Abstract
Piano key weirs (PKWs) are an improved form of labyrinth weirs, which are becoming popular as a more hydraulically efficient and cost-effective type of weir over its counterparts for both spillway and river flow conditions. More than thirty PKWs are already in construction worldwide, with constructions in India at Swara Kuddu. More than twenty parameters influence the flow over a PKW, and as such, the flow hydraulics near PKW is complex. It is imperative to study the performance of different shapes of PKW to know which shape offers more hydraulically and cost-effective advantages over other shapes. The present study combines the experimental and numerical study of discharge capacity and sediment carrying capacity of the different plan geometries of PKW. The experimental study of the discharging capacity of PKW has been carried out at eighteen discharge points for three plan geometries of PKW. A numerical study using ANSYS FLUENT has also been carried out at five discharges and compared with the experimental results. Vertical velocity near a weir is an essential factor facilitating the uplift of sediment. Sediment profile in the channel has been studied at three discharges experimentally for two types of PKWs: RPKW and TPKW6, all for free-flow conditions. The numerical study has also been carried out at these experimental discharges for studying the vertical component of velocity (v) upstream of PKW. An attempt has been made to isolate critical areas where the sediments are being lifted by the turbulence mechanism, thus helping them pass over the weir. The study shows PKW with a rectangular plan (RPKW) to be more hydraulically efficient than TPKWs with six-degree and thirteen-degree lateral crest variations (TPKW6 & TPKW13). The study also shows RPKW to be more self-cleaning in nature than its trapezoidal counterpart (TPKW6). Numerical study shows a close resemblance to the experimental results with errors well within permissible limits implying its greater use in ascertaining complex flows around hydraulic structures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Some or all data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.
Code Availability
ANSYS-FLUENT has been used for this study, license of which is available at IIT (BHU),Varanasi.
Abbreviations
- PKW:
-
Piano Key Weir
- RPKW:
-
Piano Key Weir with a rectangular plan
- TPKW6, TPKW13:
-
Piano Key Weir with trapezoidal plan and α = 6 & 13 degrees
- Relative ratio (r):
-
Increased discharge ratio (QPKW/QW)
- Bi/ Bo :
-
Length of inlet/outlet cantilever overhang
- Bb :
-
Base length
- Ts :
-
Sidewall thickness
- d:
-
Sand grain diameter (mm)
- g:
-
Acceleration of gravity (m2 = s)
- H:
-
Water head at sufficient distance upstream of PKW (upstream flow depth measured relative to the weir crest) (m)
- h:
-
Water head at middle of the lateral crest of PKW (m)
- L:
-
Total length of the PKW’s spillway front (developed crest length) (m)
- P:
-
Vertical height of PKW (m)
- Pi:
-
Height of inlet of PKW(m)
- Q:
-
Discharge (L/S)
- Cd :
-
Coefficient of discharge
- Re:
-
Reynolds number
- V:
-
Velocity (m/s)
- v:
-
Velocity Component of Velocity(V) along vertical direction (Y) (m/s)
- W:
-
Total width of the weir/channel (m)
- We :
-
Weber number
- Wi/Wo :
-
Inlet/outlet key width ratio
- X:
-
Coordinate along flow direction (m)
- Y:
-
Coordinate in the direction of the vertical depth (m)
- Z:
-
Coordinate along transverse direction (m)
- α:
-
Angle between the lateral crest and the longitudinal direction in the direction of flow (degrees)
- B:
-
Upstream–downstream lateral crest length of PKW
References
Abhash A, Pandey K (2020) A review of Piano Key Weir as a superior alternative for dam rehabilitation. ISH J Hydraul Eng 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2020.1767516
Akbari M, Salmasi F, Arvanaghi H, Karbasi M, Farsadizadeh D (2019) Application of Gaussian process regression model to predict discharge coefficient of Gated Piano Key Weir. Water Resour Manage 33:3929–3947
Allahdadi K, Ansari Ghojghar M, Zeinali M, Parsi E (2020) Predicting the discharge coefficient of arched piano key with a trapezoidal cross section. Iran J Soil Water Res. https://doi.org/10.22059/ijswr.2020.309833.668733
Belzner F, Merkel J, Pfrommer U, Gebhardt M, Thorenz C (2016) Piano-Key-Wehre und Labyrinth-Wehre unter den Randbedingungen einer Bundeswasserstraße. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11970/104560
Breusers H, Raudkivi AJ (1991) Scouring. AA Balkema, Rotterdam
Crookston BM (2010) Labyrinth weirs. Utah State University
Falvey HT (2003) Hydraulic design of labyrinth weirs. ASCE Press (American Society of Civil Engineers), Reston
Gebhardt M, Herbst J, Merkel J, Belzner F (2019) Sedimentation at labyrinth weirs–an experimental study of the self-cleaning process. J Hydraul Res 57:579–590
Herbst J, Gebhardt M, Merkel J, Belzner F, Thorenz C (2018) Sediment transport over labyrinth weirs. Int Symp Hydraul Struct. https://doi.org/10.15142/T3XP91
Jüstrich S, Pfister M, Schleiss AJ (2016) Mobile riverbed scour downstream of a Piano Key weir. J HydraulEng 142:04016043
Kabiri-Samani A, Javaheri A (2012) Discharge coefficients for free and submerged flow over Piano Key weirs. J Hydraul Res 50:114–120
Karamvand A, Hajikandi H, Sharafati A (2020) Comparison of discharge coefficient between arced piano key weir and non-arc piano key weirs. 13(47):15–26. http://wej.miau.ac.ir/article_4457_27e8179226b366a703b7f7b889d7b9c6.pdf
Khassaf SI, Al-Baghdadi MB (2015) Experimental study of non-rectangular piano key weir discharge coefficient. Journal homepage: www IJEE IEEFoundation org 6:425–436
Leite Ribeiro M, Bieri M, Boillat J-L, Schleiss A, Singhal G, Sharma N (2011) Discharge capacity of piano key weirs. J Hydraul Eng 138:199–203
Lempérière F, Ouamane A (2003) The piano keys weir: a new cost-effective solution for spillways. Int J Hydropower Dams 10:144–149
Lempérière F, Vigny J, Ouamane A (2011) General comments on labyrinth and piano key weirs: the past and present. In: Proc. Intl. Conf. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs, Liège B. pp 17–24
Machiels O, Erpicum S, Dewals BJ, Archambeau P, Pirotton M (2011) Experimental observation of flow characteristics over a piano key weir. J Hydraul Res 49:359–366
Mehboudi A, Attari J, Hosseini S (2016) Experimental study of discharge coefficient for trapezoidal piano key weirs. Flow Meas Instrum 50:65–72
Mehboudi A, Attari J, Hosseini A (2017) Flow regimes over trapezoidal piano key weirs. In: Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs III: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs (PKW), Qui Nhon, Vietnam. p 65
Noseda M, Stojnic I, Pfister M, Schleiss AJ (2019) Upstream erosion and sediment passage at piano key weirs. J Hydraul Eng 145:04019029
Pralong J et al (2011) A naming convention for the piano key weirs geometrical parameters. Proceedings of the International Conference Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 271–278
Ribeiro M, Boillat J-L, Schleiss A, Laugier F, Albalat C (2007) Rehabilitation of St-Marc dam. Experimental optimization of a piano key weir Proc of the 32ndCongress of IAHR
Ribeiro ML, Pfister M, Schleiss AJ, Boillat J-L (2012) Hydraulic design of A-type piano key weirs. J Hydraul Res 50:400–408
Ribeiro ML, Pfister M, Schleiss AJ (2013) Overview of piano key weir prototypes and scientific model investigations. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 273–281
Sharma N, Tiwari H (2013) Experimental study on vertical velocity and submergence depth near Piano Key Weir. Labyrinth and Piano Key Weirs II-PKW 2013. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 93–100
Sharma N, Tiwari H, Singhal G (2012) Piano-key weir technology: a possible solution of Dam safety in narrow river and existing dams. Dams and Spillways in Himalayan Regions. Proceedings for Seminar on ‘Dams and Spillways in Himalayan Regions’,30 November 2012, Water Resources Department, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge IIT (BHU), Varanasi for infrastructure support, and Main Library IIT (BHU), Varanasi, for paper downloads. We are also thankful to Dr. Bhawana Arora (Assistant Professor (English), Department of applied sciences, REC Sonbhadra, for taking out her precious time in language editing my paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
1. Amiya Abhash (Corresponding Author)
Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Methodology; Investigation; Validation; Resources; Visualization; Software; Validation; Roles/Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing.
2. Dr. K.KPandey (Author 2)
Conceptualization; Visualization; Methodology; Investigation; Resources; Supervision; Validation; Writing—review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abhash, A., Pandey, K.K. Experimental and Numerical Study of Discharge Capacity and Sediment Profile Upstream of Piano Key Weirs with Different Plan Geometries. Water Resour Manage 35, 1529–1546 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02800-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02800-y