Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of High Energy Shot Peening on the Microstructure and Mechanical Property of AZ31B Mg Alloy/HSLA350 Steel Lap Joints

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When using high energy shot peening (HESP) technology, the surface layer of the welded joints produced grain breakage and residual compressive stress. When the shot peening strength is the optimal parameter 0.10 MPa, the residual compressive stress reaches a maximum value of 74.02 MPa, dislocation density in welded joints increased significantly and the tensile shear strength of the joint was increased by 18.6% compared to the joint without HESP treatment (205 MPa), and the fracture position of the welded joint was located in the Al alloy base material, these were brought by fine grain strengthening and strain strengthening. When the shot peening strength was 0.05 MPa, the strength of the joint was also improved, but the fracture position of the joint was the same as that without HESP treatment, and they were all in the fusion zone. However, when the shot peening strength was further increased to 0.15 MPa, severe cracks appeared inside the joint, which deteriorates the strength of the Mg/steel joint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tan, C. W., Li, L. Q., Chen, Y. B., & Guo, W. (2013). Laser-tungsten inert gas hybrid welding of dissimilar metals AZ31B Mg alloys to Zn coated steel. Materials & Design, 49, 766–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang, K. P., Wu, L. J., Tan, C. W., Sun, Y. M., Chen, B., & Song, X. G. (2019). Influence of Al-Si coating on resistance spot welding of Mg to 22MnB5 boron steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 271, 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, J. H., Hu, X. H., & Sun, X. (2020). Molecular dynamics study on interface formation and bond strength of impact-welded Mg-steel joints. Computational Materials Science, 185, 109988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elthalabawy, W. M., & Khan, T. I. (2010). Microstructural development of diffusion-brazed austenitic stainless steel to magnesium alloy using a nickel interlayer. Materials Characterization, 61(7), 703–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, L. Q., Tan, C. W., Chen, Y. B., Guo, W., & Hu, X. B. (2012). Influence of Zn coating on interfacial reactions and mechanical properties during laser welding-brazing of Mg to steel. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions a-Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, 43a(12), 4740–4754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu, C., Sheng, G. M., Wang, H. D., Jiao, Y. J., & Yuan, X. J. (2017). Effect of high energy shot peening on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg/Ti joints. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 695, 1383–1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lu, Z. M., Shi, L. M., Zhu, S. J., Tang, Z. D., & Jiang, Y. Z. (2015). Effect of high energy shot peening pressure on the stress corrosion cracking of the weld joint of 304 austenitic stainless steel. Materials Science and Engineering a-Structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing, 637, 170–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, H. D., Yuan, X. J., Wu, K. L., Xu, C., Jiao, Y. J., Wang, G., et al. (2018). Effect of high energy shot-peening on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al5052/Ti6Al4V lap joints. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 255, 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, Y. G., & Li, M. Q. (2019). Structure response characteristics and surface nanocrystallization mechanism of alpha phase in Ti-6Al-4V subjected to high energy shot peening. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 773, 860–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu, S. X., Wang, S. R., Wang, G. Q., Yu, X. C., Liu, W. T., Chang, Z. Q., et al. (2019). Microstructure, mechanical and corrosion properties of magnesium alloy bone plate treated by high-energy shot peening. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 29(8), 1641–1652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang, C., Liu, Y. G., & Li, M. Q. (2020). Characteristics and formation mechanisms of defects in surface layer of TC17 subjected to high energy shot peening. Applied Surface Science, 509, 144711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, H., Yuan, X., Wu, K., Xu, C., Jiao, Y., Ge, W., et al. (2018). Effect of high energy shot-peening on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al5052/Ti6Al4V lap joints. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 255, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, X. Z., Wang, J. J., Fang, Y. Y., Madigan, B., Xu, G. F., & Zhou, J. Z. (2014). Investigation of microstructures and residual stresses in laser peened Incoloy 800H weldments. Optics and Laser Technology, 57, 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2013.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hatamleh, O. (2008). Effects of peening on mechanical properties in friction stir welded 2195 aluminum alloy joints. Materials Science and Engineering a-Structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing, 492(1–2), 168–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Itoh, Y. Z., Suruga, S., & Kashiwaya, H. (1989). Prediction of fatigue crack-growth rate in welding residual-stress field. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 33(3), 397–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Price, J. W. H., Pardowska, A. M., Ibrahim, R., & Finlayson, T. R. (2006). Residual stresses evaluation in welds and implications for design for pressure vessel applications. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology-Transactions of the Asme, 128(4), 638–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cellard, C., Retraint, D., Francois, M., Rouhaud, E., & Le Saunier, D. (2012). Laser shock peening of Ti-17 titanium alloy: Influence of process parameters. Materials Science and Engineering a-Structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing, 532, 362–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ganin, E., Komem, Y., & Rosen, A. (1978). Shock-Induced Hardness in Alpha-Iron. Materials Science and Engineering, 33(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hou, L. F., Wei, Y. H., Liu, B. S., & Xu, B. S. (2008). Microstructure evolution of AZ91D induced by high energy shot peening. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 18(5), 1053–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, J. T., Zhang, Y. K., Chen, J. F., Zhou, J. Y., Ge, M. Z., Lu, Y. L., et al. (2015). Effects of laser shock peening on stress corrosion behavior of 7075 aluminum alloy laser welded joints. Materials Science and Engineering a-Structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing, 647, 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFA0405903) and the Chongqing Science & Technology Commission in China (cstc2018jcyjAX0574). This research was also supported by the Sichuan Deyang Industry-University-Research Cooperation Technology Research and Development Project (2019CK094) and the Sichuan Deyang Open University-City Cooperative Technology Research and Development Project (2018CKJ004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinjian Yuan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, R., Yuan, X., Li, T. et al. Effect of High Energy Shot Peening on the Microstructure and Mechanical Property of AZ31B Mg Alloy/HSLA350 Steel Lap Joints. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 22, 831–841 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-021-00501-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-021-00501-5

Keywords

Navigation