Abstract
Massive online open courses (MOOCs) are emerging as a disruptive innovation in the e-learning industry. Despite its rapid growth, MOOCs are challenged on its financial sustainability. In this paper, we focus on freemium, the predominant business model of MOOCs, and observe the emerging practice of nudging the learners toward completion. In the analytical model, the MOOC provider maximizes its profit by setting the price of the verified track and the effect of nudging the learners, and the learner decides to either enroll in the audit track or purchase to upgrade to the verified track based on the standalone utility from learning, the utility from peers and the prospective cost relating to dropout. We solve the joint optimization problem for the MOOC provider and perform sensitivity analysis. This paper contributes to theories of exploring the business side of MOOCs and implementing the freemium model in the context of MOOCs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References
Adamopoulos, P. (2013). What makes a great MOOC? An interdisciplinary analysis of student retention in online courses. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1–21). Milano: AIS. http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2013/proceedings/BreakthroughIdeas/13/.
Agarwal, A. (2018). Updates to our platform: Achieving long-term sustainability. Retrieved June 4, 2020-2-6, from https://blog.edx.org/updates-platform-achieving-long-term-sustainability/
Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for "lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431 .
Anderson, C. (2009). Free: The future of a radical Price. New York: Hyperion.
Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). An e-learning theoretical framework. Educational Technology & Society, 19, 292–307.
Baker, R. M., & Passmore, D. L. (2016). Value and pricing of MOOCs. Education Sciences, 6, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci6020014 .
Belleflamme, P., & Jacqmin, J. (2016). An economic appraisal of MOOC platforms: Business models and impacts on higher education. CESifo Economic Studies, 62, 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifv016 .
Bhargava, H. K., & Choudhary, V. (2008). Research note—When is versioning optimal for information goods? Management Science, 54, 1029–1035. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0773 .
Burd, E. L., Smith, S. P., & Reisman, S. (2015). Exploring business models for MOOCs in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 40, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9297-0 .
Cheng, H. K., & Tang, Q. C. (2010). Free trial or no free trial: Optimal software product design with network effects. European Journal of Operational Research, 205, 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.01.014 .
Dahlstrom, E., Brooks, D. C., Grajek, S., & Reeves, J. (2015). ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology. Research report. Louisville, CO: ECAR.
Damgaard, M. T., & Nielsen, H. S. (2018). Nudging in education. Economics of Education Review, 64, 313–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.03.008 .
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5334/2012-18 .
Daniel, J., Cano, E. V., & Cervera, M. G. (2015). The future of MOOCs: Adaptive learning or business model? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 12, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2475 .
Dellarocas, C., & Van Alstyne, M. (2013). Economic and business dimensions: Money models for MOOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56, 25–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2492007.2492017 .
Dou, Y., Niculescu, M. F., & Wu, D. (2013). Engineering optimal network effects via social media features and seeding in markets for digital goods and services. Information Systems Research, 24, 164–185. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0463 .
Geng, W., & Chen, Z. (2019). Optimal pricing of virtual goods with conspicuous features in a freemium model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 23, 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2019.1619911 .
Griva, K., & Vettas, N. (2011). Price competition in a differentiated products duopoly under network effects. Information Economics and Policy, 23, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2010.08.002 .
Gu, X., Kannan, P., & Ma, L. (2018). Selling the premium in freemium. Journal of Marketing, 82, 10–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242918807170 .
Halbheer, D., Stahl, F., Koenigsberg, O., & Lehmann, D. R. (2014). Choosing a digital content strategy: How much should be free? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31, 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.10.004 .
Hew, K. F. (2016). Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12235 .
Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and reality. Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of education, Teachers College, Columbia University. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED547237.pdf
Jacoby, J. (2014). The disruptive potential of the massive open online course: A literature review. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 18, 73–85.
Jia, Y., Song, Z., Bai, X., & Xu, W. (2017). Toward economic models for MOOC pricing strategy design. International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications (pp. 387–398). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55705-2_31 .
Jing, B. (2007). Network externalities and market segmentation in a monopoly. Economics Letters, 95, 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.08.033 .
Kalman, Y. M. (2014). A race to the bottom: MOOCs and higher education business models. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2014.922410 .
Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75, 424–440.
Khalil, H., & Ebner, M. (2014). MOOCs completion rates and possible methods to improve retention - a literature review. Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2014 (pp. 1305–1313). Tampere, Finland: AACE.
Khan, I. U., Hameed, Z., Yu, Y., Islam, T., Sheikh, Z., & Khan, S. U. (2018). Predicting the acceptance of MOOCs in a developing country: Application of task-technology fit model, social motivation, and self-determination theory. Telematics and Informatics, 35, 964–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.009 .
Koch, O. F., & Benlian, A. (2017). The effect of free sampling strategies on freemium conversion rates. Electronic Markets, 27, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-016-0236-z .
Kung, L.-C., & Yang, P.-J. (2018). Certificate or subscription? The optimal pricing strategy of massive online open courses. Proceedings of the 22nd Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (p. 301). Yokohama, Japan: AIS. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2018/301
Li, H., Jain, S., & Kannan, P. K. (2019). Optimal design of free samples for digital products and services. Journal of Marketing Research, 56, 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243718823169 .
Liu, C. Z., Au, Y. A., & Choi, H. S. (2014). Effects of freemium strategy in the mobile app market: An empirical study of google play. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31, 326–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2014.995564 .
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Lundqvist, K. O., & Williams, S. A. (2015). Massive open online courses and economic sustainability. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 18, 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2015-0015 .
MacLeod, W. B., & Urquiola, M. (2015). Reputation and school competition. American Economic Review, 105(11), 3471–3488. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130332 .
Murray, S. (2019). MOOCs struggle to lift rock-bottom completion rates. Financial Times, March, 4. Retrieved June 9, 2020, from https://www.ft.com/content/60e90be2-1a77-11e9-b191-175523b59d1d
Niculescu, M. F., & Wu, D. J. (2014). Economics of free under perpetual licensing: Implications for the software industry. Information Systems Research, 25, 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2013.0508 .
Niu, B., Yue, H., Luo, H., & Shang, W. (2019). Pricing for newly-launched experience products: Free trial or not? Transportation Research Part E-logistics and Transportation Review, 126, 149–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.04.001 .
Onah, D. F., Sinclair, J. E., & Boyatt, R. (2014). Exploring the use of MOOC discussion forums. Proceedings of London International Conference on Education (pp. 1–4). London, UK. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3319.5042.
Pappas, C. (2019). Top 20 eLearning statistics for 2019 you need to know. Retrieved June 9, 2020, from https://elearningindustry.com/top-elearning-statistics-2019
Reich, J., & Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A. (2019). The MOOC pivot. Science, 363, 130–131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav7958 .
Seaton, D. T., Bergner, Y., Chuang, I., Mitros, P., & Pritchard, D. E. (2014). Who does what in a massive open online course? Communications of the ACM, 57, 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/2500876 .
Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1998). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business School Press.
Shi, Y., Li, X., Haller, A., & Campbell, J. (2018). Knowledge pricing structures on MOOC platform-a use case analysis on edX. Proceedings of the 22nd Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (p. 181). Yokohama, Japan: AIS.
Shi, Z., Zhang, K., & Srinivasan, K. (2019). Freemium as an optimal strategy for market dominant firms. Marketing Science, 38, 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2018.1109 .
Song, Z., Jia, Y., & Xu, W. (2018). Exploring business models and dynamic pricing frameworks for SPOC services. Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific web (APWeb) and web-age information management (WAIM) joint international conference on web and big data (pp. 306–317). Macau: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01298-4_26 .
Wagner, T. M., Benlian, A., & Hess, T. (2014). Converting freemium customers from free to premium - the role of the perceived premium fit in the case of music as a service. Electronic Markets, 24, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-014-0168-4 .
Wang, W., Guo, L., & Sun, R. (2019). Rational herd behavior in online learning: Insights from MOOC. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 660–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.009 .
Young, J. R. (2013). Coursera announces details for selling certificates and verifying identities. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 59(19).
Zawacki-Richter, O. (2009). Research areas in distance education: A Delphi study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.674 .
Zhang, D. J., Allon, G., & Van Mieghem, J. A. (2017). Does social interaction improve learning outcomes? Evidence from field experiments on massive open online courses. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 19, 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2016.0615 .
Zhong, S.-H., Zhang, Q.-B., Li, Z.-P., & Liu, Y. (2016). Motivations and challenges in MOOCs with eastern insights. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6, 954–960. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.824 .
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71572155).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ulrike E. Lechner
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, X., Geng, W. Enroll now, pay later: optimal pricing and nudge efforts for massive-online-open-courses providers. Electron Markets 32, 1003–1018 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00470-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00470-7