Elsevier

Journal of Affective Disorders

Volume 289, 15 June 2021, Pages 16-20
Journal of Affective Disorders

Research paper
Association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and major psychiatric disorders

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.087Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The report represents a substantial collection of data concerning an important topic of the RAS inhibitor associated psychologic illness.

  • Overall this is an investigation with the advantage of a very large study population that allows the authors to look at many subgroups/factors with statistical significance.

  • Strengths included large patient population, access to nearly the entire Taiwanese population, and well matched patients.

Abstract

Objective

To exam the association between major psychiatry illness and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) versus angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) users in a head-to-head comparison manner.

Methods

Study design is a retrospective cohort study utilizing available data through the National Health Insurance database. 13,974 ACEI users and 13,974 propensity score matching ARB users were included to look at the future incident psychiatry illness. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the cumulative curves and were tested by the Log-rank test. The crude hazard ratio (HR) and adjusted HR were estimated by univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

After controlling for the confounders, ACEI users had a higher risk of major psychiatric disorders than ARB users, (adjusted HR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.02, 1.13). The cumulative incidence of major psychiatric disorders for ACEI cohort was significantly higher than that of ARB cohort (p-value = 0.001).

Conclusions

Compared to ARB users, ACEI users are prone to major psychiatry illness development.

Introduction

Post marketing surveillance has gained widely attraction since most randomized controlled trials are highly selected and controlled (Sherman et al., 2016; de Lusignan et al., 2015; Stanley, 2007; Søren et al., 2009). In this regard, contemporary real-world observational studies is helpful in consolidation the investigation of efficacy, safety and adverse events of medications (Sherman et al., 2016; de Lusignan et al., 2015; Stanley, 2007; Søren et al., 2009). In the field of vascular biology, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) are widely used since several landmark trials have proved, confirmed and affirmed their therapeutic effect (López-Sendón et al., 2004, Yancy et al., 2020, 2016, ). Indeed, pleiotropic effects of RAS inhibitor have been proposed, including the psychoprotective effect (; Krysiak and Okopień, 2008; Ismail et al., 2010, Vian et al., 2017). However, one recent registry raised the concern that ARB users have an increased incidence of suicide (Mamdani et al., 2019). To evaluate the association between psychiatry illness and ACEI versus ARB users in a head-to-head comparison manner, we report in a retrospective observational study from a large Taiwanese registry to investigate the incidence of new-onset psychiatric illness after RAS inhibitor consumption.

Section snippets

Data source

The data in this study came from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) Database NHIR, 2015. It collects the medical record of over 99% of Taiwan residents since 1995. We analyzed the outpatient, inpatient, medication record of one million insured subjects. The identification information was encrypted due to the privacy issue. The disease code in NHIRD follows the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). This study was

Result

Each ARB cohort and ACEI cohort contains 13 974 patients (Table 1). Most ARB users and ACEI users were 50-64 years old. The mean age of the patients in the two cohorts was 58 years . Men account for 60% in this study . There were more patients diagnosed with chronic renal disease in ARB cohort. The usage of medications were similar in the two cohorts.

The incidence rate of major psychiatric disorders was 41.0 per 1,000 person-years in ACEI cohort and was 39.9 per 1,000 person-years in ARB cohort

Discussion

The report represents a substantial collection of data concerning an important topic of the RAS inhibitor associated psychologic illness.

Overall this is a study with the advantage of a very large study population that allows the authors to look at many subgroups/factors with statistical significance. Strengths included large patient population, access to nearly the entire Taiwanese population, and well matched patients.

There are several existing studies that cover the topic; most concluded that

Limitations

Whilst this is an pivotal topic, with novel findings for the development of psychiatric disorders among RAS inhibitor users of significant interest, there are certain issues with the current work that requires addressing. First, there are limits to inference from relying on ICD 9 codes for diagnosis, implying the overall results a bit plausible. Second, residual confounders did exist and should be describe as a limitation despite propensity mating has been adopted. Finally, there are myriad

Conclusion

Patients taking ACEI had a higher incidence of major psychiatry illness compared to those who took ARB.

Acknowledgement

This study is supported in part by Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Clinical Trial Center (MOHW109-TDU-B-212-114004), Taiwan.

Disclosure

None

References (21)

  • W. Rathmann et al.

    Cardiovascular drug prescriptions and risk of depression in diabetic patients

    J. Clin. Epidemiol.

    (1999)
  • P.A. Poole-Wilson

    ACE inhibitors and ARBs in chronic heart failure: the established the expected and the pragmatic

    Med. Clin. North Am.

    (2003)
  • R.E. Sherman et al.

    Real-world evidence—what is it and what can it tell us?

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2016)
  • S. de Lusignan et al.

    Creating and using realworld evidence to answer questions about clinical effectiveness

    J. Innov. Health Inform.

    (2015)
  • K. Stanley

    Design of randomized controlled trials

    Circulation

    (2007)
  • V. Søren et al.

    Evidence-based medicine: four fundamental problems with the randomized clinical trial (RCT) used to document chemical medicine

    Int. J. Adolesc. Med. Health

    (2009)
  • 2016, ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update on New Pharmacological Therapy for Heart Failure: An Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA...
  • C.W. Yancy et al.

    Circulation

    (2020)
  • J. López-Sendón et al.

    Task force on ACE-inhibitors of the European Society of Cardiology. Expert consensus document on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in cardiovascular disease. The Task Force on ACE-inhibitors of the European Society of Cardiology

    Eur. Heart J.

    (2004)
  • R. Krysiak et al.

    Pleiotropic effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in normotensive patients with coronary artery disease

    Pharmacol. Rep.

    (2008)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text