Skip to main content
Log in

Evidence From Children with Autism that Derived Relational Responding is a Generalized Operant

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We conducted an empirical examination of derived relational responding as a generalized operant and concurrently evaluated the validity and efficacy of program items contained in the Promoting the Emergence of Advanced Knowledge - Equivalence (PEAK-E) curriculum. A first study utilized a multiple-baseline across-skills experimental arrangement to determine the efficacy of equivalence-based instruction guided by PEAK-E, replicated across 11 children with autism. A total of 33 individualized skills were taught, and the subsequent emergence of untrained relations was tested throughout the investigation. The mastery criterion was achieved for 29 of the 33 instructional targets. Additionally, for 3 participants, results were again replicated with a novel set of stimuli. A second study evaluated the degree to which multiple-exemplar equivalence-based instruction led to the emergence of derived relational responding as a generalized operant. The organized nature of the PEAK curriculum allowed the impact on derived relational responding to be compared to that produced by earlier PEAK models that are focused on the direct training of traditional verbal operants. PEAK-E instruction was introduced in a multiple-baseline design across two participants, with a third staying in a training baseline throughout. Increases in derived relational responding using novel, untrained stimuli were only observed when multiple-exemplar equivalence-based instruction was introduced. Taken together, these results provide support for derived relational responding as a generalized operant and demonstrate the utility of conducting larger scale evaluations of higher order behavioral phenomena in single-case experimental arrangements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albright, L., Reeve, K. F., Reeve, S. A., & Kisamore, A. N. (2015). Teaching statistical variability with equivalence-based instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 883–894. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D., & Holmes, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395091.

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2000). Explaining complex behavior: Two perspectives on the concept of generalized operant classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392000.

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Cullinan, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner’s Verbal behavior: A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & McHugh, L. (2004). Teaching derived relational responding to young children. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 1, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belisle, J., Dixon, M. R., Stanley, C. R., Munoz, B., & Daar, J. H. (2016). Teaching foundational perspective-taking skills to children with autism using the PEAK-T curriculum: Single-reversal “I–You” deictic frames. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 965–969. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berens, N. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). Arbitrarily applicable comparative relations: Experimental evidence for a relational operant. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2007.7-06.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Burgos, J. E. (2003). Laudable goals, interesting experiments, unintelligible theorizing: A critical review of Steven C. Hayes, Dermot Barnes-Holmes, and Bryan Roche’s (Eds.) Relational frame theory (New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 2001). Behavior and Philosophy, 31, 19–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canivez, G. L. (2014). Construct validity of the WISC-IV with a referred sample: Direct versus indirect hierarchical structures. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cone, J. D. (1997). Issues in functional analysis in behavioral assessment. Behavior Research and Therapy, 35, 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00101-5.

  • Daar, J. H., Negrelli, S., & Dixon, M. R. (2015). Derived emergence of WH question–answers in children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 19, 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2015.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Houwer, J. (2013). Advances in relational frame theory: research and application. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.

  • Devany, J. M., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1986.46-243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R. (2014a). The PEAK relational training system: Direct training module. Carbondale, IL: Shawnee Scientific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R. (2014b). The PEAK relational training system: Generalization module. Carbondale, IL: Shawnee Scientific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R. (2015). The PEAK relational training system: Equivalence module. Carbondale, IL: Shawnee Scientific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Small, S. L., & Rosales, R. (2007). Extended analysis of empirical citations with Skinner’s Verbal behavior: 1984–2004. The Behavior Analyst, 30, 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Whiting, S. W., & Rowsey, K. E. (2014a). Normative sample of the PEAK Relational Training System: Direct Training Module and subsequent comparisons to individuals with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1597–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.07.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Whiting, S., & Daar, J. H. (2014b). Introduction. In M. R. Dixon, The PEAK relational training system: Direct training module. Carbondale, IL: Shawnee Scientific Press. pp. 6–30

  • Dixon, M. R., Whiting, S., & Daar, J. H. (2014c). Introduction. In M. R. Dixon, The PEAK relational training system: Generalization module. Carbondale, IL: Shawnee Scientific Press. pp. 6–44

  • Dixon, M. R., Daar, J. H., Rowsey, K. E., & Belisle, J. (2015). Introduction. In M. R. Dixon, The PEAK relational training system: Equivalence module. Carbondale, IL: Shawnee Scientific Press. pp. 9–79

  • Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Stanley, C. R., Daar, J. H., & Williams, L. A. (2016a). Derived equivalence relations of geometry skills in students with autism: An application of the PEAK-E curriculum. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0051-9.

  • Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Stanley, C. R., Speelman, R. C., Rowsey, K. E., Kime, D., & Daar, J. H. (2016b). Establishing derived categorical responding in children with disabilities using the PEAK-E curriculum. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Stanley, C. R., Belisle, J., & Rowsey, K. E. (2016c). The test-retest and interrater reliability of the Promoting theEmergence of Advanced Knowledge-Direct Training assessment for use with individuals with autism and related disabilities. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(1), 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Speelman, R. C., Rowsey, K. E., & Belisle, J. (2016d). Derived rule-following and transformations of stimulus function in a children's game: An application of PEAK-E with children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 5(3), 186–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., McKeel, A., Whiting, S., Speelman, R., Daar, J. H., & Rowsey, K. (2017a). An internal and critical review of the PEAK Relational Training System for children with autism and related intellectual disabilities: 2014–2017. The Behavior Analyst, 40, 493–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0119-4.

  • Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Stanley, C., Munoz, B. E., & Speelman, R. (2017b). Establishing derived coordinated symmetrical and transitive gustatory-visual-auditory relations in children with disabilities. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.11.001.

  • Dixon, M. R., Peach, J., Daar, J. H., & Penrod, C. (2017c). Teaching complex verbal operants to children with autism and establishing generalization using the peak curriculum. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50(2), 317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Rowsey, K. E., Gunnarsson, K. F., Belisle, J., Stanley, C. R., & Daar, J. H. (2017d). Normative sample of the PEAK relational training system: generalization module with comparison to individuals with autism. Journal of Behavioral Education, 26(1), 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugdale, N., & Lowe, C. F. (2000). Testing for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of language-trained chimpanzees. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2000.73-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, S., O’Hora, D., Whelan, R., & O’Donovan, A. (2006). Citation analysis of Skinner’s Verbal behavior: 1984–2004. The Behavior Analyst, 29, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392118.

  • Elliott, S. N., Gresham, F. M., Frank, J. L., & Beddow, P. A. (2008). Intervention validity of social behavior rating scales: Features of assessments that link results to treatment plans. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508408314111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, E., Dixon, D. R., Najdowski, A. C., Smith, M. N., & Tarbox, J. (2011). A review of assessments for determining the content of early intensive behavioral intervention programs for autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5(3), 990–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinther, P. M., & Dougher, M. J. (2015). The clinical relevance of stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory in influencing the behavior of verbally competent adults. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2, 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.015.

  • Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(2), 147–185.

  • Hayes, S. C. (1989). Non-humans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1989.51-385.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). Relational operants: Processes and implications: A response to Palmer’s review of Relational frame theory. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82, 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2004.82-213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Brownstein, A. J. (1985). Verbal behavior, equivalence classes, and rules: New definitions, data, and directions. Columbus: OH: Invited address presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Brownstein, A. J. (1986). Mentalism, behavior-behavior relations, and a behavior-analytic view of the purposes of science. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391944.

  • Hayes, S. C., & Sanford, B. (2014). Cooperation came first: Evolution and human cognition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Wilson, K. G. (1993). Some applied implications of a contemporary behavior-analytic account of verbal events. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392637.

  • Healy, O., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (2000). Derived relational responding as generalized operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2000.74-207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). Associative concept learning, stimulus equivalence, and relational frame theory: Working out the similarities and differences between human and nonhuman behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keintz, K. S., Miguel, C. F., Kao, B., & Finn, H. E. (2011). Using conditional discrimination training to produce emergent relations between coins and their values in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(4), 909–913 Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/918647799?accountid=14552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lionello-DeNolf, K. M., & Urcuioli, P. J. (2002). Stimulus control topographies and tests of symmetry in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 467–495. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2002.78-467.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lipkens, R., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of the development of derived relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56(2), 201–239. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1993.1032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, S., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2014). An evaluation of multiple exemplar instruction to teach perspective-taking skills to adolescents with Asperger syndrome. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19, 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luciano, C., Becerra, I. G., & Valverde, M. R. (2007). The role of multiple-exemplar training and naming in establishing derived equivalence in an infant. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2007.08-06.

  • Luciano, C., Rodríguez, M., Mañas, I., Ruiz, F., & Valdivia-Salas, S. (2009). Acquiring the earliest relational operants: Coordination, distinction, opposition, comparison, and hierarchy. In R. A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities: A progressive guide to change. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications. pp. 149–170.

  • Ma, M. L., Miguel, C. F., & Jennings, A. M. (2016). Training intraverbal naming to establish equivalence class performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 105, 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Malott, R. W. (2003). Behavior analysis and linguistic productivity. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19(1), 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEachin, J. J., Smith, T., & Lovaas, O. I. (1993). Long-term outcome for children with autism who received early intensive behavioral treatment. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 97, 359–372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIlvane, W. J. (2003). A stimulus in need of a response: A review of relational frame theory: a post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19(1), 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeel, A. N., Rowsey, K. E., Belisle, J., Dixon, M. R., & Szekely, S. (2015). Teaching complex verbal operants with the PEAK relational training system. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8(2), 241–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLay, L. K., Sutherland, D., Church, J., & Tyler-Merrick, G. (2013). The formation of equivalence classes in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A review of the literature. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(2), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel, C. F. (2016). Common and intraverbal bidirectional naming. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0066-2.

  • Miguel, C. F., & Petursdottir, A. I. (2009). Naming and frames of coordination. In R. A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities (pp. 129–148). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2017). Computerized behavioral skills training with selection-based instruction and lag reinforcement schedules for responses to interview questions. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 17, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. C. (2004a). Data in search of a principle: A review of Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81, 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2004.81-189.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. C. (2004b). Generic response classes and relational frame theory: Response to Hayes and Barnes-Holmes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82, 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2004.82-225.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeldt, R. A. (2011). Toward a technology of derived stimulus relations: An analysis of articles published in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1992–2009. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeldt, R. A., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2009). Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeldt, R. A., Dillen, J. E., Ziomek, M. M., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (2007). Assessing relational learning deficits in perspective-taking in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. The Psychological Record, 57, 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395563.

  • Rowsey, K. E., Belisle, J., & Dixon, M. R. (2015). Principal component analysis of the PEAK Relational Training System. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 27, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-014-9398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W., & Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, D. L., & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1991.56-519.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg, H. (2016). Risk factors associated with language in autism spectrum disorder: Clues to underlying mechanisms. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-15-0146.

  • Vinogradova, K. N. (2015). Language and communication in autism spectrum disorders. Autism and Developmental Disorders, 13, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.17759/autdd.2015130203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No external funding was utilized for the completion of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark R. Dixon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The first author receives small royalties from sales of the PEAK curriculum. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study that involved human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained for participation in this research.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The current investigation was completed in partial fulfillment of the last four authors’ master’s degree theses at Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, in the Behavior Analysis and Therapy Program of the Rehabilitation Institute.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dixon, M.R., Belisle, J., Hayes, S.C. et al. Evidence From Children with Autism that Derived Relational Responding is a Generalized Operant. Behav Analysis Practice 14, 295–323 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00425-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00425-y

Keywords

Navigation