Abstract
Nuclear reactor safety (NRS) and the branch accident analysis (AA) constitute proven technologies: these are based on, among the other things, long lasting research and operational experience in the area of water cooled nuclear reactors (WCNR). Large break loss of coolant accident (LBLOCA) has been, so far, the orienting scenario within AA and a basis for the design of reactors. An incomplete vision for those technologies during the last few years is as follows: Progress in fundamentals was stagnant, namely in those countries where the WCNR were designed. Weaknesses became evident, noticeably in relation to nuclear fuel under high burn-up. Best estimate plus uncertainty (BEPU) techniques were perfected and available for application. Electronic and informatics systems were in extensive use and their impact in case of accident becomes more and more un-checked (however, quite irrelevant in case of LBLOCA). The time delay between technological discoveries and applications was becoming longer. The present paper deals with the LBLOCA that is inserted into the above context. Key conclusion is that regulations need suitable modification, rather than lowering the importance and the role of LBLOCA. Moreover, strengths of emergency core cooling system (ECCS) and containment need a tight link.
References
D’Auria F. Nuclear fission: from E. Fermi to Adm. Rickover, to industrial exploitation, to nowadays challenges. Journal of Advancement in Scientific and Engineering Research, 2019, 4(1): 17–30
US AEC. Interim Acceptance Criteria (IAC) for ECCS. Washington D.C., USA, 1971
USNRC. Reactor safety study-an assessment of accident risk in U.S. commercial nuclear power plants, WASH-1400, NUREG-75/014, Washington D.C., USA, 1975
IAEA. Deterministic safety analysis for nuclear power plants, SSG-2-rev1. Vienna, Austria, 2019
Mazzantini O, Galassi G, D’Auria F. The role of nuclear thermal-hydraulics in the licensing of Atucha-II: the LBLOCA. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2019, 351: 33–59
USNRC. Regulatory Guide 1.222-Measuring breakaway oxidation behavior. Washington D.C., USA, 2018
USNRC. Regulatory Guide 1.223-Determining post quench ductility, Washington. D.C., USA, 2018
USNRC. Regulatory Guide 1.224-Preliminary draft (Draft was issued as DG-1263, dated March 2014), establishing analytical limits for zirconium-Alloy cladding material. Washington D.C., USA, 2018
D’Auria F, Debrecin N, Glaeser H. Strengthening nuclear reactor safety and analysis. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2017, 324: 209–219
D’Auria F, Debrecin N, Glaeser H. The technological challenge for current generation nuclear reactors. Nuclear Energy and Technology, 2019, 5(3): 183–199
Zhang J, Schneidesch C. Application of BEPU safety analysis methods to quantify margins in Belgian nuclear power plants. In: OECD/NEA/CSNI specialists meeting on transient thermal-hydraulics in water cooled nuclear reactors (SM-TH), Madrid, Spain, 2020
Kim J, Cho S, Park J K, et al. Experimental study to assess effects of ballooning and fuel relocation on the coolability of fuel rod bundle. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2018, 332: 1–10
Glantz T, Taurines T, De Luze O, et al. DRACCAR: a multi-physics code for computational analysis of multi-rod ballooning, coolability and fuel relocation during LOCA transients part one: general modeling description. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2018, 339: 269–285
Glantz T, Taurines T, Belon S, et al. DRACCAR: a multi-physics code for computational analysis of multi-rod ballooning, coolability and fuel relocation during LOCA transients. Part Two: overview of modeling capabilities for LOCA. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2018, 339: 202–214
D’Auria F. Best estimate plus uncertainty (BEPU): status and perspective. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2019, 352: 110190
Acknowledgements
This paper was supported by the Institutional Funds of University of Pisa, Italy
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
D’Auria, F. An old issue and a new challenge for nuclear reactor safety. Front. Energy 15, 854–859 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-021-0729-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-021-0729-0