Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-calibration of brightness temperature obtained by FY-3B/MWRI using Aqua/AMSR-E data for snow depth retrieval in the Arctic

  • Published:
Acta Oceanologica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study cross-calibrated the brightness temperatures observed in the Arctic by using the FY-3B/MWRI L1 and the Aqua/AMSR-E L2A. The monthly parameters of the cross-calibration were determined and evaluated using robust linear regression. The snow depth in case of seasonal ice was calculated by using parameters of the cross-calibration of data from the MWRI Tb. The correlation coefficients of the H/V polarization among all channels Tb of the two sensors were higher than 0.97. The parameters of the monthly cross-calibration were useful for the snow depth retrieval using the MWRI. Data from the MWRI Tb were cross-calibrated to the AMSR-E baseline. Biases in the data of the two sensors were optimized to approximately 0 K through the cross-calibration, the standard deviations decreased significantly in the range of 1.32 K to 2.57 K, and the correlation coefficients were as high as 99%. An analysis of the statistical distributions of the histograms before and after cross-calibration indicated that the FY-3B/MWRI Tb data had been well calibrated. Furthermore, the results of the cross-calibration were evaluated by data on the daily average Tb at 18.7 GHz, 23.8 GHz, and 36.5 GHz (V polarization), and at 89 GHz (H/V polarization), and were applied to the snow depths retrieval in the Arctic. The parameters of monthly cross-calibration were found to be effective in terms of correcting the daily average The results of the snow depths were compared with those of the calibrated MWRI and AMSR-E products. Biases of 0.18 cm to 0.38 cm were observed in the monthly snow depths, with the standard deviations ranging from 4.19 cm to 4.80 cm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdalati W, Steffen K, Otto C, et al. 1995. Comparison of brightness temperatures from SSMI instruments on the DMSP F8 and FII satellites for Antarctica and the Greenland ice sheet. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16(7): 1223–1229, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169508954473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalieri D J, Comiso J, Markus T. 2014. AMSR-E/Aqua Daily L3 12.5 km Brightness Temperature, Sea Ice Concentration, & Snow Depth Polar Grids, Version 3. Boulder, Colorado USA: NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalieri D J, Parkinson C L. 2012. Arctic sea ice variability and trends, 1979–2010, The Cryosphere, 6: 881–889, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-881-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalieri D J, Parkinson C L, DiGirolamo N, et al. 2012. Intersensor calibration between F13 SSMI and F17 SSMIS for global sea ice data records. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 9(2): 233–236, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2011.2166754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavalieri D J, Parkinson C L, Vinnikov K Y. 2003. 30-year satellite record reveals contrasting Arctic and Antarctic decadal sea ice variability, Geophysical Research Letters, 30(18): 1970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chander G, Hewison T J, Fox N, et al. 2013. Overview of intercalibration of satellite instruments. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 51(3): 1056–1080, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2228654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comiso J C, Cavalieri D J, Markus T. 2003. Sea ice concentration, ice temperature, and snow depth using AMSR-E data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(2): 243–252, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.808317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comiso J C, Parkinson C L, Gersten R, et al. 2008. Accelerated decline in the Arctic sea ice cover. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(1): L01703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das N N, Colliander A, Chan S K, et al. 2014. Intercomparisons of brightness temperature observations over land from AMSR-E and WindSat. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52(1): 452–464, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2241445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derksen C, Walker A E. 2003. Identification of systematic bias in the cross-platform (SMMR and SSM/I) EASE-grid brightness temperature time series. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(4): 910–915, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2003.812003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Jinyang, Kimball J S, Shi Jiancheng, et al. 2014. Inter-calibration of satellite passive microwave land observations from AMSR-E and AMSR2 using overlapping FY3B-MWRI sensor measurements. Remote Sensing, 6(9): 8594–8616, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6098594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Shuo, Li Zhen, Chen Quan, et al. 2019. Inter-sensor calibration between HY-2B and AMSR2 passive microwave data in land surface and first result for snow water equivalent retrieval, Sensors, 19(22): 5023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19225023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Tongxi, Zhao Tianjie, Shi Jiancheng, et al. 2016. Inter-calibration of AMSR-E and AMSR2 brightness temperature. Remote Sensing Technology and Application (in Chinese), 31(5): 919–924

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Wei, Hao Yanling, Wang Jin, et al. 2013. Brightness temperature data comparison and evaluation of FY-3B microwave radiation imager with AMSR-E. Periodical of Ocean University of China (in Chinese), 43(11): 99–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Jezek K C, Merry C J, Cavalieri D J. 1993. Comparison of SMMR and SSM/I passive microwave data collected over Antarctica, Annals of Glaciology, 17: 131–136, doi: https://doi.org/10.3189/S0260305500012726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaleschke L, Lüpkes C, Vihma T, et al. 2001. SSM/I sea ice remote sensing for mesoscale ocean-atmosphere interaction analysis. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(5): 526–537, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2001.10854892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly R E, Chang A T, Tsang L, et al. 2003. A prototype AMSR-E global snow area and snow depth algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(2): 230–242, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2003.809118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Lele, Chen Haihua, Guan Lei. 2019. Retrieval of snow depth on sea ice in the arctic using the FengYun-3B microwave radiation imager. Journal of Ocean University of China, 18(3): 580–588, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-019-3873-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Qin, Zhong Ruofei. 2011. Multiple surface parameters retrieval of simulated AMSR-E data. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources (in Chinese), 23(1): 42–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Qingquan, Ji Qing, Pang Xiaoping, et al. 2018. Inter-calibration of passive microwave satellite brightness temperatures observed by F13 SSM/I and F17 SSMIS for the retrieval of snow depth on Arctic first-year sea ice, Remote Sensing, 10(1): 36

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Zhou, Stroeve J, Xu Shiming, et al. 2020. Inter-comparison of snow depth over sea ice from multiple methods. The Cryosphere Discussions, preprint, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2020-65

  • Markus T, Cavalieri D J. 1998. Snow depth distribution over sea ice in the Southern Ocean from satellite passive microwave data. In: Jeffries M O, ed. Antarctic Sea Ice: Physical Processes, Interactions and Variability. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, 19–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus T, Cavalieri D J. 2008. AMSR-E algorithm theoretical basis document supplement: Sea ice products. Greenbelt, MD, USA: Hydrospheric and Biospheric Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslowski W, Kinney J C, Higgins M, et al. 2012. The future of arctic sea ice. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 40(1): 625–654, doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massom R A, Harris P T, Michael K J, et al. 1998. The distribution and formative processes of latent-heat polynyas in East Antarctica, Annals of Glaciology, 27: 420–426, doi: https://doi.org/10.3189/1998AoG27-1-420-426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier W N, Khalsa S J S, Savoie M H. 2011. Intersensor calibration between F-13 SSM/I and F-17 SSMIS near-real-time sea ice estimates. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49(9): 3343–3349, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2117433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nihashi S, Ohshima K I, Tamura T, et al. 2009. Thickness and production of sea ice in the Okhotsk Sea coastal polynyas from AMSR-E, Journal of Geophysical Research, 114(C10): C10025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC005222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson C L, Cavalieri D J. 2008. Arctic sea ice variability and trends, 1979–2006. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 113(C7): C07003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreen G, Kaleschke L, Heygster G. 2008. Sea ice remote sensing using AMSR-E 89-GHz channels. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 113(C2): C02S03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroeve J, Maslanik J, Li Xiaoming. 1998. An intercomparison of DMSP F11- and F13-derived sea ice products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 64(2): 132–152, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00174-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen E, Kloster K, Farrelly B, et al. 1983. Norwegian remote sensing experiment: Evaluation of the nimbus 7 scanning multichannel microwave radiometer for sea ice research. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 88(C5): 2781–2791, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/JC088iC05p02781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Hu, Weng Fuzhong, Lv Liqing, et al. 2011. The FengYun-3 microwave radiation imager on-orbit verification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 49(11): 4552–4560, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2148200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Hu, Zou Xiaolei, Li Xiaoqing, et al. 2012. Environmental data records from FengYun-3B microwave radiation imager. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(12): 4986–4993, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2197003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Shugang. 2012. An algorithm to detect arctic sea ice edge using microwave brightness temperature. Periodical of Ocean University of China (in Chinese), 42(11): 1–7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The MWRI data were provided by the NSMC Satellite Data Center, and the AMSR-E data were provided by the DAAC of NASA at the American National Snow and Ice Data Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Guan.

Additional information

Foundation item: The National Key Research and Development Program of China under contract Nos 2019YFA0607001 and 2016YFC1402704; the Global Change Research Program of China under contract No. 2015CB9539011.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Li, L. & Guan, L. Cross-calibration of brightness temperature obtained by FY-3B/MWRI using Aqua/AMSR-E data for snow depth retrieval in the Arctic. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 40, 43–53 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-021-1717-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-021-1717-2

Key words

Navigation