Abstract
The so-called ‘Big Mess Construction’ (BMC) frustrates standard assumptions about the structure of nominal groups. The normal position of an attributive adjective is after the determiner and before the noun, but in the BMC, the adjective precedes the determiner, e.g. that strange a sound, so big a scandal, too lame an excuse. Previous accounts of the BMC are couched in ‘Phrase Structure Grammar’ (PSG) and view the noun or the determiner (or the preposition of) as the root/head of the BMC phrase. In contrast, the current approach, which is couched in a ‘Dependency Grammar’ (DG) model, argues that the adjective is in fact the root/head of the phrase. A number of insights point to the adjective as the root/head, the most important of which is the optional appearance of the preposition of, e.g. that strange of a sound, so big of a scandal, too lame of an excuse.
References
Aarts, Bas. 1998. English binominal noun phrases. Transactions of the Philological Society 96. 117–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968x.00025.Search in Google Scholar
Aniya, Sosei. 2016. The Big Mess Construction straightened out. Bulletin of the Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University: I, Studies in Human Sciences 11. 1–12.Search in Google Scholar
Baumgärtner, Klaus. 1970. Konstituenz und Dependenz. In Hugo Steger (ed.), Vorschläge für eine strukturale Grammatik des Deutschen, 52–77. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Search in Google Scholar
Bennis, Hans, Norbert Corver & Marcel den Dikken. 1998. Predication in nominal phrases. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1. 85–117.10.1023/A:1009780124314Search in Google Scholar
Berman, Arlene. 1974. Adjectives and adjective complement constructions in English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1973. Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4(3). 275–343.Search in Google Scholar
Bröker, Norbert. 1999. Eine Dependenzgrammatik zur Kopplung heterogener Wissensquellen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110915952Search in Google Scholar
Bröker, Norbert. 2003. Formal foundations of dependency grammar. In Vilmos Ágel, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Hans-Werner Eroms, Hellwig Peter, Hans Jürgen Heringer & Henning Lobin (eds.), Dependency and valency: An international handbook of contemporary research, vol. 1, 294–310. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Carnie, Andrew. 2010. Constituent structure, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den. 2006. Relators and linkers: The syntax of prediction, predicate inversion, and copulas (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 47). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Engel, Ulrich. 1994. Syntax der deutschen Gegenwartssprache, 3rd edn. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Eroms, Hans-Werner. 2000. Syntax der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110808124Search in Google Scholar
Eroms, Hans-Werner & Hans Heringer. 2003. Dependenz und lineare Ordnung. In Vilmos Ágel, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Hans-Werner Eroms, Hellwig Peter, Hans Jürgen Heringer & Henning Lobin (eds.), Dependency and valency: An international handbook of contemporary research, vol. 1, 247–262. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Groß, Thomas. 1992. Konstruktive Stemmatologie. Papiere zur Linguistik 47. 115–139.Search in Google Scholar
Groß, Thomas. 2003. Dependency Grammar’s limits – And ways of extending them. In Vilmos Ágel, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Hans-Werner Eroms, Hellwig Peter, Hans Jürgen Heringer & Henning Lobin (eds.), Dependency and valency: An international handbook of contemporary research, vol. 1, 331–351. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Jacqueline Guéron. 1999. English grammar: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Hays, David. 1964. Dependency theory: A formalism and some observations. Language 40. 511–525. https://doi.org/10.2307/411934.Search in Google Scholar
Heringer, Hans. 1996. Deutsche syntax: Dependentiell. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Search in Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 2003. Word grammar. In Vilmos Ágel, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Hans-Werner Eroms, Hellwig Peter, Hans Jürgen Heringer & Henning Lobin (eds.), Dependency and valency: An international handbook of contemporary research, vol. 1, 508–526. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 2007. Language networks: The new word grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 2010. An introduction to Word Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511781964Search in Google Scholar
Jung, Wha-Young. 1995. Syntaktische Relationen im Rahmen der Dependenz-grammatik. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Search in Google Scholar
Kahane, Sylvain. 1996. If HPSG were a dependency grammar…. Traitement Automatique de Langues Naturelles (TALN) 96. 45–49.Search in Google Scholar
Kay, Paul & Ivan Sag. 2012. Discontinuous dependencies and complex determiners. In Hans Boas & Sag Ivan (eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar, 229–256. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Keizer, Evelien. 2007. The English noun phrase: The nature of linguistic categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627699Search in Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Jason Merchant. 2000. Attributive comparative deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18. 89–146. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006362716348.10.1023/A:1006362716348Search in Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok & Peter Sells. 2011. The Big Mess Construction: Interactions between the lexicon and constructions. English Language and Linguistics 15(2). 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674311000062.Search in Google Scholar
Klégr, Aleš. 2010. Noun phrases with so-adj predeterminers: So complicated a matter. In Markéta Malá & Pavlína Šaldová (eds.), … for thy speech bewrayeth thee: A Festschrift for Libuše Dušková, 93–119. Prague: Filozofická fakulta.Search in Google Scholar
Lobin, Henning. 1993. Koordinationssyntax als prozedurales Phänomen (Studien zur deutschen Sprache 46). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Search in Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter. 1981. Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
McCawley, James. 1998. The syntactic phenomena of English, 2nd edn. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor. 1979. Studies in dependency syntax. Ann Arbor: Koroma Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor. 1988. Dependency syntax: Theory and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor & Nikolai Pertsov. 1987. Surface syntax of English: A formal model with the meaning-text framework. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/llsee.13Search in Google Scholar
Osborne, Timothy. 2018. Tests for constituents: What they really reveal about the nature of syntactic structure. Language Under Discussion 5(1). 1–41. https://doi.org/10.31885/lud.5.1.223.Search in Google Scholar
Osborne, Timothy, Michael Putnam & Thomas Groß. 2012. Catenae: Introducing a novel unit of syntactic analysis. Syntax 15(4). 354–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2012.00172.x.Search in Google Scholar
Schubert, Klaus. 1987. Metataxis: Contrastive dependency syntax for machine translation. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110876062Search in Google Scholar
Starosta, Stanley. 2003. Lexicase grammar. In Vilmos Ágel, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Hans-Werner Eroms, Hellwig Peter, Hans Jürgen Heringer & Henning Lobin (eds.), Dependency and valency: An international handbook of contemporary research, vol. 1, 526–545. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Tarvainen, Kalevi. 1981. Einführung in die Dependenzgrammatik, 2nd edn. (Reihe germanistische Linguistik 35). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar
Uzonyi, Pál. 2003. Dependenzstruktur und Konstituenzstruktur. In Vilmos Ágel, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Hans-Werner Eroms, Hellwig Peter, Hans Jürgen Heringer & Henning Lobin (eds.), Dependency and valency: An international handbook of contemporary research, vol. 1, 230–247. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Van Eynde, Frank. 2007. The Big Mess Construction. In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings from the 14th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 416–433. Stanford: CSLI Publications.10.21248/hpsg.2007.24Search in Google Scholar
Wood, Johanna & Sten Vikner. 2011. Noun phrase structure and movement: A cross-linguistic comparison of such/sådan/solch and so/så/so. In Petra Sleeman & Harry Perridon (eds.), The noun phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure, variation and change, 89–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.171.07wooSearch in Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 2007. Exceptional degree markers: A puzzle in internal and external syntax. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 47. 111–23.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
