Abstract
Standard food safety assessments of genetically modified crops require a thorough molecular characterization of the novel DNA as inserted into the plant that is intended for commercialization, as well as a comparison of agronomic and nutritional characteristics of the genetically modified to the non-modified counterpart. These characterization data are used to identify any unintended changes in the inserted DNA or in the modified plant that would require assessment for safety in addition to the assessment of the intended modification. An unusual case of an unintended effect discovered from the molecular characterization of a genetically modified late blight resistant potato developed for growing in Bangladesh and Indonesia is presented here. Not only was a significant portion of the plasmid vector backbone DNA inserted into the plant along with the intended insertion of an R-gene for late blight resistance, but the inserted DNA was split into two separate fragments and inserted into two separate chromosomes. One fragment carries the R-gene and the other fragment carries the NPTII selectable marker gene and the plasmid backbone DNA. The implications of this for the food safety assessment of this late blight resistant potato are considered.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambarwati AD, Herman M, Purwito A, Sumaraw SM, Aswidinnoor H (2011) Resistance evaluation on populations of crosses between transgenic potato Katahdin RB and non-transgenic Atlantic and Granola to late blight (Phytophthora infestans) in confined field trial. Indones J AgriSci 12(1):33–39
Bushey DF, Bannon GA, Delaney BF, Graser G, Hefford M et al (2014) Characteristics and safety assessment of intractable proteins in genetically modified crops. RegulToxicolPharmacol 69(2014):154–170
Codex (2008) Codex Alimentarius: CXG 45-2003 Guideline for the conduct of food safety assessment of foods derived from recombinant-DNA plants. http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/codextexts/guidelines/en/. Accessed 19 Mar 2020
Craig W, Tepfer M, Degrassi G, Ripandelli D (2008) An overview of general features of risk assessment of genetically modified crops. Euphytica 164:853–860
Delaney B, Astwood JD, Cunny H, Conn RE, Herouet-Guicheney C et al (2008) Evaluation of protein safety in the context of agricultural biotechnology. Food ChemToxicol 46(2008):S71–S97
Devos Y, Elliott KC, Macdonald P, McComas K, Parriono L, Vrbos D, Robinson T, Spiegelhalter D, Gallani B (2019) Conducting fit-for-purpose food safety risk assessments. EFSA J 17(S1):e170707. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170707
EFSA (2007) Statement of the scientific panel on genetically modified organisms on the safe use of the nptII antibiotic reistancemarkes gene in genetically modified plants. EFSA J 5:742
Friedrichs S, Takasu Y, Kearns P, Dagallier B, Oshima R, Schofield J, Moreddu C (2019) Meeting report of the OECD conference on ‘‘Genome Editing: applications in agriculture—implications for health. Environ Regul’’ Transg Res 2019(28):419–463. https://doi.org/10.1007//s11248-019-00154-1
Fuchs RL, Ream JE, Hammond BG, Naylor MW, Leimgruber RM, Berberich SA (1993) (1993) Safety assessment of the neomycin phosphotransferase II (NPTII) protein. Bio/Technol 11:1543–1547. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1293-1543 (PMID: 7764244)
Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST). 2018. Genome editing in agriculture: methods, applications, and Governance—A paper in the series on the need for agricultural innovation to sustainably feed the World by 2050. Issue Paper 60. CAST, Ames, Iowa
Habig JW, Rowland A, Pence MG, Zhong CX (2018) Food safety evaluation for R-proteins introduced by biotechnology: a case study of VNT1 in late blight protected potatoes. RegulToxicolPharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.03.008
Halterman D, Kramer LC, Weilgus S, Jiang J (2008) Performance of transgenic potato containing the late blight resistance gene RB. Plant Dis 92:339–343
Hardigan MA, Crisovan E, Hamilton JP, Kim J, Laimbeer P, Leisner CL, Manrique-Carpintero NC, Newton L, Pham GM, Vaillancourt B, Yang X, Zeng Z, Douches DS, Jiang J, Veilleux R, Buell CR (2016) Genome reduction uncovers a large dispensable genome and adaptive role for copy number variation in asexually propagated Solanumtuberosum. Plant Cell 28(2):388–405. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.15.00538
Haverkort AJ, Struik PC, Visser RGF, Jacobsen EJPR (2009) Applied biotechnology to combat late blight in potato caused by Phytophthora infestans. Potato Res 52(3):249–264
Herman RA, Price WD (2013) Unintended compositional changes in genetically modified (GM) crops: 20 years of research. J Agric Food Chem 61:11695–11701. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf400135r
International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). (2018). Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops in 2018: biotech crops continue to help meet the challenges of increased population and climate change. Brief 54. ISAAA GM Crop Database, http://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/default.asp. Accessed 1 October 2020
Kovalic D, Garnaat C, Guo L, Yan Y, Groat J et al (2012) The use of next generation sequencing and junction sequence analysis bioinformatics to achieve molecular characterization of crops improved through modern biotechnology. Plant Genome 5(3):149–163. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2012.10.0026
Kuiper HA, Kleter GA, Noteborn HP, Kok EJ (2001) Assessment of the food safety issues related to genetically modified foods. Plant J 27:503–528. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313.2001.01119.x
Ladics GS, Bartholomaeus A, Bregitzer P, Doerrer NG, Gray A et al (2015) Genetic basis and detection of unintended effects in genetically modified crop plants. Trans Res 24:587–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-015-9867-7
Li H (2011) A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27:2987–2993. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr509
Li H (2013) Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv: Genomics
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N et al (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Li R, Quan S, Yan X, Biswas S, Zhang D, Shi J (2017) Molecular characterization of genetically-modified crops: challenges and strategies. BiotechnolAdv 35(2):302–309
Martin M (2011) Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 17(1):10–12. https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200
Oltmanns H, Frame B, Lee Y, Johnson S, Li B, Wang W, Gelvin SB (2010) Generation of “backbone” free, low transgene copy plants by launching T-DNA from the Agrobacterium chromosome. Plant Physiol 152:1158–1166. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.148585
Park D, Park S, Ban YW, Ys K, Park K, Kim N, Kim J, Choi I (2017) A bioinformatics approach for identifying transgene insertion sites using whole genome sequencing data. BMC Biotechnol 17:67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-017-0386-x
Pauwels K, De Keersmaecker SCJ, De Schrijver AD, du Jardin P, Roosens NHC, Herman P (2015) Next-generation sequencing as a tool for the molecular characterization and risk assessment of genetically modified plants: added value or not? Trends Food SciTechnol 45:319–326
Raybould A, MacDonald P (2018) Policy-led comparative environmental risk assessment of genetically modified crops: testing for increased risk rather than profiling phenotypes leads to predictable and transparent decision-making. Front BioengBiotechnol 6:43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00043
Schiemann J, Dietz-Pfeilstetter A, Hartung F, Kohl C, Romeis J, Sprink T (2019) Risk assessment and regulation of plants modified by modern biotechniques: current status and future challenges. Ann Rev Plant Biol 70:699–726. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100025
Schnell J, Steele M, Bean J, Neuspiel M, Girard C, Dormann N, Pearson C, Savoie A, Bourbonniere L, MacDonald P (2015) A comparative analysis of insertional effects in genetically engineered plants: consdierations for pre-market assessments. Trans Res 24:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007//s11248-014-9843-7
Song et al (2003) Gene RB cloned from Solanumbulbocastanum confers broad spectrum resistance to potato late blight. ProcNatlAcadSci 100(16):9128–9133
SPUD DB Potato Genomics Resource at Michigan State University. http://solanaceae.plantbiology.msu.edu/index.shtml. Accessed 1 October 2020
Thorvaldsdóttir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP (2013) Integrative genomics viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform 14:178–192
Weber N, Halpin C, Hannah LC, Jez J, Kough J, Parrott W (2012) Crop genome plasticity and its relevance to food and feed safety of genetically engineered breeding stacks. Plant Physiol 160:1842–1853
Wingett SW, Andrews S (2018) FastQ Screen a tool for multi-genome mapping and quality control. F1000Res 7:1338. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15931.2
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under Award Number AID-OAA-A-15-00056. The authors would like to thank Dr. C. Robin Buell at Michigan State University for advice on MiSeq experiments and Shafiqul Islam of Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute for assistance in segregation experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zarka, K.A., Hokanson, K. & Douches, D.S. Molecular characterization for food safety assessment of a genetically modified late blight resistant potato: an unusual case. Transgenic Res 30, 169–183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-021-00241-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-021-00241-2