Abstract
While previous research has shown that emotions are related to students’ achievement, little is known about a comprehensive and cross-national evaluation regarding the function of emotions in learning in different parts of the world. Based on the control-value theory, emotions are assumed to serve as mediators between cognitive appraisals (i.e., control and value) and academic performance. The goal of this study is to examine whether two frequently experienced emotions—enjoyment and boredom—mediate the relationship between cognitive appraisals and science performance in 53 Grade 4 and 35 Grade 8 participating regions in 2015 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Using secondary data analysis, we found that boredom significantly mediates the relationship between cognitive appraisals (control and value) and science scores in 32 Grade 4 education systems (60% of TIMSS participating regions). Boredom also serves as a significant mediator between cognitive appraisals—control (15 regions; 43%) and value (16 regions; 46%)—performance in Grade 8. Contradictory to our hypothesis, enjoyment negatively and significantly mediates the relationships in Grade 4 (value = 37 regions; 70% and control = 36 regions; 68%) and Grade 8 (control and value: 18 regions; 51%). While these results reveal the complex role in which enjoyment plays between the relationship between cognitive appraisals and performance, they also indicate that being emotionally neutral may enhance students’ rational thinking to perform well in science learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 4–12.
Areepattamannil, S., Freeman, J. G., & Klinger, D. A. (2011). The influence of motivation, self-beliefs, and instructional practices on science achievement of adolescents in Canada. Social Psychology of Education, 14, 233–259.
Barak, M., Ashkar, T., & Dori, Y. J. (2011). Learning science via animated movies: Its effect on students’ thinking and motivation. Computes and Education, 56, 839–846.
Bieg, M., Geotz, T., & Hubbard, K. (2013). Can I master it and does it matter? An intraindividual analysis on control-value antecedents of trait and state academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.006.
Buff, A. (2014). Enjoyment of learning and its personal antecedents: Testing the change-change assumption of the control-value theory of achievement emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 31, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.007.
Cain, M. K., Zhang, Z., & Bergeman, C. S. (2018). Time and other considerations in mediation design. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78, 952–972.
Camacho-Morles, J., Slemp, G. R., Oades, L. G., Pekrun, R., & Morrish, L. (2019). Relative incidence and origins of achievement emotions in computer-based collaborative problem-solving. A control-value approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 41–49.
Cheng, H. G., & Philips, M. R. (2014). Secondary analysis of existing data: Opportunities and implementation. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 26, 371–375. https://doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.214171.
Daschmann, E. C., Geotz, T., & Stupnisky, R. H. (2011). Testing the predictors of boredom at school: Development and validation of the precursors to boredom scales. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 421–440.
Foy, P. (2017). TIMSS 2015 user guide for the international database. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
Foy, P., & LaRoche, S. (2016). Estimating standard errors in the TIMSS 2015 results. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, & M. Hopper (Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
Foy, P., & Yin, L. (2016). Scaling the TIMSS 2015 achievement data. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, & M. Hopper (Eds.), Methods and Procedures in TIMSS 2015. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Stoeger, H., & Hall, N. C. (2010). Antecedents of everyday positive emotions: An experience sampling analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-009-9152-2.
Goetz, T., Keller, M. M., Lüdtke, O., Nett, U. E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2020). The dynamics of real-time classroom emotions: Appraisals mediate the relation between students’ perceptions of teaching and their emotions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112, 1243–1260. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000415.
Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Goetz, T., Martin, R., Ugen, S., Kller, U., Fischbach, A., & Preckel, F. (2014). “My questionnaire is too long!” The assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three-item and single-item measures. Contemporary educational Psychology, 39, 188–205.
Grabau, L. J., & Ma, X. (2017). Science engagement and science achievement in the context of science instruction: A multilevel analysis of U.S. students and schools. International Journal of Science Education, 39, 1045–1068.
Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change. (2nd ed., p. 23). Guildford Press.
Hofstede Insights (n.d.). Retrieved January 12, 2021, from https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/
Hofferth, S. L. (2005). Secondary data analysis in family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 891–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00182.x.
Jones, L. R., Wheeler, G., & Centurino, V. A. S. (2013). TIMSS 2015 science framework. TIMSS 2015 assessment frameworks. Copyright © 2013 International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Jung, N., Wranke, C., Hamburger, K., & Knauff, M. (2014). How emotions affect logical reasoning: Evidence from experiments with mood-manipulated participants, spider phobic, and people with exam anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 570.
King, R. B., & Gaerian, M. J. M. (2014). High self-control predicts more positive emotions, better engagement, and higher achievement in school. European Journal of Educational Psychology, 29, 81–100.
LaRoche, S., Jonacs, M., & Foy, P. (2016). Sample design in TIMSS 2015. In M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, & M. Hopper (Eds.), Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
Loderer, K., Pekrun, R., & Lester, J. C. (2020). Beyond cold technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis on emotions in technology-based learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 20, 101162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.08.002.
Luo, W., Ng, P. T., Lee, K., & Aye, K. M. (2016). Self-efficacy, value, and achievement emotions as mediators between parenting practice and homework behavior: A control-value theory perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 275–282.
Makransky, G., Andreasen, N. K., Baceviciute, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2020). Immersive virtual reality increase liking but not learning with a science simulation and generative learning strategies promote learning in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000473.
Marchant, G. J. (2015). How plausible is using averaged NAEP values to examine student achievement? Comprehensive Psychology, 4, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2466/03.CP.4.1.
Martin, W. J., II. (2013). Science is dispassionate, we are told. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 10(4), 358. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201306-167ED.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (2013). TIMSS 2015 assessment design. In I. V. S. Mullis & M. O. Martin (Eds.), TIMSS 2015 assessment frameworks. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Hooper, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods and procedures in TIMSS 2015. Retrieved April 6, 2020, from Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center website: http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/publications/timss/2015-methods.html
Maxwell, S. E., Cole, D. A., & Mitchell, M. A. (2011). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation: Partial and complete mediation under an autoregressive model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 816–841.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2020). Mplus User’s Guide.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9.
Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International Handbook of Emotions in Education. (pp. 120–141). Routledge.
Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education. (pp. 13–36). Elsevier.
Putwain, D. W., Schmitz, E. A., Wood, P., & Pekrun, R. (2020). The role of achievement emotions in primary school mathematics: Control-value antecedents and achievement outcomes. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12367.
Ranellucci, J., Hall, N. C., & Goetz, T. (2015). Achievement goals, emotions, learning and performance: A process model. Motivation Science, 2, S98-120.
Raccanello, D., Hall, R., & Burro, R. (2018). Salience of primary and secondary school students’ achievement emotions and perceived antecedents: Interviews on literacy and mathematics domains. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.015.
Respondek, L., Seufert, T., Stupniksy, R., & Nett, U. E. (2017). Perceived academic control and academic emotions predict undergraduate university student success: Examining effects on dropout intention and achievement. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00243.
Robinson, K. A., Beymer, P. N., Ranellucci, J., & Schmidt, J. A. (2020). Momentary emotion profiles in high school science and their relations to control, value, achievement and science career intentions. Motivation Science. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000174.
Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x.
Simonton, K. L., Garn, A. C., & Solmon, M. A. (2017). Class-related emotions in secondary physical education: A control-value theory approach. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36, 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2016-0131.
TIMSS 2015 Assessment Frameworks. Copyright © 2013. Supplement 1 - International Version of the TIMSS 2015 Context Questionnaires. Publisher: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College Retrieved October 18, 2018, from https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/questionnaires/index.html
Tze, V. M. C., Daniels, L. M., & Klassen, R. M. (2016). Evaluating the relationship between boredom and academic outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9301-y.
Tze, V. M. C., Li, J.C.-H., & Daniels, L. M. (2021). Similarities and differences in social and emotional profiles among students in Canada, USA China, and Singapore: PISA 2015. Research Papers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1864760.
Weir, K. (2013). Never a dull moment. Things get interesting when psychologist take a closer look at boredom. Science Watch, 44(7), 54.
Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247.
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206.
Funding
This study was funded by University of Manitoba (48452).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This study does not require ethics approval as it involves analyses of secondary data.
Informed consent
The study does not require informed consent as it involves analysis of secondary data.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tze, V.M.C., Li, J.CH. Should science be a subject that we should keep our mind cool? A systemic evaluation using TIMSS 2015 data. Motiv Emot 45, 377–396 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09880-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09880-8