Skip to main content
Log in

Reduced flexibility of cognitive control: reactive, but not proactive control, underpins the congruency sequence effect

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The congruency sequence effect (CSE) refers to facilitated conflict processing following incongruent than congruent trials, and reflects enhanced cognitive control during conflict processing. Although this effect is mostly conceived as being reactive, proactive control can also unlock it under specific circumstances according to previous studies (e.g., when an informative cue is used). However, whether or not humans can flexibly switch between these two complementing control modes remains unclear. To address this question, 55 participants completed the confound-minimized Stroop task in different blocks where the cue about the upcoming trial’s congruency was either informative or not, and orthogonally to it, the cue-stimulus interval (CSI) was either short or long. We tested if the size of the CSE could change depending on the specific combination of these two factors, which would indicate that cognitive control depends on the subtle balance between reactive and proactive control, and is therefore flexible. However, results showed that the CSE was significant and comparable across the four combinations of CSI and Cue type, suggesting that it primarily stemmed from reactive control. We discuss our results against the dual mechanism of control (DMC) framework (Braver in Trends Cogn Sci 16:106–113, 2012).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The CSE score was computed using the formula: ([CI-CC)]-[II-IC]) following van Steenbergen et al. (2009).

References

  • Aarts, E., & Roelofs, A. (2011). Attentional control in anterior cingulate cortex based on probabilistic cueing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 716–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aben, B., Verguts, T., & Van den Bussche, E. (2017). Beyond trial-by-trial adaptation: A quantification of the time scale of cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 509.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alpay, G., Goerke, M., & Stürmer, B. (2009). Precueing imminent conflict does not override sequence-dependent interference adaptation. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 6, 803–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, L. G., Boehler, C. N., Davis, L. A., Won, R. J., & Woldorff, M. G. (2014). The dynamics of proactive and reactive cognitive control processes in the human brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(5), 1021–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1406.5823.

  • Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braem, S., Bugg, J. M., Schmidt, J. R., Crump, M. J., Weissman, D. H., Notebaert, W., & Egner, T. (2019). Measuring adaptive control in conflict tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 769–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bugg, J. M., Jacoby, L. L., & Chanani, S. (2011). Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 844.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bugg, J. M., & Smallwood, A. (2016). The next trial will be conflicting! Effects of explicit congruency pre-cues on cognitive control. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 80, 16–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayson, P. E., & Larson, M. J. (2011). Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: Support for the conflict monitoring theory. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1953–1961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correa, Á., Rao, A., & Nobre, A. C. (2009). Anticipating conflict facilitates controlled stimulus-response selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1461–1472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duthoo, W., Abrahamse, E. L., Braem, S., & Notebaert, W. (2014). Going, going, gone? Proactive control prevents the congruency sequence effect from rapid decay. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 78, 483–2493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duthoo, W., & Notebaert, W. (2012). Conflict adaptation: it is not what you expect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1993–2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egner, T. (2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 380–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egner, T., Delano, M., & Hirsch, J. (2007). Separate conflict-specific cognitive control mechanisms in the human brain. NeuroImage, 35, 940–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egner, T., Ely, S., & Grinband, J. (2010). Going, going, gone: characterizing the time-course of congruency sequence effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005a). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005b). The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task. NeuroImage, 24, 539–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfarb, L., & Henik, A. (2013). The effect of a preceding cue on the conflict solving mechanism. Experimental Psychology, 60, 347–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horga, G., Maia, T. V., Wang, P., Wang, Z., Marsh, R., & Peterson, B. S. (2011). Adaptation to conflict via context-driven anticipatory signals in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 16208–16216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., & Gutsell, J. N. (2007). Running on empty: Neural signals for self-control failure. Psychological Science, 18, 933–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., & Schmeichel, B. J. (2012). What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 450–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Job, V., Dweck, C. S., & Walton, G. M. (2010). Ego depletion—Is it all in your head? Implicit theories about willpower affect self-regulation. Psychological Science, 21, 1686–1693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karayanidis, F., Mansfield, E. L., Galloway, K. L., Smith, J. L., Provost, A., & Heathcote, A. (2009). Anticipatory reconfiguration elicited by fully and partially informative cues that validly predict a switch in task. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 202–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, S., & Andrews, S. (2015). To transform or not to transform: using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, H. S., & Braver, T. S. (2008). Motivational influences on cognitive control: behavior, brain activation, and individual differences. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mordkoff, J. T. (2012). Observation: Three reasons to avoid having half of the trials be congruent in a four-alternative forced-choice experiment on sequential modulation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 750–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/

  • Scherbaum, S., Fischer, R., Dshemuchadse, M., & Goschke, T. (2011). The dynamics of cognitive control: Evidence for within-trial conflict adaptation from frequency-tagged EEG. Psychophysiology, 48, 591–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. R., & Weissman, D. H. (2014). Congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds. PLoS ONE, 9, e102337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenhav, A., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2013). The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron, 79, 217–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenbergen, H. V., Band, G. P., & Hommel, B. (2009). Reward counteracts conflict adaptation: Evidence for a role of affect in executive control. Psychological Science, 20, 1473–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Wildenberg, W. P., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Wylie, S. (2012). Once bitten, twice shy: On the transient nature of congruency sequence effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 264.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weissman, D. H., Jiang, J., & Egner, T. (2014). Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 2022.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham, H. (2017). Tidyverse: Easily install and load the ‘Tidyverse’. R package tidyverse (Version 1.2.1) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tidyverse/index.html

  • Yang, Q., Paul, K., & Pourtois, G. (2019). Defensive motivation increases conflict adaptation through local changes in cognitive control: Evidence from ERPs and mid-frontal theta. Biological Psychology, 148, 107738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Q., & Pourtois, G. (2018). Conflict-driven adaptive control is enhanced by integral negative emotion on a short time scale. Cognition and Emotion, 32, 1637–1653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Grant (201606990022) from China Scholarship Council (CSC) and co-funding (BOF) Grant (BOFCHN2017000101) from Ghent University awarded to Qian Yang.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ghent University.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Q., Pourtois, G. Reduced flexibility of cognitive control: reactive, but not proactive control, underpins the congruency sequence effect. Psychological Research 86, 474–484 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01505-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01505-6

Navigation