Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Psychological dimensions of climate change: perceptions, collective efficacy, and responses in Berehet District, north Shoa, Ethiopia

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human behavior is responsible for global climate change. The impact of climate change is worse in poor countries like Ethiopia whose agriculture heavily relies on rainfall. The aim of this research was to assess farmers’ perceptions and their collective and individual response mechanisms to the impacts of climate variability and extremes.A sequential mixed research design was applied to conduct the research. In the first phase, 22 key informants and 32 FGD participants were purposely selected for the qualitative data. Three decades of areal gridded temperature and rainfall data were collected from the National Meteorological Agency. During the second phase, quantitative data were collected from 124 randomly selected farmers through questionnaire. Appropriate qualitative and quantitative data analysis techniques were employed. Accordingly, the study revealed that the district has been experiencing a declining rainfall and increasing temperature. Persistent drought, limited surface and underground water, crop pests, and animal diseases were found to be the main impacts of climate change that harmed agricultural productivity. The traditional causal attribution of climate change to God’s wrath by farmers is decreasing. However, farmers’ collective efficacy to reverse the impact of drought was found to be low. Social loan services, borrowing seeds from relatives, working through joint collaboration (Jegie) have been major indigenous responses. Planting drought resistant crop varieties, rainwater harvesting, destocking, cut and carry livestock feeding, and soil and water conservation measures were the common planned adaptation responses to with stand the impacts of climate variability. Climate variability, especially the recurrent drought events erodes the farmers’ collective efficacy to manage the climate change risk. The introduction of drought resistant crop & livestock varieties, and livelihood diversification intervention could play crucial role to restore their adaptive capacity and confidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN (2001) Social capital and climate change. Working paper no. 8. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich

  • Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Chang 93:335–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew C, Chappell A (1999) Drought in the Sahel. Geo Journal 48:299–311. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007059403077

  • Al-Amin A, Akhter T, Islam A et al (2019) An intra-household analysis of farmers’ perceptions of and adaptation to climate change impacts: empirical evidence from drought prone zones of Bangladesh. Clim Chang 156:545–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02511-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen LB, Crowley K (2017) Moving beyond scientific knowledge: leveraging participation, relevance, and interconnectedness for climate education. Int J Glob Warming 12:299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayal D, Filho WL (2017) Farmers' perceptions of climate variability and its adverse impacts on crop and livestock production in Ethiopia. J Arid Environ 140:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (2000) Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 9:75–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles A, Böhm G, Stuart B, Christina D, Alexa S, Nicole T (2019) The resilience paradox: flooding experience, coping and climate change mitigation intentions. Clim Pol 19(6):703–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1560242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRGE (Ethiopia’s Climate-Resilient Green Economy). 2011. Green economy strategy. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Pp. 188

  • Eitzinger A, Binder CR, Meyer MA (2018) Risk perception and decision-making: do farmers consider risks from climate change? Clim Chang 151:507–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2320-1

  • Gezie M (2019) Farmer’s response to climate change and variability in Ethiopia: A review. Cogent Food Agric 5:1613770. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1613770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford R (2007) Environmental psychology and sustainable development: expansion, maturation, and challenges. J Soc Issues 63(1):199–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00503.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford R, Kormos C, McIntyre A (2011) Behavioral dimensions of climate change: drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions. WIREs Clim Chang 2:801–827. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grothmanna T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of indivdual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Chang 15:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson K, Niemeyer S (2012) What sceptics believe: the effects of information and deliberation on climate change skepticism. Sci. 22(4):396–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Huho J, Ngaira J, Ogindo H (2011) Living with drought: the case of the Maasai pastoralists of northern Kenya. Educ Res 2(1):779–789

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the 4th assessment report of the IPCC, Cambridge, Cambridge University press

  • IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects’ Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, 101 Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 1132

  • IPCC (2019) Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. Shukla PR, Skea J, Calvo Buendia E, Masson-Delmotte V, Pörtner H-O, Roberts DC, Zhai P, Slade R, Connors S, van Diemen R, Ferrat M, Haughey E, Luz S, Neogi S, Pathak M, Petzold J, Portugal Pereira J, Vyas P, Huntley E, Kissick K, Belkacemi M, Malley J (eds) In press

  • Jugert P, Greenaway KH, Barth M, Büchner R, Eisentraut S, Fritsche I (2016) Collective efficacy increases pro-environmental intentions through increasing self-efficacy. J Environ Psychol 48:12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M, Slovic P, Ouellette LL, Braman D, Mandel G (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nat Clim Chang 2:732–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence G, Felix A, Gabriel E, Kabila A, Kwadwo A, Devine OA, Razak G, Gerald A, Prince A, Felix K (2019) How do climate change adaptation strategies result in unintended maladaptive outcomes? Int J Veg Sci 26:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2019.1573393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Chang 77:45–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard R, Leviston Z (2017) Applying a model of collective efficacy for understanding consumer and civic pro-environmental actions. Soc ekol Zagreb 26(3):105–122

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scale. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Applied Climatology, Anaheim, California, 17–22 January 1993. Boston, Am Meteorol Soc 179–184

  • Met Office (2016). Seasonal weather assessment for Ethiopia during march –July 2016. Phone duty forecaster, Global Guidance Unit, UK

  • Pahl S, Sheppard S, Boomsma C, Groves C (2014) Perceptions of time in relation to climate change. WIREs Clim Chang 5:375–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radeny M, Ayal D, Mubiru D, Kyazze F, Mahoo H, Recha J, Kimeli P, Solomon D (2019) Indigenous knowledge for seasonal weather and climate forecasting across East Africa. Int J Clim Chang. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02476-9

  • Rusi J, Brigitte N, Marco C (2014) Human responses to climate change: social representation, identity and socio-psychological action. Environ Commun 8(1):110–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2013.846270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seol-A K, Seoyong K, Jae EL (2019) Analyzing the determinants of individual action on climate change by specifying the roles of six values in South Korea. Sustainability 11(1834):1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071834 Retrieved on 28/03/2020 from www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shameem M, Momtaz S, Kiem AS (2015) Local perceptions of and adaptation to climate variability and change: the case of shrimp farming communities in the coastal region of Bangladesh. Clim Chang 133:253–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1470-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneyers R (1990) On the statistical analysis of series of observation. WMO technical note no. 143, WMO, Geneva

  • Stern PC (1992) Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annu Rev Psychol 43:269–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swim J, Stern P, Clayton S, Reser J, Weber E, Gifford R, Howard G (2011) Psychology’s contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. J Am Psychol 66:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaker J, Maibach E, Leiserowitz A, Zha X, Howe P (2016) The role of collective efficacy in climate change adaptation in India. Am Meteorol Soc 8:21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldeamlak B, Conway D (2007) A note on temporal and spatial variability of rainfall in drought prone Amhara region of Ethiopia. Int J Climatol 27(11):1467–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Desalegn Yayeh Ayal.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayal, D.Y., Tilahun, K., Ture, K. et al. Psychological dimensions of climate change: perceptions, collective efficacy, and responses in Berehet District, north Shoa, Ethiopia. Climatic Change 165, 32 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03033-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03033-z

Keywords

Navigation