Research article
Resilience analysis of the nexus across water supply, power generation and environmental systems from a stochastic perspective

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112513Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The trajectories of multi-dimensional WPE model were projected onto the coordinate axes.

  • Resilience measures were quantified with the stationary probability distribution functions.

  • Environmental system was most vulnerable because of its long convergence time after a disturbance.

Abstract

Effects of external disturbances such as the population change on dynamics of water supply, power generation and environmental (WPE) systems have seldom been investigated. Following the WPE nexus profiled in the study of Feng et al. (2016), this study incorporated stochasticity of population, water supply and power generation into the modeling of the dynamical system in the Hehuang region of China, and further quantified resilience measures to understand the system's ability to withstand stochastic disturbances. First, the stochastic differential equations were used to improve the simulation of stochasticity in the WPE nexus. Next, the transient probability distribution functions (pdfs) of system variables, obtained by Monte Carlo simulation, were used to describe the evolutionary process of the system. Finally, the stationary pdfs of variables which reflect stable states of the system were derived to calculate four resilience measures. It is shown that: (1) The system approached a stable state after Year 2400 by calculating the L2 norm of the difference between transient and stationary pdfs. (2) The environmental system was identified as the most vulnerable subsystem because of its long convergence time. (3) The water supply system did not change greatly and it would remain stable at its current low level, i.e., water consumption per capita would be less than 80m3. The method adopted in this study is conducive to avoiding risk and the results provide valuable insights for regional management of a WPE nexus.

Introduction

Understanding the resilience of an interconnected system is important to maintain the system within safe and normal states. Generally, an interconnected system is investigated within the framework of a nexus (Hoff, 2011; Liang et al., 2020; Naderi et al., 2021; Nie et al., 2019; Pahl-Wostl, 2019; Rasul and Sharma, 2016; van den Heuvel et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2018), where the complex interdependencies and interactions between system components are induced by natural processes and socioeconomic connections (Cai et al., 2018). The resilience of an interconnected system represents the system's ability to withstand potential disturbances. In particular, resilience can indicate the maximum disturbance that can be withstood by a system, or the rate of system recovery from disturbed to safe states (Holling, 1996; Srinivasan and Kumar, 2015; Walker et al., 2004). Thus, quantifying the resilience of an interconnected system provides scientific support for system design and control.

The water supply, power generation and environmental (WPE) nexus (Feng et al., 2016) is developed to improve understanding of the evolutionary mechanisms in interconnected socio-hydrological systems (Kapsalis et al., 2019; Sivapalan et al., 2012, 2014; Tsiantikoudis et al., 2019; Zamparas et al., 2020). In studies of the WPE nexus, the system dynamics model has been developed to simulate various interconnected processes (Chen et al., 2016; Di Baldassarre et al., 2015; van Emmerik et al., 2014). It has become a common practice to describe system dynamics through coupled ordinary differential equations, which can be considered deterministic if they provide a single response for the system variables, model parameters and initial conditions (Bakhshianlamouki et al., 2020). However, in most cases, such research has focused on how a system might respond to change in the mean values of the environmental parameters and variables, while the effects of change in the variance have seldom been studied (Ridolfi et al., 2011). The stochasticity is caused by disturbance, for example, a sudden decrease in generating capacity or sudden increase of water supply (Barnett and Pierce, 2008; Verma et al., 2012). A deterministic model can reflect the interaction between variables and describe the reality of processes effectively, but it fails to recognize the stochasticity of model structure and parameters. Conversely, a stochastic dynamical model can provide statistics of the stochastic model outcome through simulation of the stochasticity in environmental dynamics (Stijnen et al., 2003).

Resilience reflects the capability of recovering from a disturbance or shifting to a new state (Carpenter et al., 2001), and it can help improve understanding of regime shift phenomena (Feng et al., 2019a), e.g. tidal morphological dynamics (Marani et al., 2010), lake eutrophication (C Lisa et al., 2002) and insect outbreaks (Strogatz, 2015). The system resilience can be quantified within the context of a stochastic dynamical model. For instance, Srinivasan and Kumar (2015) proposed a set of resilience measures under two types of disturbance (i.e., instantaneous shock and continuous stochasticity). Among them, common measures are “engineering resilience” and “ecological resilience”, which respectively emphasize the rate of recovery and the amount of resistance to disturbance of a system (Holling, 1996; Srinivasan and Kumar, 2015; Walker et al., 2004). Moreover, specific measures, such as “latitude”, “precariousness” and “resistance” have been developed to enhance understanding of resilience (Gunderson, 2000; Menck et al., 2013; Scheffer et al., 2001; Srinivasan and Kumar, 2015; Walker et al., 2004).

The dynamics of an n-dimensional stochastic system can be visualized as a trajectory in n-dimensional phase space. The trajectory that arises from any single sequence of random perturbations is called a realization. By averaging many realizations together, one can obtain a probability density function (pdf) for the system, which gives the relative probability that the system will occupy a particular region of phase space at a particular time.

One useful tool for studying resilience related to pdfs is the concept of a potential function (Nolting and Abbott, 2016). This is easily visualized in the two-dimensional case, where the state of the system is represented as a ball rolling on a surface specified by the potential function. In a deterministic system, the ball will roll to a local minimum (called a stable state) on the surface. In a stochastic system, the ball is subject to small random perturbations. Resilience measures the ability of the system to withstand such perturbations, so that the ball is not pushed too far from the stable state. Hence the shape of the surface specified by the potential function is key to determining the resilience of the stable state. The potential function is intimately connected to the probability density, with local minima of the potential function corresponding to local maxima in the probability density (Srinivasan and Kumar, 2015).

Various resilience measures have been developed in relation to potential functions (and more general quasi-potential functions) (Nolting and Abbott, 2016). Unfortunately, when the dimensionality of the system becomes large (>2), it is much more difficult to calculate and visualize these functions, so it is desirable to find alternative ways of measuring resilience. In this paper we offer a new approach, which consists of obtaining the marginal pdf (Xie et al., 2019) for each state variable from the multi-dimensional pdf of the system. Existing resilience measures are applied in a one-dimensional context to each of these marginal pdfs. Resilience of the system can then be studied by considering the resilience measures for each state variable. Our method thus represents a novel approach to tractably analyze the resilience of high-dimensional systems.

The stochastic dynamical model can illustrate how resilience measures change with the properties of a system and external stochasticity by analyzing the stationary pdfs of the state variables (Srinivasan and Kumar, 2015). This study aimed to construct a stochastic dynamical system to revisit the WPE nexus in the Hehuang region of China. The main objectives are: (1) to consider how to describe a stochastic WPE system; (2) to investigate how the system responds to external disturbance; (3) to determine what resilience the system exhibits to resist disturbance.

Section snippets

Study area and data

The Hehuang region covers an area of 15.2 million ha, accounting for 21% of Qinghai Province in China (Fig. 1). However, as the most developed area in Qinghai Province, the region accommodates 3.5 million people and creates a gross domestic product of 129 billion RMB, which accounted for up to 60% and 56%, respectively, of the totals for the entire province in 2014. The region includes the mainstream of the Yellow River and its tributary the Huangshui River. The abundant water resources of the

Methodology

The following steps are performed to quantify the resilience of the stochastic dynamical WPE systems.

  • (1)

    The stochasticity of state variables for the WPE model are considered as Gaussian white noise and added to the original deterministic equations (Section 3.1).

  • (2)

    Multi-dimensional transient and stationary pdfs of the state variables are fitted by kernel density estimation through Monte Carlo simulation (Section 3.2).

  • (3)

    The resilience of the WPE systems is quantified through four resilience measures

Results and discussion

The stochastic dynamical WPE systems were analyzed as follows. (1) Under the given noise intensity, the stochastic model was validated by comparing the simulated trajectories with observations. (2) The stable states of the WPE systems were obtained when the L2 norm of the difference between transient and stationary pdfs approached zero as time increased. (3) The resilience of the WPE systems was quantified with the stationary pdfs. (4) The sensitivity analysis was conducted to exam the effects

Conclusions

This study revisited the resilience of the WPE systems in China's Hehuang region. After embedding the WPE systems into the framework of a stochastic model subject to the stochasticity of water supply, power generation and population, the dynamic mechanisms were investigated and the pdfs of the variables were obtained by Monte Carlo simulation. The derived conclusions are as follows:

  • (1)

    Sensitivity analysis of parameters is conducted to examine the effects on system resilience. Among the parameters,

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions, which help to improve the quality of the paper greatly. We are particularly grateful for the support provided by Ben Nolting. This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51861125102), Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1865201), and Innovation Team in Key Field of the Ministry of Science and Technology (Grant No.

References (57)

  • C. Pahl-Wostl

    Governance of the water-energy-food security nexus: a multi-level coordination challenge

    Environ. Sci. Pol.

    (2019)
  • V. Srinivasan et al.

    Emergent and divergent resilience behavior in catastrophic shift systems

    Ecol. Model.

    (2015)
  • Y. Wang

    Reservoir ecological operation considering outflow variations across different time scales

    Ecol. Indicat.

    (2021)
  • W. Wu et al.

    Potential and flux field landscape theory. I. Global stability and dynamics of spatially dependent non-equilibrium systems

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (2013)
  • W.F. Xu

    Multi-step wind speed prediction by combining a WRF simulation and an error correction strategy

    Renew. Energy

    (2021)
  • C. Zhang et al.

    Water-energy-food nexus: Concepts, questions and methodologies

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2018)
  • E. Bakhshianlamouki et al.

    A system dynamics model to quantify the impacts of restoration measures on the water-energy-food nexus in the Urmia lake Basin, Iran

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2020)
  • T.P. Barnett et al.

    When will Lake Mead go dry?

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2008)
  • D. C Lisa et al.

    Multiple states in river and lake ecosystems

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.

    (2002)
  • S. Carpenter et al.

    From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what?

    Ecosystems

    (2001)
  • X. Chen et al.

    From channelization to restoration: sociohydrologic modeling with changing community preferences in the Kissimmee River Basin, Florida

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2016)
  • C.M. DeChant et al.

    Examining the effectiveness and robustness of sequential data assimilation methods for quantification of uncertainty in hydrologic forecasting

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2012)
  • G. Di Baldassarre

    DebatesPerspectives on socio-hydrology: capturing feedbacks between physical and social processes

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2015)
  • M.Y. Feng

    Understanding the resilience of soil moisture regimes

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2019)
  • L.H. Gunderson

    Ecological resilience--in theory and application

    Annu. Rev. Ecol. Systemat.

    (2000)
  • D.J. Higham

    An algorithmic introduction to numerical simulation of stochastic differential equations

    SIAM Rev.

    (2001)
  • H. Hoff

    Understanding the Nexus: Background Paper for the Bonn2011 Nexus Conference

    (2011)
  • C.S. Holling

    Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience

    Engineering within ecological constraints

    (1996)
  • Cited by (8)

    • Examining various control strategies for the nexus across water supply, power generation and environment systems in Hehuang, China

      2022, Journal of Hydrology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Overall, the goal is to examine the performance of various SMPC strategies in mitigating risks within the WPE nexus. First, the WPE nexus considered by Feng et al. (2016) is extended to a stochastic scheme (stochastic dynamical system, similar to that of An et al. (2021)) to capture both the interconnections and multiple-source uncertainties. Next, within the SMPC framework, the centralized and decentralized control models are formulated to minimize the risks of system failure and the control costs at global and local scales, respectively.

    • Delayed feedback between adaptive reservoir operation and environmental awareness within water supply-hydropower generation-environment nexus

      2022, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, more work should be done for describing the environmental awareness using the quantitative index, such as Google index (Quesnel and Ajami, 2017), Baidu index (Weng et al., 2021), topic-related articles in newspaper (Li et al., 2019), and so on. As future work, it is possible to propose a stochastic WHE nexus model by adding the uncertainty term to the ordinary differential equations in present determined model (An et al., 2021). Stability and resilience of the WHE nexus system can then be quantified and discussed more deeply based on the solution results of the stochastic model.

    • Identifying the effect of forecast uncertainties on hybrid power system operation: A case study of Longyangxia hydro–photovoltaic plant in China

      2021, Renewable Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      To stabilize power output, a cost-effective way is the hybrid system operation [9,10], using dispatchable energies (e.g., hydropower) to compensate for the fluctuation from non-schedulable energies (e.g., photovoltaic power) [11–13]. Hydro–photovoltaic hybrid power systems are gradually popular due to the schedulability of hydro units [14,15], and the high obtainability of photovoltaic energy worldwide [16–18]. For the hydro–photovoltaic system operation, crucial inputs are streamflow and photovoltaic forecasts [19–21].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text