Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical investigation of cavitation suppression in an inducer for water and liquid nitrogen with emphasis on thermodynamic effect

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cavitation commonly occurs in the hydraulic machineries like inducers. Existing computational fluid dynamics could provide relatively precise prediction for water, but may fail to simulate the cryogens cavitation precisely. Based on the modified Merkle cavitation model, this paper studies the cavitation suppression in an inducer in thermo-sensitive fluid with special emphasis on thermodynamic effect. The cavitation characteristics of an inducer under different working conditions for water and liquid nitrogen were analyzed systematically. Through the comparative analysis of the cavitation morphology, temperature drop, axial vapor volume fraction and axial pressure distribution, the cavitation in water was found to be very large and continuous, whereas that in liquid nitrogen was found to be relatively small and discontinuous, indicating that the stronger thermodynamic effect in liquid nitrogen can effectively suppress the development of cavitation. The cavitation performance of inducer showed good improvement in liquid nitrogen than that in water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1
Fig.2
Fig.3
Fig.4
Fig.5
Fig.6
Fig.7
Fig.8
Fig.9
Fig.10
Fig.11
Fig.12
Fig.13
Fig.14
Fig.15
Fig.16
Fig.17
Fig.18
Fig.19
Fig.20
Fig.21
Fig.22
Fig.23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang Y et al (2018) Effects of thermodynamic on unsteady cavitation flow of liquid hydrogen. Hangkong Dongli Xuebao/J Aerosp Power 33(12):2866–2876

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liu H, Zhang T, Kang C (2018) Evaluation of cavitation erosion resistance of copper alloy in different liquid media. Mater Corros 69(7):917–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bai L et al (2019) Vibration in a multistage centrifugal pump under varied conditions. Shock Vib 2019:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang L et al (2019) Numerical simulation of the sound field of a five-stage centrifugal pump with different turbulence models. Water (Switzerland) 11(9):1777

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guo X et al (2015) The rotating cavitation performance of a centrifugal pump with a splitter-bladed inducer under different rotational speed. Int J Turbo Jet Engines 32(3):275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang D-X, Naranmandula (2018) Theoretical study of coupling double-bubbles ultrasonic cavitation characteristics. Acta Physica Sinica 67(3):0378021–0378028

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang S et al (2019) Studies on thermal effects of cavitation in LN2 flow over a twisted hydrofoil based on large eddy simulation. Cryogenics 97:40–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang W, Li X, Zhu Z (2019) Quantification of wake unsteadiness for low-Re flow across two staggered cylinders. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci 233(19–20):6892–6909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang S et al (2019) Numerical investigation of attached cavitating flow in thermo-sensitive fluid with special emphasis on thermal effect and shedding dynamics. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44(5):3170–3184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li X et al (2019) Calculation of cavitation evolution and associated turbulent kinetic energy transport around a NACA66 hydrofoil. J Mech Sci Technol 33(3):1231–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li X et al (2020) Extended compressible thermal cavitation model for the numerical simulation of cryogenic cavitating flow. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45(16):10104–10118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu Y et al (2020) Numerical investigation on the evolution of forces and energy features in thermo-sensitive cavitating flow. European J Mech B Fluids 84:233–249

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu Y et al (2021) Numerical investigation of transient liquid nitrogen cavitating flows with special emphasis on force evolution and entropy features. Cryogenics 113:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hord, J., (1973), Cavitation in liquid cryogens—2. hydrofoil. NASA Contractor Reports, (CR-2156)

  15. Hord, J., (1973) Cavitation in liquid cryogens—3. ogives. NASA Contractor Reports, (CR-2242)

  16. Ito Y et al (2016) Experimental visualization of cryogenic backflow vortex cavitation with thermodynamic effects. J Propul Pow 32(1):71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hashimoto T et al (1997) Experimental study on rotating cavitation of rocket propellant pump inducers. J Propul Pow 13(4):488–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang Y et al (2019) Investigation of the cavitation model in an inducer for water and liquid nitrogen. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 233(19–20):6939–6952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. De Giorgi MG, Ficarella A, Fontanarosa D (2018) Numerical investigation of non-isothermal cavitating flows on hydrofoils by means of an extended schnerr-sauer model coupled with a nucleation model. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, GT 2018, June 11, 2018–June 15, 2018. 2018. Oslo, Norway: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

  20. Salvador FJ et al (2017) Using a homogeneous equilibrium model for the study of the inner nozzle flow and cavitation pattern in convergent–divergent nozzles of diesel injectors. J Comput Appl Math 309:630–641

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Singhal AK et al (2002) Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 124(3):617–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tran TD et al (2015) Investigation of cavitation models for steady and unsteady cavitating flow simulation. Int J Fluid Mach Syst 8(4):240–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Q et al. (2019) Numerical simulation of the cavitation flow around a hydrofoil based on a coupled CFD-PBM model. In: AIAA Scitech Forum, 2019, January 7, 2019 - January 11, 2019. 2019. San Diego, CA, United states: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc: AIAA

  24. Zhang Y, Li X, Li Y (2017) Cavitation model verification and validation for water and liquid nitrogen in an inducer. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, GT 2017, June 26, 2017–June 30, 2017. 2017. Charlotte, NC, United states: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

  25. Jackson D et al. (2016) Cavitation instabilities in an inducer using heated water as a cryogenic simulant. in 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2016, January 4, 2016–January 8, 2016. 2016. San Diego, CA, United states: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA

  26. Ito Y, Zheng X, Nagasaki T (2019) Numerical simulation using the bubble size distribution model of cryogenic cavitation around an axial helical inducer. In: 29th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, IAHR 2018, September 16, 2018–September 21, 2018. 2019. Kyoto, Japan: Institute of Physics Publishing

  27. Ito Y, Zheng X, Nagasaki T (2019) One-way coupling numerical simulation of cryogenic cavitation around an inducer. Int J Fluid Mach Syst 12(3):235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Coutier-Delgosha O, Fortes-Patella R, Reboud JL (2003) Evaluation of the turbulence model influence on the numerical simulations of unsteady cavitation. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 125(1):38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yakhot V, Orszag SA (1986) Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I Basic theory 1(1):3–51

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Reboud J-L, Stutz B, Coutier O (1998) Two phase flow structure of cavitation: experiment and modeling of unsteady effects. In: 3rd International Symposium on Cavitation CAV1998, Grenoble, France.

  31. Merkle CL (1998) Computational modelling of the dynamics of sheet cavitation. in Proc. of the 3rd Int. Symp on Cavitation, Grenoble, France.

  32. Xu B et al (2020) Numerical investigation of modified cavitation model with thermodynamic effect in water and liquid nitrogen. Cryogenics 106:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Franc J-P, Rebattet C, Coulon A (2004) An experimental investigation of thermal effects in a cavitating inducer. J Fluids Eng, Transactions of the ASME 126(5):716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tani N, Yamanishi N, Tsujimoto Y (2012) Influence of flow coefficient and flow structure on rotational cavitation in inducer. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME. 134(2):0213021–02130213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kikuta K et al (2008) Thermodynamic effect on cavitation performances and cavitation instabilities in an inducer. J Fluids Eng, Trans ASME 130(11):1113021–1113028

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported financially by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51776087 and 51979125), the Senior Talent Foundation of Jiangsu University (Grant No. 18JDG034), the Open Research Subject of Key Laboratory (Fluid Machinery and Engineering Research Base) of Sichuan Province (Grant No. szjj2019-028) and the Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds (Grant No. 2018K102C).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Desheng Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Daniel Onofre de Almeida Cruz.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, B., Feng, J., Shen, X. et al. Numerical investigation of cavitation suppression in an inducer for water and liquid nitrogen with emphasis on thermodynamic effect. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 43, 212 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02947-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02947-0

Keywords

Navigation