Elsevier

Journal of Algebra

Volume 579, 1 August 2021, Pages 365-387
Journal of Algebra

Perverse equivalence in SL(2,q)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2021.02.031Get rights and content

Abstract

We show that the derived equivalence between full defect blocks of SL(2,q) in defining characteristic and their Brauer correspondants can be presented as a composition of perverse equivalences.

Introduction

Broué's Abelian Defect Conjecture [2, 6.2, Question] is a very important focal point of the block theory of finite groups:

Conjecture

Let F be an algebraically closed field of characteristic p>0. Let G be a finite group and A be a block of FG. If A has an abelian defect group D, then A is derived equivalent to a block B of NG(D), its Brauer correspondent.

For general introduction, see [11]. This conjecture has been studied by many and it is proved when D is cyclic [15]. However, for the general abelian case it is still a case-by-case verification. For SL(2,q) in defining characteristic, the principal block of Broué's conjecture was proven by Okuyama [13] using a construction that differs from most of the other cases. Yoshii generalised Okuyama's method to the non-principal block case in [20]. As time passed, tools such as mutation or perverse equivalence came into play. In particular, perverse equivalence gathered some geometrical information about certain derived equivalences in surprising ways. One such example is Craven's application of perverse equivalence with Lusztig's L-function in [5]. This paper report a similar job for SL(2,q), by showing the derived equivalence between full defect blocks of SL(2,q) and their Brauer correspondents contemplated by Okuyama (and Yoshii) is a composition of perverse equivalences.

Theorem

(Theorem 5.1) The derived equivalence between full defect blocks of SL(2,q) in defining characteristic and its Brauer correspondent, as introduced by [13] and [20], is a composition of perverse equivalences.

Conventions

We use right modules throughout the paper. Let F be an algebraically closed field of characteristic p. When A is an finite dimensional (fd) F-algebra, let A-mod be the category of finitely-generated (fg) A-modules, st(A) be the stable category of fg A-modules and Db(A) be the bounded derived category of fg A-modules. The symbol Ω is used to denote the Heller translate of a module. For complexes we use the cochain convention, that is, differential maps in a complex are of degree 1. A tensor product without a subscript is over the base field F. An asterisk as a superscript over a module denotes its F-dual.

Acknowledgement. This project grew out from the lecture by Radha Kessar during the workshop Morita Equivalence Problems for Blocks of Finite Groups at École Polytechnic Fédérale de Lausanne, September 2016. The author is thus deeply grateful for the organisers and Bernoulli Centre in EPFL. In addition, the author would like to thank Joseph Chuang for the immensely valuable discussions, comments and encouragement during and after his supervision. The author was supported by a JSPS International Research Fellowship (P17814) and is grateful to Aaron Chan and Osamu Iyama's interest and comments for the presentations related to this project during the fellowship.

Section snippets

Representations

In this section, we give a brief review of representations of SL(2,q) in defining characteristic, and the representations of its Borel subgroup, which is the Brauer correspondent of the full-defect blocks in SL(2,q). We also introduce some combinatorics involved in restriction and induction.

Tilting complex

In this section we introduce Okuyama's and Yoshii's approach to show the derived equivalence between the aforementioned categories of representations.

Perverse equivalence

In this section we introduce perverse equivalence in general and we characterise a special case that we name simply alternating perverse equivalence.

Main theorem and proof

We first state our main theorem.

Theorem 5.1

Let A be a full defect block of kSL(2,q) in the defining characteristic. Then A is derived equivalent to its Brauer correspondent B via a composition of simply alternating (or elementary) perverse equivalence. In particular, Okuyama's and Yoshii's proof of Broué's abelian defect conjecture in [13] and [20] is such a composition.

We will prove the theorem in what follows. The main observation to the proof is the tilt from At to At+1 defined in Definition 3.10 can

Example and comments

This section presents the case for G=SL(2,9), p=3. After the example we make some brief comments related to the construction.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (3)

View full text