Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Solidago canadensis L. on Species Diversity of Plant Communities at Different Spatial Scale

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is known that invasive dominants can significantly limit the species diversity of plant communities in microplots. However, it remains unclear whether they are capable of influencing the species diversity of large areas of vegetation. We considered this issue by the example of six areas of plant communities dominated by Solidago сanadensis located in habitats of different types (Belaya River valley, Western Caucasus, 190–210 m above sea level). Within each of them, biomass samples were taken from 25 plots of 0.25 m2, which were then disassembled by species and weighed. The results of the data analysis showed that (1) S. сanadensis significantly reduces the number of accompanying species in microplots of plant communities; however, the process of displacement of these species is predominantly nonselective (random); (2) areas of communities of different sizes with a high and low degree of dominance of S. сanadensis, containing a similar total stock of biomass of accompanying species, include, on average, a similar number of such species; and (3) the species similarity of plant communities located in habitats of different types does not depend on the degree of dominance of S. сanadensis in them. It was concluded that the size of the species pools of cenoses with high and low degrees of dominance of S. сanadensis is approximately the same. Accordingly, an increase in the participation of this species in communities can directly threaten other species only if the area of these communities is relatively small.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Akatov, V.V., Akatova, T.V., and Chefranov, S.G., Relationship between degree of dominance and species richness in grass communities with different productivities, Contemp. Probl. Ecol., 2018a, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akatov, V.V., Akatova, T.V., and Chefranov, S.G., The relationship of dominance and evenness with productivity and species richness in plant communities with different organization models, Russ. J. Ecol., 2018b, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 296–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akatov, V.V., Akatova, T.V., and Chefranov, S.G., Degree of dominance and species richness in plant communities with high and low intensity of interspecies competition, Biol. Bull. Rev., 2018c, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartha, S., Szentes, Sz., Horváth, A., Házi, J., Zimmermann, Z., Molnár, Cs., Dancza, I., Margóczi, K., Pál, R., Purger, D., Schmidt, D., Óvári, M., Komoly, C., Sutyinszki, Zs., Szabó, G., Csathó, A.I., Juhász, M., Penksza, K., and Molnar, Zs., Impact of mid-successional dominant species on the diversity and progress of succession in regenerating temperate grasslands, Appl. Veg. Sci., 2014, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 201–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Callaway, R.M. and Ridenour, W.M., Novel weapons: a biochemically based hypothesis for invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability, Front. Ecol. Environ., 2004, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 433–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chase, J.M., Powell, K.I., and Knight, T.M., ‘Bigger data’ on scale-dependent effects of invasive species on biodiversity cannot overcome confounded analyses: a comment on Stohlgren and Rejmánek (2014), Biol. Lett., 2015, vol. 10. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0103

  7. Csergő, A.M., Demeter, L., and Turkington, R., Declining diversity in abandoned grasslands of the Carpathian mountains: do dominant species matter?, PLoS One, 2013, vol. 8, no. 8.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073533

  8. Gaertner, M., Breeyen, A.D., Hui, C., and Richardson, D.M., Impacts of alien plant invasions on species richness in Mediterranean-type ecosystems: a meta-analysis, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 2009, vol. 33, pp. 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gross, K. and Cardinale, B.J., The functional consequences of random vs. ordered species extinctions, Ecol. Lett., 2005, vol. 8, pp. 409–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hejda, M. and Pyšek, P., What is the impact of Impatiens glandulifera on species diversity of invaded riparian vegetation?, Biol. Conserv., 2006, vol. 132, pp. 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hejda, M., Pyšek, P., and Jarošik, V., Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity, and composition of invaded communities, J. Ecol., 2009, vol. 97, pp. 3393–3403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hejda, M., Štajerová, K., and Pyšek, P., Dominance has a biogeographical component: do plants tend to exert stronger impacts in their invaded rather than native range?, J. Biogeogr., 2017, vol. 44, pp. 18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hillebrand, H., Bennett, D.M., and Cadotte, M.W., Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes, Ecology, 2008, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 1510–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Houlahan, J.E. and Findlay, C.S., Effect of invasive plant species on temperate wetland plant diversity, Conserv. Biol., 2004, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1132–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, Y., Oduor, A.M.O., Zhang, Z., Manea, A., Tooth, I.M., Leishman, M.R., Xu, X., and Kleunen, M.V., Do invasive alien plants benefit more from global environmental change than native plants?, Global Change Biol., 2017, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 3363–3370. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Meiners, S.J., Pickett, S.T.A., and Cadenasso, M.L., Effects of plant invasions on the species richness of abandoned agricultural land, Ecography, 2001, vol. 24, pp. 633–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morozova, O.V. and Vinogradova, Yu.K., Solidago canadensis, Canada goldenrod, in Samye opasnye invazionnye vidy Rossii (Top-100) (The Most Dangerous Invasive Species in Russia (Top-100)), Dgebuadze, Yu.Yu., Petrosyan, V.G., and Khlyap, L.A., Eds., Moscow: Tov. Nauchn. Izd. KMK, 2018.

  18. Powell, K.I., Chase, J.M., and Knight, T.M., A synthesis of plant invasion effects on biodiversity across spatial scales, Am. J. Bot., 2011, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 539–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Powell, K.I., Chase, J.M., and Knight, T.M., Invasive plants have scale-dependent effects on diversity by altering species-area relationships, Science, 2013, vol. 339, pp. 316–318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pyšek, P. and Pyšek, M., Invasion by Heracleum mantegazzianum in different habitats in the Czech Republic, J. Veg. Sci., 1995, vol. 6, pp. 711–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rejmánek, M. and Rosѐn, E., Cycles of heterogeneity during succession: A premature generalization?, Ecology, 1992, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 2329–2331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rejmánek, M. and Simberloff, D., Origin matters, Environ. Conserv., 2017, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 97–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rejmánek, M. and Stohlgren, T.J., Scale-dependent impacts of invasive species: a reply to Chase et al., Biol. Lett., 2015, vol. 11. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0402

  24. Rejmánek, M., Richardson, D.M., and Pyšek, P., Plant invasions and invasibility of plant communities, in Vegetation Ecology, van der Maarel, E. and Franklin, J., Eds., Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2013, 2nd ed., pp. 387–424.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richardson, D.M., Macdonald, I.A.W., and Forsyth, G.G., Reductions in plant species richness under stands of alien trees and shrubs in the fynbos biome, South Afr. For. J., 1989, vol. 149, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Richardson, D.M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M.G., Panetta, F.D., and West, C.J., Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: Concepts and definitions, Diversity Distrib., 2000, vol. 6, pp. 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rijal, D.P., Alm, T., Inger, L.N., and Alsos, G., Giant invasive Heracleum persicum: Friend or foe of plant diversity?, Ecol. Evol., 2017, vol. 7, pp. 4936–4950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Seabloom, E.W., Borer, E.T., Buckley, Y.M., et al., Plant species’ origin predicts dominance and response to nutrient enrichment and herbivores in global grasslands, Nat. Commun., 2015, vol. 6, pp. 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Solan, M., Cardinale, B.J., Downing, A.L., Engelhardt, K.A.M., Ruesink, J.L., and Srivastava, D.S., Extinction and ecosystem function in the marine benthos, Science, 2004, vol. 306, pp. 1177–1180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Somodi, I., Virágh, K., and Podani, J., The effect of the expansion of the clonal grass Calamagrostis epigejos on the species turnover of a semi-arid grassland, Appl. Veg. Sci., 2008, vol. 11, pp. 187–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Srivastava, D.S. and Lawton, J.H., Why more productive sites have more species: An experimental test of theory using tree-hole communities, Am. Nat., 1998, vol. 152, pp. 510–529.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Standish, R.J., Robertson, A.W., and Williams, P.A., The impact of an invasive weed Tradescantia fluminensis on native forest regeneration, J. Appl. Ecol., 2001, vol. 38, pp. 1253–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stohlgren, T.J. and Rejmánek, M., No universal scale-dependent impacts of invasive species on native plant species richness, Biol. Lett., 2014, vol. 10. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0939

  34. Vinogradova, Yu.K., Maiorov, S.R., and Khorun, L.V., Chernaya kniga flory Srednei Rossii (Chuzherodnye vidy rastenii v ekosistemakh Srednei Rossii) (The Black Book of Flora of Central Russia (Alien Plant Species in Ecosystems of Central Russia)), Moscow: GEOS, 2009.

  35. Vítková, M., Müllerová, J., Sádlo, J., Pergl, J., and Pyšek, P., Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) beloved and despised: a story of an invasive tree in Central Europe, For. Ecol. Manage., 2017, vol. 384, pp. 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Weber, E., Biological flora of Central Europe: Solidago altissima L., Flora (Switzerland), 2000, vol. 195, pp. 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wright, D.H., Species-energy theory – an extension of species-area theory, Oikos, 1983, vol. 41, pp. 496–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zernov, A.S., Flora Severo-Zapadnogo Kavkaza (Flora of the Northwest Caucasus), Moscow: Tov. Nauchn. Izd. KMK, 2006.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Professor M. Rejmánek for the recommendation to pay attention to the role of dominants in limiting the species diversity in large areas of vegetation and for help in finding publications on this issue.

Funding

The paper presents the results of research carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant nos. 16-04-00228 and 20-04-00364).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. V. Akatov.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akatov, V.V., Akatova, T.V. & Chefranov, S.G. Impact of Solidago canadensis L. on Species Diversity of Plant Communities at Different Spatial Scale. Russ J Biol Invasions 12, 1–10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2075111721010021

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2075111721010021

Keywords:

Navigation