Research Paper
A parameter calibration method in two-surface elastoplastic model for sand-structure interface under monotonic shear loading

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104115Get rights and content

Abstract

A new method is proposed to calibrate the key parameters of a two-surface elastoplastic model to simulate the sand-structure interface under monotonic shear loading. A series of DEM simulations, in which a few sand-structure interface parameters and boundary conditions are considered, are conducted to guide the establishment of a calibration method. The simulation results, together with other researchers’ test results, are used to provide semiempirical and empirical equations for parameter calibration using the two-surface elastoplastic constitutive model. Numerical calculations are performed using the new method and the model’s performance is evaluated for dense and loose sands, under constant normal load and constant normal stiffness conditions by comparison with experimental results, which are shown to be in good agreement with the experimental data.

Introduction

Soil-structure systems such as retaining walls, piles, embankment dams and underground tunnels exist widely across engineering applications. The thin layer on the contact face between soil particles and structures is known as the interface shear zone; most of the shear behavior takes place here, such as particle sliding, rolling, breakage and separation during shearing. Thus, it is important to study the interface shear zone to understande the response of sand-structure systems.

Many researchers have tried to simulate the behavior of interface shearing and proposed different models mainly based on the theory of elastoplasticity. These models can be classified as disturbed state concept (DSC) (Fakharian and Evgin, 2000), damage plasticity (Zhang and Zhang, 2004, Zhang and Zhang, 2006), two-surface plasticity (Manzari and Dafalias, 1997, Mortara et al., 2007, Dejong and Westgate, 2009, Lashkari, 2009, Saberi et al., 2016), hypoplasticity (Herle and Arnold, 2006, Stutz et al., 2016, Stutz et al., 2017, Stutz and Wuttke, 2018) and generalized potential theory (Aizhao and Tinghao, 2009; Aizhao et al., 2012) models. Among them, the theory of hypoplasticity is relatively simple and can accurately predict responses to shear stress (Wichtmann et al., 2019). The theory of the DSC and damage plasticity considers that the behavior is caused by disturbance or damage, and generalized potential theory reduces the number of parameters needed to make the model simpler and more practical. The two-surface plasticity theory is suitable for simulating soil-structure behavior under monotonic and cyclic loading with a complex loading history in the plastic range (Saberi et al., 2016, Saberi et al., 2018). Moreover, the concept of critical state soil mechanics (CSSM) is often introduced as a general framework for the two-surface plastic model to capture volumetric changes during shearing (Hachey et al., 1991, Li et al., 1999, Liu et al., 2006, Liu and Ling, 2008, Lashkari, 2009, Saberi et al., 2016). However, the physical parameters in two-surface plastic models need to be calibrated through standard interface shear tests (Shahrour and Rezaie, 1997, Lashkari, 2012, Saberi et al., 2018) using relatively subject data-processing methods such as fitted lines, empirical hypotheses, trial and error approach, etc. Moreover, for different kinds of soils and interfaces, it is inconvenient to perform a large number of tests and data processing. Therefore, a theoretical calibration method needs to be proposed to make two-surface plasticity theory effective and applicable.

Usually, the proposed interface shearing theories can also be implemented in commercial simulation software to simulate the shearing process under different conditions using FDM (Belen et al., 2011, Anubhav, 2015), and FEM (Saberi et al., 2016, Saberi et al., 2018, Saberi et al., 2019, Wichtmann et al., 2019), which have shown good agreement with experimental results in terms of the stress–strain response. Recently, a micropolar continuum approach (Ebrahimian and Bauer, 2012, Ebrahimian and Bauer, 2015; Ebrahimian et al., 2017) was proposed to model the soil-structure interface, which provided a new method to simulate granular soil behavior under shearing in contact with a continuum of differing surface roughness values. However, soils are known to be highly discontinuous media and are well suited to be modeled using the DEM method (Jensen et al., 1999). A number of DEM simulations have been performed to explore the behavior of the soil-structure interface at microscopic scales (Jensen et al., 1999, Gu et al., 2017, Jing et al., 2018, Feng et al., 2019, Huang et al., 2019). Thus, the DEM method is adopted in this paper to study the effect of basic parameters on the sand-structure interface, such as particle diameters, void ratios, surface roughness values, etc.

The present study conducted a series of DEM simulations of sand-structure interfaces under shear loading under different conditions, aiming to establish theoretical procedure for calibrating key parameters in a two-surface elastoplastic model with basic parameters, i.e., the void ratio e0, mean particle diameter D50, internal friction angle ϕpeak of soil, normalized surface roughness Rn and normal stress σn of boundary conditions.

Together with other research test results, DEM simulation results are used to provide empirical equations and semiempirical equations. Sand-structure behavior curves are derived with the new calibration method and introduced into the computer code numerical calculation software. The model predictions are compared to the measured sand-structure interface response using other researchers’ test results. Moreover, a parametric numerical analysis is performed to better understand the influence of the basic parameters on the soil-structure.

Section snippets

Problem definition

There are three main boundary conditions used to study the mechanics of sand-structure interface systems under different conditions of the normal spring stiffness K, where dσn=-Kdun, in which dσn and dun are the increment of normal stress and displacement respectively.

i. Constant Normal Load (CNL)

The normal load of the constant normal load (CNL) condition is constant (σn=cst,dσn=0), and the increment of normal displacement is changed during shearing (dun0). Thus, the normal spring stiffness is

Parameter calibration method

The two-surface elastoplastic model used this paper is mainly based on the model of Saberi’s sand-structure model (Saberi et al., 2016, Saberi et al., 2018), which was first proposed by Manzari for the problem of triaxial compression testing (Manazari and Dafalias, 1997); it was then modified by Dafalias (Lashkari, 2010), and the model of Lashkari was used to simulate for sand-structure interfaces (Lashkari, 2012, Lashkari, 2013). The elastoplastic constitutive interface model proposed by

Application to interface shearing cases

The proposed calibration method is introduced as code into MATLAB to calculate the behavior of interface shearing based on the two-surface elastoplastic model proposed by Saberi (Saberi et al., 2018). The calculation flow is as Fig. 26. Three different soil-interface shearing tests were conducted by researchers (Hu and Pu, 2004, Shahrour and Rezaie, 1997, Mortara et al., 2007) including dense and loose soils under CNL and CNS conditions. The soil-interface parameters are shown in Table 4. The

Effect of normal stress σn

The normal stress directly determines the value of the shearing stress and the vertical displacement of the soil interface. To better show the effect of normal stress on shearing behavior, sand is set as medium dense with relative a density of Dr=0.9, an emin of 0.6 and an emax of 1. The sand mean particle diameter D50 is 0.4 mm and the internal friction angle ϕpeak is assumed to be 38°. The relative interface roughness Rn is 0.5 and the stiffness is set to 1000kPa/mm under the CNS condition.

Conclusion

A new parameter calibration method in two-surface elastoplastic model for sand-structure interface under monotonic shear loading is proposed in this study and is mainly based on the basic sand-structure interface parameters. A series of DEM simulation results are used to guide method establishment. The calibration method mainly considers the influence of the void ratio and internal friction of the soil, the relative interface roughness of the interface and the normal stress of the boundary

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51678570 and 51978665) and Focus on research and development plan of Hunan province (No.2015SK2053).

References (74)

  • M. Saberi et al.

    A unified constitutive model for simulating stress-path dependency of sandy and gravelly soil-structure interfaces

    Int. J. Non Linear Mech.

    (2018)
  • M. Saberi et al.

    Implementation of a soil-structure interface constitutive model for application in geo-structures

    Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Eng.

    (2019)
  • I. Shahrour et al.

    An elastoplastic constitutive relation for the soil-structure interface under cyclic loading

    Comput. Geotech.

    (1997)
  • H. Stutz et al.

    A general approach to model interfaces using existing soil constitutive models - application to hypoplasticity

    Comput. Geotech.

    (2017)
  • Z. Xu et al.

    Effects of particle shapes and sizes on the minimum void ratios of sand

    Adv. Civil Eng.

    (2019)
  • Z. Aizhao et al.

    Elasto-plastic constitutive model of soil-structure interface in consideration of strain softening and dilation

    Acta Mech. Solida Sin.

    (2009)
  • Z. Aizhao et al.

    General description of soil-structure interface constitutive model based on generalized potential theory

    Rock and Soil Mech.

    (2012)
  • Wu H. Anubhav

    Modelling of non-linear shear displacement behaviour of soil-geotextile interface

    Int. J. Geosynthetics & Ground Eng.

    (2015)
  • Azzouz, A.S., Krizek, R.J., Corotis, R.B., 1976. Regression analysis of soil compressibility. Soils and Foundations....
  • K. Been et al.

    A state parameter for sands

    Geotechnique

    (1985)
  • M. Belen et al.

    A new constitutive model for textured geomembrane/geotextile interfaces

    Geotext. Geomembr.

    (2011)
  • J.E. Bowles

    Physical and geotechnical properties of soils

    (1979)
  • Y.F. Dafalias et al.

    Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects

    J. Eng. Mech.

    (2004)
  • Y.F. Dafalias et al.

    A model of nonlinearly hardening materials for complex loadings

    Acta Mech.

    (1975)
  • J.T. Dejong et al.

    Role of initial state, material properties, and confinement condition on local and global soil-structure interface behavior

    J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.

    (2009)
  • M.S. Dietz et al.

    Postpeak strength of interfaces in a stress-dilatancy framework

    J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.

    (2006)
  • B. Ebrahimian et al.

    Numerical simulation of the effect of interface friction of a bounding structure on shear deformation in a granular soil

    Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech.

    (2012)
  • Ebrahimian, B., Bauer, E., 2015. Investigation of Direct Shear Interface Test Using Micro-polar Continuum Approach....
  • B. Ebrahimian et al.

    Modeling interface shear behavior of granular materials using micro-polar continuum approach

    Continuum Mech. Thermodynamics

    (2017)
  • K. Fakharian et al.

    Elasto-plastic modelling of stress-path-dependent behaviour of interfaces

    Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech.

    (2000)
  • S. Feng et al.

    Analysis of sand-woven geotextile interface shear behavior using DEM

    Can. Geotech. J.

    (2019)
  • V.N. Ghionna et al.

    An elastoplastic model for sand–structure interface behavior

    Geotechnique

    (2002)
  • X. Gu et al.

    Critical state shear behavior of the soil-structure interface determined by discrete element modeling

    Particuology.

    (2017)
  • L. Guerra

    Physical modeling of bored piles in sand

    (2010)
  • J. Hachey et al.

    The critical state of sands

    Geotechnique

    (1991)
  • F. Han et al.

    Effects of interface roughness, particle geometry, and gradation on the sand-steel interface friction angle

    J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.

    (2018)
  • I. Herle et al.

    Hypoplastic description of the frictional behaviour of contacts

    Numer. Methods Geotech. Eng.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (7)

    • Effect of the particle size ratio on macro- and mesoscopic shear characteristics of the geogrid-reinforced rubber and sand mixture interface

      2022, Geotextiles and Geomembranes
      Citation Excerpt :

      Feng et al. (2017) conducted a 3D discrete element simulation of a direct shear test of the interface between a geomembrane and sand, while Grabowski et al. (2021) analysed the interface behaviour between the non-cohesive soil and the rigid body, with different roughness values. Pang et al. (2021) proposed a new method to calibrate the key elastoplastic model's parameters of the sand–structure interface. Wang et al. (2018) established a discrete element model for direct shear tests of rubber and sand mixtures, and obtained important particulate-scale observations, including force chain, particle displacement, and porosity.

    • Novel approach to apply existing constitutive soil models to the modelling of interfaces

      2022, International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text