Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“To give someone a fish or teach them how to fish?”: effects of a self-reflection tool on orthographic performance in Portuguese children

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

Our aim was to assess the effect of a self-correction spelling tool based on orthographic revision procedures on third-grade children’s orthographic performance. This tool consisted of grids displaying explicit contextual, phonological and morphological rules. Participants were 70 third-grade students, randomly assigned to an experimental (N = 35) and control group (N = 35). A pretest and post-test were performed a week before the training programme and two weeks after the end of it, consisting of a 76-word spelling test that referred to contextual (32 words), phonological (32 words) and morphological (12 words) rules. The experimental training programme was carried out with children in class and consisted of nine sessions in which children had to spell words dictated by an adult, who then underlined their misspellings with a specific colour (a different colour was assigned to each rule) and asked them to self-correct the misspellings using the grid. None of the words present in the pre- and post-test were used in the training programme. The same words were used in the control group, but instead of self-correcting the misspellings, children were shown the correct spelling and had to copy it three times. The post-test results showed that the experimental group decreased significantly the number of misspellings when compared with the control group, with statistically significant differences for each rule. Nevertheless, the morphological misspellings, after the intervention, were superior to the other types of misspellings. These results show the importance of inducing self-correction spelling strategies in educational contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 17 April 2021

    In the reference the author name "Siliman” has been changed to “Silliman”.

References

  • Bahr, R., Silliman, E., Berninger, W., & Dow, M. (2012). Linguistic pattern analyses of misspelling typically developing writers in grades 1–9. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 55, 1587–1599. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T., Castles, A., Luciano, M., Wright, M., Coltheart, M., & Martin, N. (2007). Genetic and environmental bases of reading and spelling: A unified genetic dual route model. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9022-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binamé, F., & Poncelet, M. (2016). The development of the abilities to acquire novel detailed orthographic representations and maintain them in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 143, 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.10.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanche-Benveniste, C. (2002). La escritura irredutible a un código [The irredeemable writing to a code]. In E. Ferreiro (Ed.), Relaciones de (in)dependencia entre oralidad y escritura [Relations of (in)dependence between oral and writing]. (pp. 15–31). Gedisa Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosse, M.-L., Chaves, N., Largy, P., & Valdois, S. (2015). Orthographic learning during reading: The role of whole-word visual processing. Journal of Research in Reading, 38, 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01551.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bousquet, S., Cogis, D., Ducard, D., Massonnet, J., & Jaffré, J. P. (1999). Acquisition de l´orthographe et mondes cognitifs [Spelling acquisiton and cognitive worlds]. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 126, 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassar, M., & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children’s knowledge of double letters in words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.631

  • Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa. (2019). Léxico multifuncional computorizado do português contemporâneo [Computerized multifunctional lexicon of contemporary Portuguese]. http://clul.ulisboa.pt/projeto/lexico-multifuncional-computorizado-do-portugues-contemporaneo

  • Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). RDC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordewener, K., Hasselman, F., Verhoeven, L., & . Bosman A. . (2018). The role of instruction for spelling performance and spelling consciousness. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(2), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1315711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critten, S., & Pine, K. J. (2009). Viewing spelling in a cognitive context: Underlying representations and processes. In C. Wood, & V. Connelly (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on reading and spelling: New perspectives on learning and instruction (pp. 92–108). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critten, S., Pine, K., & Messer, D. (2013). Revealing children’s implicit spelling representations. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critten, S., Pine, K., & Steffler, D. (2007). Spelling development in young children: A case of representational redescription? Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critten, S., Sheriston, L., & Mann, F. (2016). Young children’s spelling representations and spelling strategies. Learning and Instruction, 46, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, C., & Sintra, L. (2013). Nova gramática do português contemporâneo [New grammar of contemporary Portuguese]. (21st ed.). Editora Figueirinhas.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, P. F., & Share, D. L. (2007). Orthographic learning during oral and silent reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1101_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, H., Conrad, N., & Pacton, S. (2008). A statistical learning perspective on children´s learning about graphotactic and morphological regularities in spelling. Canadian Psychology, 49(2), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, H., Pasquarella, A., Marinus, E., Tims, T., & Castles, A. (2019). Orthographic processing and children’s word reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(2), 509–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devonshire, V., Morris, P., & Fluck, M. (2013). Spelling and reading development: The effect of teaching children multiple levels of representation in their orthography. Learning and Instruction, 25, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. (1997). Apprendre à lire et à orthographier, c´est la même chose, ou pratiquement la même chose [Learning to read and spell is the same or almost the same]. In L. Rieben, M. Fayol, & C. Perfetti (Eds.), Des orthographes et leur acquisition [Spellings and their acquisition]. (pp. 231–265). Delachaux et Niestlé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics in Language Disorder, 20, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200020030-00005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas, M., Rodrigues, C., Costa, T., & Castelo, A. (2012). Os sons que estão dentro das palavras: Descrição e implicações para o ensino do português como língua materna [Sounds within words: Description and implications for teaching Portuguese as mother tongue]. . Edições Colibri e Associação de Professores de Português.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaintza, Z., & Goikoetxea, E. (2016). Spelling instruction in Spanish: A comparison of self-correction, visual imagery and copying. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(4), 428–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingras, M., & Sénéchal, M. (2019). Evidence of statistical learning of orthographic representation in grade 1–5: The case of silent letters and double consonants in French. Scientific Studies in Reading, 23(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1482303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, I. (2001). Ler e escrever em português europeu. [Reading and writing in European Portuguese]. Doctoral Thesis, University of Porto.

  • Hatcher, P., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (2004). Explicit phoneme training combined with phonics reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(2), 338–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00225.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IAVE. (2018). Provas de aferição −Ensino básico: Relatório nacional: 2016 e 2017 [Benchmarking tests - Basic education: National report: 2016 and 2017]. http://iave.pt/images/FicheirosPDF/Docs_Avalia%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Alunos/Relat%C3%B3rios/RESULTS_Relatorio_PA_2016-2017_form.pdf

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. . MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In L. Katz & R. Frost (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning. (pp. 67–84). Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Peterson, O.-P. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(3), 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyster, S. (2002). The effects of morphological versus phonological awareness training in kindergarten on reading development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(3), 261–294. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015272516220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montanero, M., Lucero, M., & Fernandez, M. J. (2014). Iterative co-evaluation with a rubric of narrative texts in primary education/Coevaluacion iterativa con rubrica de textos narrativos en la Educacion Primaria. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 37, 184–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2014.881653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morais, A., & Teberosky, A. (1994). Erros e transgressões infantis na ortografia do Português [Children´s mistakes and transgressions in Portuguese spelling]. Discursos, 8, 15–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2006). Improving literacy by teaching morphemes. . Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2014). Leitura e ortografia: além dos primeiros passos [Reading and spelling: beyond the first steps]. . Penso Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Olsson, J. (2003). Learning morphological rules and phonological spelling rules. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0703_6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette, G., Martin-Chang, S., & Rossi, M. (2017). Learning from our mistakes: Improvements in spelling lead to gains in reading speed. Scientific Studies in Reading, 21(4), 350–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1306064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro, A. (1995). Reading and spelling development in Brazilian Portuguese. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7(1), 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01026950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scale. . Oxford Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, F., Genard, N., Sucena, A., Defior, S., Alegria, J., Mousty, P., & Seymour, P. (2011). Variations in reading and spelling acquisition in Portuguese, French and Spanish: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 10(1), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.5334/jpl.106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., & the COST Action A8 Network. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87(4), 267–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, C. (2009). Aprender ortografia: O caso das regras contextuais [Learning how to spell: The case of contextual rules]. Análise Psicológica, 27(4), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, C. (2013). O impacto da revisão na qualidade de composições de crianças do 4° ano de escolaridade, [The impact of revision on the quality of composition of 4th grade children]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 26(1), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722013000100019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, A., & Almeida, T. (2018). Escritas inventadas em crianças de idade pré-escolar: A necessidade de um modelo que integre os contributos das abordagens fonológica, construtivista e da aprendizagem estatística. [Invented spelling in preschool children: The need for a model that integrates the contributions of phonological, constructivist and statistical approaches in learning]. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 22(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-35392018019534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simões, M. R. (2000). Investigações no âmbito da aferição nacional do teste das matrizes progressivas coloridas de Raven (M.P.C.R) Researches within the framework of the national validation of Raven’s Progressive Colored Matrices test. . Berlin: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L., & Béchennec, D. (1997). Beginning reading and spelling acquisition in French: A longitudinal study. In C. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages. (pp. 339–359). Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tainturier, M. J., & Rapp, . (2004). Complex graphemes as functional spelling units: Evidence from acquired dysgraphia. Neurocase, 10(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790409609943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (2018). Statistical learning and spelling. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49, 644–652. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-STLT1-17-0122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2014). How children learn to write words. . Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., & Zubowsky, A. (1991). Levels of phonological awareness. In S. Brady & D. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy. (pp. 67–83). Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J., Rafferty, L., Sullivan, R., & Blake, A. (2017). Action research of an error self-correction intervention: Examining the effects on the spelling accuracy behaviors of fifth-grade students identified as at-risk. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 6(2), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1225661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigário, M., Martins, F., & Frota, S. (2006). A ferramenta FreP e a frequência de tipos silábicos e classes de segmentos no Português. [The FreP tool ant the frequency of syllabic typs and classes of segments in Portuguese] In Textos Seleccionados do XXI Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística [Selected Texts of the XXI Congress of Portuguese Linguistic Association] (pp. 675–687). APL/Colibri.

  • Wirtz, C. L., Gardner, R., Weber, K., & Bullara, D. (1996). Using self-correction to improve the spelling performance of low-achieving third graders. Remedial and Special Education, 17(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259601700106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyse, D., & Goswami, U. (2008). Synthetic phonics and the teaching of reading. British Educational Research Journal, 34(6), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802268912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science and Technology; Grants UIDB/04853/2020 and UIDP/04853/2020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CIE-ISPA (Centre for Educational Research), ISPA – Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco, 34, 1149-041, Lisbon, Portugal

    Cristina Silva, Francisco Peixoto & Liliana Salvador

Authors
  1. Cristina Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francisco Peixoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liliana Salvador
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Silva.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 267 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silva, C., Peixoto, F. & Salvador, L. “To give someone a fish or teach them how to fish?”: effects of a self-reflection tool on orthographic performance in Portuguese children. Read Writ 34, 2481–2503 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10154-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10154-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation