Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Approximate Analytic Solution of Burger Huxley Equation Using Feed-Forward Artificial Neural Network

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Solutions of non-linear partial differential equations of Burgers Huxley type are obtained using a feed-forward artificial neural network technique. Solution process requires minimization of an error function which is constructed by making use of the differential equation and the associated initial and boundary conditions. The minimization is carried out using the Quasi Newton algorithm employed through Matlab optimization toolbox. The solutions that are obtained using the technique are analytic in nature and have excellent generalization properties. Results are compared with the existing solutions to validate the utility and effectiveness of proposed procedure. Effect of variation in number of training points on solution accuracy is also studied through calculation of numerical rate of convergence. Solutions obtained using the neural network technique are analytic in nature and can be obtained directly without linearising non-linear partial differential equations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jiwari R (2015) A hybrid numerical scheme for the numerical solution of the Burgers’ equation. Comput Phys Commun 188:59–67

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashpazzadeh E, Han B, Lakestani M (2017) Biorthogonal multiwavelets on the interval for numerical solutions of Burgers’ equation. J Comput Appl Math 317:510–534

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Seydaoglu M, Erdogan U, Ozis T (2016) Numerical solution of Burgers’ equation with high order splitting methods. J Comput Appl Math 291:410–421

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Lai CH, Cuffe AM, Pericleous KA (1996) A domain decomposition algorithm for viscous/inviscid coupling. Adv Eng Softw 26:151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Velivelli AC, Bryden KM (2014) Domain decomposition based coupling between the lattice Boltzmann method and traditional CFD methods-Part I: formulation and application to the 2-D Burgers’ equation. Adv Eng Softw 70:104–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Macias-Diaz JE (2018) A modified exponential method that preserves structural properties of the solutions of the Burgers–Huxley equation. Int J Comput Math 95(1):3–19

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Wasim I, Abbas M, Amin M (2018) Hybrid B-Spline collocation method for solving the generalized Burgers–Fisher and Burgers–Huxley equations. Math Probl Eng 2018, Article ID 6143934. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6143934

  8. Alinia N, Zarebnia M (2019) A numerical algorithm based on a new kind of tension B-spline function for solving Burgers–Huxley equation. Numer Algorithms. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11075-018-0646-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hashim I, Noorani MSM, Al-Hadidi MRS (2006) Solving the generalized Burgers-Huxley equation using the Adomian decomposition method. Math Comput Model 43:1404–1411

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Bratsos AG (2010) A fourth-order numerical scheme for solving the modified Burgers equation. Comput Math Appl 60:1393–1400

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Macias-Diaz JE, Ruiz-Ramirez J, Villa J (2011) The numerical solution of a generalized Burgers-Huxley equation through a conditionally bounded and symmetry-preserving method. Comput Math Appl 61:3330–3342

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Abazari R, Abazari M (2013) Numerical study of Burgers–Huxley equations via reduced differential transform method. Comput Appl Math 32:1–17

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Ervin VJ, Macias-Diaz JE, Ruiz-Ramirez J (2015) A positive and bounded finite element approximation of the generalized Burgers–Huxley equation. J Math Anal Appl 424:1143–1160

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Machado JAT, Babaei A, Moghaddam BP (2013) Highly accurate scheme for the Cauchy problem of the generalized Burgers–Huxley equation. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica 13(6):183–195

    Google Scholar 

  15. Babolian E, Saeidian J (2009) Analytic approximate solutions to Burgers, Fisher, Huxley equations and two combined forms of these equations. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 14:1984–1992

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Cicek Y, Tanoglu Y (2016) Strang splitting method for Burgers–Huxley equation. Appl Math Comput 276:454–467

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Suzuki K, Abe H, MacMahon H, Doi K (2006) Image-processing technique for suppressing ribs in chest radiographs by means of massive training artificial neural network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25(4):406–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hall LO, Bensaid AM, Clarke LP, Velthuizen RP, Silbiger MS, Bezdek JC (1992) A comparison of neural network and fuzzy clustering techniques in segmenting magnetic resonance images of the brain. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 3(5):672–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Egmont-Petersen M, de Ridder D, Handels H (2002) Image processing with neural networks—a review. Pattern Recognit 35:2279–2301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Graves A, Mohamed AR, Hinton G (2013) Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing. Vancouver, BC, pp 6645–6649

  21. Deng L, Hinton G, Kingsbury B (2013) New types of deep neural network learning for speech recognition and related applications: an overview. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing. Vancouver, BC, pp 8599–8603

  22. Moghaddam AH, Moghaddam MH, Esfandyari M (2016) Stock market index prediction using artificial neural network. J Econ Finance Adm Sci 21(41):89–93

    Google Scholar 

  23. Patel J, Shah S, Thakkar P, Kotecha K (2015) Predicting stock market index using fusion of machine learning techniques. Expert Syst Appl 42(4):2162–2172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hafezi R, Shahrabi J, Hadavandi E (2015) A bat-neural network multi-agent system (BNNMAS) for stock price prediction: case study of DAX stock price. Appl Soft Comput 29:196–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang L, Zeng Y, Chen T (2015) Back propagation neural network with adaptive differential evolution algorithm for time series forecasting. Expert Syst Appl 42(2):855–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Doucoure B, Agbossou K, Cardenas A (2016) Time series prediction using artificial wavelet neural network and multi-resolution analysis: application to wind speed data. Renew Energy 92:202–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiong T, Bao Y, Hu Z, Chiong R (2015) Forecasting interval time series using a fully complex-valued RBF neural network with DPSO and PSO algorithms. Inf Sci 305:77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lagaris IE, Likas A, Fotiadis DI (1998) Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 9:987–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aarts LP, Pvd Veer (2001) Neural network method for solving partial differential equations. Neural Process Lett 14:261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Alli H, Uçar A, Demir Y (2003) The solutions of vibration control problems using artificial neural networks. J Frankl Inst 340:307–325

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Malek A, Beidokhti RS (2006) Numerical solution for high order differential equations using a hybrid neural network—optimization method. Appl Math Comput 183:260–271

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Mall S, Chakraverty S (2016) Application of Legendre Neural Network for solving ordinary differential equations. Appl Soft Comput 43:347–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mall S, Chakraverty S (2017) Single layer Chebyshev neural network model for solving elliptic partial differential equations. Neural Process Lett 45:825–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shirvany Y, Hayati M, Moradian R (2009) Multilayer perceptron neural networks with novel unsupervised training method for numerical solution of the partial differential equations. Appl Soft Comput 9:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Beidokhti RS, Malek A (2009) Solving initial-boundary value problems for systems of partial differential equations using neural networks and optimization techniques. J Frankl Inst 346:898–913

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Ezadi S, Parandin N (2013) An application of neural networks to solve ordinary differential equations. Int J Math Model Comput 3:245–252

    Google Scholar 

  37. Raja MAZ, Khan JA, Siddiqui AM, Behloul D, Haroon T, Samar R (2015) Exactly satisfying initial conditions neural network models for numerical treatment of first Painlevé equation. Appl Soft Comput 26:244–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kumar M, Yadav N (2015) Numerical solution of Bratu’s problem using multilayer perceptron neural network method. Natl Acad Sci Lett 38(5):425–428

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Tawfiq LNM, Hussein AAT (2013) Design feed forward neural network to solve singular boundary value problems ISRN. Appl Math 2013:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  40. Liu Z, Yang Y, Cai Q (2019) Neural network as a function approximator and its application in solving differential equations. Appl Math Mech 40:237–248

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Piscopo ML, Spannowsky M, Waite P (2019) Solving differential equations with neural networks: applications to the calculation of cosmological phase transitions. Phys Rev D 100:016002

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Gilani K, Saeed U (2018) CAS wavelet Picard technique for Burger’s–Huxley and Burgers equation. Int J Appl Comput Math 4:133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-018-0565-z

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Batiha B, Noorani MSM, Hashim I (2008) Application of variational iteration method to the generalized Burgers–Huxley equation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 36(3):660–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Alinia N, Zarebnia M (2019) A numerical algorithm based on a new kind of tension B-spline function for solving Burgers–Huxley equation. Numer Algorithms 82:1121–1142

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Shukla S, Kumar M (2020) Error analysis and numerical solution of Burgers–Huxley equation using 3’ scale Haar wavelets. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01037-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our sincere thanks to editor in chief, editor and reviewers for their valuable suggestions to revise this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Prayagraj, India

    Shagun Panghal & Manoj Kumar

Authors
  1. Shagun Panghal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manoj Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shagun Panghal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panghal, S., Kumar, M. Approximate Analytic Solution of Burger Huxley Equation Using Feed-Forward Artificial Neural Network. Neural Process Lett 53, 2147–2163 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-021-10508-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-021-10508-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation