Skip to main content
Log in

The role of social network sites on the relationship between game users and developers: an evolutionary game analysis of virtual goods

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social network sites (SNS) have gradually permeated into people’s daily life recently, providing a new perspective for promoting the virtual market in games. The impact of SNS on users’ purchase decision for virtual goods and developers’ decision to create them has to be determined given the dilemma of online games. However, prior studies do not focus on the relationship between users and developers in the game on virtual goods and neglect the role of SNS. Thus, this study adopts an evolutionary game method to model the supply–demand relationship on virtual goods and examine the impact of SNS on it. Results indicate that psychological effect on purchasing and cost of time spent on playing influence strategic changes of both parties. Furthermore, SNS effectively stimulates users to purchase virtual goods and developers to increase virtual good creation by reversing the impact of perceived enjoyment. This study contributes to the theoretical research on SNS games and virtual goods and provides insights into game developers’ performance improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sims Bainbridge W (2010) Virtual sustainability. Sustainability 2(10):3195–3210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2103195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goode S, Shailer G, Wilson M, Jankowski J (2014) Gifting and status in virtual worlds. J Manag Information Syst 31(2):171–210. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222310207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Institute Mg (2012) The social economy: unlocking value and productivity through social technologies. New York

  4. Jung Y, Pawlowski SD (2014) Virtual goods, real goals: exploring means-end goal structures of consumers in social virtual worlds. Information Manag 51(5):520–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamari J (2015) Why do people buy virtual goods? attitude toward virtual good purchases versus game enjoyment. Int J Inf Manag 35(3):299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamari J, Lehdonvirta V (2010) Game design as marketing: how game mechanics create demand for virtual goods. Int J Business Sci Appl Manag 5(1):14–29

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holin L, Sun C-T (2011) Cash trade in free-to-play online games. Games Culture 6(3):270–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412010364981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paavilainen J, Hamari J, Stenros J, Kinnunen J (2013) Social network games. Simul Gaming 44(6):794–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878113514808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alha K, Koskinen E, Paavilainen J, Hamari J, Kinnunen (2014) J Free-to-play games: professionals’ perspectives. In: proceedings of nordic DiGRA, 2014

  10. Hamari J (2011) Perspectives from behavioral economics to analyzing game design patterns: loss aversion in social games. In: Chi social games workshop, 2011

  11. Hamari J, Järvinen A (2012) Building Customer Relationship through Game Mechanics in Social Games. Social science electronic publishing, Newyork

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fields T (2014) Mobile & social game design: monetization methods and mechanics, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Florida

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Baek YM, Cho Y, Kim H (2014) Attachment style and its influence on the activities, motives, and consequences of SNS use. J Broadcast Electron Media 58(4):522–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.966362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kwak KT, Choi SK, Lee BG (2014) SNS flow, SNS self-disclosure and post hoc interpersonal relations change: focused on Korean Facebook user. Comput Hum Behav 31:294–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. boydEllison DMNB (2007) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput-Mediat Commun 13(1):210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi H, Choi E, Song S (2012) The structure of affection descriptors for social network game: case study of CityVille on facebook. Multimedia Tools Appl 68(2):375–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1310-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hsieh J-K, Tseng C-Y (2018) Exploring social influence on hedonic buying of digital goods-online games’ virtual items. J Electron Commerce Res 19(2):164–185

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hamari J, Keronen L (2017) Why do people buy virtual goods: a meta-analysis. Comput Hum Behav 71:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hsu C-L, Lu H-P (2004) Why do people play on-line games? an extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information Manag 41(7):853–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen KH, Shen KS, Ma MY (2012) The functional and usable appeal of Facebook SNS games. Internet Res 22(4):467–481. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211250999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Markus ML (1987) Toward a “critical mass” theory of interactive media. Commun Res 14(5):491–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014005003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu Y, Deng SL, Hu F (2014) E-Loyalty building in competitive e-service market of sns: resources, habit, satisfaction and switching costs. In: Li H, Mantymaki M, Zhang X (eds) Digital Services and Information Intelligence, vol 445. IFIP Advances in Information and communication technology. Springer, Berlin, pp 79–90

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Ku Y-C, Chen R, Zhang H (2013) Why do users continue using social networking sites? an exploratory study of members in the United States and Taiwan. Information Manag 50(7):571–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lou H, Luo W, Strong D (2000) Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance. Eur J Inform Syst 9(2):91–103. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shin DH (2008) Understanding purchasing behaviors in a virtual economy: consumer behavior involving virtual currency in Web 2.0 communities. Interacting Comput 20(4–5):433–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2008.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aleem S, Capretz LF, Ahmed F (2016) Critical success factors to improve the game development process from a developer’s perspective. J Comput Sci Technol 31(5):925–950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-016-1673-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Koskenvoima A, Mäntymäki M (2015) Why do small and medium-size freemium game developers use game analytics? In: Janssen M, Mäntymäki M, Hidders J, Klievink B, Lamersdorf W, van Loenen B, Zuiderwijk A (eds) I3E 2015. LNCS, vol. 9373. Springer, Cham, pp. 326–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25013-7_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Maruyama M, Flath D, Minamikawa K, Ohkita K, Zennyo Y (2015) Platform selection by software developers: theory and evidence. J Jpn Int Econ 38:282–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2015.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee JH, Cheol P (2015) Factors influencing social game accessibility. e-Business Stud 16(3):145–169. https://doi.org/10.15719/geba.16.3.201506.145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Piguing A, Ko I (2016) Continuance intention to use social network game: the Philipines case. Paper presented at the 2016 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS)

  31. Wu L-r, Chen X Modeling of evolutionary game between SNS and user: From the perspective of privacy concerns. In: 2014 International conference on management science & engineering 21th Annual conference proceedings, 2014. IEEE, pp 115–119

  32. Gao S, Ling S, Liu W (2018) The role of social media in promoting information disclosure on environmental incidents: an evolutionary game theory perspective. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lehdonvirta V, Castronova E (2014) Virtual economies: design and analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen H, Chen H (2020) Understanding the relationship between online self-image expression and purchase intention in SNS games: a moderated mediation investigation. Comput Hum Behav 112:106477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhu J, Fang M, Shi Q, Wang P, Li Q (2018) Contractor cooperation mechanism and evolution of the green supply chain in mega projects. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Friedman D (1991) Evolutionary games in economics. Econometrica 59(3):637–666. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cameron IT, Gani R (1988) Adaptive runge-kutta algorithms for dynamic simulation. Comput Chem Eng 12(7):705–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(88)80009-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai-Tao Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Chen, HT. The role of social network sites on the relationship between game users and developers: an evolutionary game analysis of virtual goods. Inf Technol Manag 22, 67–81 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-021-00325-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-021-00325-9

Keywords

Navigation