Elsevier

Quaternary International

Volume 624, 30 June 2022, Pages 67-79
Quaternary International

Tool wielding and activities at the Middle Paleolithic site of Nesher Ramla, Israel: A use-wear analysis of major tool types from unit III

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2021.03.041Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper communicates the results of a detailed use-wear analysis of flint tools from Unit III of Nesher Ramla, central Israel, an open-air Middle Paleolithic site, dated to Marine Isotope Stage 5. The analyzed sample consists of 966 artifacts that represent major techno-typological categories; scrapers, tools with a lateral tranchet blow, naturally backed knives and other Middle Paleolithic artifact types. Most tools were associated with bone working activities, mainly scraping and cutting, suggesting both consumption and non-consumption-related practices. Results also suggest extensive butchering activities, but other applications are less common, especially the underrepresentation of armature, and plant and hide working is noteworthy. All in all, these patterns suggest a narrow range of activities. Most tools were used by their sharp edge, while the retouched edges bore weak use-related patterns. It is assumed that in some cases, the retouch served to facilitate the grip. The most widely used tools in Nesher Ramla were the naturally backed knives that according to technological studies were one of the goals of knapping at Nesher Ramla. Tools with a lateral tranchet blow, representing a cultural marker of the Nesher Ramla inhabitants, show evidence of multiple use of both retouched and non-retouched edges shaped by the lateral blow. Hafting traces are relatively rare in the analyzed sample.

Introduction

The open-air Middle Paleolithic (MP) site of Nesher Ramla is located on the western slopes of the Judean hills, near the modern city of Ramla, central Israel (Fig. 1 a). The site consists of an 8-m-thick depositional sequence inside a funnel-shaped sinkhole (Frumkin et al., 2015; Zaidner et al., 2014, 2016) (Fig. 1 a). The MP deposits comprised 6 stratigraphic units that were divided into Upper (Units I and II) and Lower (Units III to VI) stratigraphic sequences (Fig. 1b, Friesem et al., 2014; Tsatskin and Zaidner, 2014). Dated with optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) and thermoluminescence (TL) methods, it is assigned to the middle MP (late Marine Isotopic Stage 6 and early MIS 5) (Zaidner et al., 2014; Guérin et al., 2017). The site yielded substantial quantities of archaeological remains, including flint artifacts (over 80.000), manuports, animal bones and remains of combustion features.

The present paper presents the results of a detailed use-wear analysis of flint tools from Unit III. It is a stratigraphically well-defined, 30–40 cm thick stratum located in the middle of the archaeological sequence. It is one of the most artifact-rich layers of the site, characterized by concentrations (0.4–2 m in diameter) of bones, flint, manuports, and ground stone tools (Fig. 1 c). Several combustion features were also found (Friesem et al., 2014; Zaidner et al., 2018).

The results of the study conducted on a sample of faunal remains from Unit III show that spur-thighed tortoises (Testudo graeca), aurochs (Bos primigenius), and equids (probably Equus caballus and E. asinus/hemionus) dominate the assemblage, while gazelle (Gazella gazella) and Mesopotamian fallow deer (Dama mesopotamica) are rarely present (Crater Gershtein et al., 2020). The skeletal element profiles suggest that medium-sized ungulates were brought to the site in a more complete state than the large ones. A bias in favor of meat- and fat-rich body parts indicates that initial butchery took place elsewhere and animal parts with the highest utility index were imported to the sinkhole for processing and consumption.

The knapped flint assemblage of Unit III comprises ca. 11,000 artifacts ≥2 cm (Prévost and Zaidner, 2020). The major raw material type is the local Mishash flint. The lithic production is flake-oriented; blades and points are virtually absent. The assemblage contains all stages of different reduction sequences as indicated by cortical flakes, general core trimmings elements (CTEs) and various end-products (i.e. Levallois flakes, naturally backed knives (NBKs) and kombewa flakes). The reduction sequences identified are the Levallois, NBK production, core-on-flake and other opportunistic reductions strategies (Zaidner et al., 2018; Prévost and Zaidner, 2020). The intensive use of the Levallois centripetal method by both, preferential and recurrent modes characterize the assemblage. The centripetal Levallois knapping system is dominant and is clearly identified by the Levallois cores, CTEs (i.e. débordant flakes, pseudo-Levallois flakes, striking platform preparation flakes), and the end-products (i.e. Levallois flakes with centripetal scar pattern).

The retouched tool assemblage is homogeneous and is dominated by scrapers and by tools with a lateral tranchet blow (LTB). The latter constitutes a unique tool-type previously unreported in the Levantine MP context. Its production consists of the removal of a thin spall along the retouched edge of the tool. This new tool type represents a cultural trait of the Nesher Ramla hominins as well as a new technological trait in the Levantine MP (Prévost et al., 2021a).

Nesher Ramla is a unique site both in its setting and content. Its location in a sinkhole in open terrain is unparalleled for the Levantine MP. Coupled with distinct archaeological and technological features, it provides access to a yet unfamiliar mode of human lifeways and interactions with the environment. One of the most interesting issues is the understanding of the function of the site and its place in MP hominins subsistence strategies. In this paper we tackle these issues from the point of view of the use of lithic artifacts. On the basis of the use-wear analysis, we seek to reconstruct how artifacts were used: what materials were they applied to? how were they wielded? This study is aimed at providing more data on activities at the site, and thus, further enhance the understanding of hominin behavior in the MP of the Levant.

Section snippets

Use-wear analysis methodology

Use-wear analysis of archaeological tools is a microscopic investigation of wear patterns that form on a tool's surface during use. Drawing on the principles of tribology, a science of interacting surfaces in motion, these patterns can be traced to the materials manipulated, the movement with which the tool was applied, or the tool's grip arrangement. In archaeology, such inferences rely on controlled experiments that strive to replicate the tribological processes and wear patterns as an

General observations

Of the 966 items constituting the sample, only 157 (16%) were found to carry sufficiently strong traces of use-wear to support a detailed analysis. The vast majority of the sample (n = 665, 69%) bore no traces at all, 12% (n = 122) had high PDSMs that precluded use-wear analysis, and 2% (n = 22) bore traces that were non-diagnostic. Seventeen tools had two or more working edges, and six items carried traces of hafting but not of use. Accordingly, the total number of edges with diagnostic traces

Discussion and conclusions

The use-wear analysis of major typological and technological components of the lithic assemblage of Nesher Ramla Unit III suggests a unique profile of activities. Perhaps the most striking feature is the observation that the lithic assemblage is almost exclusively dedicated to the processing of animal materials. Thirty-six of the 41 tools (i.e., 88%) that could be traced to specifiable substances were attributed to the processing of faunal matter—bone and flesh—a pattern that accords well with

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research in Nesher Ramla site was supported by the Israel Science Foundation (grant number 1773/15 to Y.Z.). The excavations at Nesher Ramla were conducted by Y.Z. on behalf of the Zinman Institute of Archaeology, the University of Haifa.

References (60)

  • M. Lombard

    Evidence of hunting and hafting during the Middle Stone Age at Sibidu cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a multianalytical approach

    J. Hum. Evol.

    (2005)
  • M. Lombard et al.

    Hunting with Howiesons Poort segments: pilot experimental study and the functional interpretation of archaeological tools

    J. Archaeol. Sci.

    (2008)
  • G.F. Monnier et al.

    A multi-analytical methodology of lithic residue analysis applied to Paleolithic tools from Hummal, Syria

    J. Archaeol. Sci.

    (2013)
  • J. Pargeter

    Assessing the macrofracture method for identifying Stone Age hunting weaponry

    J. Archaeol. Sci.

    (2011)
  • V. Rots

    Insights into early Middle Palaeolithic tool use and hafting in Western Europe. The functional analysis of level IIa of the early Middle Palaeolithic site of Biache-Saint-Vaast (France)

    J. Archaeol. Sci.

    (2013)
  • V. Rots et al.

    Projectiles and the abuse of the use-wear method in a search for impact

    J. Archaeol. Sci.

    (2014)
  • V. Rots et al.

    Aspects of tool production, use, and hafting in Palaeolithic assemblages from Northeast Africa

    J. Hum. Evol.

    (2011)
  • J.J. Shea et al.

    An experimental investigation of the effects of trampling on the results of lithic microwear analysis

    J. Archaeol. Sci.

    (1993)
  • S. Tomasso et al.

    Changes in hafting practices during the middle stone Age at Ifri n'Ammar

    Quat. Int.

    (2020)
  • A. Tsatskin et al.

    Geoarchaeological context of the later phases of Mousterian occupation (80–115ka) at Nesher Ramla, Israel: soil erosion, deposition and pedogenic processes

    Quaternary International

    (2014)
  • T. Van Kolfschoten et al.

    Lower Paleolithic bone tools from the ‘spear Horizon’ at Schöningen (Germany)

    J. Hum. Evol.

    (2015)
  • Y. Zaidner et al.

    Middle Paleolithic sidescrapers were resharped or recycled? A view from Nesher Ramla, Israel

    Quat. Int.

    (2015)
  • Y. Zaidner et al.

    Landscapes, depositional environments and human occupation at Middle Paleolithic open-air sites in the southern Levant, with new insights from Nesher Ramla, Israel

    Quat. Sci. Rev.

    (2016)
  • Y. Zaidner et al.

    A series of Mousterian occupations in a new type of site: the Nesher Ramla karst depression, Israel

    J. Hum. Evol.

    (2014)
  • L.R. Binford

    Bones: Ancient Men and Modern Myths

    (1981)
  • E. Boëda et al.

    Middle Palaeolithic bitumen use at Umm el Tlel around 70 000 BP

    Antiquity

    (2008)
  • E. Boëda et al.

    Bitumen as hafting material on Middle Paleolithic artifacts from the el Kowm basin, Syria

  • S. Bonilauri

    Le débitage Levallois: un concept de préhension normalisé et varié? Exemples de productions Levalloiso-Moustériennes issues du site d’Umm el Tlel, Syrie centrale

    Paléorient

    (2015)
  • F. Bordes

    Typologie du Paléolithique Ancien et Moyen

    (1961)
  • L. Centi et al.

    The bulb retouchers in the Levant: new insights into Middle Palaeolithic retouching techniques and mobile tool-kit composition

    PloS One

    (2019)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Lithic provisioning strategies at the Middle Paleolithic open-air site of Nesher Ramla, Israel: A case study from the upper sequence

      2022, Quaternary International
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our interpretation of the Stones Horizon's function relies on the high frequencies of scrapers and evidence for on-site knapping. We consider the high frequencies of scrapers an indication of animal butchering and processing (Groman-Yaroslavski et al., this volume), an estimation corroborated by the faunal remains. Presenting less taxonomic diversity, more substantial anthropogenic impact, and relatively intense post-discard trampling and charring, the animal bones indicate more prolonged stays (e.g., Yeshurun et al., 2014).

    View full text