Abstract
In the 1990s and 2000s, soybean farming grew sharply, particularly in states located in Brazil’s mid-west region. To curb deforestation, the Federal Government implemented command and control policies and, at the same time, soy-buying companies and Civil Society Organizations implemented the Soy Moratorium. This paper focused on the major role of these initiatives in decreasing soybean farming in areas deforested after 2006 and their importance in achieving this result. We considered rich database deforestation, and soybean planted area based on highly detailed remote sensing images, combined with explanatory variables of different sources, forming a panel data of 287 municipalities over 8 years. Spatial panel data models are implemented to avoid any spatial correlation problems and to analyze relationships through regional units and time. The results confirm that lower deforestation rates in the biome laid the foundation for reducing soybean farming in the Amazon biome. However, since 2008, when the Soy Moratorium was launched, there was a structural decline in this relationship that was decisive for a decoupling of soybean farming from deforestation. Therefore, government programs to reduce deforestation made room for a new environment for agricultural expansion in line with Brazilian law and environmental commitments. The Soy Moratorium reinforced this new order, and this production chain became a case study on public and private governance, given its importance in reducing soybean farming in deforested areas after the cut-off date. These public and private effects stress the importance of coordinated actions to achieve efficient results, especially in a large social and environmentally complex region as the Brazilian Amazon, to halt biodiversity degradation and increase participation in value added markets.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
GeoDa software version 1.8.16.4.
Matlab software version R2015a (8.5.0.197613) for Windows.
References
ABIOVE (2006) Moratória da Soja: Declaração das Empresas. São Paulo, SP
ABIOVE (2009a) Moratória da Soja: Termo de Compromisso. São Paulo, SP
ABIOVE (2009b) Moratória da Soja: 2° ano de mapeamento e monitoramento da soja no bioma Amazônia. São Paulo, SP
ABIOVE (2010a) Banco do Brasil adere à Moratória da Soja. São Paulo, SP
ABIOVE (2010b) Moratória da Soja: 3° ano de mapeamento e monitoramento da soja no bioma Amazônia. São Paulo, SP
ABIOVE (2010c) Reconhecimento Público. http://www.abiove.org.br/site/_FILES/Portugues/17072012-140138-ms4_reconhecimento_clientes_2010_br.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2015
ABIOVE (2011) Moratória da Soja: 4° ano de mapeamento e monitoramento da soja no bioma Amazônia. São Paulo, SP
ABIOVE (2012) Moratória da Soja: 5° ano de mapeamento e monitoramento da soja no bioma Amazônia. São Paulo, SP
ABIOVE (2013) Moratória da Soja: 6° ano de mapeamento e monitoramento da soja no bioma Amazônia. São Paulo, SP
ABIOVE (2014) Moratória da Soja: 7° ano de mapeamento e monitoramento da soja no bioma Amazônia. São Paulo, SP
ABIOVE (2015) Arquivos com Estatísticas do Biodiesel. www.abiove.com.br. Accessed 6 Jul 2015
ABIOVE (2016a) ABIOVE: Moratória da Soja no Bioma Amazônia foi renovada. São Paulo, SP
ABIOVE (2016b) Moratória da Soja: 8° ano de mapeamento e monitoramento da soja no bioma Amazônia. São Paulo, SP
ABIOVE (2017) Moratória da Soja: Safra 2016/2017. São Paulo, SP
Aguiar APD, Câmara G, Escada MIS (2007) Spatial statistical analysis of land-use determinants in the Brazilian Amazonia: Exploring intra-regional heterogeneity. Ecol Modell 209:169–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.06.019
Andam KS, Ferraro PJ, Pfaff A et al (2008) Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:16089–16094. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800437105
Andrade LC (2016) Spillover effects of blacklisting policy in the Brazilian Amazon. Universidade de São Paulo
Araujo C, Bonjean CA, Combes JL et al (2009) Property rights and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecol Econ 68:2461–2468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.015
Arima EY, Richards P, Walker R, Caldas MM (2011) Statistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ Res Lett 6:024010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024010
Arima EY, Barreto P, Araújo E, Soares-Filho B (2014) Public policies can reduce tropical deforestation: lessons and challenges from Brazil. Land Use Policy 41:465–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.026
Assunção J, Gandour C, Rocha R (2013a) DETERring deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: environmental monitoring and law enforcement—webinar slides. Rio de Janeiro, RJ
Assunção J, Gandour C, Rocha R (2013b) Deterring deforestation in the brazilian amazon: environmental monitoring and law enforcement—executive summary. Rio de Janeiro, RJ
Assunção J, Gandour C, Rocha R (2015) Deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon: prices or policies? Environ Dev Econ 20:697–722. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X15000078
Azevedo AA, Stabile MCC, Reis TP (2015) Commodity production in Brazil: combining zero deforestation and zero illegality. Elem Sci Anthropog 3:12. https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000076
Barona E, Ramankutty N, Hyman G, Coomes OT (2010) The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environ Res Lett 5:9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024002
Boucher D, Elias P, Faires J, Smith S (2014) Histórias de sucesso no âmbito do desmatamento. Cambridge, MA
Bowman MS, Soares-Filho BS, Merry FD et al (2012) Persistence of cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon: a spatial analysis of the rationale for beef production. Land Use Policy 29:558–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.009
Brasil (2004) Plano de Ação para a Prevenção e Controle do Desmatamento na Amazônia Legal
BRASIL (2012) Lei Federal no 12.651, de 25 de maio de 2012. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2011-2014/2012/Lei/L12651.htm. Accessed 3 Oct 2018
Brazil (2015) Intended nationally determined contribution: towards achieving the objective of the united nations framework convention on climate change
Brown DS, Brown JC, Brown C (2016) Land occupations and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy 54:331–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.003
Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York
Cohn AS, Mosnier A, Havlík P et al (2014) Cattle ranching intensification in Brazil can reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by sparing land from deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:7236–7241. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307163111
CONAB (2016) Séries históricas de área plantada, produtividade e produção relativas às safras de grãos 1976/77 a 2014/15: soja
Cropper M, Puri J, Griffiths C (2001) Predicting the location of deforestation: the role of roads and protected areas in North Thailand. Land Econ 77:172–186. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.77.2.172
de Almeida CA, Coutinho AC, Esquerdo JCDM et al (2016) High spatial resolution land use and land cover mapping of the Brazilian Legal Amazon in 2008 using Landsat-5/TM and MODIS data. Acta Amaz 46:291–302. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4392201505504
de Espindola GM, de Aguiar APD, Pebesma E et al (2012) Agricultural land use dynamics in the Brazilian Amazon based on remote sensing and census data. Appl Geogr 32:240–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.04.003
De Souza Ferreira Filho JB, Ribera L, Horridge M (2015) Deforestation control and agricultural supply in Brazil. Am J Agric Econ 97:589–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aav004
Diniz CG, Souza AADA, Santos DC et al (2015) DETER-B: The new amazon near real-time deforestation detection system. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 8:3619–3628. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2437075
Elhorst JP, Devillers R, Group F et al (2014) Spatial econometrics from cross-sectional data to spatial panels. Springer, Berlin
Etter A, McAlpine C, Wilson K et al (2006) Regional patterns of agricultural land use and deforestation in Colombia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114:369–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.013
Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D et al (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 80(319):1235–1239
Faria WR, Almeida AN (2016) Relationship between openness to trade and deforestation: empirical evidence from the Brazilian Amazon. Ecol Econ 121:85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.014
Gibbs HK (2014) The end of Brazil’s soy moratorium will mean more deforestation
Gibbs HK, Rausch L, Munger J et al (2014) Brazil’s soy moratorium—supplementary material. Sci Policy Forum Environ Dev 347:377–378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0181
Gibbs HK, Munger J, L’Roe J et al (2015) Did ranchers and slaughterhouses respond to zero-deforestation agreements in the Brazilian amazon? Conserv Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12175
Greenpeace (2006a) Comendo a Amazônia. Manaus, AM
Greenpeace (2006b) Indústria da soja anuncia moratória no desmatamento da Amazônia depois de pressão de consumidores. http://www.greenpeace.org/brasil/pt/Noticias/ind-stria-da-soja-anuncia-mora/. Accessed 20 Nov 2015
Greenpeace (2007) Indústria da soja promete não financiar produtores que causem novos desmatamentos na Amazônia. http://www.greenpeace.org/brasil/pt/Noticias/ind-stria-da-soja-promete-n-o/. Accessed 20 Nov 2015
Greenpeace (2008) Monitoramento na Amazônia comprova: moratória da soja deu resultado. http://www.greenpeace.org/brasil/pt/Noticias/monitoramento-comprova-morat/. Accessed 20 Nov 2015
Greenpeace (2009a) Moratória da soja vale até 2010. http://www.greenpeace.org/brasil/pt/Noticias/morat-ria-da-soja-vale-ate-201/. Accessed 20 Nov 2015
Greenpeace (2009b) Bertin, Carrefour, Wal Mart e Pão de Açúcar respondem ao relatório do Greenpeace. http://www.greenpeace.org/brasil/pt/Noticias/bertin-carrefour-wal-mart-e/. Accessed 20 Nov 2015
Greenpeace (2010) Mais um ano de trégua para a Amazônia. http://www.greenpeace.org/brasil/pt/Noticias/Mais-um-ano-de-tregua-para-a-Amazonia/. Accessed 20 Nov 2015
Greenpeace (2012) Seis anos de moratória. http://www.greenpeace.org/brasil/pt/Noticias/Seis-anos-de-moratoria/. Accessed 20 Nov 2015
Greenpeace (2014) Moratória da soja é renovada pela última vez. http://www.greenpeace.org/brasil/pt/Noticias/Moratoria-da-soja-e-renovada-pela-ultima-vez/. Accessed 20 Nov 2015
Greenpeace (2015) Desmatamento Zero. http://www.desmatamentozero.org.br/. Accessed 1 Nov 2015
Halleck Vega S, Elhorst JP (2015) The slx model. J Reg Sci 55:339–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12188
Hansen MC, Wang L, Song XP et al (2020) The fate of tropical forest fragments. Sci Adv 6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax8574
Hargrave J, Kis-Katos K (2013) Economic causes of deforestation in the brazilian amazon: a panel data analysis for the 2000s. Environ Resour Econ 54:471–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9610-2
IBGE—Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2006) Censo Agropecuário 2006. Rio de Janeiro, RJ
IBGE—Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2016) Sistema IBGE de Recuperação Automática—SIDRA. http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/. Accessed 28 Jul 2016
INPE (2008) Monitoramento da cobertura florestal da Amazônia por satélites: sistemas PRODES, DETER, DEGRAD e Queimadas 2007–2008. São José dos Campos—SP
INPE (2015a) Projeto PRODES. http://www.obt.inpe.br/prodes/index.php. Accessed 17 Nov 2015
INPE (2015b) Taxas anuais do desmatamento—1988 até 2014. http://www.obt.inpe.br/prodes/prodes_1988_2014.htm. Accessed 1 Nov 2015
IPEA, GIZ, Cepal (2011) Avaliação do Palno de Ação para Prevenção e Controle do Desmatamento na Amazônia Legal: PPCDAm 2007–2010
Kirby KR, Laurance WF, Albernaz AK et al (2006) The future of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Futures 38:432–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.07.011
Lago AAC do (2009) Stockholm, Rio, Johannesburg: Brazil and the three united nations conferences on the environment. Brasília, DF
Lapola DM, Schaldach R, Alcamo J et al (2010) Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:3388–3393. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907318107
Laurance WF, Albernaz AKM, Schroth G et al (2002) Predictors of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. J Biogeogr 29:737–748. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00721.x
LeSage JP, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. Taylor & Francis Group
Macedo MN, DeFries RS, Morton DC et al (2012) Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:1341–1346. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111374109
Mendonça MJ, Loureiro PRA, Sachsida A (2012) The dynamics of land-use in Brazilian Amazon. Ecol Econ 84:23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.014
MMA (2013a) O Brasil na Agenda Internacional para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Brasília, DF
MMA (2013b) Plano de Ação para prevenção e controle do desmatamento na Amazônia Legal (PPCDAm): 3a fase (2012-2015)—Pelo uso sustentável e conservação da Floresta. Brasília, DF
Morton DC, DeFries RS, Shimabukuro YE et al (2006) Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian Amazon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:14637–14641. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606377103
Nepstad D, McGrath D, Stickler C et al (2014) Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science (80-) 80(344):1118–1123. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248525
Pfaff ASP (1999) What drives deforestation in the Brazilian amazon? J Environ Econ Manag 37:26–43. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1998.1056
Pfaff A, Robalino J, Walker R et al (2007) Road investments, spatial spillovers and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. J Reg Sci 47:109–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2007.00502.x
Pfaff A, Pfaff A, Robalino J et al (2015) Protected area types, strategies and impacts in Brazil’s Amazon: public protected area strategies do not yield a consistent ranking of protected area types by impact. Phil Trans R Soc B. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0273
Pfaff A, Robalino J, Herrera D, Sandoval C (2015) Protected areas’ impacts on Brazilian amazon deforestation: examining conservation—development interactions to inform planning. PLoS ONE 10:e0129460. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129460
Richards PD, Walker RT, Arima EY (2014) Spatially complex land change: the indirect effect of Brazil’s agricultural sector on land use in Amazonia. Glob Environ Chang 29:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.011
Richards P, Pellegrina H, VanWey L, Spera S (2015) Soybean development: the impact of a decade of agricultural change on urban and economic growth in Mato Grosso, Brazil. PLoS ONE 10:e0122510. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122510
Risso J (2013) Diagnóstico espacialmente explícito da expansão da soja no Mato Grosso de 2000 a 2012. INPE
Rodrigues-Filho S, Verburg R, Bursztyn M et al (2015) Land use policy election-driven weakening of deforestation control in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy 43:111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.002
Ross JLS (2011) Geografia do Brasil, 6a edição. Editora EdUSP - Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo
Rudorff BFT, Adami M, Aguiar DA et al (2011) The soy moratorium in the Amazon biome monitored by remote sensing images. Remote Sens 3:185–202
Rudorff BFT, Adami M, Risso J et al (2012) Remote sensing images to detect soy plantations in the amazon biome-the soy moratorium initiative. Sustainability 4:1074–1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/su40501074
Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA et al (2008) Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 80(423):1238–1241
Stakhovych S, Bijmolt THA (2009) Specification of spatial models: a simulation study on weights matrices. Pap Reg Sci 88:389–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00213.x
Ter Steege H, Vaessen RW, Cárdenas-López D et al (2016) The discovery of the Amazonian tree flora with an updated checklist of all known tree taxa. Sci Rep 6:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29549
The European Soy Consumer Group (2010) 2010 Joint Statement of the European Soy Customer Group. http://www.abiove.org.br/site/_FILES/English/17072012-145031-ms03a_reconhecimento_clientes_2010_us.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2015
The European Soy Consumer Group (2011) European Soy Customer Group Statement. http://www.abiove.org.br/site/_FILES/Portugues/18062012-174233-ms_reconhecimento_2011_us.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2015
Vera-Diaz MC, Kaufmann RK, Nepstad DC (2009) The environmental impacts of soybean expansion and infrastructure development in Brazil’s Amazon Basin
Verburg R, Filho SR, Lindoso D et al (2014) The impact of commodity price and conservation policy scenarios on deforestation and agricultural land use in a frontier area within the Amazon. Land Use Policy 37:14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.10.003
Wang Y, Ziv G, Adami M et al (2020) Upturn in secondary forest clearing buffers primary forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat Sustain 3:290–295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0470-4
Weinhold D, Reis E (2008) Transportation costs and the spatial distribution of land use in the Brazilian Amazon. Glob Environ Chang 18:54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.06.004
Weinhold D, Killick E, Reis EJ (2013) Soybeans, poverty and inequality in the Brazilian Amazon. World Dev 52:132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.11.016
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers and the editor for their helpful and valuable comments that considerably contributed to improving this paper. Also, Marcos Adami acknowledges the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for the fellowship [306334/2020-8]. André Luis Squarize Chagas is funded by Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (Capes) [88881.172635/2018-01].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handled by Shiqiu Zhang, Peking University Institute of Environment and Economy College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering Peking University Beijing, China.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amaral, D.F., de Souza Ferreira Filho, J.B., Chagas, A.L.S. et al. Expansion of soybean farming into deforested areas in the amazon biome: the role and impact of the soy moratorium. Sustain Sci 16, 1295–1312 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00942-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00942-x