Skip to main content
Log in

A Gender-Based Generational Comparison of Sexual Behaviors Adolescents Engage in Prior to First Coitus

  • Published:
Sexuality Research and Social Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Comparing two convenience samples of college students in the northeastern region of the USA, this study sought to examine, by gender, whether there has been a change over the past two decades in the type and frequency of sexual behaviors heterosexual emerging adults report engaging in prior to their first coitus.

Methods

Sexual behaviors engaged in prior to coital initiation were extracted from our 2018 survey of college students (n = 293) and compared to published results from a similar survey conducted in 1995/1996 (n = 311). Mean comparisons and chi-square tests were used to evaluate gender differences among the 2018 cohort, and equality of proportion tests were used to compare the 2018 and 1995/1996 cohorts.

Results

Overall, a higher percentage of respondents in the 2018 cohort reported engaging in precoital activity as compared to the 1995/1996 cohort. Specifically, relative to the 1995/1996 cohort, masturbation significantly increased among both males and females; caressing partner’s genitals or giving oral sex significantly increased in frequency among females, and receiving oral sex significantly increased in frequency among males. A salient finding of this study is that the rate of increase in precoital sexual activity was greater among females than it was among males.

Conclusions

Health and education professionals seeking to facilitate the healthy sexual development of adolescents may want to consider broadening the scope of risk management strategies when working with heterosexual emerging adults, focusing not only on the coitally experienced population but also on adolescents who have not yet experienced coitus and may be engaging in other behaviors that pose a risk for STI transmission (e.g., oral sex).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Select survey questions are listed in Appendix.

References

  • Akers, A. Y., Gold, M. A., Bost, J. E., Adimora, A. A., Orr, D. P., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2011). Variation in sexual behaviors in a cohort of adolescent females: The role of personal, perceived peer, and perceived family attitudes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(1), 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, R., & Risman, B. J. (2013). A double standard for “hooking up”: How far have we come toward gender equality? Social Science Research, 42(5), 1191–1206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, K. L., & Tillman, K. H. (2008). Who’s doing it? Patterns and predictors of youths’ oral sexual experiences. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42(1), 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhi, E. R., & Goodson, P. (2007). Predictors of adolescent sexual behavior and intention: A theory-guided systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(1), 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. L., Volk, K. D., & Hyde, J. S. (1985). Differences between males and females in motives for engaging in sexual intercourse. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14(2), 131–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Last reviewed: 2018). Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2017 [Data Set]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats17/tables.htm#gonorrhea

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (Last reviewed: 2019). CDC Wonder: Selected STDs by Age, Race/Ethnicity, and Gender, 1996–2014 Request [Data Set]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D128https://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/help/std-race-age-frame.html#Step1

  • Cuffe, K. M., Newton-Levinson, A., Gift, T. L., McFarlane, M., & Leichliter, J. S. (2016). Sexually transmitted infection testing among adolescents and young adults in the United States. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58(5), 512–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein,  M., Furlong, M., Kosterman, R., Bailey, J. A., King, K. M., Vasilenko, S. A., Steeger, C. M., Hill, C. K. (2018). Adolescent age of sexual initiation and subsequent adult health outcomes. American Journal of Public Health, 108(6), 822–828.

  • Ethier, K. A., Kann, L., & McManus, T. (2018). Sexual intercourse among high school students—29 states and United States overall, 2005–2015. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66(5152), 1393–1397.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2014). Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001–2008. American Journal of Public Health, 104(S1), S43–S48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2016). Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(9), 843–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern-Felsher, B. L., Cornell, J. L., Kropp, R. Y., & Tschann, J. M. (2005). Oral versus vaginal sex among adolescents: Perceptions, attitudes, and behavior. Pediatrics, 115(4), 845–851.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, B. E., & Mathews, T. J. (2016). Continued declines in teen births in the United States, 2015 (NCHS Data Brief No. 259). Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db259.pdf

  • Hans, J. D., Gillen, M., & Akande, K. (2010). Sex redefined: The reclassification of oral-genital contact. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 42(2), 74–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haydon, A. A., Herring, A. H., Prinstein, M. J., & Halpern, C. T. (2012). Beyond age at first sex: Patterns of emerging sexual behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(5), 456–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holway, G. V., & Hernandez, S. M. (2018). Oral sex and condom use in a US national sample of adolescents and young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 62(4), 402–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, J., & Williams, J. C. (2018). Gender, sexual agency, and friends with benefits relationships. Sexuality & Culture, 22(2), 555–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreager, D. A., Staff, J., Gauthier, R., Lefkowitz, E. S., & Feinberg, M. E. (2016). The double standard at sexual debut: Gender, sexual behavior and adolescent peer acceptance. Sex Roles, 75(7), 377–392.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, L. D., Jones, R., & Santelli, J. S. (2008). Noncoital sexual activities among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(3), 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, G., Copen, C. E., & Abma, J. C. (2011). Teenagers in the United States; sexual activity, contraceptive use, and childbearing, 2006–2010 national survey of family growth. Vital Health Statistics, 23(31), 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, M. N., Hyde, J. S. (2009). When two ssn’t better than one: predictors of early sexual activity in adolescence Using a cumulative risk model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(8), 1059–1071

  • Regan, P. C., Durvasula, R., Howell, L., Ureno, O., & Rea, M. (2004). Gender, ethnicity, and the developmental timing of first sexual and romantic experiences. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 32(7), 667–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, S. A., & Reinisch, J. M. (1999). Would you say you “had sex” if...?. Jama, 281(3), 275–277.

  • Satterwhite, C. L., Torrone, E., Meites, E., Dunne, E. F., Mahajan, R., Ocfemia, M. C. B., Su, J., Xu, F., & Weinstock, H. (2013). Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: Prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 40(3), 187–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, I. M. (1999). Sexual activity prior to coital initiation: A comparison between males and females. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 28(1), 63–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smiler, A. P., Frankel, L. B., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (2011). From kissing to coitus? Sex-of-partner differences in the sexual milestone achievement of young men. Journal of Adolescence, 34(4), 727–735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp LLC. (2019). Stata Statistical Software (Release 16) [Computer software]. StataCorp LLC. https://www.stata.com/

  • Twenge, J. M., & Park, H. (2019). The decline in adult activities among US adolescents, 1976–2016. Child Development, 90(2), 638–654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilenko, S. A., Maas, M. K., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2015). “It felt good but weird at the same time”: Emerging adults’ first experiences of six different sexual behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30(5), 586–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weis, D. L. (1983). Affective reactions of women to their initial experience of coitus. Journal of Sex Research, 19(3), 209–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, B. E., & Twenge, J. M. (2005). Changes in young people's sexual behavior and attitudes, 1943–1999: A cross-temporal meta-analysis Review of General Psychology, 9(3), 249–261.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Israel M. Schwartz.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The institutional review board of the university where the study was conducted approved the survey and survey methods used to collect data for the 2018 cohort.

Informed Consent

Survey respondents were informed (through the survey text) that participation was regarded as giving consent.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Select Survey Question Topics

Appendix: Select Survey Question Topics

Age at First Coitus

The survey question on age at first coitus used in the current study is listed as follows.

  • Your age at the first time that you had sexual intercourse

    • Open-ended response

Coital Behavior

Schwartz provided his earlier questionnaire for review, in both studies coital behavior was defined as penile-vaginal penetration.

The survey question on coital behavior used in the current study is listed as follows.

  • Have you ever had penile-vaginal sexual intercourse (defined as placing your penis within a female’s vagina or having a male place his penis within your vagina)?

    • Responses were yes or no

Gender

The survey question on gender used in the current study is listed as follows:

  • What is your sex/gender?

  • Responses:

  • Female

  • Male

  • Transgender Female

  • Transgender Male

  • Other (please specify)

Precoital Sexual Behavior

The survey question regarding behaviors engaged prior to first coitus used in the current study is listed as follows.

  • Before [please note that “Before” was bolded on the survey] you had sexual intercourse for the first time, how often had you participated in the following behaviors?

  • Masturbating yourself

  • Kissing a partner

  • Caressing your partner’s breasts

  • Partner caressing your breasts

  • Caressing your partner’s genitals

  • Partner caressing your genitals

  • Stimulating your partner’s genitals with your mouth

  • Partner stimulating your genitals with their mouth

  • The options for each item were:

  • Never, Once, Rarely, Occasionally, Frequently, Very frequently

Sexual Orientation

The survey question on sexual orientation used in the current study is listed as follows.

  • What is your sexual orientation?

  • Responses:

  • Heterosexual

  • Homosexual

  • Bisexual

  • Asexual

  • Other (please specify)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schwartz, I.M., Coffield, E. A Gender-Based Generational Comparison of Sexual Behaviors Adolescents Engage in Prior to First Coitus. Sex Res Soc Policy 19, 521–529 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00567-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00567-w

Keywords

Navigation