Abstract
Although it seems reasonable to assume that start-up packages are important for faculty success, the contribution of start-up packages to faculty professional development is understudied. The aim of this study was to explore how the number of benefits obtained in start-up package agreements (number of benefits), faculty satisfaction with the start-up packages (faculty satisfaction), and faculty perception if the university honored the start-up package agreements (honored packages) influenced faculty perception of the contribution of start-up packages to faculty professional development (contribution to professional development). Professional development is a planned activity that improves faculty member’s knowledge and skills that are essential to their performance. Faculty at all ranks (N = 121) from a public research university from the southeastern U.S. completed a Start-Up Package Satisfaction Survey. To measure the contribution to professional development, we asked participants to rate their level of agreement with the following statement, “My start-up package has helped me or contributed to my professional development.” Multiple mediation analyses revealed that: (1) number of benefits was positively associated with contribution to professional development, (2) both honored packages and faculty satisfaction mediated the link between number of benefits and contribution to professional development in a parallel fashion, and (3) honored packages and faculty satisfaction also sequentially mediated the link between number of benefits and contribution to professional development. The findings are valuable for university practice because they provide evidence of the importance of faculty satisfaction with start-up packages as well as faculty perception of university fair treatment and accountability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [AMP], upon reasonable request.
References
Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 414–435. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2000.1774
Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985079
Baldwin, R. G., & Blackburn, R. T. (1981). The academic career as a developmental process: Implications for higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 52(6), 598–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1981.11778133
Barnard, L., Stevens, T., Siwatu, K.O., & Lan, W.Y. (2007). Faculty epistemological beliefs as a mediator to attitudes toward persons with disabilities. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 2(3), 5–15.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bergeron, D. M., Shipp, A. J., Rosen, B., & Furst, S. A. (2013). Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: The cost of being a good citizen. Journal of Management, 39(4), 958–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311407508
Brutkiewicz, R. R. (2012). Research faculty development: An historical perspective and ideas for a successful future. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9261-4
Callie, T. M., & Cheslock, J. J. (2008). The hiring and compensation practices of business school deans. The Review of Higher Education, 32(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0021
Coldwell, M. (2017). Exploring the influence of professional development on teacher careers: A path model approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.015
Comm, C.L., & Mathaisel, D.F.X. (2003). A case study of the implications of faculty workload and compensation for improving academic quality. International Journal of Educational Management, 17(5), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540310484922
Dabos, G. E., & Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.52
Dorsey, E. R., van Wuyckhuyse, B. C., Beck, C. A., Passalacqua, W. P., & Guzick, D. S. (2009). Economics of new faculty hires in basic science. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 84(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181904633
Dreher, G. F., Ash, R. A., & Bretz, R. D. (1988). Benefit coverage and employee cost: Critical factors in explaining compensation satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 41(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb02383.x
Eisenberg, M. J. (2011). The physician scientist's career guide. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-908-6
Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.42
Faulk, L. H. (2002). Pay satisfaction consequences: Development and test of a theoretical model. (publication no. 3069707) [doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University]. ProQuest dissertations and theses global.
Ford, W. J. (2012). Package deal. Diverse: Issues in Higher Education, 29(6), 18–19.
Giancola, F. (2013). How important are benefit plans to your employees and how satisfied are they with your offerings? Employee Benefit Plan Review, 68(1), 27–30.
Hagedorn, L. S. (2000). Conceptualizing faculty job satisfaction: Components, theories, and outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2000(105), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.10501
Hamann, D. L. (2013). On staff: A practical guide to starting your career in a university music department. Oxford University Press.
Hameed, A., & Waheed, A. (2011). Employee development and its affect on employee performance a conceptual framework. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(13), 224–229.
Hardré, P. L. (2014). Raising the bar on faculty productivity: Realigning performance standards to enhance quality trajectories. The Journal of Faculty Development, 28(1), 25–32.
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
Hekman, D. R., Bigley, G. A., Steensma, H. K., & Hereford, J. F. (2009). Combined effects of organizational and professional identification on the reciprocity dynamic for professional employees. The Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 506–526. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.41330897
Hemmasi, M., Graf, L. A., & Lust, J. A. (1992). Correlates of pay and benefit satisfaction: The unique case of public university faculty. Public Personnel Management, 21(4), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609202100402
Heneman, H. G., & Judge, T. A. (2000). Compensation attitudes. In S. L. Rynes & B. Gerhart (Eds.), Compensation in organizations (pp. 66–103). Jossey-Bass.
Hofrova, A., & Moore de Peralta, A. (2019). Faculty satisfaction with start-up packages: Gender differences in a public university in the southeastern U.S. In J. Fejfar & M. Fejfarova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th international conference efficiency and responsibility in education 2019 (pp. 68–75). Czech University of Life Sciences.
Igalens, J., & Roussel, P. (1999). A study of the relationships between compensation package, work motivation and job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(7), 1003–1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199912)20:7%3C1003::AID-JOB941%3E3.0.CO;2-K
Ismail, A. I., Abdul-Halim, A. M., & Joarder, M. H. R. (2015). Mediating role of distributive justice in the relationship between career incentives and employee performance. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(10), 929–935. https://doi.org/10.7763/JOEBM.2015.V3.311
Jia, J., Li, X., Li, D., Zhou, Y., Wang, Y., & Sun, W. (2017). Psychological security and deviant peer affiliation as mediators between teacher-student relationship and adolescent internet addiction. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.063
Lee, C., Esen, E., & DiNicola, S. (2017). Employee job satisfaction and engagement: The doors of opportunity are open. Society for Human Resource Management, 1–12.
Lucero, M. A., & Allen, R. A. (1994). Employee benefits: A growing source of psychological contract violations. Human Resource Management, 33(3), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930330310
Lyde, A. R., Grieshaber, D. C., & Byrns, G. (2016). Faculty teaching performance: Perceptions of a multi-source method for evaluation (MME). Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 82-94. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.18145
McLean, M., Cilliers, F., & Van Wyk, J. M. (2008). Faculty development: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Medical Teacher, 30(6), 555–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802109834
Millis, B. J. (1994). Faculty development in the 1990s: What it is and why we can't wait. Journal of Counseling & Development, 72(5), 454–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1994.tb00974.x
Mizell, H. (2010). Why professional development matters. Learning Forward.
Morrison, E., & Robinson, S. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 226–256. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707180265
National Research Council. (2009). Partnerships for emerging research institutions: Report of a workshop. National Academies Press.
National Science Foundation. (2005). Proposed toolkit for peporting progress toward NSF ADVANCE: Institutional transformation goals. https://advance.vt.edu/content/dam/advance_vt_edu/documents/other/advance_indicators_toolkit.pdf
Pelletier, K. L., Kottke, J. L., & Reza, E. M. (2015). During furloughs, who is more attached to a public university? staff? faculty? . . . managers. Public Personnel Management, 44(1), 120–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026014558155
Phuong, T. T., & McLean, G. N. (2016). The experiences of Vietnamese university faculty in relation to their faculty development. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(4), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9454-5
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Rancourt, D. (2010). Leading your research enterprise - part 2. The post: Your newsletter, 1(2), 9–10. University of Calgary.
Restubog, S., Bordia, P., & Tang, R. (2006). Effects of psychological contract breach on performance of IT employees: The mediating role of affective commitment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(2), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X53183
Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150306
Rosopa, P. J., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (2008). Problems with detecting assumed mediation using the hierarchical multiple regression strategy. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.009
Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384942
Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(5), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030110506
Rousseau, D. M., & Ho, V. T. (2000). Psychological contract issues in compensation. In S. L. Rynes & B. Gerhart (Eds.), Compensation in organizations: Current research and practice (pp. 273–310). Jossey-Bass.
Santo, S. A., Engstrom, M. E., Reetz, L., Schweinle, W. E., & Reed, K. (2009). Faculty productivity barriers and supports at a school of education. Innovative Higher Education, 34(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-009-9098-z
Sheets, K. J., & Schwenk, T. L. (1990). Faculty development for family medicine educators: An agenda for future activities. Teaching and Learning in Medicine: An International Journal, 2(3), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401339009539447
Stone-Romero, E. F., & Rosopa, P. J. (2010). Research design options for testing mediation models and their implications for facets of validity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(7), 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941011075256
Tekleab, A. G., Orvis, K. A., & Taylor, M. S. (2013). Deleterious consequences of change in newcomers' employer-based psychological contract obligations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28(3), 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-012-9277-2
Williams, M. L. (1995). Antecedents of employee benefit level satisfaction: A test of a model. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1097–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(95)90024-1
Williams, M. L., Malos, S. B., & Palmer, D. K. (2002). Benefit system and benefit level satisfaction: An expanded model of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management, 28(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800204
Williams, M. L., McDaniel, M. A., & Nguyen, N. T. (2006). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of pay level satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 392–413. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.392
Williams, M. L., McDaniel, M. A., & Ford, L. R. (2007). Understanding multiple dimensions of compensation satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(3), 429–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-006-9036-3
Wu, X. (2008). A longitudinal study of pay satisfaction: An examination of reactions to commitment and work performance. In 4th international conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing (pp. 1-4). Institute of electrical and electronics engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/WiCom.2008.1703
Yao, Y. H., Locke, E. A., & Jamal, M. (2018). On a combined theory of pay level satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(4), 448–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2243
Zacher, H., Rudolph, C. W., Todorovic, T., & Ammann, D. (2019). Academic career development: A review and research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.08.006
Zhao, H. A. O., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 647–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00087.x
Code Availability
Not applicable.
Funding
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. (HRD-1629934) and by the Internal Grant Agency (IGA) of Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (2019MEZ0008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics Approval
Clemson University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) granted ethical approval for research protocol, instruments and procedures.
Consent to Participate
After reading the consent, study participants indicated their agreement to participate in this study by checking a box that allowed them to continue to the online survey.
Consent for Publication
The author declares that any person named as co-author of this contribution is aware of the fact and has consented to the manuscript being published in the Innovative Higher Education Journal.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Höfrová, A., Moore de Peralta, A., Rosopa, P.J. et al. Faculty Perception of the Contribution of Start-up Packages to Professional Development. Innov High Educ 46, 481–497 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09550-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09550-0