Skip to main content
Log in

New schools in New York City and Singapore

  • Published:
Journal of Educational Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper compares the evolution of two initiatives—one in Singapore and one in New York City—designed expressly to support the development and spread of new and innovative school models. These two initiatives—Future Schools in Singapore and the iZone in New York City—reflected the hope that new school models and associated innovations could be incubated and then replicated to help create system-wide conditions that would allow new approaches to schooling to emerge. Despite dramatically different system contexts—in terms of governance, politics and professional capacity—we show how both initiatives have to deal with basic institutional, political and societal conditions that sustain conventional educational practice. We focus particularly on how common factors like capacity demands, frequent changes in policies and emerging technologies create opportunities for the development of some new resources and practices even as they reinforce many aspects of the conventional "grammar of schooling." Although this analysis emphasizes common challenges for developing more "innovative" approaches to schooling, we highlight as well the often-unanticipated developments that contribute to smaller scale innovations and incremental change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Bloomberg also sought to encourage the development of charter schools by inviting operators of successful charter networks to launch schools in New York City. We have examined the development of the charter sector in New York City elsewhere (Hatch et. al. 2017). Given space limitations we do not discuss charter school development here.

  2. Far from unique to the iZone, however, the capacity challenges were also evident in many aspects of Bloomberg and Klein’s education initiatives. In fact, even major corporations like IBM found themselves unable to meet deadlines and fulfill agreements, undermining the development of a data-system (ARIS) envisioned as a critical ingredient in the DOE’s strategy of granting schools autonomy in return for accountability.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Hatch.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hatch, T., Corson, J. & den Berg, S.G.v. New schools in New York City and Singapore. J Educ Change 23, 199–220 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09419-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09419-1

Keywords

Navigation