Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of heat transfer at the stagnation point during the detached bow shock establishment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Shock Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diffraction of a shock wave over a stationary body is a problem of interest associated with the starting of shock tubes and expansion tubes which are well suited to studies of hypersonic flows. However, these facilities are characterized by very short test times. The transient parameters during the establishment of the detached bow shock in such impulsive facilities are important for both data processing and experimental design. In the present study, numerical simulations are conducted to investigate the diffraction of a normal shock wave over a sphere and the subsequent transient phenomena in a viscous perfect-gas flow field. The incident shock Mach number ranges from 3 to 5 with a specific heat ratio of 1.4. Based on the theoretical description of the reflected shock position during bow shock formation, approximate solutions for the time histories of the stagnation-point heat flux are also derived. The analytical and numerical results agree well. The results show that the stagnation-point pressure and heat flux approach their steady-state values much more rapidly than the shock detachment distance does.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mohammadiun, H., Rahimi, A.B.: Stagnation-point flow and heat transfer of a viscous, compressible fluid on a cylinder. J. Thermophys. Heat Transf. 26, 494–502 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.T3833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, Z.H., Bao, L., Tong, B.G.: Variation character of stagnation point heat flux for hypersonic pointed bodies from continuum to rarefied flow states and its bridge function study. Sci. China Ser. G 52, 2007–2015 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-009-0226-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Miles, J.W., Mirels, H., Wang, H.E.: Time required for establishing detached bow shock. AIAA J. 4, 1127–1128 (1966). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.3633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, G.F.: Real gas effects on the time required for establishing a detached bow shock. AIAA J. 5, 366–367 (1967). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.3981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moran, J.P., Moorhem, W.K.: Diffraction of a plane shock by an analytic blunt body. J. Fluid Mech. 38, 127–136 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112069000085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barnwell, R.W.: Numerical results for the diffraction of a normal shock wave by a sphere and for the subsequent transient flow. NASA TR R-268 (1967)

  7. Miller, C.G., Moore, J.A.: Flow-establishment times for blunt bodies in an expansion tube. AIAA J. 13, 1676–1678 (1975). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.7048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Patz, G.: Formation of bow waves around blunt bodies in the flow behind a moving shock. Acta Mech. 32, 89–100 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01176136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, J.P., Chen, H., Zhang, S.Z., Zhang, X.Y., Yu, H.R.: On the response of coaxial surface thermocouples for transient aerodynamic heating measurements. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 86, 141–148 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Collen, P.L., Doherty, L.J., McGilvray, M., Naved, I., Morgan, R.G., Hermann, D.E.: Commissioning of the T6 Stalker tunnel. AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, San Diego, CA, AIAA Paper 2019-1941 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-1941

  11. Gildfind, D.E., James, C.M., Toniato, P., Morgan, R.G.: Performance considerations for expansion tube operation with a shock-heated secondary driver. J. Fluid Mech. 777, 364–407 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2015.349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McGilvray, M., Morgan, R.G., Jacobs, P.A.: Scramjet experiments in an expansion tunnel: evaluated using a quasi-steady analysis technique. AIAA J. 48, 1635–1646 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Candler, G.V., Subbareddy, P.K., Brock, J.M.: Advances in computational fluid dynamics methods for hypersonic flows. J. Spacecr. Rockets 52, 17–28 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun, Q.H., Zhu, H.Y., Wang, G., Fang, J.: Effects of mesh resolution on hypersonic heating prediction. Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett. 1, 37–40 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/2.1102201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, X.D., Hu, Z.M., Jiang, Z.L.: Numerical investigation on the thermal protection mechanism for blunt body with forward-facing cavity. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 59, 1–10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-6015-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim, K.H., Kim, C., Rho, O.H.: Methods for the accurate computations of hypersonic flows: I. AUSMPW+ scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 174, 38–80 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2001.6873

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kitamura, K., Shima, E., Nakamura, Y., Roe, P.L.: Evaluation of Euler flux for hypersonic heating computations. AIAA J. 48, 763–776 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.41605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jameson, A., Yoon, S.: Lower-upper implicit schemes with multiple grids for the Euler equations. AIAA J. 25, 929–935 (1987). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.9724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Q., Li, J.P., Zhao, W., Jiang, Z.L.: Influence of thermal sensor installation on measuring accuracy at stagnation points. J. Thermophys. Heat Transf. 31, 318–323 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.T4971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Billig, F.S.: Shock-wave shapes around spherical and cylindrical nosed bodies. J. Spacecr. Rockets 4, 822–823 (1967). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.28969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fay, J., Riddell, F.: Theory of stagnation point heat transfer in dissociated air. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 25, 73–85 (1958). https://doi.org/10.2514/8.7517

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Holman, J.P.: Heat Transfer, 10th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, Q., Olivier, H., Einhoff, J., Li, J.P., Zhao, W.: Influence of test model material on the accuracy of transient heat transfer measurements in impulse facilities. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 104, 59–66 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11402275, 11472280, and 11532014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Li.

Additional information

Communicated by K. Hannemann.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Li, J.P., Luo, K. et al. Evolution of heat transfer at the stagnation point during the detached bow shock establishment. Shock Waves 31, 133–140 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-021-01007-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-021-01007-9

Keywords

Navigation