An intelligent planning model for the development and utilization of urban underground space with an application to the Luohu District in Shenzhen

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.103933Get rights and content

Highlights

  • An intelligent planning model for UUS development and utilization was established.

  • An improved AIGA with an additional correlation operator was developed.

  • A three-dimensional UUS planning scheme of Luohu District in Shenzhen was derived.

Abstract

Development and utilization of Urban underground space (UUS) is one of the key ways for developing sustainable cities. However, the development and utilization of UUS is currently occurring in a passive manner, lacking proactive and quantitative planning. In this paper, an intelligent planning model was established to guide the future development and utilization of UUS. The proposed model, in which more than twenty factors were considered, is capable of analysing the suitability of UUS development in different regions and at different depths. In addition, an improved artificial intervention genetic algorithm (AIGA) with an additional correlation operator was integrated into the proposed model to achieve the optimal two-dimensional (2D) planning scheme by quantitively analysing the matching of the ground surface and underground space, and the compactness and suitability of underground space. A three-dimensional (3D) planning scheme was obtained by analysing the stratification of the underground space and hierarchical development. The proposed intelligent planning model was, subsequently, applied to the development and utilization of UUS in Luohu District in Shenzhen. An analysis of the geological conditions and the current construction status of the ground surface showed that 69.4% of the underground space is suitable for shallow layer developments, and this proportion further increases to 76% for the sub-shallow, sub-deep and deep layers, indicating that the Luohu District is highly suitable for developing underground space. Furthermore, the derived optimal 2D planning scheme indicated that the suitability component plays a greater important role in the objective values than the matching and compactness components, and more attentions should be paid to the development of municipal facilities in the shallow layer in Luohu District. The derived 3D planning scheme of Luohu District showed the characteristics of an “inverted cone”, where the utilization rate significantly decreases with increasing depth. The findings in this paper provide new insights for the future development and utilization of UUS.

Introduction

Due to the intense urbanization, existing cultivated land is reaching the limit to support the population, particularly in some large cities. A series of “urban syndromes”, e.g., urban green space reduction, traffic congestion, environmental pollution and resource shortages, have formed and seriously restricted the sustainability of city developments (Inmaculada, 2008, Kalnay and Cai, 2003, Xie, 2011). The development and utilization of urban underground space (UUS) is regarded as an effective way to solve these problems (Bobylev, 2006, Carmody and Sterling, 1983, Monnikhof et al., 1998, Sterling, 1997, Zhao and Künzli, 2016). In addition, the development of UUS has demonstrated prominent advantages than that of ground space in terms of urban space expansion and environmental improvement (Rönkä et al. 1998).

Underground space is a non-renewable resource because it is difficult to transform once assigned to a specific function (Sterling 1983). However, a great deal of underground infrastructure has been passively designed and constructed, causing numerous problems. For example, the random and reckless exploitation of underground coal leads to many goafs and other potential crises (Gong et al. 2008). Due to the lack of overall planning, the use rate of underground commercial space is low, and a large portion of underground space has been abandoned, leading to the waste of underground space resources (Pan 2012). Moreover, the layout of previous underground civil defence structures has influenced the current planning of underground infrastructure such as underground utility tunnels (Zhang et al. 2012). Therefore, the scientific and systematic planning of the development and utilization of UUS is essential.

A suitability evaluation of UUS development is crucial to the intelligent planning of sustainable cities. A UUS suitability evaluation provides key information such as geological conditions and land usage of ground surface and underground space for the intelligent planning of cities (Malone, 1996, Peng et al., 2009, Liu et al., 2018, Zhao et al., 2016). Sterling and Nelson (1982) identified different geological factors, i.e., rock characteristics, soil layer distribution, hydrogeological distribution and topographic gradient, and classified the effects of different ground and underground infrastructure on the development and utilization of UUS. In addition, some other factors, e.g., society, economy, psychology and actualities, are also taken into consideration in a suitability evaluation (Bobylev, 2005, Monnikhof et al., 1998). Many analytical methods have therefore been developed to systematically analyse and characterize the effect of the abovementioned factors on the development and utilization of UUS. For example, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is widely used to comprehensive evaluate multi-factors and guided the design of urban underground development (Bobylev, 2011, Feng and Lin, 1999, Liu et al., 2015). One multilayer framework based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was proposed to evaluate the geological engineering effect on the suitability of UUS exploitation and was further applied to study a railway station area (Lu et al. 2016). Compared to the fuzzy AHP, the classical AHP method is more suitable to evaluate the suitability of the underground space for specific decision makers. Peng and Peng (2018a) synthetically used the most unfavourable grading method (MUGM) and the exclusive method (EM) on the analysis platform of Geographic Information System (GIS) to determine suitability classifications. However, the collection of influencing factors was not standardized and varied form different situations and scholars (Ron and Jyrki, 2001, Wu et al., 2013). Moreover, collecting information on the abovementioned factors is also difficult (Yu et al. 2006).

The intelligent planning of UUS aims to rationally guide the development and utilization of underground space according to actual economical, social, ecological and other needs and to be included in the master planning and detailed planning (Bobylev, 2009, Brian, 2015, Li et al., 2013a, Zhao et al., 2016). Master planning plays a critical role in coordinating the different needs of UUS in various regions and different urban systems, and has a significant influence on the overall development of urban areas and guides the detailed planning process (Qiao and Peng 2016). Detailed planning involves the use of a specific design layout that is based on master planning (Huang and Yu 2014). Numerous studies have been conducted to guide and optimize UUS planning. Rönkä et al. (1998) proposed the principles of underground space planning and suggested the optimal depths for different activities. Li et al. (2013b) proposed using integrated planning in Suzhou, China and conducted a comprehensive assessment of underground resources, i.e., underground space, groundwater, geomaterials and geothermal energy. Zhao et al. (2016) proposed that government at all levels should develop UUS planning based on local economic, social and ecological development needs and urban master planning.

However, UUS planning is still facing many problems when it is applied to practice. First, the development of UUS planning is still in a preliminary stage, lagging behind actual demand and lacking relevant laws, standards, systems, etc. (Lu and Ji, 2012, Sterling et al., 2012). Second, current UUS planning is basically qualitative in nature and is not based on mature theories and methods (Volchko et al. 2020). UUS planning is currently in a rough and preliminary planning state due to the difficulty to quantitatively consider actual economic, social and ecological needs. Note that, such quantitative manner is to obtain an optimal solution of the underground space planning by analyzing the effects of economic, social, ecological and geological factors using a certain mathematical algorithm. Notably, although the quantitative intelligent planning models with mature algorithms are seldom used in the real practices of UUS planning, they have been adopted to guide the development of urban ground surface (Balling et al., 1999, Day et al., 1999, Liu et al., 2015, Stewart et al., 2004). It is suggested that quantitative ground surface planning maximizes the economic, social and ecological benefits by arranging different types of ground surface into spatial units, which is challenging because it not only addresses the tradeoffs of multiple objectives but also conciliates the competition of different land uses for the same spatial unit (Chen et al., 2018, Aerts et al., 2003, Eastman et al., 1995).

Three main challenges may hinder the development and utilization of UUS in a quantitative manner. First, it is difficult to establish the qualitative correlation between underground space and ground surface, which inhibits the ability of the current ground development status to drive intelligent planning for underground space (Liu and Liao, 2017, Zhang et al., 2018). Second, the objective function of underground space is difficult to solve using traditional algorithms because traditional algorithms, e.g., the genetic algorithm, are difficult to address constraints that widely exist in the UUS planning, e.g., excluding the unusable space. (Anastasios and Dimitrios, 2016, Liu et al., 2014). Third, it is difficult to combine the three-dimensional (3D) planning of underground space with the principle of hierarchical development (Admiraal 2006). Therefore, further quantitative research on underground space planning is needed.

To proactively and quantitatively design UUS planning, an intelligent planning model for the development and utilization of UUS, which is capable of analysing the correlation between ground surface and underground space and further giving the optimal two-dimensional (2D) and 3D planning schemes, is proposed in this paper. First, the suitability evaluation method of the development and utilization of UUS is introduced. Second, based on the correlation between ground surface and underground space, the 2D planning of UUS was generated by using the artificial intervention genetic algorithm (AIGA). Third, the 3D planning of UUS is proposed according to the principles of depth stratification and hierarchical development. Finally, the proposed intelligent planning model is applied to the development and utilization of UUS in Luohu District, Shenzhen. The findings in this paper could provide innovative insights for the future development and utilization of UUS.

Section snippets

An intelligent planning model for UUS development and utilization

The current UUS planning models are basically qualitative in nature and not based on mature theories and methods. In this section, an intelligent planning model for UUS development and utilized is proposed. This model has advantages of conducting suitability evaluation in a quantitative manner, analysing the optimal solution with a rigorous algorithm and providing 3D planning scheme with depth stratification and hierarchical development planning.

Case study

In this section, the proposed improved intelligent planning model was applied to the planning of UUS in Luohu District. Luohu District is located in the central part of Shenzhen, with an area of 78.75 km2, of which the built-up area is 34.74 km2. The forest coverage rate and the urban green coverage rate are 50.1% and 64.5%, respectively, and the resident population has reached 1,461,000 (Chen et al. 2014; Shenzhen Municipal Government, 2010). Moreover, Luohu District has abundant land use

Conclusions

UUS, as the second space of the city, is an important trend for the future development of urban space. This paper proposed an UUS intelligent planning model from a quantitative way and successfully adopted it into Luohu District in Shenzhen. The main conclusions are as follows:

  • 1)

    The intelligent planning model for the development and utilization of UUS was established. It includes components of suitability evaluation, 2D planning and 3D planning.

  • 2)

    By addressing all the influencing factors of the

Author's Contribution

J.G. contributes to the preparation, review and editing of the mansucript.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research is financially supported by Program for Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Enterpreneurial Teams (No. 2019ZT08G315) and the Shenzhen Municipal Design and Research Institute (No. HTSP-27143).

References (76)

  • X.L. Liu et al.

    Multiscale hierarchical analysis of rock mass and prediction of its mechanical and hydraulic properties

    J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng.

    (2018)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Regional land-use allocation with a spatially explicit genetic algorithm

    Landscape Ecol. Eng.

    (2015)
  • Z. Lu et al.

    Quantitative assessment of engineering geological suitability for multilayer UUS

    Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.

    (2016)
  • A.W. Malone

    The use of underground space in Hong Kong

    Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.

    (1996)
  • R. Monnikhof et al.

    How to determine the necessity for using underground space: an integral assessment method for strategic decision-making

    Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.

    (1998)
  • J. Peng et al.

    A GIS-based evaluation method of underground space resources for urban spatial planning: Part 1 methodology

    Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.

    (2018)
  • J. Peng et al.

    A GIS-based evaluation method of underground space resources for urban spatial planning: Part 2 application

    Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.

    (2018)
  • Y.K. Qiao et al.

    Master planning for underground space in Luoyang: a case of a representative Historic City in China

    Procedia Eng.

    (2016)
  • K. Rönkä et al.

    Underground space in land-use planning

    Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.

    (1998)
  • T.L. Saaty

    How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process

    Eur. J. Oper. Res.

    (1990)
  • R. Sterling

    Underground technologies for livable cities

    Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.

    (1997)
  • T.J. Stewart et al.

    A genetic algorithm approach to multiobjective land use planning

    Comput. Oper. Res.

    (2004)
  • O.S. Vaidya et al.

    Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications

    Eur. J. Oper. Res.

    (2006)
  • Y. Volchko et al.

    Subsurface planning: towards a common understanding of the subsurface as a multifunctional resource

    Land Use Policy.

    (2020)
  • X. Wang et al.

    Factors influencing the development potential of urban underground space: structural equation model approach

    Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.

    (2013)
  • J. Zhao

    Rock mass hydraulic conductivity of the Bukit Timah granite, Singapore

    Eng. Geol.

    (1998)
  • J. Zhao et al.

    An introduction to connectivity concept and an example of physical connectivity evaluation for underground space

    Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.

    (2016)
  • J.W. Zhao et al.

    Advances in master planning of urban underground space (UUS) in China

    Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.

    (2016)
  • J. Aerts et al.

    Using linear integer pro-gramming for multi-site land-use allocation

    Geogr. Anal.

    (2003)
  • K. Anastasios et al.

    Optimization of exit location in underground spaces

    Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.

    (2016)
  • R.J. Balling et al.

    Multiobjective urban planning using genetic algorithm

    J. Urban Plann. Dev.

    (1999)
  • Bobylev, N., 2005. Environmental assessment of urban underground infrastructure. In: New Technologies for Urban Safety...
  • N. Bobylev

    Strategic environmental assessment of urban underground infrastructure development policies

    Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.

    (2006)
  • N. Bobylev

    Mainstreaming sustainable development into a city’s Master plan: a case of Urban Underground Space use

    Land Use Policy.

    (2009)
  • M. Brian

    Planning for underground development: principles and problems

    Eng. Geol. Soc. Territ.

    (2015)
  • J. Carmody et al.

    Underground Building Design – Commercial and Institutional Structures

    (1983)
  • Chen, C., Du, Z., Zhu, D., Zhang, C., 2016. Land use classification in construction areas based on volunteered...
  • Q.Y. Chen et al.

    A virtual globe-based integration and visualization framework for aboveground and underground 3D spatial objects

    Earth Sci. Inf.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (26)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text