GB non-native organism risk assessment scheme, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London

  • Chapman NG (2021) History of Reeves’ muntjac in Great Britain and ecological characteristics facilitating expansion of feral populations. Eur J Wildl Res

  • Chapman NG, Harris S (1996) Muntjac. Mammal Society, London and British Deer Society, Fordingbridge

  • Chapman NG, Harris S, Stanford A (1994) Reeves’ muntjac Muntiacus reevesi in Britain: their history, spread, habitat selection and the role of human intervention in accelerating their dispersal. Mammal Rev 4:113–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke AS (1996) Conservation, muntjac deer and woodland reserve management. J Pract Ecol Cons, Spec Pub 1:43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke AS (2006) Monitoring muntjac deer Muntiacus reevesi and their impacts in Monks Wood National Nature Reserve. English Nature Research Report 681. English Nature, Peterborough

  • Cooke AS (2009) Classifying the impact of deer in woodland. Deer 14(10):35–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke AS (2011) Deer in Huntingdonshire and the Soke of Peterborough. Ann Rep Huntingdon Fauna Flora Soc 6:51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke AS (2013) Muntjac deer in Cambridgeshire. Nat Cambs 59:57–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke AS (2014) Outfoxing the muntjac. Deer 17(2):30–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke AS (2019a) Muntjac and water deer. Natural history, environmental impact and management. Pelagic Publishing, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke AS (2019b) Woodland recovery in the absence of deer management. Deer 19(1):12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke AS, Farrell L (2001) Impact of muntjac deer (Muntiacus reevesi) at Monks Wood National Nature Reserve, Cambridgeshire, eastern England. Forestry 74:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke AS, Lakhani K (1996) Damage to coppice regrowth by muntjac deer Muntiacus reevesi and protection with electric fencing. Biol Conserv 75:231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dansie O (1983) Muntjac, 2nd edn. British Deer Society, Warminster

    Google Scholar 

  • Deer Initiative (2012) Woodland impact survey. www.thedeerinitiative.co.uk/monitoring/activity-and-impact.php. Accessed 25 Mar 2020

  • Dolman P, Fuller R, Gill R, Hooton D, Tabor R (2010) Escalating ecological impacts of deer in lowland woodland. Brit Wildlife 21:242–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing G (2014) Stalking muntjac. Quiller Publishing, Shrewsbury

    Google Scholar 

  • Langbein J, Chapman N (2003) Fallow deer. The Mammal Society, London and The British Deer Society, Fordingbridge

  • Nentwig W, Bacher S, Kumschick S, Pyšek P, Vilà M (2018) More than ‘100 worst’ alien species in Europe. Biol Invasions 20:1611–1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols RV, Cromsigt JPGM, Spong G (2015) DNA left on twigs uncovers bite-scale resource use patterns in European ungulates. Oecologia 178:275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemann D (2016) A tale of trees. The battle to save Britain’s ancient woodland. Short Books, London

  • Patmore DW (1995) Reeves’ muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) in Northamptonshire. In: Mayle BA (ed) Muntjac deer: their biology, impact and management in Britain. Forestry Commission, Farnham and British Deer SocietyTrentham, pp 44–47

  • Putman R, Langbein J, Green P, Watson P (2011) Identifying threshold densities for wild deer in the UK above which negative impacts may occur. Mammal Rev 41:175–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rackham O (2003) Ancient woodland: its history, vegetation and uses in England. Castlepoint Press, Colvend

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabor RCC (1999) The effects of muntjac deer, Muntiacus reevesi, and fallow deer, Dama dama, on the oxlip, Primula elatior. Deer 11:14–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabor RCC (2006) Woodland plants and deer – the potential for damage to plant biodiversity by deer and the use of plant indicators to monitor and predict this damage. Essex Nat 23:65–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Trout R, Pepper H (2006) Forest Fencing. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward AI, Richardson S, Mergeay J (2021) Reeves' muntjac populations continue to grow and spread across Great Britain and are invading continental Europe. Eur J Wildl Res

  • White PCL, Smart JCR, Böhm M, Langbein J, Ward A (2004) Economic impacts of wild deer in the east of England. www.woodlandforlife.net/PDFs/DEERstudyExecutive_Summary. Accessed 24 Mar 2020

  • Wilson K (1995) The impact of muntjac in woodlands. In: Mayle BA (ed) Muntjac deer: their biology, impact and management in Britain. Forestry Commission, Farnham and British Deer Society, Trentham, pp 40–43

  • Worden A (1960) Mammals. Ann Rep Huntingdon Fauna Flora Soc 12:3–4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Natural England, the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, the Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Northamptonshire (and the bodies these organisations succeeded), and the Woodland Trust for their interest, help and support over many years. I also acknowledge the enormous dedication displayed by staff of these organisations and by the deer stalkers to the conservation of woodland reserves in the county. My thanks are due to Professor Rory Putman and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on the manuscript.

Funding

Some funding for studying impacts on National Nature Reserves was provided by English Nature.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnold S. Cooke.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The article reports deer management undertaken to appropriate UK standards by certificated hunters.

Consent to participate

The author agrees.

Consent to publication

The author agrees.

Conflicts of interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Management of Reeves’ muntjac, an invasive alien game species

Guest Editor: Rory Putman

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cooke, A.S. Colonisation, impacts in conservation woodland and management of Reeves’ muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) in an English county. Eur J Wildl Res 67, 35 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-021-01480-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-021-01480-8

Keywords

Navigation