Abstract
We provide a characterization of multipartite systems constraints in terms of quantum correlations. By using the Hamming weight of the binary vectors associated with the subsystems, we give the α th power of monogamy and β th power of polygamy inequalities for general quantum correlations. Using concurrence as an application, one gets tighter inequalities than the existing ones for some classes of quantum states. Detailed examples are presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge(2000). Press (2000)
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, K.: Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009)
Mintert, F., Kuś, M., Buchleitner, A.: Concurrence of mixed bipartite quantum states in arbitrary dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 167902 (2004)
Chen, K., Albeverio, S., Fei, S.M.: Concurrence of arbitrary dimensional bipartite quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 040504 (2005)
Breuer, H.P.: Separability criteria and bounds for entanglement measures. J. Phys A Math. Gen. 39, 11847 (2006)
Breuer, H.P.: Optimal entanglement criterion for mixed quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 080501 (2006)
de Vicente, J.I.: Lower bounds on concurrence and separability conditions. Phys. Rev. A 75, 052320 (2007)
Zhang, C.J., Zhang, Y.S., Zhang, S., Guo, G.C.: Optimal entanglement witnesses based on local orthogonal observables. Phys. Rev. A 76, 012334 (2007)
Bennett, C.H., Wiesner, S.J.: Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881 (1992)
Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., Wootters, W.K.: Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993)
Pawlowski, M.: Security proof for cryptographic protocols based only on the monogamy of bells inequality violations. Phys. Rev. A 82, 032313 (2010)
Pati, A.K.: Minimum classical bit for remote preparation and measurement of a qubit. Phys. Rev. A 63, 014302 (2000)
Raussendorf, R., Briegel, H.J.: A One-Way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188 (2001)
Koashi, M., Winter, A.: Monogamy of quantum entanglement and other correlations. Phys. Rev. A 69, 022309 (2004)
Osborne, T.J., Verstraete, F.: General monogamy inequality for bipartite qubit entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 220503 (2006)
Jin, Z.X., Fei, S.M.: Tighter monogamy relations of quantum entanglement for multiqubit W-class states. Quantum Inf Process 17, 2 (2018)
Bai, Y.K., Ye, M.Y., Wang, Z.D.: Entanglement monogamy and entanglement evolution in multipartite systems. Phys. Rev. A 80, 044301 (2009)
de Oliveira, T.R., Cornelio, M.F., Fanchini, F.F.: Monogamy of entanglement of formation. Phys. Rev. A 89, 034303 (2014)
Adesso, G., Illuminati, F.: Continuous variable tangle, monogamy inequality, and entanglement sharing in Gaussian states of continuous variable systems. New J. Phys. 8, 15 (2006)
Hiroshima, T., Adesso, G., Illuminati, F.: Monogamy inequality for distributed gaussian entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 050503 (2007)
Adesso, G., Illuminati, F.: Strong monogamy of bipartite and genuine multiparitie entanglement: The gaussian case. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 150501 (2007)
Christandl, M., Winter, A.: Squashed entanglement: An additive entanglement measure. J. Math. Phys. 45, 829 (2004)
Yang, D., et al.: Squashed entanglement for multipartite states and entanglement measures based on the mixed convex roof. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 55, 3375 (2009)
Ou, Y.C., Fan, H.: Monogamy inequality in terms of negativity for three-qubit states. Phys. Rev. A 75, 062308 (2007)
Jin, Z.X., Li, J., Li, T., Fei, S.M.: Tighter monogamy relations in multiqubit systems. Phys. Rev. A 97, 032336 (2018)
Jin, Z.X., Fei, S.M.: Superactivation of monogamy relations for nonadditive quantum correlation measures. Phys. Rev. A 99, 032343 (2019)
Kim, J.S., Das, A., Sanders, B.C.: Entanglement monogamy of multipartite higher-dimensional quantum systems using convex-roof extend negativity. Phys. Rev. A 79, 012329 (2009)
He, H., Vidal, G.: Disentangling theorem and monogamy for entanglement negativity. Phys. Rev. A 91, 012339 (2015)
Choi, J.H., Kim, J.S.: Negativity and strong monogamy of multiparty quantum entanglement beyond qubits. Phys. Rev. A 92, 042307 (2015)
Luo, Y., Li, Y.: Monogamy of α-th power entanglement measurement in qubit system. Ann. Phys. 362, 511 (2015)
Kim, J.S.: Tsallis entropy and entanglement constraints in multiqubit systems. Phys. Rev. A 81, 062328 (2010)
Kim, J.S.: Generalized entanglement constraints in multi-qubit systems in terms of Tsallis entropy. Ann. Phys. 373, 197–206 (2016)
Kim, J.S., Sanders, B.C.: Monogamy of multi-qubit entanglement using rényi entropy. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 43, 445305 (2010)
Cornelio, M.F., de Oliveira, M.C.: Strong superadditivity and monogamy of the Renyi measure of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 81, 032332 (2010)
Wang, Y.X., Mu, L.Z., Vedral, V., Fan, H.: Entanglement rényi-entropy. Phys. Rev. A 93, 022324 (2016)
Gour, G., Meyer, D.A., Sanders, B.C.: Deterministic entanglement of assistance and monogamy constraints. Phys. Rev. A 72, 042329 (2005)
Kim, J.S.: Tsallis entropy and entanglement constraints in multiqubit systems. Phys. Rev. A 81, 062328 (2010)
Jin, Z.X., Qiao, C.-F.: Monogamy and polygamy relations of multiqubit entanglement based on unified entropy. Chin. Phys. B 29, 020305 (2020)
Goura, G., Bandyopadhyayb, S., Sandersc, B.C.: Dual monogamy inequality for entanglement. J. Math. Phys. 48, 012108 (2007)
Jin, Z.X., Fei, S.M., Qiao, C.-F.: Complementary quantum correlations among multipartite systems. Quantum Inf Process 19, 101 (2020)
Jin, Z.X., Fei, S.M.: Polygamy relations of multipartite entanglement beyond qubits. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 52, 165303 (2019)
Buscemi, F., Gour, G., Kim, J.S.: Polygamy of distributed entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 80, 012324 (2009)
Kim, J.S.: General polygamy inequality of multiparty quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 85, 062302 (2012)
Kim, J.S.: Tsallis entropy and general polygamy of multiparty quantum entanglement in arbitrary dimensions,. Phys. Rev. A 94, 062338 (2016)
Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., Zbinden, H.: Quantum cryptography. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145 (2002)
Kumar, A., Prabhu, R., Sen(de), A., Sen, U.: Effect of a large number of parties on the monogamy of quantum correlations. Phys. Rev. A 91, 012341 (2015)
Jin, Z.X., Fei, S.M.: Monogamy relations of all quantum correlation measures for multipartite quantum systems. Optics Commun. 446, 39–43 (2019)
Salini, K., Prabhu, R., Sen(de), A., Sen, U.: Monotonically increasing functions of any quantum correlation can make all multiparty states monogamous. Ann. Phys 348, 297–305 (2014)
Laustsen, T., Verstraete, F., Van Enk, S.J.: Local vs. joint measurements for the entanglement of assistance. Quantum Inf. Comput. 3, 64 (2003)
Yu, C.S., Song, H.S.: Entanglement monogamy of tripartite quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 77, 032329 (2008)
Goura, G., Bandyopadhyayb, S., Sandersc, B.C.: Dual monogamy inequality for entanglement. J. Math. Phys. 48, 012108 (2007)
Jin, Z.X., Fei, S.M.: Tighter entanglement monogamy relations of qubit systems. Quantum Inf Process 16, 77 (2017)
Kim, J.S.: Negativity and tight constraints of multiqubit entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 97, 012334 (2018)
Jin, Z.X., Fei, S.M.: Finer distribution of quantum correlations among multiqubit systems. Quantum Inf Process 18, 21 (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, D. Tighter Constraints of Quantum Correlations Among Multipartite Systems. Int J Theor Phys 60, 1455–1470 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-021-04770-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-021-04770-8