Abstract
This paper introduces the PSCORE, which aggregates nine personal characteristics of chief executive officers (CEOs), to signal the quality of earnings. The PSCORE is a composite score based on publicly available data on CEOs. The study reports strong positive relationships between the PSCORE and two different proxies for earnings quality, (1) discretionary accruals and (2) financial statement errors, measured by deviations of the first digits of figures reported in financial statements from those expected by Benford’s Law. Further analyses indicate that the relationships between the PSCORE and the proxies for earnings quality become more pronounced when CEOs have high equity-based compensation incentives. The findings have some implications for practitioners.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This evidence is also consistent with the work of Custódio and Metzger (2014), which shows that financial expert CEOs lead to favourable financial outcomes for firms.
Although some papers (Klein 2002; Bédard et al. 2004; Badolato et al. 2014) refer to membership of an audit committee as an indicator of financial expertise, the PSCORE does not include this indicator, to avoid overidentification. Most corporate governance codes require an audit committee to have at least one member with a financial background (FRC 2003, 2012). Therefore, any member of an audit committee is likely to have a finance-related certification or finance-related work experience. These characteristics have already been captured by the other three financial expertise factors in the PSCORE.
This approach does not apply to the calculation of the other variables.
As a robustness test (not tabulated), we include observations with fewer than 50 first digits and the findings do not change qualitatively.
UK national newspapers which are included in the research results in the LexisNexis database are the Daily Star, Daily Star Sunday, Express Online, Independent Print Ltd, MailOnline, Morning Star, The Business, The Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday (London), The Daily Telegraph (London), Telegraph (London), telegraph.co.uk, The Express, The Guardian, The Independent (United Kingdom), The Mirror (The Daily Mirror and The Sunday Mirror), mirror.co.uk, The Observer, The People, The Sunday, The Sunday Times (London), and The Times (London).
The subsample is smaller than the main sample because firms with fewer than 50 first digits are excluded.
Amiram et al. (2015) report mean and standard deviation of the FSD_SCOREs of listed companies in the US from 2001 to 2011 to be 0.0296 and 0.0087, respectively.
While the PSCORE theoretically varies from zero to nine, there is no CEO with a PSCORE of nine in the sample.
As a robustness test (not tabulated), we define PSCORE groups in another way, with the low-PSCORE group including PSCOREs ranging from 0 to 4 and the high-PSCORE group those from 5 to 8. The findings do not change qualitatively.
We note that we measure real earnings management using the absolute values of residuals estimated from the models of Roychowdhury (2006) for consistency with the construction of the PSCORE, which is designed to signal earnings quality without a particular emphasis on the directional effects of earnings management. When we use the real values of the residuals, the findings show that the coefficients on the PSCORE are still positive. Generally, the results seem to support the notion that the PSCORE is positively associated with the established proxies for real earnings management.
References
Ahmed AS, Duellman S (2013) Managerial overconfidence and accounting conservatism. J Account Res 51(1):1–30
Aier JK, Comprix J, Gunlock MT, Lee D (2005) The financial expertise of CFOs and accounting restatements. Account Horiz 19(3):123–135
Ali A, Zhang W (2015) CEO tenure and earnings management. J Account Econ 59(1):60–79
Amiram D, Bozanic Z, Rouen E (2015) Financial statement errors: evidence from the distributional properties of financial statement numbers. Rev Account Stud 20(4):1540–1593
Armstrong CS, Jagolinzer AD, Larcker DF (2010) Chief executive officer equity incentives and accounting irregularities. J Account Res 48(2):225–271
Armstrong CS, Larcker DF, Ormazabal G, Taylor DJ (2013) The relation between equity incentives and misreporting: the role of risk-taking incentives. J Finan Econ 109(2):327–350
Athanasakou VE, Strong NC, Walker M (2009) Earnings management or forecast guidance to meet analyst expectations? Account Bus Res 39(1):3–35
Baber WR, Kang S-H, Li Y (2011) Modeling discretionary accrual reversal and the balance sheet as an earnings management constraint. Account Rev 86(4):1189–1212
Badolato PG, Donelson DC, Ege M (2014) Audit committee financial expertise and earnings management: the role of status. J Account Econ 58(2–3):208–230
Ball R (2013) Accounting informs investors and earnings management is rife: two questionable beliefs. Account Horiz 27(4):847–853
Barua A, Davidson LF, Rama DV, Thiruvadi S (2010) CFO gender and accruals quality. Account Horiz 24(1):25–39
Bédard J, Chtourou SM, Courteau L (2004) The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Audit J Pract Theory 23(2):13–35
Bergstresser D, Philippon T (2006) Ceo incentives and earnings management. J Finan Econ 80(3):511–529
Bertrand M, Schoar A (2003) Managing with style: the effect of managers on firm policies. Q J Econ 118(4):1169–1208
Botsari A, Meeks G (2008) Do acquirers manage earnings prior to a share for share bid? J Bus Finance Account 35(5–6):633–670
Bozio A, Crawford R, Tetlow G. (2010). The history of state pensions in the UK: 1948 to 2010: Institute for Fiscal Studies
Campbell TC, Gallmeyer M, Johnson SA, Rutherford J, Stanley BW (2011) CEO optimism and forced turnover. J Finan Econ 101(3):695–712
Capalbo F, Frino A, Lim MY, Mollica V, Palumbo R (2018) The impact of CEO narcissism on earnings management. Abacus 54(2):210–226
Carslaw CA (1988) Anomalies in income numbers: evidence of goal oriented behavior. Account Rev 63(2):321–327
Chava S, Purnanandam A (2010) CEOs versus CFOs: incentives and corporate policies. J Finan Econ 97(2):263–278
Cheng Q, Warfield TD (2005) Equity incentives and earnings management. Account Rev 80(2):441–476
Chi J, Gupta M (2009) Overvaluation and earnings management. J Bank Financ 33(9):1652–1663
Christodoulou D, Ma L, Vasnev A (2018) Inference-in-residuals as an estimation method for earnings management. Abacus 54(2):154–180
Cohen DA, Zarowin P (2010) Accrual-based and real earnings management activities around seasoned equity offerings. J Account Econ 50(1):2–19
Custódio C, Metzger D (2014) Financial expert CEOs: CEO׳s work experience and firm׳s financial policies. J Finan Econ 114(1):125–154
Davidson R, Dey A, Smith A (2015) Executives’ “off-the-job” behavior, corporate culture, and financial reporting risk. J Finan Econ 117(1):5–28
Davis AK, Ge W, Matsumoto D, Zhang JL (2015) The effect of manager-specific optimism on the tone of earnings conference calls. Rev Account Stud 20(2):639–673
Dechow PM, Dichev ID (2002) The quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. Account Rev 77(s-1):35–59
Dechow PM, Sloan RG (1991) Executive incentives and the horizon problem: an empirical investigation. J Account Econ 14(1):51–89
Dechow PM, Sloan RG, Sweeney AP (1995) Detecting earnings management. Account Rev 70(2):193–225
Dechow PM, Sloan RG, Sweeney AP (1996) Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the sec. Contemp Account Res 13(1):1–36
Dechow PM, Ge W, Schrand C (2010) Understanding earnings quality: a review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. J Account Econ 50(2):344–401
Dechow PM, Ge W, Larson CR, Sloan RG (2011) Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemp Account Res 28(1):17–82
DeFond ML (2010) Earnings quality research: advances, challenges and future research. J Account Econ 50(2–3):402–409
Demerjian PR, Lev B, Lewis MF, McVay SE (2013) Managerial ability and earnings quality. Account Rev 88(2):463–498
Dey A (2008) Corporate governance and agency conflicts. J Account Res 46(5):1143–1181
Dickinson V (2011) Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle. Account Rev 86(6):1969–1994
Ellul A, Yerramilli V (2013) Stronger risk controls, lower risk: Evidence from U.S. Bank holding companies. J Finance 68(5):1757–1803
Farber DB (2005) Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter? Account Rev 80(2):539–561
Feng M, Ge W, Luo S, Shevlin T (2011) Why do CFOs become involved in material accounting manipulations? J Account Econ 51(1–2):21–36
Fields TD, Lys TZ, Vincent L (2001) Empirical research on accounting choice. J Account Econ 31(1–3):255–307
Financial Reporting Council (FRC) (2003) The combined code on corporate governance
Financial Reporting Council (FRC) (2012) UK corporate governance code. https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/Corporate-Governance/UK-Corporate-Governance-Code-September-2012.aspx. Accessed 27 Aug 2018
Financial Reporting Council (FRC) (2016) Current RSBs and RQBs. https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Conduct/Professional-oversight/Oversight-of-Audit/Recognition-of-Recognised-Supervisory-Bodies-and-R/Current-RSBs-and-RQBs.aspx. Accessed 27 Aug 2018
Francis J, Huang AH, Rajgopal S, Zang AY (2008) Ceo reputation and earnings quality. Contemp Account Res 25(1):109–147
Galasso A, Simcoe TS (2011) CEO overconfidence and innovation. Manag Sci 57(8):1469–1484
García Lara JM, Garcia Osma B, Neophytou E (2009) Earnings quality in ex-post failed firms. Account Bus Res 39(2):119–138
Gerakos J (2012) Discussion of detecting earnings management: a new approach. J Account Res 50(2):335–347
Goh L, Gupta A (2016) Remuneration of non-executive directors: evidence from the UK. Br Account Rev 48(3):379–399
Gounopoulos D, Pham H (2018) Financial expert ceos and earnings management around initial public offerings. Int J Account 53(2):102–117
Hambrick DC (2007) Upper echelons theory: an update. Acad Manag Rev 32(2):334–343
Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manag Rev 9(2):193–206
Hambrick DC, Finkelstein S, Mooney AC (2005) Executive job demands: new insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Acad Manag Rev 30(3):472–491
Hilary G, Huang S, Xu Y (2016) Marital status and earnings management. Eur Account Rev 26(2):1–6
Hirshleifer D, Low A, Teoh SH (2012) Are overconfident CEOs better innovators? J Finance 67(4):1457–1498
Holthausen RW, Larcker DF, Sloan RG (1995) Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earnings. J Account Econ 19(1):29–74
Hribar P, Collins DW (2002) Errors in estimating accruals: implications for empirical research. J Account Res 40(1):105–134
Hsieh T-S, Bedard JC, Johnstone KM (2014) Ceo overconfidence and earnings management during shifting regulatory regimes. J Bus Finance Account 41(9–10):1243–1268
Huang H-W, Rose-Green E, Lee C-C (2012) CEO age and financial reporting quality. Account Horiz 26(4):725–740
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) (2009) ISA 315 “identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement through understanding the entity and its environment”. In: International auditing and assurance standards board
Iqbal A, Strong N (2010) The effect of corporate governance on earnings management around UK rights issues. Int J Manag Finance 6(3):168–189
Iqbal A, Espenlaub S, Strong N (2009) Earnings management around UK open offers. Eur J Finance 15(1):29–51
Jackson AB (2018) Discretionary accruals: Earnings management… Or not? Abacus 54(2):136–153
Jia Y, Lent LV, Zeng Y (2014) Masculinity, testosterone, and financial misreporting. J Account Res 52(5):1195–1246
Jian M, Lee KW (2011) Does CEO reputation matter for capital investments? J Corp Finan 17(4):929–946
Jiang J, Petroni KR, Yanyan Wang I (2010) CFOs and CEOs: Who have the most influence on earnings management? J Finan Econ 96(3):513–526
Jones JJ (1991) Earnings management during import relief investigations. J Account Res 29(2):193–228
Joos P, Leone A, Zimmerman JL (2003) Selecting CEOs: matching the person to the job. Unpublished working paper University of Rochester
Kalyta P (2009) Accounting discretion, horizon problem, and CEO retirement benefits. Account Rev 84(5):1553–1573
Kim J-B, Wang Z, Zhang L (2016) Ceo overconfidence and stock price crash risk. Contemp Account Res 33(4):1720–1749
Klein A (2002) Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. J Account Econ 33(3):375–400
Kothari SP, Leone AJ, Wasley CE (2005) Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. J Account Econ 39(1):163–197
Kuang YF, Qin B, Wielhouwer JL (2014) Ceo origin and accrual-based earnings management. Account Horiz 28(3):605–626
Lafond R (2008) Discussion of “CEO reputation and earnings quality”. Contemp Account Res 25(1):149–156
Larcker DF, Richardson SA, Tuna I (2007) Corporate governance, accounting outcomes, and organizational performance. Account Rev 82(4):963–1008
Lee C-WJ, Li LY, Yue H (2006) Performance, growth and earnings management. Rev Account Stud 11(2–3):305–334
Liang Y, Marinovic I, Varas F (2018) The credibility of financial reporting: a reputation-based approach. Account Rev 93(1):317–333
Malmendier U, Tate G (2009) Superstar CEOs. Q J Econ 124(4):1593–1638
McNichols MF, Stubben SR (2018) Research design issues in studies using discretionary accruals. Abacus 54(2):227–246
Milbourn TT (2003) CEO reputation and stock-based compensation. J Finan Econ 68(2):233–262
Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996) Applied linear statistical models, vol 4. Irwin, Chicago
Nguyen NTM, Iqbal A, Shiwakoti RK (2015) There’s no smoke without fire: Does the context of earnings management contain information about future stock returns? Working paper. University of Kent. http://www.efmaefm.org/0EFMAMEETINGS/EFMA%20ANNUAL%20MEETINGS/2015-Amsterdam/papers/EFMA2015_0174_fullpaper.pdf
Nguyen TT, Duong C, Nguyen N (2018) Benford’s law, earnings management, and accounting conservatism: The UK evidence. Paper presented at the European Financial Management Association
Nguyen TT, Duong CM, Nguyen NTM, Bui HQ (2020) Accounting conservatism and banking expertise on board of directors. Rev Quant Finance Account 55:501–539
Nigrini MJ (1996) A taxpayer compliance application of benford’s law. J Am Tax Assoc 18(1):72–91
Nigrini MJ (2015) Persistent patterns in stock returns, stock volumes, and accounting data in the US Capital markets. J Account Audit Finance 30(4):541–557
Nigrini MJ, Miller SJ (2009) Data diagnostics using second-order tests of Benford’s law. Audit J Pract Theory 28(2):305–324
Nigrini MJ, Mittermaier LJ (1997) The use of Benford’s law as an aid in analytical procedures. Audit J Pract Theory 16(2):52–67
Owens E, Wu J, Zimmerman J (2013) Business model shocks and abnormal accrual models (ssrn scholarly paper no. Id 2365304). Social Science Research Network, Rochester
Peasnell KV, Pope PF, Young S (2000) Detecting earnings management using cross-sectional abnormal accruals models. Account Bus Res 30(4):313–326
Peasnell KV, Pope PF, Young S (2005) Board monitoring and earnings management: Do outside directors influence abnormal accruals? J Bus Finance Account 32(7–8):1311–1346
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (2010) Auditing standard no. 12 “identifying and assessing risks of material misstatement”. In: Public company accounting oversight board
Roychowdhury S (2006) Earnings management through real activities manipulation. J Account Econ 42(3):335–370
Schrand CM, Zechman SLC (2012) Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial misreporting. J Account Econ 53(1–2):311–329
Serfling MA (2014) CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies. J Corp Finance 25:251–273
Shipman JE, Swanquist QT, Whited RL (2017) Propensity score matching in accounting research. Account Rev 92(1):213–244
Taffler RJ (1983) The assessment of company solvency and performance using a statistical model. Account Bus Res 13(52):295–308
Thomas JK (1989) Unusual patterns in reported earnings. Account Rev 64:773–787
Wade JB, Porac JF, Pollock TG, Graffin SD (2006) The burden of celebrity: the impact of CEO certification contests on CEO pay and performance. Acad Manag J 49(4):643–660
Yim S (2013) The acquisitiveness of youth: CEO age and acquisition behavior. J Finan Econ 108(1):250–273
Zang AY (2012) Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. Account Rev 87(2):675–703
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Cheng-Few Lee (the Editor in Chief) and the two anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions that have greatly improved our paper. We gratefully acknowledge John Chandler, Balasingham Balachandran, Jia Liu, Yanlei Zhang, Facundo Mercado, Laila Aldaoor, Young Sang Kim, Donghui Li, Halit Gonenc, Youngsuk Yook, Jurica Susnjara, Ljiljana Kukec, Tiemei (Sarah) Li, Wei Luo as well as anonymous reviewers and participants at British Academy of Management’s 2016 Corporate Governance Early Careers Researcher Conference, British Accounting and Finance Association South Western Area Group’s 2016 Doctoral Colloquium, European Financial Management Association’s 2017 Annual Conference, European Accounting Association’s 2017 Annual Congress, and American Accounting Association’s 2017 Annual Meeting for helpful comments and suggestions on previous versions of the paper. All remaining errors are our own.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Variable definitions
Appendix: Variable definitions
Variable | Definition |
---|---|
Individual factors of the PSCORE | |
pAGE | Equals one if either (1) the age of the CEO is less than or equal to the 25th percentile of the industry-year (identified by Datastream Level 6) or (2) the CEO is 1 year or less from retirement age, and zero otherwise. The retirement ages of men and women in the UK are 65 and 60, respectively, for the period from 1948 to 2010; from April 2010 to March 2020, the retirement age of women increases by one month every month until it reaches 65 (Bozio et al. 2010) |
pCERT | Equals one if the CEO does not have an MBA or CPA equivalent, and zero otherwise. CPA equivalent is defined as a professional accounting certification issued by one of the five qualifying bodies currently accredited by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC 2016): Association of International Accountants (AIA), Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA), Chartered Accountants Ireland (CAI), Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW), Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS) (or international equivalent certifications) |
pCFO | Equals one if the CEO does not have work experience as a chief financial officer, and zero otherwise |
pCHAIRMAN | Equals one if the CEO serves as the chairperson of the board of directors of the firm, and zero otherwise |
pEARLY | Equals one if the CEO is within their first three years of service at the firm, and zero otherwise |
pFOUNDER | Equals one if the CEO is the founder or a co-founder of the firm, and zero otherwise |
pPRESS | Equals one if the number of newspapers simultaneously citing the name of the CEO and the company they work for in the year question is less than the corresponding industry mean (identified by Datastream Level 6), and zero otherwise |
pROA | Equals one if the average of the industry-adjusted return on assets (aveROA) during the last 3 years of the CEO’s tenure is negative, and zero otherwise, where aveROA is (1) the average of the industry-adjusted return on assets in years t, t − 1 and t-2 if the CEO is in their third year of tenure, or (ii) the average of the industry-adjusted return on assets in years t and t − 1 if the CEO is in their second year of tenure, or (3) the industry-adjusted return on assets in year t if the CEO is in their first year of tenure. Return on assets equals net income before extraordinary items divided by total assets |
pROLE | Equals one if the number of years the CEO has been working as the CEO of their current firm is less than the corresponding industry-year mean (identified by Datastream Level 6), and zero otherwise |
PSCORE | \( = {\text{pCFO}} + {\text{pCERT}} + {\text{pROLE}} + {\text{pPRESS}} + {\text{pROA}} + {\text{pEARLY}} + {\text{pFOUNDER}} + {\text{pCHAIRMAN}} + {\text{pAGE}} \) |
PSCORE_O | PSCORE with CEO overconfidence: \( PSCORE\_O = PSCORE + CEO\_OVERCONFIDENCE \) where CEO_OVERCONFIDENCE is CEO-level overconfidence. We first calculate the measure of firm-level overconfidence (Campbell et al. 2011; Schrand and Zechman 2012; Kim et al. 2016), denoted by OVERCONFIDENCE, which has a value of one if a firm-year observation meets at least three out of the following five conditions: (1) INVEST is ranked in the top industry-year (Datastream Level 6) quartile. INVEST is excess investment, which is the residual of the regression: \( \frac{{Total Assets_{i,t} - Total Assets_{i,t - 1} }}{{Total Assets_{i,t - 1} }} = \alpha + \beta \frac{{Sale_{i,t} - Sale_{i,t - 1} }}{{Sale_{i,t - 1} }} + \varepsilon \) (2) ACQUISITION is ranked in the top industry-year (Datastream Level 6) quartile. ACQUISITION is equal to net acquisition (cash flow statements) scaled by total assets (3) The debt-to-equity ratio is ranked in the top industry-year (Datastream Level 6) quartile. The debt-to-equity ratio is equal to the sum of long-term debts and short-term debts divided by the market value of equity (4) Either convertible debt is greater than zero or preferred stock is greater than 0 (5) Zero dividend yield Otherwise, it has a value of zero. Following Campbell et al. (2011) and Kim et al. (2016), CEO-level overconfidence takes a value of one starting from the first year in which the CEO’s firm has a score for OVERCONFIDENCE equal to one |
Proxies for earnings quality | |
DAC | Absolute values of discretionary total accruals (DAC), estimated by the modified-Jones models (Jones 1991; Dechow et al. 1995) with at least ten observations for each industry-year (Datastream Level 6). \( DAC_{i,t} = \left| {\frac{{AC_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }} - \left[ {\hat{\alpha } + \hat{\beta }_{1} \left( {\frac{1}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right) + \hat{\beta }_{2} \left( {\frac{{\Delta REV_{i,t} - \Delta REC_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right) + \hat{\beta }_{3} \varvec{ }\left( {\frac{{PPE_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right)} \right]} \right| \); where \( \hat{\alpha },\; \hat{\beta }_{1} ,\;\hat{\beta }_{2} ,\;\hat{\beta }_{3} \) are coefficients estimated by the model: \( \frac{{AC_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }} = \alpha + \beta_{1} \left( {\frac{1}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right) + \beta_{2} \left( {\frac{{\Delta REV_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right) + \beta_{3} \varvec{ }\left( {\frac{{PPE_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right) + \varepsilon_{i,t} \); \( AC_{i,t} \) is total accruals, which equals net income before extraordinary items minus net cash flows from operations; \( A_{i,t - 1} \) is total assets of firm i at end of year t–1; \( \Delta REV_{i,t} \) and \( \Delta REC_{i,t} \) are change in sales and change in receivables from year t–1 to year t of firm i, respectively; \( PPE_{i,t} \) is gross plant, property and equipment of firm i at end of year t |
DAMP | Absolute values of discretionary working capital accruals (DAMP) estimated by the margin model of Peasnell et al. (2000) with at least ten observations for each industry-year (Datastream Level 6). DAMP are the absolute values of the residuals of the following regression: \( \frac{{WAC_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }} = \alpha + \beta_{1} \left( {\frac{{REV_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right) + \beta_{2} \left( {\frac{{REV_{i,t} - \Delta REC_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right) + \varepsilon_{i,t} ; \) \( WAC_{i,t} \) is working capital accruals, \( WAC_{i,t} = \left( {\Delta CA_{i,t} - \Delta CHE_{i,t} } \right) - \left( {\Delta CL_{i,t} - \Delta STD_{i,t} } \right) \) [\( \Delta CA_{i,t} \) is change in current assets; \( \Delta CHE_{i,t} \) is change in cash and cash equivalents; \( \Delta CL_{i,t} \) is change in current liabilities; \( \Delta STD_{i,t} \) is change in short-term debts]; \( A_{i,t - 1} \) is total assets of firm i at end of year t–1; \( REV_{i,t} \) is sales of firm i in year t; \( \Delta REC_{i,t} \) is receivables from year t–1 to year t of firm i |
DWAC | Absolute values of discretionary working capital accruals (DWAC) estimated by the modified-Jones models (Jones 1991; Dechow et al. 1995) with at least ten observations for each industry-year (Datastream Level 6). \( DWCA_{i,t} = \left| {\frac{{WAC_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }} - \left[ {\hat{\alpha } + \hat{\beta }_{1} \left( {\frac{1}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right) + \hat{\beta }_{2} \left( {\frac{{\Delta REV_{i,t} - \Delta REC_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right) + \hat{\beta }_{3} \varvec{ }\left( {\frac{{PPE_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right)} \right]} \right| \); where \( \hat{\alpha },\; \hat{\beta }_{1} ,\;\hat{\beta }_{2} ,\;\hat{\beta }_{3} \) are coefficients estimated by the model: \( \frac{{WAC_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }} = \alpha + \beta_{1} \left( {\frac{1}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right) + \beta_{2} \left( {\frac{{\Delta REV_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right) + \beta_{3} \varvec{ }\left( {\frac{{PPE_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right) + \varepsilon_{i,t} \); \( WAC_{i,t} \) is working capital accruals, \( WAC_{i,t} = \left( {\Delta CA_{i,t} - \Delta CHE_{i,t} } \right) - \left( {\Delta CL_{i,t} - \Delta STD_{i,t} } \right) \) [\( \Delta CA_{i,t} \) is change in current assets; \( \Delta CHE_{i,t} \) is change in cash and cash equivalents; \( \Delta CL_{i,t} \) is change in current liabilities; \( \Delta STD_{i,t} \) is change in short-term debts]; \( A_{i,t - 1} \) is total assets of firm i at end of year t–1; \( \Delta REV_{i,t} \) and \( \Delta REC_{i,t} \) are change in sales and change in receivables from year t–1 to year t of firm i respectively; \( PPE_{i,t} \) is gross plant, property and equipment of firm i at end of year t |
FSD_SCORE | Mean absolute deviation of the first digits of figures reported in the financial statements of firm i in year t from what are expected by Benford’s Law. \( FSD\_SCORE_{i,t} = \frac{{\mathop \sum \nolimits_{d = 1}^{9} \left| {OBSERVED_{d,i,t} - EXPECTED_{d} } \right|}}{9} \); where \( OBSERVED_{d,i,t} \) is the observed (actual) probability of digit d of firm i in year t; \( EXPECTED_{d} \) is the expected probability of first digit d as defined by Benford’s Law; and d = 1, 2, …, 9 |
KS | The maximum cumulative absolute deviation of the first digits of items reported in the financial statements from those expected by Benford’s Law: \( KS_{i,t} = max\left\{ {\left| {OD_{1,i,t} - ED_{1} } \right|,\left| {\left( {OD_{1,i,t} + OD_{2,i,t} } \right) - \left( {ED_{1} + ED_{2} } \right)} \right|, \ldots ,\left| {\left( {OD_{1,i,t} + OD_{2,i,t} + \ldots + OD_{9,i,t} } \right) - \left( {ED_{1} + ED_{2} + \ldots + ED_{9} } \right)} \right|} \right\} \) where \( OD_{d,i,t} \) is the cumulative observed probability of the first digit d (d = 1, 2, …, 9) of firm i in year t; \( ED_{d} \) is the expected probability of the first digit d (d = 1, 2, …, 9), as defined by Benford’s Law |
DCF | Absolute value of abnormal cash flow. DCF is the absolute value of the residual of the following regression for each (Datastream Level 6) industry and each year with at least ten observations: \( \frac{{CFO_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }} = \alpha + \beta_{1} \left( {\frac{1}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right) + \beta_{2} \left( {\frac{{REV_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right) + \beta_{3} \left( {\frac{{\Delta REV_{i,t} }}{{A_{i,t - 1} }}} \right) + \varepsilon_{i,t} \) where \( CFO_{i,t} \) is net cash flows from operations; \( A_{i,t - 1} \) is total opening assets; \( REV_{i,t} \) is sales; \( \Delta REV_{i,t} \) is sales in year t minus sales in year t − 1; i is firm i; t is the year; and \( \varepsilon_{i,t} \) is the error term |
DDISEXP | Absolute value of abnormal discretionary expenditures. DDISEXP is the absolute value of the residual of the following regression for each (Datastream Level 6) industry and each year with at least ten observations: \( \frac{{{\text{DISEXP}}_{{{\text{i}},{\text{t}}}} }}{{{\text{A}}_{{{\text{i}},{\text{t}} - 1}} }} =\upalpha\left( {\frac{1}{{{\text{A}}_{{{\text{i}},{\text{t}} - 1}} }}} \right) +\upbeta_{1} \left( {\frac{{{\text{REV}}_{{{\text{i}},{\text{t}} - 1}} }}{{{\text{A}}_{{{\text{i}},{\text{t}} - 1}} }}} \right) +\upvarepsilon_{{{\text{i}},{\text{t}}}} \) where \( DISEXP_{i,t} \) is discretionary expenditures, which equals R&D expenses plus selling and administrative expenses; \( A_{it - 1} \) is total opening assets; \( REV_{i,t - 1} \) is sales in year t− 1; i is the firm; t is the year; \( \varepsilon_{i,t} \) is the error term |
DPROD | Absolute value of abnormal production costs. DPROD is the absolute value of the residual of the following regression for each (Datastream Level 6) industry and each year with at least ten observations: \( \frac{{{\text{PROD}}_{\text{it}} }}{{{\text{A}}_{{{\text{i}},{\text{t}} - 1}} }} =\upalpha\left( {\frac{1}{{{\text{A}}_{{{\text{i}},{\text{t}} - 1}} }}} \right) +\upbeta_{1} \left( {\frac{{{\text{REV}}_{{{\text{i}},{\text{t}}}} }}{{{\text{A}}_{{{\text{i}},{\text{t}} - 1}} }}} \right) +\upbeta_{2} \left( {\frac{{\Delta {\text{REV}}_{{{\text{i}},{\text{t}}}} }}{{{\text{A}}_{{{\text{i}},{\text{t}} - 1}} }}} \right) +\upbeta_{3} \left( {\frac{{\Delta {\text{REV}}_{{{\text{i}},{\text{t}} - 1}} }}{{{\text{A}}_{{{\text{i}},{\text{t}} - 1}} }}} \right) +\upvarepsilon_{{{\text{i}},{\text{t}}}} \) where \( PROD_{i,t} \) is production costs, which equal the sum of cost of goods sold and change in inventories from year t − 1 to year t; \( REV_{i,t} \) is sales; \( \Delta REV_{it} \) is sales in year t minus sales in year t − 1; \( \Delta REV_{it - 1} \) is sales in year t − 1 minus sales in year t−2; \( A_{it - 1} \) is total opening assets; i is the firm; t is the year; \( \varepsilon_{i,t} \) is the error term |
REM | Total real earnings management. REM = DCF + DPROD + DDISEXP |
Control variables | |
aACIND | Industry-adjusted audit committee independence, where audit committee independence is the percentage of independent members on the audit committee. Industry-adjusted value equals the firm value minus the mean for the corresponding industry-year. |
aBDIND | Industry-adjusted board independence, where board independence is the percentage of independent directors on the board. |
aLEV | Industry-adjusted leverage, where leverage (LEV) equals the sum of long-term debts and short-term debts, scaled by total assets. |
aLOGMBT | Industry-adjusted market-to-book ratio, where the market-to-book ratio (LOGMTB) is the natural log of the ratio of the market value to the book value of equity. |
aLOGMVE | Industry-adjusted firm size, where firm size (LOGMVE) equals the natural log of the market value of equity. |
aNOA | Industry-adjusted net operating asset ratio (NOA), where \( NOA = \left[ {CEQ + \left( {DLTT + DLC} \right) - CHE} \right]/REV \), where \( {\text{CEQ}} \) is the total book value of equity, \( {\text{DLTT}} \) is long-term debts, \( {\text{DLC}} \) is short-term debts; \( {\text{CHE}} \) is cash and cash equivalent; \( {\text{REV}} \) is sales. |
AUDIT | equals one if the firm is audited by a Big Four audit firm, and zero otherwise. |
CYCLE | Indicator for the business life cycle, calculated based on Dickinson (2011), and equals one if a firm has negative CFO, negative CFI, and positive CFF (young firm), or positive CFO, negative CFI, and positive CFF (growth firm), and zero if a firm has positive CFO, negative CFI, and negative CFF (mature firm), where CFO is cash flows from operating activities, CFI is cash flows from investing activities, and CFF is cash flows from financing activities |
DISTRESS | equals one if ZSCORE is negative, and zero otherwise, where ZSCORE, following Taffler (1983), is calculated as follows: \( {\text{ZSCORE}} = 3.2 + 12.18 * {\text{X}}_{1} + 2.50 * {\text{X}}_{2} - 10.68 * {\text{X}}_{3} + 0.029 * {\text{X}}_{4} \), where \( {\text{X}}_{1} = \frac{\text{Profit before tax}}{\text{current liabilities}} \), \( {\text{X}}_{2} = \frac{\text{Current assets}}{\text{Total liabilities}} \), \( {\text{X}}_{3} = \frac{\text{Current liabilities}}{\text{Total assets}} \), and \( {\text{X}}_{4} = \frac{{\left( {{\text{Quick assets}} - {\text{Current liabilities}}} \right)}}{{\left( {{\text{Sales}} - {\text{Pretax income}} - {\text{Depreciation}}} \right)/365}} \). |
INCENTIVE | Equity-based incentives of the CEO: \( INCENTIVE = \frac{ONEPCT}{{\left( {ONEPCT + SALARY + BONUS} \right)}} \) \( ONEPCT = 0.01 x PRICE x \left( {SHARE + OPTION} \right) \) where \( INCENTIVE \) is the equity-based incentives of the CEO; \( ONEPCT \) is the dollar change in the CEO’s equity holdings following a 1% change in the stock price; \( PRICE \) is the closing share price; \( SHARE \) is the number of shares held by the CEO; \( OPTION \) is the number of options held by the CEO; \( SALARY \) is the total cash salary the CEO receives; and \( BONUS \) is the cash bonus the CEO receives. Compensation data are manually collected from the Bloomberg database |
M&A | Equals one if a firm announces a share-financed merger and acquisition deal, and zero otherwise |
SEO | Equals one if a firm issues a significant portion of equity (outstanding shares increase by at least 5% and proceeds from equity issuance are positive), and zero otherwise |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nguyen, T.T., Duong, C.M. & Narendran, S. CEO profile and earnings quality. Rev Quant Finan Acc 56, 987–1025 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-020-00916-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-020-00916-7