Abstract
Agricultural nitrogen loading is a leading cause of eutrophication within the Chesapeake Bay. Agriculture in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is responsible for a large portion of the nitrogen load entering the bay. Vegetated riparian buffers are a common agroforestry practice used to intercept surface runoff and subsurface leaching of nutrients such as nitrogen from upland agricultural fields. Watershed-wide nutrient credit trading has been suggested as a mechanism for reducing nutrient pollution entering the Chesapeake Bay. The cost of producing nitrogen credits through the establishment of riparian buffers on Pennsylvania farmland was analyzed to determine if nitrogen credit trading could provide an incentive for buffer establishment. Forest buffers were shown to have marginally lower nitrogen credit production costs and payback periods than grass filter strips. Larger riparian buffers were shown to have higher credit production costs than smaller buffers due to increases in establishment costs outpacing increases in nitrogen credit trading revenue. Nitrogen credit trading was determined to be an inadequate incentive for agricultural riparian buffer establishment due to the high cost of producing nitrogen credits. Furthermore, nitrogen credit trading was shown to be less lucrative compared to the Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program, a common riparian buffer cost share program. However, increases in the market price of nitrogen credits or bundling nitrogen with other nutrient credits such as phosphorus could ultimately result in credit trading providing an adequate incentive for agricultural riparian buffer establishment. These results could be used to guide the framework for nutrient credit trading programs within other watersheds.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data should be reproducible given methodology in manuscript.
References
Branosky E, Jones C, Selman M (2011) Comparison Tables of State Nutrient Trading Programs in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. World Resources Institute
Chesapeake Bay Commission (2012) Nutrient credit trading for the Chesapeake Bay: an economic study
Chesapeake Bay Program 2017 and 2025 Watershed Implementation Plans. https://www.chesapeakeprogresscom/clean-water/watershed-implementation-plans. Accessed November 2018
Cooper E, Jacobson M (2009) Establishing conservation easements on forested riparian buffers: opportunities for long-term streamside protection. Small-Scale For 8(3):263–268
Correll DL (1997) Buffer zones and water quality protection: general principles. In Buffer zones: their processes and potential in water protection. In: Haycock NE, Burt TP, Goulding KWT, Pinay G (eds) The Proceedings of the International Conference on Buffer Zones. (Quest Environmental, pp 7–20
Hill AR, Devito KJ, Campagnolo S, Sanmugadas K (2000) Subsurface denitrification in a forest riparian zone: interactions between hydrology and supplies of nitrate and organic carbon. Biogeochemistry 51:193–223
Jones C, Branosky E, Selman M, Perez M (2010) How nutrient trading could help restore the Chesapeake Bay. World Resources Institute
Kavian A, Saleh I, Habibnejad M, Brevik EC, Jafarian Z, Rodrigo-Comino J (2018) Effectiveness of vegetative buffer strips at reducing runoff, soil erosion, and nitrate transport during degraded hillslope restoration in northern Iran. Land Degrad Dev 29(9):3194–3203
King SE, Osmond DL, Smith J, Burchell MR, Dukes M, Evans RO, Knies S, Kunickis S (2016) Effects of riparian buffer vegetation width: A 12-year longitudinal study. J Environ Qual 45(4):1243–1251
Lee KH, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC (2003) Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi-species riparian buffer. J Soil Water Conserv 58:1–7
Lowrance R, Altier LS, Newbold JD, Schnabel RR, Groffman PM, Denver JM, Correll DL, Gilliam JW, Robinson JL, Brinsfield RB, Staver KW, Lucas W, Todd AH (1997) Water quality functions of riparian forest buffers in Chesapeake Bay watersheds. Environ Manage 21(5):687–712
Mayer PM, Reynolds SK, Canfield TJ, and McCutchen MD (2005) Riparian buffer width, vegetative cover, and nitrogen removal effectiveness: a review of current science and regulations. United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA/600/R-05/118
Palone R, Todd A 1998 Chesapeake Bay Riparian Handbook: a Guide for Establishing and Maintaining Riparian Forest Buffers. USDA Forest Service. NA-TP-02-97. Radnor, PA
Pennsylvania Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (PA CREP). CREP Payment Descriptions. https://www.creppa.org/about/payments/. Accessed December 2020
Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) (2016) DCNR leading statewide forest buffer planting effort to help improve water quality. http://www.apps.dcnr.state.pa.us/news/resource/res2016/16-0427-forestbuffers.aspx. Accessed 21 July 2016
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) (2016) A DEP strategy to enhance Pennsylvania’s Chesapeake Bay restoration effort. http://files.dep.state.pa.us/Water/ChesapeakeBayOffice/DEP%20Chesapeake%20Bay%20Restoration%20Strategy%20012116.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2016
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Nutrient credit registry. https://www.dep.pa.gov/Business/Water/CleanWater/NutrientTrading/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed December 2020
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) (2016) Phase 2 Watershed Implementation Plan Nutrient Trading Supplement
Penn State Extension (2018) The agronomy guide 2017–2018. Pennsylvania State University; 2017. http://extension.psu.edu/agronomy-guide
Ribaudo M, Savage J, and Aillery M (2014) An economic assessment of policy options to reduce agricultural pollutants in the Chesapeake Bay. USDA Economic Research Service ERR-166
Sweeney BW, Newbold JD (2014) Streamside forest buffer width needed to protect stream water quality, habitat, and organisms: A literature review. J Am Water Resour Assoc 50(3):560–584
Talberth J, Jones C, Perez M, Selman M, and Branosky E (2010) How baywide nutrient trading could benefit Pennsylvania farms. World Resources Institute
United States Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency (FSA). Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program. https://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/conservation-programs/conservation-reserve-enhancement/index. Accessed 24 July 2016
United States Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency (FSA). Soil Rental Rates by soil type for Pennsylvania counties. Obtained from, 2015United States Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency (FSA). Soil Rental Rates by soil type for Pennsylvania counties. Obtained from 2015 correspondence with Pennsylvania Farm Service Agency, Harrisburg, PA
United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) (2015) Quickstats 2.0. https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Environmental Quality Incentives Program. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/programs/financial/eqip/. Accessed July 24, 2016
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (2015) Pennsylvania Field Office Technical Guides. 2015 Conservation Practice Cost Scenarios. Accessed July 21, 2016. http://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov/treemenuFS.aspx
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (2006) Partnership agreement between the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service and the United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water. Washington, DC. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/16/stelprdb1043600.pdf. Accessed July 21, 2016
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2017) Interim evaluation of Pennsylvania’s 2016–2017 milestones. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-06/documents/pa_interim_2016_2017_milestone_eval_20170630.pdf
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2010) Chesapeake Bay TMDL Executive Summary
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2003) Water Quality Trading Policy. US EPA Archive
Weller DE, Baker ME (2014) Cropland riparian buffers throughout Chesapeake Bay Watershed: spatial patterns and effects on nitrate loads delivered to streams. J Am Water Resour Assoc 50(3):696–712
Woodbury P, Kemanian A, Jacobson M, Langholtz M (2017) Improving water quality in the Chesapeake Bay using payments for ecosystem services for perennial bioenergy feedstock production. Biomass Bioenergy 114:132–142
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
Michael Jacobson is associate editor with Agroforestry Systems.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boleman, P., Jacobson, M. Nitrogen credit trading as an incentive for riparian buffer establishment on Pennsylvania farmland. Agroforest Syst 95, 1033–1045 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00595-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00595-w