Skip to main content
Log in

Cooperative representation of multiscale patch face recognition based on fuzzy decision

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The machine learning of small sample size is one of the most challenging problems in face recognition. Multiscale patch cooperative representation for face recognition provides multiple patch scales to a sample set. In each patch scale, all samples in the training set and test set are segmented into patches of the same size, followed by a collaborative representation classification. A sample belongs to the category in which the number of patch blocks is the highest. Under a single scale, however, the patch blocks of a sample often belong to different categories. If the decision value of the sample is defined as the category with the largest number of patches, the possibility of the sample belonging to other categories is often disregarded; this will then significantly reduce the recognition accuracy. Therefore, a multiscale patched collaborative representation based on fuzzy decision is proposed herein. In a single scale, among all the patch blocks in a sample, the proportion of patch blocks belonging to a category to the total patch blocks is used to represent the degree of a sample belonging to the category. Hence, a fuzzy decision matrix can be obtained for a sample set in each scale. The elements of the decision matrix represent the possibility of samples belonging to categories, thereby solving the absolute problem of classification. Corresponding weights are applied to the patch scales, and multiscale outputs can be integrated by regularizing boundary distribution optimization. It is experimentally demonstrated that the proposed method exhibits high recognition accuracy and is superior to some existing algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhao W, Chellappa R, Phillips P, Rosenfeldv A (2003) Face recognition: a literature survey. ACM Comput Surv 35(4):399–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu B, Li P, Li J (2019) Group collaborative representation for image set classification. Int J Comput Vision 127:181–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tan X, Chen S, Zhou Z, Zhang F (2006) Face recognition from a single image per person: a survey. Pattern Recogn 39(9):1725–1745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cai S, Zhang L, Zuo W, Feng X (2016) A probabilistic collaborative representation based approach for pattern classification. In: CVPR 2016, pp. 2950–2959

  5. Wright J, Ma Y, Mairal J, Sapiro G, Huang T, Yan S (2010) Sparse representation for computer vision and pattern recognition. Proc IEEE 98(6):1031–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang H, Zhang Y, Huang T (2013) Pose-robust face recognition via sparse representation. Pattern Recogn 46(5):1511–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Akhtar N, Shafait F, Mian A (2017) Efficient classification with sparsity augmented collaborative representation. Pattern Recogn 65:136–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wright J, Yang A, Ganesh A, Sastry S, Ma Y (2009) Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 31(2):210–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Zhang, M. Yang, X. Feng, Sparse representation or collaborative representation: Which helps face recognition? In: ICCV 2011, pp. 471–478

  10. Wright J, Ganesh A, Yang A, Zhou Z, Ma Y (2011) Sparsity and robustness in face recognition. In: Computerence 2011

  11. Zhang J, Yan Y, Lades M (1997) Face recognition: eigenface, elastic matching, and neural nets. Proc IEEE 85(9):1423–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Belhumeur P, Hespanha J, Kriegman D (1997) Eigenfaces vs. fifisherfaces: recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Tran Pattern Anal Mach Intell 19(7):711–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Phillips P, Flynn P, Scruggs T, Bowyer K, Worek W (2005) Overview of the face recognition grand challenge. In: CSCCV 2005, pp. 947–954

  14. Zhu P, Zhang L, Hu Q (2012) Multi-scale patch based collaborative representation for face recognition with margin distribution optimization. In: ECCV 2012, pp. 822–835

  15. Rosset S, Zhu J, Hastie T (2004) Boosting as a regularized path to a maximum margin classififier. J Mach Learn Res 5:941–973

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Shawe-Taylor J, Cristianini N (1999) Robust bounds on generalization from the margin distribution. In: 4th European Conference on computational learning theory 1999

  17. Reyzin L, Schapire R (2006) How boosting the margin can also boost classififier complexity. In ICML 2006, pp 753–760

  18. Shen C, Li H (2010) Boosting through optimization of margin distributions. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 21(4):659–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shen C, Li H (2010) On the dual formulation of boosting algorithms. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(12):2216–2231

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Pan J, Wang X, Feng Q, Chu S (2020) A kernel-based probabilistic collaborative representation for face recognition. IEEE Access 8:37946–37957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar R, Banerjee A, Vemuri B (2009) Volterrafaces: discriminant analysis using volterra kernels In: CVPR 2009, pp 150–155

  22. Gestel T, Suykens J, Baesens B, Viaene S, Vanthienen J, Dedene G, De Moor B, Vandewalle J (2004) Benchmarking least squares support vector machine classififiers. Mach Learn 54(1):532

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang A, Ganesh A, Zhou Z, Sastry S, Ma Y (2010), A review of fast l1-minimization algorithms for robust face recognition. Comput Vis Pattern Recognit, pp1007–3753

  24. Kim S, Koh K, Lustig M, Boyd S, Gorinevsky D (2007) An interior-point method for large-scale l1-regularized least squares. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 1(4):606–617. https://arxiv.org/abs/1007.3753v2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Martinez A (1998) The AR face database, CVC Technical Report 24

  26. Georghiades A, Belhumeur P, Kriegman D (2001) From few to many: Illumination cone models for face recognition under variable lighting and pose. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 23(6):643–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gross R, Matthews I, Cohn J, Kanade T, Baker S (2010) Multipie. Image Vis Comput 28(5):807–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. http://www.cad.zju.edu.cn/home/dengcai/Data/FaceData.html. Accessed 15 Aug 2020

  29. http://www.pudn.com/Download/item/id/2553604.html. Accessed 15 Aug 2020

  30. https://www.dssz.com/3106295.html. Accessed 15 Aug 2020

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61976027, 61976120, 61673396, and 61773349, in part by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province under Grant BK20191445, Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu Province under Grant XYDXXJS-048.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changzhong Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pei, S., Wang, C., Fan, X. et al. Cooperative representation of multiscale patch face recognition based on fuzzy decision. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 12, 2109–2119 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-021-01296-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-021-01296-7

Keywords

Navigation