Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Innovative behavior among service workers and the importance of leadership: evidence from an emerging economy

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on how service firms can nurture innovative behavior of employees through the important role of leadership. Despite the growth in innovation research, scholars have been slow to move from an R&D (i.e., technical capital) focus to that focusing on employee innovative behavior. However, organizations’ innovation initiatives heavily depend on employee human capital and behavior at work as these are key inputs in the value creation process. We focus on a specific type of leadership, transformational leadership, and explore a nascent employee concept, job embeddedness, to enhance our understanding of the mechanisms and conditions by which leaders may encourage follower innovative behavior. We collected data from employees working in the hotel service sector in Ghana, and analyzed the data using structural equation modelling and Hayes’ PROCESS Macro. Our results revealed that leaders can promote innovative behavior among service workers only when the workers are embedded in the organization. Further, our results showed positive relationships between transformational leadership and organizational embeddedness, and organizational embeddedness and innovative behavior. However, we found no evidence to suggest that employees’ embeddedness in their community might alter the relationship between organizational embeddedness and innovative behavior. We conclude that to support innovation among employees, the behaviors of leaders are important especially in terms of encouraging employees to proactively embed themselves in their organizations, thereby contributing to the development of the hospitality industry and other service sectors in emerging economies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The research data that support the analyses and results of this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author, [AA].

References

  • Afsar, B. F., Badir, Y., & Bin Saeed, B. (2014). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 114(8), 1270–1300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amankwaa, A., Gyensare, M. A., & Susomrith, P. (2019). Transformational leadership with innovative behavior: Examining multiple mediating paths with PLS-SEM. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 40(4), 402–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amankwah-Amoah, J., Debrah, Y. A., Honyenuga, B. Q., & Adzoyi, P. N. (2018). Business and government interdependence in emerging economies: Insights from hotels in Ghana. International Journal of Tourism Research, 20(1), 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis, S. (2008). Explaining innovative activity in service industries: Micro data evidence for Switzerland. Economics of Innovation New Technology, 17(3), 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Zhou, Q., & Hartnell, C. A. (2012). Transformational leadership, innovative behavior, and task performance: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Human Performance, 25(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athreye, S. S. (2001). Competition, rivalry and innovative behavior. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 10(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambacas, M., & Kulik, C. T. (2013). Job embeddedness in China: How HR practices impact turnover intentions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(10), 1933–1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual and sampler set (Vol. 3). California: Mind Garden, Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., Jung, D. I., Avolio, B. J., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (Vol. 2). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. P., Holtom, B. C., Sablynski, C. J., Mitchell, T. R., & Lee, T. W. (2010). The buffering effects of job embeddedness on negative shocks. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(1), 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bysted, R. (2013). Innovative employee behavior: The moderating effects of mental involvement and job satisfaction on contextual variables. European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(3), 268–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., Meitar, R., & Weisberg, J. (2006). Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work. International Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlier, S. D., Guay, R. P., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2016). Plugged in or disconnected? A model of the effects of technological factors on employee job embeddedness. Human Resource Management, 55(1), 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. J., & Huang, J. W. (2009). Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance: The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 104–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., & Ayoun, B. (2019). Is negative workplace humor really all that ‘negative’?, Workplace humor and hospitality employees’ job embeddedness. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 79, 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S. B., Kim, K., Ullah, S. M. E., & Kang, S. W. (2016). How transformational leadership facilitates innovative behavior of Korean workers: Examining mediating and moderating processes. Personnel Review, 45(3), 459–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, J. G., & Haskins, M. E. (2000). Beating the career blues. Academy of Management Executives, 14(3), 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coetzer, A., Inma, C., Poisat, P., Redmond, J., & Standing, C. (2018). Job embeddedness and employee enactment of innovation-related work behaviors. International Journal of Manpower, 39(2), 222–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzarin, B. P. (2017). Impact of organizational innovation on product and process innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(5), 405–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, J., & den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devloo, T., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., & Feys, M. (2016). When the fire dies: perceived success and support for innovation shape the motivating potential of innovative work behavior. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(4), 512–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 178–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. C., & Ng, T. W. H. (2007). Careers: Mobility, embeddedness, and success. Journal of Management, 33(3), 350–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. C. T., Ng, W. H. & Vogel, R. M. (2012). Off-the-job embeddedness: A reconceptualization and agenda for future research. In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, vol. 31, pp. 209–251. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Felps, W., Mitchell, T. R., Hekman, D. R., Lee, T. W., Holtom, B. C., & Harman, W. S. (2009). Turnover contagion: How coworkers’ job embeddedness and job search behaviors influence quitting. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 545–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 461–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. New Jersey: Prentice hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haned, N., Mothe, C., & Nguyen-Thi, T. U. (2014). Firm persistence in technological innovation: The relevance of organizational innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 23(5–6), 490–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. J., Wheeler, A. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (2011). The mediating role of organizational job embeddedness in the LMX–outcomes relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 271–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D., & Watson, D. (2005). The dynamic spillover of satisfaction between work and marriage: The role of time and mood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1273–1279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J. P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtom, B. C., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., & Eberly, M. B. (2008). 5 turnover and retention research: A glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture into the future. The Academy of Management Annal, 2(1), 231–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness, and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O. (2005). The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 573–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong, A. D., & De Ruyter, K. (2004). Adaptive versus proactive behavior in service recovery: The role of self-managing teams. Decision Sciences, 35(3), 457–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta- analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, D. I. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and their effects on creativity in groups. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 185–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J. H., Solomon, G. T., & Choi, D. Y. (2015). CEOs’ leadership styles and managers’ innovative behavior: Investigation of intervening effects in an entrepreneurial context. Journal of Management Studies, 52(4), 531–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karatepe, O. M. (2016). Does job embeddedness mediate the effects of co-worker and family support on creative performance? An empirical study in the hotel industry. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality and Tourism, 15(2), 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiazad, K., Holtom, B. C., Hom, P. W., & Newman, A. (2015). Job embeddedness: A multifoci theoretical extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 641–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krabel, S., & Schacht, A. (2014). Follow the leader? How leadership behavior influences scientists’ commercialization behavior (or not). Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 23(2), 134–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. (2020). The role of R&D and input trade in productivity growth: Innovation and technology spillovers. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(3), 908–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. H., Gerhart, B., Weller, I., & Trevor, C. O. (2008). Understanding voluntary turnover: Path-specific job satisfaction effects and the importance of unsolicited job offers. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 651–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Sablynski, C. J., Burton, J. P., & Holtom, B. C. (2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 711–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. T., Burch, T. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (2014). The story of why we stay: A review of job embeddedness. Annual Review Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. N. (2019). Innovative behavior of minorities, women, and immigrants: Special issue. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 28(7), 758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masood, M., & Afsar, B. (2017). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior among nursing staff. Nursing Inquiry, 24(4), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medda, G. (2020). External R&D, product and process innovation in European manufacturing companies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 339–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). The impact of job embeddedness on innovation-related behaviors. Human Resource Management, 49(6), 1067–1087.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2011). Locus of control and organizational embeddedness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2014). Community embeddedness and work outcomes: The mediating role of organizational embeddedness. Human Relations, 67(1), 71–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, V. Q., Taylor, G. S., & Bergiel, E. (2017). Organizational antecedents of job embeddedness. Management Research Review, 40(11), 1216–1235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paarlberg, L. E., & Lavigna, B. (2010). Transformational leadership and public service motivation: Driving individual and organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 710–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltokorpi, V., Allen, D. G., & Froese, F. (2015). Organizational embeddedness, turnover intentions, and voluntary turnover: The moderating effects of employee demographic characteristics and value orientations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(2), 292–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 327–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, A. N., van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M., & Stam, D. (2010). Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 609–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T., & Sardessai, R. (2005). Determinants of innovative work behavior: Development and test of an integrated model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 142–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuvers, M., Van Engen, M. L., Vinkenburg, C. J., & Wilson-Evered, E. (2008). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior: Exploring the relevance of gender differences. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(3), 227–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, K., & Shipton, H. (2012). The relationship between transformational leadership and innovative behavior in a healthcare context: A team learning versus a cohesion perspective. European Journal of International Management, 6(1), 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarros, J. C., Cooper, B. K., & Santora, J. C. (2008). Building a climate for innovation through transformational leadership and organizational culture. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 15(2), 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekiguchi, T., Burton, J. P., & Sablynski, C. J. (2008). The role of job embeddedness on employee performance: The interactive effects with leader–member exchange and organization-based self-esteem. Personnel Psychology, 61(4), 761–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, H. A., & Susanto, E. (2016). Perceived identifiability, shared responsibility and innovative work behavior. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(22), 3109–3127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Si, S., & Wei, F. (2012). Transformational and transactional leaderships, empowerment climate and innovation performance: A multilevel analysis in the Chinese context. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(2), 299–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (2019). Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susomrith, P., & Amankwaa, A. (2020). Relationship between job embeddedness and innovative work behavior. Management Decision, 58(5), 864–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanova, C., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Using job embeddedness factors to explain voluntary turnover in four European countries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(9), 1553–1568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, A. W., Cordery, J., & Gamble, J. (2016). Staying and performing: How human resource management practices increase job embeddedness and performance. Personnel Review, 45(5), 947–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbano, D., Turro, A., & Aparicio, S. (2019). Innovation through R&D activities in the European context: antecedents and consequences. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(5), 1481–1504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valcour, M. (2007). Work-based resources as moderators of the relationship between work hours and satisfaction with work-family balance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1512–1523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N., Xiao, M., & Savin, I. (2020). Complementarity effect in the innovation strategy: internal R&D and acquisition of capital with embodied technology. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09780-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., & Zatzick, C. D. (2019). Human capital acquisition and organizational innovation: A temporal perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1), 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, E. (2004). Firms’ decisions to innovate and innovation routines. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(8), 733–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, A. R., Harris, K. J., & Sablynski, C. J. (2012). How do employees invest abundant resources? The mediating role of work effort in the job-embeddedness/job-performance relationship. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(1), 244–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Harrigan, K. R., Ang, S. H., & Wu, Z. (2019). The impact of imitation strategy and R&D resources on incremental and radical innovation: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(1), 210–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Fried, D. D., & Griffeth, R. W. (2012). A review of job embeddedness: Conceptual, measurement issues, and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 22(3), 220–231.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia

    Albert Amankwaa, Pattanee Susomrith & Pi-Shen Seet

Authors
  1. Albert Amankwaa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pattanee Susomrith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pi-Shen Seet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Amankwaa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Fig. 3 .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amankwaa, A., Susomrith, P. & Seet, PS. Innovative behavior among service workers and the importance of leadership: evidence from an emerging economy. J Technol Transf 47, 506–530 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09853-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09853-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation