Abstract
This paper compares the evolution of two initiatives—one in Singapore and one in New York City—designed expressly to support the development and spread of new and innovative school models. These two initiatives—Future Schools in Singapore and the iZone in New York City—reflected the hope that new school models and associated innovations could be incubated and then replicated to help create system-wide conditions that would allow new approaches to schooling to emerge. Despite dramatically different system contexts—in terms of governance, politics and professional capacity—we show how both initiatives have to deal with basic institutional, political and societal conditions that sustain conventional educational practice. We focus particularly on how common factors like capacity demands, frequent changes in policies and emerging technologies create opportunities for the development of some new resources and practices even as they reinforce many aspects of the conventional "grammar of schooling." Although this analysis emphasizes common challenges for developing more "innovative" approaches to schooling, we highlight as well the often-unanticipated developments that contribute to smaller scale innovations and incremental change.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Bloomberg also sought to encourage the development of charter schools by inviting operators of successful charter networks to launch schools in New York City. We have examined the development of the charter sector in New York City elsewhere (Hatch et. al. 2017). Given space limitations we do not discuss charter school development here.
Far from unique to the iZone, however, the capacity challenges were also evident in many aspects of Bloomberg and Klein’s education initiatives. In fact, even major corporations like IBM found themselves unable to meet deadlines and fulfill agreements, undermining the development of a data-system (ARIS) envisioned as a critical ingredient in the DOE’s strategy of granting schools autonomy in return for accountability.
References
Carnegie forum on education and the economy. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. The report of the Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
Chapman, B. (2014). City schools dumping $95 million computer system for tracking student data. NY Daily News. Retrieved from https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/education/city-schools-dumping-95-million-computer-system-article-1.2012454.
Cohen, D., & Mehta, J. (2017). Why reform sometimes succeeds: Understanding the conditions that produce reforms that last. American Educational Research Journal, 54(4), 644–690.
Cohen, D., Spillane, J., & Peurach, D. (2018). The dilemmas of educational reform. Educational Researcher, 47(3), 204–212.
CPRE. (2020). External resources: iZone. Retrieved from https://www.crpe.org/external-resources/izone-nyc.
Deng, Z., & Gopinathan, S. (2016). PISA and high-performing education systems: explaining Singapore’s education success. Comparative Education, 52(4), 449–472.
Elmore, R. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Education Review, 66(1), 1–26.
Fullan, M. (2003). Change forces with a vengeance. New York: Routledge.
Goh, C. B. & Gopinathan. S. The development of education in Singapore since 1965. In S.K. Lee, C.B. Goh, B. Fredriksen & J.P. Tan (Eds.), Toward a Better Future: Education and Training for Economic Development in Singapore since 1965 (pp. 12–38). Washington DC: The World Bank and the National Institute of Education (NIE) at Nanyang Technological University.
Hagel, J., Brown, J. S., Mathew, R., Wooll, M., & Tsu, W. (2014). The lifetime learner: A journey through the future of postsecondary education. Deloitte University Press.
Hatch, T. (2013). Innovation at the Core; R&D. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 34–38.
Hatch, T., Ahn, M., Ferguson, D., & Rumberger, A. (2019). The role of external support in improving K-3 reading outcomes in New York City. Urban Education.
Hatch, T., Corson, J., van den Berg, S., & Faughey, D. (2017). Improve and innovate? The possibilities and challenges for educational transformation in New York City. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.
Hatch, T., Corson, J., & van den Berg, S. G. (2021). The education we need for a future we can’t predict. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Hernandez, J. (2009). Web site lets parents track data on students. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/29/education/29aris.html.
Hill, P. (2011). Leadership and governance in New York City school reform. In J. O’day, C. Bitter, & L. Gomez (Eds.), Education reform in New York City: Ambitious change in the nation’s most complex school system (pp. 17–32). Cambridge MA: Harvard Education Press.
Hung, D., Lee, S., & Lim, K. Y. T. (2014). Adaptive in the Singapore education system: From great to excellent. In D. Hung, S. Lee, & K. Y. T. Lim (Eds.), Adaptivity as a transformative disposition: For learning in the 21st century (pp. 247–266). Springer.
Hung, D., Toh, Y., Jamaludin, A., & So, H. (2017). Innovation becoming trajectories: Leveraging lateral and vertical moves for collaborative diffusion of twenty-first century learning practices. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(4), 582–600.
ICT Connection. (2017). eduLab. Retrieved from https://ictconnection.moe.edu.sg/professional-learning/edulab.
Keat. (2013). Student-centric, values-driven education: A broad and deep foundation for a lifelong journey [Keynote Address]. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/speeches/keynote-address-by-mr-heng-swee-keat--minister-for-education--at-the-ministry-of-education-work-plan-seminar-2013--on-wednesday--25-september-2013-at-915am-at-ngee-ann-polytechnic-convention-centre.
Kemple, J. (2015). High school closures in New York City: Impacts on students’ academic outcomes, attendance and mobility. Research Alliance for New York City Schools. Retrieved from https://steinhardt.nyu.edu/scmsAdmin/media/users/sg158/PDFs/hs_closures/HighSchoolClosuresinNewYorkCity_ResearchAllianceforNYCSChools_pdf.
Koh, T., & Lee, S. (2008). Information communication technology in education: Singapore’s ICT masterplans 1997–2008. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
Lake R. & Gross, B. (2011). New York City’s iZone. (Working Paper #2011–1). Center on Reinventing Public Education. Retrieved from https://www.crpe.org/sites/default/files/wp_crpe_NYCiZone_Jan11_0.pdf.
Leavitt, B., & March, J. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.
Lim, B. C., & Tay, L. Y. (2013). A reflection of our journey into the future – Sustaining and transferring our practices. In L. Tay & C. Lim (Eds.), Creating holistic technology-enhanced learning experiences (pp. 177–187). Sense Publishers.
March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
McDonald, J. P., & cities and schools research group. (2014). American school reform: What works, what fails and why. University of Chicago Press.
Medina, J. (2009). Laptop? check. student playlist? check. Classroom of the future? Check. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/22/education/22school.html.
Meyer, R. (2015). New York City’s small schools revolution. Education Next. Retrieved from https://www.educationnext.org/new-york-citys-small-schools-revolution/.
Melwani, M., Tay, L., & Lim, C. (2018). Digital storytelling as a pedagogy to develop literacy and twenty-first century competencies in a Singapore primary school: Teachers as designers. In G. Oakley (Ed.), Mobile technologies in children’s language and literacy (pp. 67–81). Emerald Publishing.
Mirakhur, Z. & Hill, K. (2018). Persisting students: Exploring the pathways and outcomes of students who don’t graduate in four years, but remain enrolled in NYC high schools. The Research Alliance for New York City Schools. Retrieved from: https://steinhardt.nyu.edu/site/research_alliance/2018/05/30/how-have-the-odds-of-graduating-in-four-years-dropping-out-or-persisting-in-nyc-high-schools-changed-over-time/#_ftnref2.
National institute of education, Singapore. (2017). eduLab funding programme [website]. Retrieved from https://www.nie.edu.sg/research/apply-for-grants/edulab-funding-programme.
New visions. (2007). Reforming high schools [report]. Retrieved from https://www.newvisions.org/page/-/Prelaunch%20files/PDFs/NV%20Publications/reforming_high_schools.pdf.
Ng, P. T., & Chan, D. (2008). A comparative study of Singapore’s school excellence model with Hong Kong’s school-based management. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(6), 488–505.
Ng, P. T. (2012). An examination of school leadership in Singapore through the lens of the Fourth Way. Educational Research for Policy & Practice, 11, 27–34.
Ng, P. T. (2017). Learning from Singapore: The power of paradoxes. Routledge.
O’Day, J. A., Bitter, C. S., & Gomez, L. M. (2011). Education reform in New York City: Ambitious change in the nation’s most complex school system. Harvard University Press.
OECD. (2011). Lessons from PISA for the United States, Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education, OECD Publishing. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1787/9789264096660-en.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 high performers: Singapore. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2015-singapore.pdf.
Partnership for New York City. (2005). Progress report on New York City school reform. Partnership for New York City.
Phillips, A. (2010). More schools to experiment with online work, schedule changes. Chalkbeat. Retrieved from https://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/ny/2010/04/14/more-schools-to-experiment-with-online-work-schedule-changes/#.V05W4ZMrJ-V.
Singapore Ministry of Education. (2018). 21st century competencies. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/education-system/21st-century-competencies.
Singapore Ministry of Education. (2016). Speech by Mr Ng Chee Meng, Acting Minister For Education (Schools), At the 5th international conference on teaching and learning with technology on wednesday, 30 March. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/speeches/speech-by-mr-ng-chee-meng--acting-minister-for-education-schools--at-the-5th-international-conference-on-teaching-and-learning-with-technology-on-wednesday--30-march.
Singapore National Library Board. (2018). Thinking schools, learning nation. Retrieved from http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/articles/SIP_2018-06-04_154236.html.
Spillane, J. P., Seelig, J. L., Blaushild, N. L., Cohen, D. K., & Peurach, D. J. (2019). Educational system building in a changing educational sector: Environment, Organization and the Technical core. Educational Policy., 33(6), 846–881.
Tay, L. Y., Lim, C. P., Shanthi, S. J., Siew, K., & L. . (2014). Online software applications for learning: observations from an elementary school. Educational Media International, 51(2), 146–161.
Thong, C. H., Pei, X. C., & Kang, Z. (2015). The Making of wRiteFormula: Issues and Considerations for a Chemistry Nomenclature app. Association for the Advancement of Computing. in Education.
Tyack, D. B. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Harvard University Press.
Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Zimmerman, A. (2019). NYC’s graduation rate went up in 2018. But the gain may have little to do with student learning. Chalkbeat. Retrieved from https://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/ny/2019/02/06/nycs-graduation-rate-went-up-in-2018-but-the-gain-may-have-little-to-do-with-student-learning/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hatch, T., Corson, J. & den Berg, S.G.v. New schools in New York City and Singapore. J Educ Change 23, 199–220 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09419-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09419-1