Abstract
Performance-based accountability (PBA) policies are increasingly adopted in a wide range of education systems in order to reform school governance and to improve students’ results and schools’ performance. Countries around the world have been implementing national large-scale assessments to make school actors more accountable and responsible for students’ results. This policy model has been generalized in countries with different administrative traditions, including those with a short tradition in New Public Management. This is the case in Spain, where PBA has been adopted unevenly in different regions, with Madrid being one of the earliest adopters. In recent decades, Madrid has developed a model that combines administrative test-based accountability with a system of broad parental school choice, which also facilitates the activation of market forms of accountability. However, the combination and interaction between market and administrative forms of accountability is understudied. This paper adopts a policy enactment perspective to analyze, through a case study approach, the interaction of administrative and market forms of accountability and its enactment at the school level. The case study is based on a set of 41 semi-structured interviews with teachers, principals, and school inspectors in a sample of eight schools in Madrid, combined with document analysis of school educational projects and improvement plans. The evidence suggests that administrative and market forms of accountability tend to generate dynamics of interdependence, resulting in increasing external pressures which schools tend to address with superficial responses, including teaching to the test, or second-order competition between schools.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
According to Carpintero and Siemiatycki (2015), between 2005 and 2012, new Public–Private Partnerships were agreed to build and operate schools to provide education for about 60,000 students and with a total investment of around 650 million euros (439).
References
Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational researcher, 36(5), 258–267.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of education policy, 18(2), 215–228.
Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge.
Barbana, S., Dumay, X., & Dupriez, V. (2020). Local implementation of accountability instruments in the French-speaking community of Belgium. European Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119850964.
Bonal, X., & Zancajo, A. (2018). School segregation in the Spanish quasi-market education system: Local dynamics and policy absences. In X. Bonal and C. Bellei (Eds.), Understanding school segregation: Patterns, causes and consequences of spatial inequalities in education (pp. 201–221). Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350033542.ch-010.
Bolívar, A. (2008). El discurso de las competencias en España: Educación básica y educación superior. Revista de docencia universitaria, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2008.6268.
Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. (2017). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: Concept evolution and theoretical challenges. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 2, 79–104.
Braun, A., Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Taking context seriously: Towards explaining policy enactments in the secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 585–596.
Busuioc, M., & Lodge, M. (2017). Reputation and accountability relationships: Managing accountability expectations through reputation. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 91–100.
Carvalho, L. M., Costa, E., & Sant’Ovaia, C. (2020). Depicting the faces of results-oriented regulatory processes in Portugal: National testing in policy texts. European Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 125–141.
Carpintero, S., & Siemiatycki, M. (2015). PPP projects in local infrastructure: Evidence from schools in the Madrid region, Spain. Public Money & Management, 35(6), 439–446.
Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244.
Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509.
Diamond, J. B. (2012). Accountability policy, school organization, and classroom practice: Partial recoupling and educational opportunity. Education and Urban Society, 44(2), 151–182.
Dumay, X., Cattonar, B., Maroy, C., & Mangez, C. (2013). The local institutionalization of accountability in education: Network and bureaucratic modes of implementation. RISE, 2(2), 99–141.
Escardíbul, J. O., & Villarroya, A. (2009). The inequalities in school choice in Spain in accordance to PISA data. Journal of Education Policy, 24(6), 673–696.
Falabella, A. (2014). The Performing School: Effects of Market & Accountability Policies. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(51). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n70.2014.
Gawlik, M. A. (2015). Shared sense-making: How charter school leaders ascribe meaning to accountability. Journal of Educational Administration, 53, 393–415.
Gewirtz, S., Ball, S. J., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice, and equity in education. Open University Press.
Hallett, T. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74.
Landri, P. (2018). Digital governance of education: Technology, standards and Europeanization of education. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Lipman, P. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. Psychology Press.
Maroy, C. (2015). “Comparing Accountability Policy Tools and Rationales : Various Ways, Various Effects?” In Governing Educational Spaces : Knowledge, Teaching and Learning in Transition, H.-G. Kotthoff, and Klerides E., dir., 35–58. Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
Maroy, C., & Van Zanten, A. (2009). Regulation and competition among schools in six European localities. Sociologie du travail, 51, e67–e79.
Maroy, C., & Pons, X. (2019). Accountability policies in education. Springer.
Maroy, C., Dupriez, V., & Pons, X. (2020). Accountability and datafication in francophone contexts: A reinforcing cognitive state still challenged by local actors. In S. Grek, C. Maroy, & A. Verger (Eds.), World Yearbook in Education 2021: Accountability and datafication in education. Routledge.
Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8(2), 193.
Merton, R. K. (1995). The Thomas theorem and the Matthews effect. Social Forces, 74, 379.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Meyer, H. & Rowan, B. (2006). Institutional analysis and the study of education. In H. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 1–14) Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Mittleman, J., & Jennings, J.L. (2018). Accountability, achievement, and inequality in American Public Schools: A review of the literature. In: B. Schneider (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education in the 21st century (pp. 475–492). Cham: Springer.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.
Pagès, M., & Prieto, M. (2020). The instrumentation of global education reforms: an analysis of school autonomy with accountability policies in Spanish education. Educational Review, 72(6), 671–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1803795.
Parcerisa, L. (2016). Modernización conservadora y privatización de la educación el caso de la LOMCE y la Nueva Gestión Pública. Revista Educación, Política y Sociedad, 1(2), 11–42.
Perryman, J., Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2011). Life in the pressure cooker–School league tables and English and mathematics teachers’ responses to accountability in a results-driven era. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(2), 179–195.
Skedsmo, G. (2011). Formulation and realisation of evaluation policy: Inconsistencies and problematic issues. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 23(1), 5–20.
Spillane, J. P. (2009). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy. Harvard University Press.
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.
Tiana, A. (2011). Análisis de las competencias básicas como núcleo curricular en la educación obligatoria española. Bordón: Revista de pedagogía, 63(1), 63–75.
Verger, A., & Curran, M. (2014). New public management as a global education policy: Its adoption and re-contextualization in a Southern European setting. Critical studies in Education, 55(3), 253–271.
Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Parcerisa, L. (2019a). Reforming governance through policy instruments: How and to what extent standards, tests and accountability in education spread worldwide. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(2), 248–270.
Verger, A., Parcerisa, L., & Fontdevila, C. (2019b). The growth and spread of large-scale assessments and test-based accountabilities: A political sociology of global education reforms. Educational Review, 71(1), 5–30.
Verger, A., Prieto, M., Pagès, M., & Villamor, P. (2020a). Common standards, different stakes: A comparative and multi-scalar analysis of accountability reforms in the Spanish education context. European Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 142–164.
Verger, A., Ferrer, G., & Parcerisa, L. (2020b). In and out of the ‘pressure cooker’: Schools’ varying responses to accountability and datafication. In S. Grek, C. Maroy, & A. Verger (Eds.), World Yearbook in Education 2021: Accountability and datafication in education. Routledge.
Villamor, P., & Prieto, M. (2016). Reformas hacia la privatización de la educación en la Comunidad de Madrid. Revista de Sociología de la Educación-RASE, 9(2), 265–276.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods (ed.). Applied social research methods series, 5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pagès, M. Enacting performance-based accountability in a Southern European school system: between administrative and market logics. Educ Asse Eval Acc 33, 535–561 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-021-09359-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-021-09359-7