Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Should science be a subject that we should keep our mind cool? A systemic evaluation using TIMSS 2015 data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While previous research has shown that emotions are related to students’ achievement, little is known about a comprehensive and cross-national evaluation regarding the function of emotions in learning in different parts of the world. Based on the control-value theory, emotions are assumed to serve as mediators between cognitive appraisals (i.e., control and value) and academic performance. The goal of this study is to examine whether two frequently experienced emotions—enjoyment and boredom—mediate the relationship between cognitive appraisals and science performance in 53 Grade 4 and 35 Grade 8 participating regions in 2015 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Using secondary data analysis, we found that boredom significantly mediates the relationship between cognitive appraisals (control and value) and science scores in 32 Grade 4 education systems (60% of TIMSS participating regions). Boredom also serves as a significant mediator between cognitive appraisals—control (15 regions; 43%) and value (16 regions; 46%)—performance in Grade 8. Contradictory to our hypothesis, enjoyment negatively and significantly mediates the relationships in Grade 4 (value = 37 regions; 70% and control = 36 regions; 68%) and Grade 8 (control and value: 18 regions; 51%). While these results reveal the complex role in which enjoyment plays between the relationship between cognitive appraisals and performance, they also indicate that being emotionally neutral may enhance students’ rational thinking to perform well in science learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Areepattamannil, S., Freeman, J. G., & Klinger, D. A. (2011). The influence of motivation, self-beliefs, and instructional practices on science achievement of adolescents in Canada. Social Psychology of Education, 14, 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., Ashkar, T., & Dori, Y. J. (2011). Learning science via animated movies: Its effect on students’ thinking and motivation. Computes and Education, 56, 839–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieg, M., Geotz, T., & Hubbard, K. (2013). Can I master it and does it matter? An intraindividual analysis on control-value antecedents of trait and state academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buff, A. (2014). Enjoyment of learning and its personal antecedents: Testing the change-change assumption of the control-value theory of achievement emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 31, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M. K., Zhang, Z., & Bergeman, C. S. (2018). Time and other considerations in mediation design. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78, 952–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camacho-Morles, J., Slemp, G. R., Oades, L. G., Pekrun, R., & Morrish, L. (2019). Relative incidence and origins of achievement emotions in computer-based collaborative problem-solving. A control-value approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, H. G., & Philips, M. R. (2014). Secondary analysis of existing data: Opportunities and implementation. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 26, 371–375. https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.214171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Daschmann, E. C., Geotz, T., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2011). Testing the predictors of boredom at school: Development and validation of the precursors to boredom scales. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foy, P. (2017). TIMSS 2015 user guide for the international database. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

  • Foy, P., & LaRoche, S. (2016). Estimating standard errors in the TIMSS 2015 results. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, & M. Hopper (Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

  • Foy, P., & Yin, L. (2016). Scaling the TIMSS 2015 achievement data. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, & M. Hopper (Eds.), Methods and Procedures in TIMSS 2015. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

  • Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Stoeger, H., & Hall, N. C. (2010). Antecedents of everyday positive emotions: An experience sampling analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-009-9152-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, T., Keller, M. M., Lüdtke, O., Nett, U. E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2020). The dynamics of real-time classroom emotions: Appraisals mediate the relation between students’ perceptions of teaching and their emotions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112, 1243–1260. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Goetz, T., Martin, R., Ugen, S., Kller, U., Fischbach, A., & Preckel, F. (2014). “My questionnaire is too long!” The assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures. Contemporary educational Psychology, 39, 188–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabau, L. J., & Ma, X. (2017). Science engagement and science achievement in the context of science instruction: A multilevel analysis of U.S. students and schools. International Journal of Science Education, 39, 1045–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. (2nd ed., p. 23). Guildford Press.

  • Hofstede Insights (n.d.). Retrieved January 12, 2021, from https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/

  • Hofferth, S. L. (2005). Secondary data analysis in family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 891–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00182.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. R., Wheeler, G., & Centurino, V. A. S. (2013). TIMSS 2015 science framework. TIMSS 2015 assessment frameworks. Copyright © 2013 International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.

  • Jung, N., Wranke, C., Hamburger, K., & Knauff, M. (2014). How emotions affect logical reasoning: Evidence from experiments with mood-manipulated participants, spider phobic, and people with exam anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 570.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • King, R. B., & Gaerian, M. J. M. (2014). High self-control predicts more positive emotions, better engagement, and higher achievement in school. European Journal of Educational Psychology, 29, 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaRoche, S., Jonacs, M., & Foy, P. (2016). Sample design in TIMSS 2015. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, & M. Hopper (Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

  • Loderer, K., Pekrun, R., & Lester, J. C. (2020). Beyond cold technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis on emotions in technology-based learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 20, 101162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, W., Ng, P. T., Lee, K., & Aye, K. M. (2016). Self-efficacy, value, and achievement emotions as mediators between parenting practice and homework behavior: A control-value theory perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 275–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makransky, G., Andreasen, N. K., Baceviciute, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2020). Immersive virtual reality increase liking but not learning with a science simulation and generative learning strategies promote learning in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, G. J. (2015). How plausible is using averaged NAEP values to examine student achievement? Comprehensive Psychology, 4, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.CP.4.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, W. J., II. (2013). Science is dispassionate, we are told. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 10(4), 358. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201306-167ED.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (2013). TIMSS 2015 assessment design. In I. V. S. Mullis & M. O. Martin (Eds.), TIMSS 2015 assessment frameworks. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

  • Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Hooper, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015. Retrieved April 6, 2020, from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-methods.html

  • Maxwell, S. E., Cole, D. A., & Mitchell, M. A. (2011). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation: Partial and complete mediation under an autoregressive model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 816–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2020). Mplus User’s Guide.

  • Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International Handbook of Emotions in Education. (pp. 120–141). Routledge.

  • Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education. (pp. 13–36). Elsevier.

  • Putwain, D. W., Schmitz, E. A., Wood, P., & Pekrun, R. (2020). The role of achievement emotions in primary school mathematics: Control-value antecedents and achievement outcomes. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranellucci, J., Hall, N. C., & Goetz, T. (2015). Achievement goals, emotions, learning and performance: A process model. Motivation Science, 2, S98-120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raccanello, D., Hall, R., & Burro, R. (2018). Salience of primary and secondary school students’ achievement emotions and perceived antecedents: Interviews on literacy and mathematics domains. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Respondek, L., Seufert, T., Stupniksy, R., & Nett, U. E. (2017). Perceived academic control and academic emotions predict undergraduate university student success: Examining effects on dropout intention and achievement. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. A., Beymer, P. N., Ranellucci, J., & Schmidt, J. A. (2020). Momentary emotion profiles in high school science and their relations to control, value, achievement and science career intentions. Motivation Science. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, K. L., Garn, A. C., & Solmon, M. A. (2017). Class-related emotions in secondary physical education: A control-value theory approach. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36, 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2016-0131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TIMSS 2015 Assessment Frameworks. Copyright © 2013. Supplement 1 - International Version of the TIMSS 2015 Context Questionnaires. Publisher: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College Retrieved October 18, 2018, from https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/questionnaires/index.html

  • Tze, V. M. C., Daniels, L. M., & Klassen, R. M. (2016). Evaluating the relationship between boredom and academic outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9301-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tze, V. M. C., Li, J.C.-H., & Daniels, L. M. (2021). Similarities and differences in social and emotional profiles among students in Canada, USA China, and Singapore: PISA 2015. Research Papers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1864760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, K. (2013). Never a dull moment. Things get interesting when psychologist take a closer look at boredom. Science Watch, 44(7), 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by University of Manitoba (48452).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virginia M. C. Tze.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study does not require ethics approval as it involves analyses of secondary data.

Informed consent

The study does not require informed consent as it involves analysis of secondary data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 100 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tze, V.M.C., Li, J.CH. Should science be a subject that we should keep our mind cool? A systemic evaluation using TIMSS 2015 data. Motiv Emot 45, 377–396 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09880-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09880-8

Keywords

Navigation