Skip to main content
Log in

In-Situ SEM High Strain Rate Testing of Large Diameter Micropillars Followed by TEM and EBSD Postmortem Analysis

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 15 September 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Dislocation dynamic simulations are intended as a tool to understand and predict the mechanical behavior of metallic materials, but its prediction has never been directly verified by experiments due to differences in specimen strain rate and size.

Objective

In this work, a comprehensive experimental framework is proposed to attempt direct comparison between experiments and discrete dislocation dynamics (DDD) modelling.

Methods

By integrating high-throughput sample fabrication and a customized testing apparatus, the sample size and strain rate typically employed in DDD simulations are explored experimentally. Constitutive properties such as stress-strain response are measured, and microstructural information is obtained from transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging, electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), and TEM-based orientation mapping.

Results

Magnesium and copper were selected, as case studies, to demonstrate the newly developed experimental procedure. Measured stress-strain responses for Mg are consistent with those obtained with a miniaturized Hopkison bar experiments. By exploiting the validated workflow, the effect of strain rate on micropillar heterogeneous deformation and associated dislocation plasticity were revealed.

Conclusion

The work establishes a methodology for the systematic study of not only metals but also other materials and structures at the microscale and high strain rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Taylor GF (1924) A Method of Drawing Metallic Filaments and a Discussion of their Properties and Uses. Phys Rev 23:655–660. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.23.655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brenner SS (1956a) The growth of whiskers by the reduction of metal salts. Acta Metall 4:62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(56)90111-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner SS (1956b) Tensile strength of whiskers. J Appl Phys 27:1484–1491. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1722294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Uchic MD, Dimiduk DM, Florando JN, Nix WD (2003) Exploring specimen size effects in plastic deformation of Ni 3(Al, Ta). Mater Res Soc Symp - Proc 753:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1557/proc-753-bb1.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Uchic MD, Dimiduk DM, Florando JN, Nix WD (2004) Sample dimensions influence strength and crystal plasticity. Science (80- ) 305:986–989. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1098993

  6. Bernal RA, Aghaei A, Lee S et al (2015) Intrinsic Bauschinger Effect and Recoverable Plasticity in Pentatwinned Silver Nanowires Tested in Tension. Nano Lett 15:139–146. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl503237t

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramachandramoorthy R, Gao W, Bernal R, Espinosa H (2016) High Strain Rate Tensile Testing of Silver Nanowires: Rate-Dependent Brittle-to-Ductile Transition. Nano Lett 16:255–263. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park HS, Cai W, Espinosa HD, Huang H (2009) Mechanics of Crystalline Nanowires. MRS Bull 34:178–183. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2009.49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang H, Schwarz KW, Espinosa HD (2008) Dislocation-Source Shutdown and the Plastic Behavior of Single-Crystal Micropillars. Phys Rev Lett 100:185503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.185503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu T, Li J, Ogata S, Yip S (2009) Mechanics of Ultra-Strength Materials. MRS Bull 34:167–172. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2009.47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jennings AT, Li J, Greer JR (2011) Emergence of strain-rate sensitivity in Cu nanopillars: Transition from dislocation multiplication to dislocation nucleation. Acta Mater 59:5627–5637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeong J, Alfreider M, Konetschnik R et al (2018) In-situ TEM observation of 101¯2 twin-dominated deformation of Mg pillars: Twinning mechanism, size effects and rate dependency. Acta Mater 158:407–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.07.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Casem D, Ligda J, Walter T et al (2020) Strain-Rate Sensitivity of Nanocrystalline Cu–10Ta to 700,000/s. J Dyn Behav Mater 6:24–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40870-019-00223-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sills RB, Bertin N, Aghaei A, Cai W (2018) Dislocation Networks and the Microstructural Origin of Strain Hardening. Phys Rev Lett 121:085501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.085501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guillonneau G, Mieszala M, Wehrs J et al (2018) Nanomechanical testing at high strain rates: New instrumentation for nanoindentation and microcompression. Mater Des 148:39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramachandramoorthy R (2019) Deformation and Failure in Metallic Nanowires Under Stress-relaxation. Northwestern University, Cyclic and High Strain Rate Loading Conditions

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ben-David E, Tepper-Faran T, Rittel D, Shilo D (2014) A New Methodology for Uniaxial Tensile Testing of Free-Standing Thin Films at High Strain-Rates. Exp Mech 54:1687–1696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-014-9911-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Greer JR, Oliver WC, Nix WD (2005) Size dependence of mechanical properties of gold at the micron scale in the absence of strain gradients. Acta Mater 53:1821–1830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hütsch J, Lilleodden ET (2014) The influence of focused-ion beam preparation technique on microcompression investigations: Lathe vs. annular milling. Scr Mater 77:49–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.01.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Echlin MP, Titus MS, Straw M et al (2017) Materials response to glancing incidence femtosecond laser ablation. Acta Mater 124:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang H, Schuster BE, Wei Q, Ramesh KT (2006) The design of accurate micro-compression experiments. Scr Mater 54:181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.06.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Uchic MD, Dimiduk DM (2005) A methodology to investigate size scale effects in crystalline plasticity using uniaxial compression testing. Mater Sci Eng A 400–401:268–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.03.082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao X, Strickland DJ, Derlet PM et al (2015) In situ measurements of a homogeneous to heterogeneous transition in the plastic response of ion-irradiated 〈111〉 Ni microspecimens. Acta Mater 88:121–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li Q (2011) Dynamic mechanical response of magnesium single crystal under compression loading: Experiments, model, and simulations. J Appl Phys 109 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3585870

  25. Obara T, Yoshinga H, Morozumi S (1973) {112̄2}〈1123〉 Slip system in magnesium. Acta Metall 21:845–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(73)90141-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Larson BC, Yang W, Ice GE et al (2002) Three-dimensional X-ray structural microscopy with submicrometre resolution. Nature 415:887–890. https://doi.org/10.1038/415887a

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

H. D. Espinosa gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Army Research Lab through award No. W911NF1220022. The authors thank Dr. Robert Stroud (NANOMEGAS USA) for acquiring the TEM nano-mapping data reported in Fig. 14(d) and acknowledge the Argonne National Lab - Center for Nanomaterial user awards 57577, 57549, and 67558.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. D. Espinosa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, Z., Magagnosc, D.J., Wen, J. et al. In-Situ SEM High Strain Rate Testing of Large Diameter Micropillars Followed by TEM and EBSD Postmortem Analysis. Exp Mech 61, 739–752 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-021-00693-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-021-00693-x

Keywords

Navigation