Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modelling hybrid and backpropagation adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems for flood forecasting

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability of the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference algorithm architecture to simulate floods is explored in this research. The development of models for flood forecasting has been centered on two adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference (ANFIS) algorithms. The Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy inference systems (FIS) generated through subtracted clustering were trained using hybrid and backpropagation training algorithms. Multiple statistical performance evaluators were used to assess the performability of the established models. The validity and predictive power of the models are evaluated by estimating a flood occurrence in the study area. In designing the models, a total of 12 inputs were employed. The best performability was found for the ANFIS model created utilizing a hybrid training algorithm with mean square error (MSE) of 0.00034, co-efficient of correlation (R2) of 97.066%, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.018, Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE) of 0.968, mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0073 and combined accuracy (CA) of 0.018, indicating the possible usage of exploiting the established model for prediction of floods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40
Fig. 41
Fig. 42
Fig. 43
Fig. 44
Fig. 45
Fig. 46
Fig. 47
Fig. 48
Fig. 49
Fig. 50
Fig. 51
Fig. 52
Fig. 53
Fig. 54
Fig. 55
Fig. 56
Fig. 57
Fig. 58
Fig. 59
Fig. 60
Fig. 61
Fig. 62
Fig. 63
Fig. 64
Fig. 65
Fig. 66
Fig. 67
Fig. 68
Fig. 69
Fig. 70
Fig. 71
Fig. 72
Fig. 73

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data used in the study were procured from various agencies recognized by the Government of India mentioned in the manuscript.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the MHRD, India for funding the research.

Funding

This research is funded by the MHRD- India, through the scholarship granted to Ruhhee Tabbussum.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruhhee Tabbussum.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors don’t have any conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figs. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tabbussum, R., Dar, A.Q. Modelling hybrid and backpropagation adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems for flood forecasting. Nat Hazards 108, 519–566 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04694-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04694-w

Keywords

Navigation