Abstract
A grassroots movement of parents who fear that their children’s reading struggles are going unrecognized at school has led to dyslexia laws in all but three states in the U.S. The current study was undertaken to provide data relevant to this topic by characterizing the reading profiles of 71 children referred for testing at a center specializing in the assessment of reading disabilities. These children were receiving instruction and intervention in reading across the tiers of instructional support in general and special education within their schools. On average, the children demonstrated equivalent deficits in print literacy skills on norm-referenced assessments regardless of the intensity of their reading support, and the majority of children who were only receiving tier 1 instruction exhibited characteristics of dyslexia. Moreover, 69% of children only receiving tier 1 instruction, and all remaining children, performed below benchmark expectations on a curriculum-based measure of oral reading fluency. While these data are not an evaluation of the implementation of the state’s dyslexia laws or the statewide implementation of RTI, they provide data characterizing the real struggles and lack of identification of children whose parents seek an external evaluation of their children’s reading skills. However, they are set in the context of a state in which 66% of public-school children cannot read proficiently by the end of the third grade. The reading struggles highlighted in this clinic referral sample are unexceptional in the larger state context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Catts, H. W., McIlraith, A., Bridges, M. S., & Nielson, D. C. (2017). Viewing a phonological deficit within a multifactorial model of dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 30, 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9692-2.
Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 184–192 https://eric-ed-gov.ezproxy.mtsu.edu/?id=EJ785942. Accessed 2 Feb 2021.
Elliott, J. G., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). The dyslexia debate. Cambridge University Press.
Fletcher, J. M. (2009). Dyslexia: The evolution of a scientific concept. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 15(4), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617709090900.
Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2018). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention (Second). Guilford Press.
Gearin, B., Petscher, Y., Stanley, C., Nelson, N. J., & Fien, H. (2021). Document analysis of state dyslexia legislation suggests likely heterogeneous effects on student and school outcomes. Learning Disability Quarterly., 073194872199154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948721991549.
Gearin, B., Turtura, J., Kame’enui, E. J., Nelson, N. J., & Fien, H. (2018). A multiple streams analysis of recent changes to state-level dyslexia education law. Educational Policy, 34, 1036–1068. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818807328.
Good III, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2011). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills, Next. Dynamic Measurement Group.
Haft, S. L., Myers, C. A., & Hoeft, F. (2016). Socio-emotional and cognitive resilience in children with reading disabilities. Current Opinions in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.06.005.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (2004). Retrieved from: https://sites.ed.gov/idea/topic-areas/. Accessed 2 Feb 2021.
Katzir, T., Kim, Y.-S., Wolf, M., O’Brien, B., Kennedy, B., Lovett, M., & Morris, R. D. (2006). Reading fluency: The whole is more than the parts. Annals of Dyslexia, 56(1), 51–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-006-0003-5.
Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., Steinbach, K. A., & De Palma, M. (2014). Development and evaluation of a research-based intervention program for children and adolescents with reading disabilities. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 40(4), 21–31 https://mydigitalpublication.com/publication/?i=220222&article_id=1779116&view=articleBrowser&ver=html5. Accessed 2 Feb 2021.
Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywtiz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-003-0001-9.
Mangrum, M. (2021). Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee backs legislation focusing on learning loss, reading ahead of the special session. The Tennessean. https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/education/2021/01/14/tennessee-gov-bill-lee-push-legislation-focusing-learning-loss-reading/4166301001/. Accessed 2 Feb 2021.
Miciak, J., & Fletcher, J. M. (2020). The critical role of instructional response for identifying dyslexia and other learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420906801.
Odegard, T. N., Farris, E. A., Middleton, A. E., Oslund, E., & Rimrodt-Frierson, S. (2020). Characteristics of students identified with dyslexia within the context of state legislation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420914551
Odegard, T. N., Ring, J., Smith, S., Biggan, J., & Black, J. (2008). Differentiating the neural response to intervention in children with developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 58(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-008-0014-5.
Pennington, B. F. (2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101(2), 385–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.04.008.
Petscher, Y., Cabell, S. Q., Catts, H. W., Compton, D. L., Foorman, B. R., Hart, S. A., Lonigan, C. J., Phillips, B. M., Schatschneider, C., Steacy, L. M., Terry, N. P., & Wagner, R. K. (2020). How the science of reading informs 21st-century education. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S267–S282. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.352.
Rose, J. (2009). Identifying and teaching children and young people with dyslexia and literacy difficulties. http://www.thedyslexia-spldtrust.org.uk/media/downloads/inline/the-rose-review.1327396992.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2021.
Stevens, E. A., Austin, C., Moore, C., Scammacca, N., Boucher, A. N., & Vaughn, S. (2021). Current state of the evidence: Examining the effects of Orton-Gillingham reading interventions for students with or at risk for word-level reading disabilities. Exceptional Children., (February 2021), 001440292199340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402921993406.
Tennessee Department of Education (2016). Response to instruction and intervention framework. Retrieved from: https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/education/special-education/rti/rti2_manual.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2021.
Torgeson, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2012). Test of Word Reading Efficiency (2nd ed.). Pro-ed.
University of Oregon Center on Teaching and Learning (2012). DIBELS Next recommended goals. Retrieved from: https://dibels.uoregon.edu/docs/DIBELSNextRecommendedBenchmarkGoals.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2021.
Wagner, R. K., Edwards, A. A., Malkowski, A., Schatschneider, C., Joyner, R. E., Wood, S., & Zirps, F. A. (2019). Combining old and new for better understanding and predicting dyslexia. New directions for child and adolescent development, 2019(165), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20289.
Wang, Z., Sabatini, J., O’Reilly, T., & Weeks, J. (2019). Decoding and reading comprehension: A test of the decoding threshold hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000302.
Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Third edition. PsychCorp..
Wise, B. W., Ring, J., & Olson, R. K. (2000). Individual differences in gains from computer-assisted remedial reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 197–235. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1999.2559.
Youman, M., & Mather, N. (2013). Dyslexia laws in the United States. Annals of Dyslexia, 63, 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-012-0076-2.
Youman, M., & Mather, N. (2015). Dyslexia laws in the United States: An update. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 41, 10–18.
Youman, M., & Mather, N. (2018). Dyslexia laws in the USA: A 2018 update. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 44(2), 37–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Odegard, T.N., Hutchings, T., Farris, E.A. et al. External evaluations for dyslexia: do the data support parent concerns?. Ann. of Dyslexia 71, 50–59 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-021-00224-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-021-00224-2