Elsevier

Mechatronics

Volume 75, May 2021, 102541
Mechatronics

Serial-kinematic monolithic nanopositioner with in-plane bender actuators

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2021.102541Get rights and content

Abstract

This article describes a monolithic nanopositioner constructed from in-plane bending actuators which provide greater deflection than previously reported extension actuators, at the expense of stiffness and resonance frequency. The proposed actuators are demonstrated by constructing an XY nanopositioning stage with a serial kinematic design. Analytical modeling and finite-element-analysis accurately predicts the experimental performance of the nanopositioner. A 10μm range is achieved in the X and Y axes with an applied voltage of +/-200 V. The first resonance mode occurs at 250 Hz in the Z axis. The stage is demonstrated for atomic force microscopy imaging.

Introduction

Nanopositioning devices are a class of short-range motion stages with resolution on the nanometer scale or below [1]. Applications include atomic force microscopy [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], data storage [9], nanofabrication [10], [11], cell surgery [12], and precision optics [13].

Piezoelectric tube scanners were the first common nanopositioning systems used in Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) [14]. Since these are constructed from a single piece of piezoelectric ceramic, they are known as monolithic structures which provide both actuation and some motion guidance [15], [16]. The travel range of piezoelectric tubes is determined by the length, radius, and tube wall thickness. They tend to be long (e.g. 50 mm) and thin (e.g. 7 mm diameter) which can be difficult to integrate due the significant vertical height. There is significant scope to explore other monolithic geometries that are similar in cost but provide improved performance and alternative dimensions.

The most common class of nanopositioners are flexure-based devices [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. In these designs, metal flexures guide a central stage which is driven by piezoelectric stack actuators. Metal flexure-based nanopositioners provide the highest performance metrics with respect to displacement gain, resonance frequency, cross-coupling, and load size. However, they are also much larger, heavier, and more costly than monolithic devices like piezoelectric tubes. In addition, assembling and preloading piezoelectric stack actuators are required to avoid damage to the stack actuators [26]. Preload mechanisms require careful design considerations and precise machining which increase manufacturing time and cost.

There is significant demand for low profile positioning systems in applications such as optical microscopy [27], atomic force microscopy [28], and in particular, scanning electron microscopy (SPM) where the load-lock area is typically less than 10 mm in height [29], [30]. Products designed for these applications include the SuperFlat AFM from Kleindiek nanotechik [28], the P-541 and P-542 Series from Physik Instrumente [31], and the Nano-Bio and Nano-LPS Series from Mad City Labs [27].

This work combines monolithic and flexure-based designapproaches which results in a vertical thickness of less than 1 mm, which is an order of magnitude less than current metal flexure based devices. The advantages of the proposed approach over metal flexure designs are generalized by lower vertical height; lower mass; no preload mechanism; compatibility with vacuum and low temperature applications. The proposed method is light weight, which makes it suitable for applications such as camera stabilization and optical scanning from small-scale air vehicles [32]. The simple mechanical structure of the proposed method also avoids the need for stack actuators and the resulting preloading requirements. Since bonding or encapsulation materials are not required, the reported monolithic design can also be easily adapted to high-vacuum and cryogenic applications.

The disadvantages of the proposed method stem from the low vertical height that results in low vertical stiffness. This results in higher vertical cross-coupling and a lower payload capability compared to metal flexure devices. The most useful range of payload masses for the proposed method is less than 10 g.

Microelectromechanical systems (MEMs) are another class of monolithic flexure-based nanopositioners [33]. These devices provide the smallest size and the opportunity to integrate sensing mechanisms [33], [34], [35]. MEMs based nanopositioners are best suited to payload masses in the milligram range. The proposed methods represent an intermediate point between MEMs based nanopositioners and metal-flexure based nanopositioners.

This article describes a new actuation method for monolithicnanopositioners using in-plane bending actuators. As illustrated in Fig. 1, Fig. 2, each actuator is made from a thin piezoelectric beam with four top electrodes and a grounded bottom electrode. When opposite voltages are applied to the top electrodes, the resultant deflection is shown in Fig. 3. A unique feature of this design is that the moving end deflects in a plane and does not rotate. Compared to a piezoelectric bimorph bender, the motion is lateral rather than vertical [36].

The methods described herein are compared to previous and future work in Fig. 1, including the previous beam extension actuators (top), the topic of this work (middle), and future work (bottom). Other related work has also included closed-loop [37] and feedforward [38] control of extension actuators. Future work (bottom) aims at extending the monolithic concept to a bimorph structure which enables vertical and angular motion [39], [40].

A summary of the application characteristics of extension [41] and in-plane bending actuators are listed in Table 1. In-plane bending actuators provide increased flexibility in the choice of travel range since the deflection is proportional to the actuator length squared, rather than directly proportional [41]. The beam width of an in-plane bending actuator can be used to control the trade-off between stiffness and travel range. In practice, reduced in-plane stiffness is not expected to be a significant disadvantage since the operating speed is limited by the first resonance mode, which is an out-of-plane mode primarily determined by the material thickness and is similar for both approaches.

A preliminary version of this work was presented at the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics in 2018 [42] which used Euler–Bernoulli beam theory to estimate the static deflection of each bender, and a lumped mass and stiffness approach to estimate the combined deflection and stiffness. This modeling approach does not capture the out-of-plane dynamics which are the lowest frequency and most significant eigenmodes of the system.

Compared to [42], the present work uses a combination of Euler–Bernoulli beam theory and Hamilton’s principle to predict the total deflection in each axis and the first resonance modes in both the lateral and vertical directions. This work also extends on [42] with an experimental measurement of resonance modes, measurement of the cross-coupling between axes, and application to atomic force microscopy imaging.

In the remainder of the article, Section 2 outlines the structural design, fabrication, and actuating principles of the nanopositioner. Sections 3 Electromechanical model of an active flexure, 4 Electromechanical model of the piezoelectric nanopositioner present a reduced-order model of an active flexure from which the dynamics of the nanopositioner are predicted. Section 5 presents finite element analysis (FEA) of the device which validates the modeling of the nanopositioner. Section 6 presents the experimental performance of the device which examines the range, cross-coupling, non-linearity, and modal characteristics. Section 7 demonstrates the use of the nanopositioner for atomic force microscopy.

Section snippets

Design and fabrication

Fig. 2(a) shows the fabricated serial-kinematic nanopositionerwhere a smaller inner stage is nested into a larger outer stage. The nanopositioner is fabricated from a single square sheet of PZT-5 A ceramic of thickness 500 µm. The piezoelectric sheet is coated with a 5 µm layer of nickel on both sides. The mechanical and electrode features are created by ultrasonic machining. Fig. 2(b) shows the mechanical features and the nickel electrode arrangement with dimensions. The nickel layer on the

Electromechanical model of an active flexure

To analyze the dynamics of the piezoelectric nanopositioner, a model of a single piezoelectric flexure, shown in Fig. 3, is derived. The constitutive equations of the piezoelectric material, Euler–Bernoulli beam theory, and Hamilton’s principle are applied to relates the stress, strain, electric field, and electric displacement in the structure. This results in a voltage-deflection model of the active flexure.

Electromechanical model of the piezoelectric nanopositioner

In Section 4.1, the out-of-plane resonance frequencies are derived using a combination of the flexure models from Section 3 with the corresponding thickness and width parameters for bending in the out-of-plane direction. In addition, since there is no actuation in the out-of-plane direction, the piezoelectric constant can be set to zero. Section 4.2 combines a set of piezoelectric flexure models derived in Section 3 with appropriate boundary conditions to derive the in-plane displacement per

Finite-element modeling

A numerical finite-element-analysis (FEA) model of the monolithic stage was constructed using ANSYS workbench. The displacement of all four edges are fixed as shown in Fig. 7. The piezoelectric properties of the stage are modeled using the ANSYS Piezo and MEMS Application Customization Toolkit (ACT) extension. The piezoelectric properties for PZT-5 A are listed in Table 4. Each piezoelectric layer is polarized outwards along its thickness direction.

To obtain the displacement per unit voltage

Experimental characterization of the nanopositioner

This section presents the experimental identification and characterization of the sensitivity, range, cross-coupling, nonlinearity, and modal responses of the nanopositioner. Fig. 9 shows the experimental setup used to drive the piezoelectric bender actuators. A custom built amplifier with two input channels (Vx,Vy) and four output channels (+Vx,Vx,+Vy,Vy) provides the required voltages to actuate the device. To avoid de-polarization of the piezoelectric ceramic, the applied voltages are

AFM imaging

The proposed monolithic nanopositioning stage was used to scan a sample underneath a Nanosurf Atomic Force Microscope (AFM), as shown in Fig. 13. A 10μm × 10μm area of a BudgetSensors HS-100MG calibration grating was imaged in constant-force contact-mode with a resolution of 200 × 200 pixels. With the sample placed on the central platform of the nanopositioner, Fig. 14 (Left) shows an image captured using a 1 Hz scan rate. Image artifacts caused by hysteresis and cross-coupling can be observed.

Conclusions

This article describes the mechanics of a piezoelectric in-plane bender actuator. A serial-kinematic approach is then used to construct a dual-axis monolithic nanopositioning stage. Compared to previous monolithic nanopositioners that utilize extension actuators, the in-plane bender actuators offer a more flexible trade-off between deflection range and stiffness, and also eliminate push–pull actuation which has been associated with non-linear cross-coupling. However, compared to a

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Steven I. Moore: Methodology, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. Yuen K. Yong: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing. Meysam Omidbeike: Investigation, Validation, Writing - original draft. Andrew J. Fleming: Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Steven Ian Moore graduated from the University of Newcastle, Australia with a Bachelor of Electrical Engineering and a Bachelor of Mathematics in 2012, and a PhD degree in electrical engineering in 2016. He is currently a post-doctoral researcher with the Precision Mechatronics Lab at the University of Newcastle. His research focus is on the design, modeling, implementation, and optimization of mechatronic systems including precision motion control and sensing in Microelectromechanical systems

References (56)

  • FlemingA.J. et al.

    Design, modeling and control of nanopositioning systems

    (2014)
  • RanaM.S. et al.

    Performance of sinusoidal scanning with MPC in AFM imaging

    IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics

    (2015)
  • BazaeiA. et al.

    Combining spiral scanning and internal model control for sequential AFM imaging at video rate

    IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics

    (2016)
  • SalapakaS.M. et al.

    Scanning probe microscopy

    IEEE Control Syst

    (2008)
  • Abramovitch DY, Andersson SB, Pao LY, Schitter G. A tutorial on the mechanisms, dynamics, and control of atomic force...
  • FairbairnM. et al.

    Q control of an atomic force microscope micro-cantilever: a sensor-less approach

    IEEE/ASME J Microelectromech Syst

    (2011)
  • Yong YK, Moheimani SOR. A compact XYZ scanner for fast atomic force microscopy in constant force contact mode. In...
  • SebastianA. et al.

    Nanopositioning for probe-based data storage

    IEEE Control Syst

    (2008)
  • MishraS. et al.

    Precision positioning of wafer scanners. Segmented iterative learning control for nonrepetitive disturbances

    IEEE Control Syst

    (2007)
  • FerreiraA. et al.

    Virtual reality and haptics for nanorobotics

    IEEE Robot Autom Mag

    (2006)
  • FanZ.-Q. et al.

    Piezo-assisted in vitro fertilization of mouse oocytes with spermatozoa retrieved from epididymides stored at 4 degree c

    J Reprod Dev

    (2008)
  • HassenS.Z.S. et al.

    Frequency locking of an optical cavity using linear–quadratic Gaussian integral control

    J Phys B: At Mol Opt Phys

    (2009)
  • BinnigG. et al.

    Single-tube three-dimensional scanner for scanning tunneling microscopy

    Rev Sci Instrum

    (1986)
  • MaessJ. et al.

    Simulation of dynamics-coupling in piezoelectric tube scanners by reduced order finite element models

    Rev Sci Instrum

    (2008)
  • RanaM.S. et al.

    High-speed AFM image scanning using observer-based MPC-notch control

    IEEE Trans Nanotechnol

    (2013)
  • ChaeK.W. et al.

    A transparent polymeric flexure-hinge nanopositioner, actuated by a piezoelectric stack actuator

    Nanotechnology

    (2011)
  • KentonB.J. et al.

    A compact ultra-fast vertical nanopositioner for improving SPM scan speed

    Rev Sci Instrum

    (2011)
  • YongY.K. et al.

    Invited review article: High-speed flexure-guided nanopositioning: Mechanical design and control issues

    Rev Sci Instrum

    (2012)
  • Cited by (8)

    • Five-axis bimorph monolithic nanopositioning stage: Design, modeling, and characterization

      2021, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although it can be minimized by design, high precision applications such as wafer scanning [9] require active compensation requiring six DOF actuation. To provide a more compact and lower cost alternative to piezoelectric tubes and flexure-based designs, a new class of monolithic nanopositioners constructed from a single piezoelectric sheet was proposed in [1] and [35,36]. In reference [1], a two-DOF monolithic nanopositioner is constructed by removing parts of a piezoelectric sheet to create active flexures that provide guidance and create X and Y axis motion.

    • Design and Testing of a Flexure-Based XYZ Micropositioner with High Space-Utilization Efficiency

      2023, IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Steven Ian Moore graduated from the University of Newcastle, Australia with a Bachelor of Electrical Engineering and a Bachelor of Mathematics in 2012, and a PhD degree in electrical engineering in 2016. He is currently a post-doctoral researcher with the Precision Mechatronics Lab at the University of Newcastle. His research focus is on the design, modeling, implementation, and optimization of mechatronic systems including precision motion control and sensing in Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), structural design of piezoelectric micro-cantilevers, nanopositioning, ultra-high bandwidth fixed point control realizations, image stabilization in optical systems, and inertial stabilization systems.

    Yuen Kuan Yong received the Bachelor of Engineering degree in Mechatronics Engineering and the PhD degree in mechanical engineering from The University of Adelaide, Australia, in 2001 and 2007, respectively. She was an Australian Research Council DECRA Fellow from 2013 to 2017. She is currently an associate professor with the School of Electrical Engineering and Computing, The University of Newcastle, Australia. Her research interests include nanopositioning systems, design and control of novel micro-cantilevers, atomic force microscopy, and miniature robotics. A/Prof Yong is the recipient of the University of Newcastle Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Research Excellence in 2014, and the Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Research Supervision Excellence in 2017. She is an associate editor for the IEEE/ASME Transactions of Mechatronics.

    Meysam Omidbeike graduated from the University of Newcastle, Australia with a Bachelor of Electrical Engineering in 2015. He is currently a PhD student within the Precision Mechatronics Lab, located in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Newcastle. His research focus is on design, sensing and control of monolithic piezoelectric devices including nanopositioning, multivariable precision sensing and control, sensor fusion, digital signal processing and vibration control.

    Andrew J. Fleming graduated from The University of Newcastle, Australia (Callaghan campus) with a Bachelor of Electrical Engineering in 2000 and PhD in 2004. Prof Fleming is the Director of the Precision Mechatronics Lab at The University of Newcastle, Australia. His research interests include lithography, nano-positioning, scanning probe microscopy, and biomedical devices. Prof Fleming’s research awards include the ATSE Baterham Medal in 2016, the IEEE Control Systems Society Outstanding Paper Award in 2007, and The University of Newcastle Researcher of the Year Award in 2007. He is the co-author of three books and more than 180 Journal and Conference articles. Prof Fleming is the inventor of several patent applications, and in 2012 he received the Newcastle Innovation Rising Star Award for Excellence in Industrial Engagement.

    This paper was recommended for publication by Associate Editor Robert T. M’Closkey.

    View full text