Abstract
Key challenges when implementing routine outcome monitoring developed for counseling into statutory children’s services were studied. Extensive field work was undertaken in a Danish municipality, followed by a thematic analysis. Working as counsellors was new to the statutory social workers. The challenges relating to combining counselling and statutory social work concerned how to take client preferences into account, how to maintain one’s authority and how to understand the term error. The scale used to measure outcomes was too simple for the statutory setting and did not focus on risk. The multiple potential uses of measures were played down. The feedback and case management software systems were not compatible. Some challenges were overcome during the implementation process, while others remain to be dealt with. While the approach is promising, new practices need to be developed that support transparency in the statutory role and a necessary risk orientation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ankestyrelsen, [The Danish National Welfare Board]. (2020). Børnesagsbarometeret [The child case barometer]. Retrieved 18 Nov 2020 from https://ast.dk/publikationer/bornesagsbarometret-2020
Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance . Psychotherapy: Theory Research and Practice, 16, 252–260.
Boswell, J. F., Kraus, D. R., Miller, S. D., & Lambert, M. J. (2015). Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.817696.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Drapeau, M. (2012). The value of tracking in psychotherapy. Integrating Science & Practice, 2, 2–6.
Forrester, D. (2017). Outcomes in children’s social care. Journal of Children’s Services, 12, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-08-2017-0036.
Harris, R., Murphy, M. J., & Rakes, S. (2019). The psychometric properties of the outcome rating scale used in practice. Journal of Evidence-based Practice, 16, 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2019.1645071.
Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, P. L., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 51, 1059–1064. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.10.1059.
La Valle, I., Holmes, L., Gill, C., Brown, R., Hart, Di., & Barnard, M. (2016). Improving children’s social care services: Results of a feasibility study. London: CAMHS Press.
La Valle, I., Hart, Di., Holmes, L. & Pinto, V. S. (2019). How do we know if children’s social care services make a difference? Development of an outcomes framework. Retrieved 22 Nov 2020 from http://www.education.ox.ac.uk/research/measuring-outcomes-for-childrens-social-care-services/
Lov om social service. [Danish Consolidated Act on Social Services] (2020). Ministry of Social and Interior Affairs. No. 1287, 28/8 2020
Mackrill, T., & Steensbæk, S. (2020). What can the use of feedback informed treatment teach us about involving children, young people and caregivers in statutory casework? The European Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2020.1726297.
Mackrill, T., & Sørensen, K. M. (2019). Implementing routine outcome measurement in psychosocial interventions—A systematic review. European Journal of Social Work, 23, 790–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2019.1602029.
Mackrill, T., Nielsen, S., Kronbæk, M. & Nedergård, L. (2020). Feedback informed treatment—manual for statutory children’s services. Retrieved 18 Nov 2020 from https://www.ucviden.dk/da/publications/feedback-informed-treatment-manual-for-statutory-childrens-servic, Copenhagen: University College Copenhagen.
Murphy, M., Rakes, S., & Harris, R. (2020). The psychometric properties of the session rating scale. Journal of Evidence-based Practice, 17, 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2020.1729281.
Prescott, D. S., Maeschalck, C. L., & Miller, S. D. (Eds.). (2017). Feedback-informed treatment in clinical practice: Reaching for excellence (pp. 37–52). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Reason, P., & Rowan, J. (1981). Issues of validity in new paradigm research. In P. Reason & J. Rowan (Eds.), Human inquiry: A sourcebook of new paradigm research (pp. 239–250). New York: Wiley.
Rigsrevisionen, (2016). Rigsrevisionens beretning om indsatsen over for anbragte børn. [The national audit agency’s report on child placement interventions] 21/2015. Copenhagen: Statsrevisorerne, Folketinget.
Tasma, M., Liemburg, E. J., Knegtering, H., Delespaul, P. A. E. G., Boonstra, A., & Castelein, S. (2017). Exploring the use of routine outcome monitoring in the treatment of patients with a psychotic disorder. European Psychiatry, 42, 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.12.008.
Funding
This study was supported with funds from the A. P. Møllerske Støttefond.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mackrill, T., Svendsen, I.L. Implementing Routine Outcome Monitoring in Statutory Children’s Services. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 38, 193–200 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00734-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-020-00734-9