An intelligent planning model for the development and utilization of urban underground space with an application to the Luohu District in Shenzhen
Introduction
Due to the intense urbanization, existing cultivated land is reaching the limit to support the population, particularly in some large cities. A series of “urban syndromes”, e.g., urban green space reduction, traffic congestion, environmental pollution and resource shortages, have formed and seriously restricted the sustainability of city developments (Inmaculada, 2008, Kalnay and Cai, 2003, Xie, 2011). The development and utilization of urban underground space (UUS) is regarded as an effective way to solve these problems (Bobylev, 2006, Carmody and Sterling, 1983, Monnikhof et al., 1998, Sterling, 1997, Zhao and Künzli, 2016). In addition, the development of UUS has demonstrated prominent advantages than that of ground space in terms of urban space expansion and environmental improvement (Rönkä et al. 1998).
Underground space is a non-renewable resource because it is difficult to transform once assigned to a specific function (Sterling 1983). However, a great deal of underground infrastructure has been passively designed and constructed, causing numerous problems. For example, the random and reckless exploitation of underground coal leads to many goafs and other potential crises (Gong et al. 2008). Due to the lack of overall planning, the use rate of underground commercial space is low, and a large portion of underground space has been abandoned, leading to the waste of underground space resources (Pan 2012). Moreover, the layout of previous underground civil defence structures has influenced the current planning of underground infrastructure such as underground utility tunnels (Zhang et al. 2012). Therefore, the scientific and systematic planning of the development and utilization of UUS is essential.
A suitability evaluation of UUS development is crucial to the intelligent planning of sustainable cities. A UUS suitability evaluation provides key information such as geological conditions and land usage of ground surface and underground space for the intelligent planning of cities (Malone, 1996, Peng et al., 2009, Liu et al., 2018, Zhao et al., 2016). Sterling and Nelson (1982) identified different geological factors, i.e., rock characteristics, soil layer distribution, hydrogeological distribution and topographic gradient, and classified the effects of different ground and underground infrastructure on the development and utilization of UUS. In addition, some other factors, e.g., society, economy, psychology and actualities, are also taken into consideration in a suitability evaluation (Bobylev, 2005, Monnikhof et al., 1998). Many analytical methods have therefore been developed to systematically analyse and characterize the effect of the abovementioned factors on the development and utilization of UUS. For example, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is widely used to comprehensive evaluate multi-factors and guided the design of urban underground development (Bobylev, 2011, Feng and Lin, 1999, Liu et al., 2015). One multilayer framework based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was proposed to evaluate the geological engineering effect on the suitability of UUS exploitation and was further applied to study a railway station area (Lu et al. 2016). Compared to the fuzzy AHP, the classical AHP method is more suitable to evaluate the suitability of the underground space for specific decision makers. Peng and Peng (2018a) synthetically used the most unfavourable grading method (MUGM) and the exclusive method (EM) on the analysis platform of Geographic Information System (GIS) to determine suitability classifications. However, the collection of influencing factors was not standardized and varied form different situations and scholars (Ron and Jyrki, 2001, Wu et al., 2013). Moreover, collecting information on the abovementioned factors is also difficult (Yu et al. 2006).
The intelligent planning of UUS aims to rationally guide the development and utilization of underground space according to actual economical, social, ecological and other needs and to be included in the master planning and detailed planning (Bobylev, 2009, Brian, 2015, Li et al., 2013a, Zhao et al., 2016). Master planning plays a critical role in coordinating the different needs of UUS in various regions and different urban systems, and has a significant influence on the overall development of urban areas and guides the detailed planning process (Qiao and Peng 2016). Detailed planning involves the use of a specific design layout that is based on master planning (Huang and Yu 2014). Numerous studies have been conducted to guide and optimize UUS planning. Rönkä et al. (1998) proposed the principles of underground space planning and suggested the optimal depths for different activities. Li et al. (2013b) proposed using integrated planning in Suzhou, China and conducted a comprehensive assessment of underground resources, i.e., underground space, groundwater, geomaterials and geothermal energy. Zhao et al. (2016) proposed that government at all levels should develop UUS planning based on local economic, social and ecological development needs and urban master planning.
However, UUS planning is still facing many problems when it is applied to practice. First, the development of UUS planning is still in a preliminary stage, lagging behind actual demand and lacking relevant laws, standards, systems, etc. (Lu and Ji, 2012, Sterling et al., 2012). Second, current UUS planning is basically qualitative in nature and is not based on mature theories and methods (Volchko et al. 2020). UUS planning is currently in a rough and preliminary planning state due to the difficulty to quantitatively consider actual economic, social and ecological needs. Note that, such quantitative manner is to obtain an optimal solution of the underground space planning by analyzing the effects of economic, social, ecological and geological factors using a certain mathematical algorithm. Notably, although the quantitative intelligent planning models with mature algorithms are seldom used in the real practices of UUS planning, they have been adopted to guide the development of urban ground surface (Balling et al., 1999, Day et al., 1999, Liu et al., 2015, Stewart et al., 2004). It is suggested that quantitative ground surface planning maximizes the economic, social and ecological benefits by arranging different types of ground surface into spatial units, which is challenging because it not only addresses the tradeoffs of multiple objectives but also conciliates the competition of different land uses for the same spatial unit (Chen et al., 2018, Aerts et al., 2003, Eastman et al., 1995).
Three main challenges may hinder the development and utilization of UUS in a quantitative manner. First, it is difficult to establish the qualitative correlation between underground space and ground surface, which inhibits the ability of the current ground development status to drive intelligent planning for underground space (Liu and Liao, 2017, Zhang et al., 2018). Second, the objective function of underground space is difficult to solve using traditional algorithms because traditional algorithms, e.g., the genetic algorithm, are difficult to address constraints that widely exist in the UUS planning, e.g., excluding the unusable space. (Anastasios and Dimitrios, 2016, Liu et al., 2014). Third, it is difficult to combine the three-dimensional (3D) planning of underground space with the principle of hierarchical development (Admiraal 2006). Therefore, further quantitative research on underground space planning is needed.
To proactively and quantitatively design UUS planning, an intelligent planning model for the development and utilization of UUS, which is capable of analysing the correlation between ground surface and underground space and further giving the optimal two-dimensional (2D) and 3D planning schemes, is proposed in this paper. First, the suitability evaluation method of the development and utilization of UUS is introduced. Second, based on the correlation between ground surface and underground space, the 2D planning of UUS was generated by using the artificial intervention genetic algorithm (AIGA). Third, the 3D planning of UUS is proposed according to the principles of depth stratification and hierarchical development. Finally, the proposed intelligent planning model is applied to the development and utilization of UUS in Luohu District, Shenzhen. The findings in this paper could provide innovative insights for the future development and utilization of UUS.
Section snippets
An intelligent planning model for UUS development and utilization
The current UUS planning models are basically qualitative in nature and not based on mature theories and methods. In this section, an intelligent planning model for UUS development and utilized is proposed. This model has advantages of conducting suitability evaluation in a quantitative manner, analysing the optimal solution with a rigorous algorithm and providing 3D planning scheme with depth stratification and hierarchical development planning.
Case study
In this section, the proposed improved intelligent planning model was applied to the planning of UUS in Luohu District. Luohu District is located in the central part of Shenzhen, with an area of 78.75 km2, of which the built-up area is 34.74 km2. The forest coverage rate and the urban green coverage rate are 50.1% and 64.5%, respectively, and the resident population has reached 1,461,000 (Chen et al. 2014; Shenzhen Municipal Government, 2010). Moreover, Luohu District has abundant land use
Conclusions
UUS, as the second space of the city, is an important trend for the future development of urban space. This paper proposed an UUS intelligent planning model from a quantitative way and successfully adopted it into Luohu District in Shenzhen. The main conclusions are as follows:
- 1)
The intelligent planning model for the development and utilization of UUS was established. It includes components of suitability evaluation, 2D planning and 3D planning.
- 2)
By addressing all the influencing factors of the
Author's Contribution
J.G. contributes to the preparation, review and editing of the mansucript.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This research is financially supported by Program for Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Enterpreneurial Teams (No. 2019ZT08G315) and the Shenzhen Municipal Design and Research Institute (No. HTSP-27143).
References (76)
A bottom-up approach to the planning of underground space
Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.
(2006)Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of selected underground construction technologies using analytic network process
Automat. Constr.
(2011)- et al.
Sustainable land use optimization using boundary-based fast genetic algorithm
Comput. Environ. Urban Syst.
(2012) - et al.
Comparing urban land expansion and its driving factors in Shenzhen and Dongguan, China
Habitat Int.
(2014) - et al.
Using a genetic algorithm to generate alternative sketch maps for urban planning
Comput. Environ. Urban Syst.
(1999) - et al.
Approach for integrated optimization of community heating system at urban detailed planning stage
Energy Build.
(2014) - et al.
An integrated planning concept for the emerging underground urbanism: deep City Method Part 1 concept, process and application
Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. Incorp. Trenchless Technol. Res.
(2013) - et al.
An integrated planning concept for the emerging underground urbanism: Deep City Method Part 2 case study for resource supply and project valuation
Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. Incorp. Trenchless Technol. Res.
(2013) - et al.
An improved Genetic Algorithm for spatial optimization of multi-objective and multi-site land use allocation
Comput. Environ. Urban Syst.
(2016) - et al.
Combining system dynamics and hybrid particle swarm optimization for land use allocation
Ecol. Model.
(2013)
Multiscale hierarchical analysis of rock mass and prediction of its mechanical and hydraulic properties
J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng.
Regional land-use allocation with a spatially explicit genetic algorithm
Landscape Ecol. Eng.
Quantitative assessment of engineering geological suitability for multilayer UUS
Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.
The use of underground space in Hong Kong
Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.
How to determine the necessity for using underground space: an integral assessment method for strategic decision-making
Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.
A GIS-based evaluation method of underground space resources for urban spatial planning: Part 1 methodology
Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.
A GIS-based evaluation method of underground space resources for urban spatial planning: Part 2 application
Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.
Master planning for underground space in Luoyang: a case of a representative Historic City in China
Procedia Eng.
Underground space in land-use planning
Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.
How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
Underground technologies for livable cities
Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.
A genetic algorithm approach to multiobjective land use planning
Comput. Oper. Res.
Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications
Eur. J. Oper. Res.
Subsurface planning: towards a common understanding of the subsurface as a multifunctional resource
Land Use Policy.
Factors influencing the development potential of urban underground space: structural equation model approach
Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.
Rock mass hydraulic conductivity of the Bukit Timah granite, Singapore
Eng. Geol.
An introduction to connectivity concept and an example of physical connectivity evaluation for underground space
Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.
Advances in master planning of urban underground space (UUS) in China
Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.
Using linear integer pro-gramming for multi-site land-use allocation
Geogr. Anal.
Optimization of exit location in underground spaces
Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.
Multiobjective urban planning using genetic algorithm
J. Urban Plann. Dev.
Strategic environmental assessment of urban underground infrastructure development policies
Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol.
Mainstreaming sustainable development into a city’s Master plan: a case of Urban Underground Space use
Land Use Policy.
Planning for underground development: principles and problems
Eng. Geol. Soc. Territ.
Underground Building Design – Commercial and Institutional Structures
A virtual globe-based integration and visualization framework for aboveground and underground 3D spatial objects
Earth Sci. Inf.
Cited by (26)
Enhancing resilience of urban underground space under floods: Current status and future directions
2024, Tunnelling and Underground Space TechnologyFeasibility study on the preparation of ternary cement with calcined slag powder and seashell powder as supplementary cementitious materials
2023, Construction and Building MaterialsReview of constraints and critical success factors of developing urban underground space
2023, Underground Space (China)Spatiotemporal characteristics of Chinese metro-led underground space development: A multiscale analysis driven by big data
2023, Tunnelling and Underground Space TechnologyOptimization of spatial layouts for deep underground infrastructure in central business districts based on a multi-agent system model
2023, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology