Skip to main content
Log in

Transfer learning in deep neural network-based receiver coil sensitivity map estimation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The success of parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging algorithms like SENSitivity Encoding (SENSE) depends on an accurate estimation of the receiver coil sensitivity maps. Deep learning-based receiver coil sensitivity map estimation depends upon the size of training dataset and generalization capabilities of the trained neural network. When there is a mismatch between the training and testing datasets, retraining of the neural networks is required from a scratch which is costly and time consuming.

Materials and methods

A transfer learning approach, i.e., end-to-end fine-tuning is proposed to address the data scarcity and generalization problems of deep learning-based receiver coil sensitivity map estimation. First, generalization capabilities of a pre-trained U-Net (initially trained on 1.5T receiver coil sensitivity maps) are thoroughly assessed for 3T receiver coil sensitivity map estimation. Later, end-to-end fine-tuning is performed on the pre-trained U-Net to estimate the 3T receiver coil sensitivity maps.

Result and conclusion

Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Root Mean Square Error and central line profiles (of the SENSE reconstructed images) show a successful SENSE reconstruction by utilizing the receiver coil sensitivity maps estimated by the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McRobbie DW, Moore EA, Graves MJ (2017) MRI from picture to proton. MRI Pict Proton. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.182.3.1820592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamilton J, Franson D, Seiberlich N (2017) Recent advances in parallel imaging for MRI. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 101:71–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Siddiqui MF, Reza AW, Shafique A, Omer H, Kanesan J (2017) FPGA implementation of real-time SENSE reconstruction using pre-scan and Emaps sensitivities. Magn Reson Imaging 44:82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Irfan AS, Nisar A, Shahzad H, Omer H (2016) Sensitivity maps estimation using eigenvalues in sense reconstruction. Appl Magn Reson 47:487–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adalsteinsson E, Aksoy M, Atkinson D, Bammer R, Batchelor P, Benner T, Bock M, Casselman J, Dietrich O, Duensing R, Eibel R, Essig M, Fink C, Finn J, Fischer B, Griswold M, Herrmann K, Hoogeveen R, Huber A, Zech C (2007) Parallel imaging in clinical MR applications. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68879-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Biyik E, Ilicak E, Cukur T (2018) Reconstruction by calibration over tensors for multi-coil multi-acquisition balanced SSFP imaging. Magn Reson Med 79:2542–2554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu F, Samsonov A, Chen L, Kijowski R, Feng L (2019) SANTIS: sampling-augmented neural network with incoherent structure for MR image reconstruction. Magn Reson Med 82:1890–1904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dar SUH, Özbey M, Çatlı AB, Çukur T (2020) A transfer-learning approach for accelerated mri using deep neural networks. Magn Reson Med 84:663–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Han Y, Yoo J, Kim HH, Shin HJ, Sung K, Ye JC (2018) Deep learning with domain adaptation for accelerated projection-reconstruction MR. Magn Reson Med 80:1189–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee D, Yoo J, Ye JC (2017) Deep artifact learning for compressed sensing and parallel MRI. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.01120

  11. Hyun CM, Kim HP, Lee SM, Lee S, Seo JK (2018) Deep learning for undersampled MRI reconstruction. Phys Med Biol 63:135007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gözcü B, Mahabadi RK, Li Y-H, Ilıcak E, Cukur T, Scarlett J, Cevher V (2018) Learning-based compressive MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 37:1394–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peng X, Perkins K, Cli B, Sutton B, Liang Z (2018) Deep-SENSE: learning coil sensitivity functions for SENSE reconstruction using deep learning. In: Joint Annual Meeting ISMRM-ESMRMB, 2018. https://archive.ismrm.org/2018/3528.html

  14. Chen Z, Chen Y, Li D, Christodoulou AG (2019) A deep learning algorithm for non-cartesian coil sensitivity map estimation. In: ISMRM 27th Annual meeting and exhibition. https://archive.ismrm.org/2019/4783.html

  15. Meng N, Yang Y, Xu Z, Sun J (2019) A Prior learning network for joint image and sensitivity estimation in parallel MR imaging BT-medical image computing and computer assisted intervention–MICCAI 2019 . In: Shen D, Liu T, Peters TM, Staib LH, Essert C, Zhou S, Yap P-T, Khan A (eds) International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 732–740

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dar SUH, Yurt M, Shahdloo M, Ildız ME, Tınaz B, Çukur T (2020) Prior-guided image reconstruction for accelerated multi-contrast MRI via generative adversarial networks. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 14:1072–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tajbakhsh N, Shin JY, Gurudu SR, Hurst RT, Kendall CB, Gotway MB, Liang J (2016) Convolutional neural networks for medical image analysis: full training or fine tuning? IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35:1299–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Knoll F, Hammernik K, Kobler E, Pock T, Recht MP, Sodickson DK (2019) Assessment of the generalization of learned image reconstruction and the potential for transfer learning. Magn Reson Med 81:116–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hendrick RE (2008) Breast MRI: fundamentals and technical aspects. Breast MRI Fundam Tech Asp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73507-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wiesinger F, Van De Moortele PF, Adriany G, De Zanche N, Ugurbil K, Pruessmann KP (2004) Parallel imaging performance as a function of field strength: an experimental investigation using electrodynamic scaling. Magn Reson Med 52:953–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells WM, Frangi AF (eds) Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 234–241

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Bahadir CD, Dalca AV, Sabuncu MR (2019) Learning-Based Optimization of the Under-Sampling Pattern in MRI. Lect Notes Comput Sci (including Subser Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinformatics). Springer, Cham, pp 780–792

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kingma DP, Ba JL (2015) Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations-ICLR 2015-Conference Track Processdings, pp 1–15

  24. Chollet F & others (2015) Keras. GitHub. Retrieved from https://github.com/fchollet/keras

  25. Kramer O (2016) Scikit-learn. Machine learning for evolution strategies. Springer, Cham, pp 45–53

    Google Scholar 

  26. Guerquin-Kern M (2012) Matlab code for MRI simulation and reconstruction. Department of Computer Science Engineering University, Calcutta

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marcus DS, Wang TH, Parker J, Csernansky JG, Morris JC, Buckner RL (2007) Open access series of imaging studies (OASIS): cross-sectional MRI data in young, middle aged, nondemented, and demented older adults. J Cogn Neurosci 19:1498–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chow LS, Rajagopal H, Paramesran R (2016) Correlation between subjective and objective assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) images. Magn Reson Imaging 34:820–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wood R, Bassett K, FoersterSpryTong VCL (2012) 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanners compared with 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanners: systematic review of clinical effectiveness. CADTH Technol Overv 2:e2201–e2201

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Pruessmann KP (2004) Parallel imaging at high field strength: synergies and joint potential. Top Magn Reson Imaging 15:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madiha Arshad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Madiha Arshad declares that she has no conflict of interest. Mahmood Qureshi declares that he has no conflict of interest. Omair Inam declares that he has no conflict of interest. Hammad Omer declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arshad, M., Qureshi, M., Inam, O. et al. Transfer learning in deep neural network-based receiver coil sensitivity map estimation. Magn Reson Mater Phy 34, 717–728 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-021-00919-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-021-00919-y

Keywords

Navigation