Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Robust spectral risk optimization when the subjective risk aversion is ambiguous: a moment-type approach

  • Full Length Paper
  • Series A
  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

Choice of a risk measure for quantifying risk of an investment portfolio depends on the decision maker’s risk preference. In this paper, we consider the case when such a preference can be described by a law invariant coherent risk measure but the choice of a specific risk measure is ambiguous. We propose a robust spectral risk approach to address such ambiguity. Differing from Wang and Xu (SIAM J Optim 30(4):3198–3229, 2020), the new robust model allows one to elicit the decision maker’s risk preference through pairwise comparisons and use the elicited preference information to construct an ambiguity set of risk spectra. The robust spectral risk measure (RSRM) is based on the worst case risk spectrum from the set. To calculate RSRM and solve the associated optimal decision making problem, we use a technique from Acerbi and Simonetti (Portfolio optimization with spectral measures of risk. Working paper, 2002) to develop a new computational approach which is independent of order statistics and reformulate the robust spectral risk optimization problem as a single deterministic convex programming problem when the risk spectra in the ambiguity set are step-like. Moreover, we propose an approximation scheme when the risk spectra are not step-like and derive a bound for the model approximation error and its propagation to the optimal decision making problems. Some preliminary numerical test results are reported about the performance of the robust model and the computational scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use the phrase which may represent decision makers, regulators, engineers, customers etc depending on the nature of decision making problems.

  2. Similar inequalities also hold for the cases that \(q\nu =k/2\) and \(q\nu >k/2\), see [14, Theorem 2].

References

  1. Acerbi, C.: Spectral measures of risk: a coherent representation of subjective risk aversion. J. Bank. Finance 26(7), 1505–1518 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Acerbi, C., Simonetti, P.: Portfolio optimization with spectral measures of risk. Working paper (2002)

  3. Armbruster, B., Delage, E.: Decision making under uncertainty when preference information is incomplete. Manag. Sci. 61(1), 111–128 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M., Heath, D.: Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3), 203–228 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonnans, J.F., Shapiro, A.: Perturbation Analysis of Optimization Problems. Springer, New York (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Brandtner, M., Kürsten, W.: Decision making with expected shortfall and spectral risk measures: the problem of comparative risk aversion. J. Bank. Finance 58, 268–280 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Debreu, G.: Continuity properties of Paretian utility. Int. Econ. Rev. 30, 285–293 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Delage, E., Li, J.Y.: Minimizing risk exposure when the choice of a risk measure is ambiguous. Manag. Sci. 64(1), 327–344 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Denneberg, D.: Distorted probabilities and insurance premiums. Methods Oper. Res. 63, 3–5 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dentcheva, D., Ruszczyński, A.: Risk preferences on the space of quantile functions. Math. Program. 148, 181–200 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Escobar, D.D., Pflug, G.Ch.: The distortion principle for insurance pricing: properties, identification and robustness. Ann. Oper. Res. 292, 771–794 (2020)

  12. Esfahani, P.M., Kuhn, D.: Data-driven distributionally robust optimization using the Wasser-stein metric: performance guarantees and tractable reformulations. Math. Program. 171, 115–166 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Föllmer, H., Schied, A.: Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Finance Stochast. 6(4), 429–447 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Fournier, N., Guilline, A.: On the rate of convergence in Wasserstein distance of the empirical measure. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 162, 707–738 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Frittelli, M., Rosazza Gianin, E.: Law invariant convex risk measures. In: Kusuoka S., Yamazaki, A. (eds.) Advances in Mathematical Economics, pp. 33–46. Springer, Tokyo (2005)

  16. Guo, S., Xu, H.: Distributionally robust shortfall risk optimization model and its approximation. Math. Program. 174(1), 473–498 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Kusuoka, S.: On law invariant coherent risk measures. In: Kusuoka, S., Maruyama, T. (eds.) Advances in Mathematical Economics, pp. 83–95. Springer, Berlin (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Pflug, G.C., Pichler, A.: Multistage Stochastic Optimization. Springer, Cham (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Pichler, A.: A quantitative comparison of risk measures. Ann. Oper. Res. 254, 251–275 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Pichler, A., Shapiro, A.: Minimal representation of insurance prices. Insur. Math. Econ. 62, 184–193 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Puppe, C.: Distored Probabilities and Choice Under Risk. Springer, Berlin (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Robinson, S.M.: An application of error bounds for convex programming in a linear space. SIAM J. Control 13, 271–273 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S.: Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2, 21–41 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruszczyński, A., Shapiro, A.: Stochastic Programming, Handbooks in OR & MS, vol. 10. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shapiro, A., Ruszczyński, A., Dentcheva, D.: Errata and Comments for Lectures on Stochastic Programming, 2nd edn

  26. Tsanakas, A., Desli, E.: Risk measures and theories of choice. Br. Actuar. J. 9, 959–991 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1947)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, S.: Premium calculation by transforming the premium layer density. ASTIN Bull. 26(1), 71–92 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wozabal, D.: Convex risk measures for linear portfolios: a nonparametric approach. Oper. Res. 62(6), 1302–1315 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, W., Xu, H.: Robust spectral risk optimization when information on risk spectrum is incomplete. SIAM J. Optim. 30(4), 3198–3229 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Yaari, M.: The dual theory of choice under risk. Econometrica 55(1), 95–115 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the two anonymous referees for a number of valuable comments and suggestions which help us strengthen the presentation of this work. We would also like to thank the Associate Editor for effective handling of the review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mathematical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, China

    Shaoyan Guo

  2. Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong

    Huifu Xu

Authors
  1. Shaoyan Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huifu Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaoyan Guo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The research of the first author is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11801057). The research of the second author is supported by the GRC grant (14500620)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, S., Xu, H. Robust spectral risk optimization when the subjective risk aversion is ambiguous: a moment-type approach. Math. Program. 194, 305–340 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-021-01630-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-021-01630-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Search

Navigation