Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of bone chip-vacuum system in orthopedic drilling process

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Overheating occurs during the bone drilling process using drill bits in orthopedic surgery. The temperatures frequently exceed 47 °C, usually accepted as critical value, since the bones and surrounding tissues burn and then cause the necrosis during the drilling process. To prevent this, orthopedic surgeons either spray coolants to the drilling zone or pause the drilling process until the bones and tissues cool down. Such heat damage in bones and soft tissues is undesirable event for surgeons. The bone chips, sometimes, are also complicating the bone fracture fixations. In this study, an investigation is described the effects of the processing parameters on bone chip formations, temperature levels and chip-vacuuming performances during drilling. The temperature levels are also measured using thermocouple devices. A bone chip collecting system is developed as a specific device to collect the chips or fragments using vacuuming technique. The collected bone chips are stored in a pot (reservoir) and delivered to a reparative site in case of necessary. Some design parameters for the developed vacuum system are identified considering the temperature rise during the drilling process. Analyzing the effects of these parameters on chip formation and developed vacuum system statistically and some results are presented. At the end of the study, the bone chip-vacuum device was developed and performed successfully to collect the whole fragments in the bone drilling experimental tests. The chip-collecting device was also useful to remove overheat from the drilling zone. The optimal level of the processing parameters was calculated as A1B3C1 for both vacuumed and non-vacuumed conditions. The fractured powder-type chips were formed as anticipated using the cortical structure of diaphyseal part of calf bone which is helpful for chip vacuuming device.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gok K, Buluc L, Muezzinoglu US, Kisioglu Y (2015) Development of a new driller system to prevent the osteonecrosis in orthopedic surgery applications. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 37(2):549–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-014-0186-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hillery MT, Shuaib I (1999) Temperature effects in the drilling of human and bovine bone. J Mater Process Technol 92–93:302–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00155-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T, Albrektsson B (1984) Heat caused by drilling cortical bone. Temperature measured in vivo in patients and animals. Acta Orthop Scand 55:629–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Augustin G, Davila S, Mihoci K, Udiljak T, Vedrina D, Antabak A (2008) Thermal osteonecrosis and bone drilling parameters revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128(1):71–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0427-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sezek S, Aksakal B, Karaca F (2011) Ortopedik operasyonlardaki kemik delme işlemlerinde sıcaklık dağılım analizleri. In: 6th international advanced technologies symposium (IATS’11):276–281

  6. Shakouri E, Haghighi Hassanalideh H, Gholampour S (2018) Experimental investigation of temperature rise in bone drilling with cooling: a comparison between modes of without cooling, internal gas cooling, and external liquid cooling. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 232(1):45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarparast M, Ghoreishi M, Jahangirpoor T, Tahmasbi V (2020) Experimental and finite element investigation of high-speed bone drilling: evaluation of force and temperature. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 42(6):349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02436-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Agarwal R, Jain V, Gupta V, Saxena S, Dwibedi V (2020) Effect of surface topography on pull-out strength of cortical screw after ultrasonic bone drilling: an in vitro study. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 42(7):363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02449-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mercuri GM, Buss RA (2000) Bone harvesting collection and delivery system.

  10. Enokida M, Kanaya H, Uehara K, Ueki M, Nagashima H (2019) An experimental comparative study of drilling efficiency and temperature elevation with unmodified and modified medical drills in pig tibia bone. Heliyon 5(8):e02189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang YX, Wang CY, Qin Z, Xu LL, Song YX, Chen HY (2010) Drilling force and temperature of bone by surgical drill. Adv Mater Res 126–128:779–784. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.126-128.779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karaca F, Aksakal B (2013) Effects of various drilling parameters on bone during implantology: An in vitro experimental study. Acta Bioeng Biomech 15(4):25–32

    Google Scholar 

  13. Taguchi G, Elsayed EA, Hsiang TC (1989) Quality engineering in production systems. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Montgomery DC (2000) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gok K, Gok A, Kisioglu Y (2015) Optimization of processing parameters of a developed new driller system for orthopedic surgery applications using Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5):1437–1448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6327-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gok K, Gok A, Kisioglu Y Computer Aided Finite Element Simulation of the Developed Driller System for bone Drilling Process in Orthopedic Surgery. J Adv Manuf Syst 0 (ja):null. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219686719500318

  17. Gok A, Gologlu C, Demirci HI (2013) Cutting parameter and tool path style effects on cutting force and tool deflection in machining of convex and concave inclined surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(5):1063–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5075-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee J, Ozdoganlar OB, Rabin Y (2012) An experimental investigation on thermal exposure during bone drilling. Med Eng Phys 34(10):1510–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sezek S, Aksakal B, Karaca F (2012) Influence of drill parameters on bone temperature and necrosis: a FEM modelling and in vitro experiments. Comput Mater Sci 60:13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Basiaga M, Paszenda Z, Szewczenko J, Kaczmarek M (2011) Numerical and experimental analyses of drills used in osteosynthesis. Acta Bioeng Biomech Wroclaw Univ Technol 13(4):29–36

    Google Scholar 

  21. Abouzgia MB, James DF (1995) Measurements of shaft speed while drilling through bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53(11):1308–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(95)90590-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Toews AR, Bailey JV, Townsend HGG, Barber SM (1999) Effect of feed rate and drill speed on temperatures in equine cortical bone. Am J Vet Res 60:942–944

    Google Scholar 

  23. Matthews LS, Green CA, Goldstein SA, AA M (1984) The thermal effects of skeletal fixation-pin insertion in bone. J Bone Joint Surg 66(7):1077–1083

  24. Augustin G, Davila S, Udiljak T, Vedrina D, Bagatin D (2009) Determination of spatial distribution of increase in bone temperature during drilling by infrared thermography: preliminary report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(5):703–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0630-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mellinger JC, Ozdoganlar OB, Devor RE, Kapoor SG (2002) Modeling chip-evacuation forces and prediction of chip-clogging in drilling. J Manuf Sci Eng 124(3):605–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Costich ER, Youngblood PJ, Walden JM (1964) A study of the effects of high-speed rotary instruments on bone repair in dogs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 17:563–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Natali C, Ingle P, Dowell J (1996) Orthopaedic bone drills—can they be improved? temperature changes near the drilling face. J Bone Joint Surg British 78-B(3):357–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ohashi H, Therin M, Meunier A, Christel P (1994) The effect of drilling parameters on bone. J Mater Sci Mater Med 5(4):237–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00121095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nam O, Yu W, Choi MY, Kyung HM (2006) Monitoring of bone temperature during osseous preparation for orthodontic micro-screw implants: effect of motor speed and pressure. Key Eng Mater 321–323:1044–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharawy M, Misch CE, Weller N, Tehemar S (2002) Heat generation during implant drilling: the significance of motor speed. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 60(10):1160–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stabler GV (1951) The fundamental geometry of cutting tools. Proce Inst Mech Eng 165:14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shamoto E, Altintas Y (1999) Prediction of shear angle in oblique cutting with maximum shear stress and minimum energy principles. J Manuf Sci Eng 121(3):399–407. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2832695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z (1997) Heat generation during implant site preparation: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12(2):186–193

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tehemar SH (1999) Factors affecting heat generation during implant site preparation: a review of biologic observations and future considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14(1):127–136

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kalidindi V (2004) Optimization of drill design and coolant systems during dental implant surgery. Master Thesis, University of Kentucky,

  36. Liao Z, Axinte DA (2016) On monitoring chip formation, penetration depth and cutting malfunctions in bone micro-drilling via acoustic emission. J Mater Process Technol 229:82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alam K, Mitrofanov AV, Silberschmidt VV (2011) Experimental investigations of forces and torque in conventional and ultrasonically-assisted drilling of cortical bone. Med Eng Phys 33(2):234–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was granted by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under the project number of 117M958. The authors would like to thank TUBITAK for valuable support and their understanding during the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kadir Gok.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Adriano Fagali de Souza.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gok, K., Erdem, M., Kisioglu, Y. et al. Development of bone chip-vacuum system in orthopedic drilling process. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 43, 224 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02959-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02959-w

Keywords

Navigation