1 Correction to: Pure Appl. Geophys. 173 (2016), 285–303 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-015-1116-8

  1. 1.

    Unfortunately, Fig. 8 has been published incorrect. Please find the corrected Fig. 8 below:

    figure a
  1. 2.

    Due to an unfortunate oversight the sentence “… A probability gain (compared with a random guess) from 1.5 up to 3.7 was achieved as far as only SSTAs preceding earthquakes with M ≥ 5.5 are considered. …” is not given correctly.

    It should read: “… A probability gain (compared with a random guess) from 1.5 up to 3.7 was achieved as far as only SSTAs preceding earthquakes with M ≥ 5 are considered. …”.

The authors apologize for this mistake.

The original article was updated.