Abstract
We consider a general framework of optimal mechanism design under adverse selection and ambiguity about the type distribution of agents. We prove the existence of optimal mechanisms under minimal assumptions on the contract space and prove that centralized contracting implemented via mechanisms is equivalent to delegated contracting implemented via a contract menu under these assumptions. Our abstract existence results are applied to a series of applications that include models of optimal risk sharing and of optimal portfolio delegation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aliprantis, C., Border, K.: Infinite dimensional analysis: a hitchhiker’s guide. Springer Verlag, Berlin (2006)
Auster, S.: Robust contracting under common value uncertainty. Theor. Econ. 13(1), 175–204 (2018)
Backhoff, J., Horst, U.: Conditional analysis and a principal-agent problem. SIAM J. Financ. Math. 7(1), 477–507 (2016)
Balder, E., Hess, C.: Two generalizations of komlo’s theorem with lower closure-type applications. J. Convex Anal. 1(3), 25–44 (1996)
Balder, E.J.: New sequential compactness results for spaces of scalarly integrable functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 151(1), 1–16 (1990)
Balder, E.J.: On the existence of optimal contract mechanisms for incomplete information principal-agent models. J. Econ. Theory 68(1), 133–148 (1996)
Baranov, A., Woracek, H.: Majorization in de Branges spaces. III. Division by Blaschke products. Algebra i Analiz 21(6), 3–46 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1090/S1061-0022-2010-01122-1
Barbu, V., Precupanu, T.: Convexity and optimization in Banach spaces. Springer, Berlin (2012)
Beer, G.: Topologies on closed and closed convex sets, vol. 268. Springer, Berlin (1993)
Berge, C.: Topological Spaces: including a treatment of multi-valued functions, vector spaces, and convexity. Courier Corporation (1963)
Bergemann, D., Schlag, K.: Robust monopoly pricing. J. Econ. Theory 146(6), 2527–2543 (2011)
Bourbaki, N.: Éléments de mathématique. I: Les structures fondamentales de l’analyse. Fascicule VIII. Livre III: Topologie générale. Chapitre 9: Utilisation des nombres réels en topologie générale. Deuxième édition revue et augmentée. Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles, No. 1045. Hermann, Paris (1958)
Brannath, W., Schachermayer, W.: A bipolar theorem for L \({} _+^ 0 (\Omega ,{\cal{F}},{\bf P}) \). In: Séminaire de Probabilités XXXIII, pp. 349–354. Springer, Berlin (1999)
Brooks, B., Du, S.: Optimal auction design with common values: An informationally robust approach. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA (2018)
Carroll, G.: Robustness and linear contracts. Am. Econ. Rev. 105(2), 536–63 (2015)
Carroll, G.: Information games and robust trading mechanisms. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA (2018)
Carroll, G.: Robustness in mechanism design and contracting. Ann. Rev. Econ. 11, 139–166 (2019)
Cvitanić, J., Schachermayer, W., Wang, H.: Utility maximization in incomplete markets with random endowment. Finance Stochast. 5(2), 259–272 (2001)
Du, S.: Robust mechanisms under common valuation. Econometrica 86(5), 1569–1588 (2018)
Föllmer, H., Schied, A.: Stochastic finance: an introduction in discrete time. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (2011)
Frankel, A.: Aligned delegation. Am. Econ. Rev. 104(1), 66–83 (2014)
Garrett, D.F.: Robustness of simple menus of contracts in cost-based procurement. Games Econ. Behav. 87, 631–641 (2014)
Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D.: Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. J. Math. Econ. 18(2), 141–153 (1989)
Kramkov, D., Schachermayer, W.: The asymptotic elasticity of utility functions and optimal investment in incomplete markets. Ann. Appl. Probab. pp. 904–950 (1999)
Kramkov, D., Schachermayer, W.: Necessary and sufficient conditions in the problem of optimal investment in incomplete markets. Ann. Appl. Probab. 13(4), 1504–1516 (2003)
Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., Rustichini, A.: Ambiguity aversion, robustness, and the variational representation of preferences. Econometrica 74(6), 1447–1498 (2006)
Mirrlees, J., Raimondo, R.C.: Strategies in the principal-agent model. Econ. Theor. 53(3), 605–656 (2013)
Ou-Yang, H.: Optimal contracts in a continuous-time delegated portfolio management problem. Rev. Financ. Stud. 16(1), 173–208 (2003)
Page, F.H.: Optimal contract mechanisms for principal-agent problems with moral hazard and adverse selection. Econ. Theor. 1(4), 323–338 (1991)
Page, F.H.: Mechanism design for general screening problems with moral hazard. Econ. Theor. 2(2), 265–281 (1992)
Page, F.H.: Optimal deterministic contracting mechanisms for principal-agent problems with moral hazard and adverse selection. Rev. Econ. Design 3(1), 1–13 (1997)
Sannikov, Y.: A continuous-time version of the principal-agent problem. Rev. Econ. Stud. 75(3), 957–984 (2008)
Schachermayer, W.: Optimal investment in incomplete financial markets. In: Mathematical Finance-Bachelier Congress 2000, pp. 427–462. Springer, Berlin (2002)
Schättler, H., Sung, J.: The first-order approach to the continuous-time principal-agent problem with exponential utility. J. Econ. Theory 61(2), 331–371 (1993)
Song, Y.: Efficient implementation with interdependent valuations and maxmin agents. J. Econ. Theory 176, 693–726 (2018)
Spear, S.E., Srivastava, S.: On repeated moral hazard with discounting. Rev. Econ. Stud. 54(4), 599–617 (1987)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees and editors for their valuable advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Horst and Beissner gratefully acknowledge financial support by the CRC TRR 190 Rationality and competition - the economic performance of individuals and firms
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Backhoff-Veraguas, J., Beissner, P. & Horst, U. Robust contracting in general contract spaces. Econ Theory 73, 917–945 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-021-01354-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-021-01354-9