Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Horse-Sized Ducks or Duck-Sized Horses? Oddball Personality Questions Are Likable (but Useless) for Organizational Recruitment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To stand out, some organizations have started asking unorthodox interview questions to uncover unique qualities of the candidates while signaling the playful culture of their organization (e.g., “Would you rather fight a horse-sized duck or 100 duck-sized horses?”). Despite its growing popularity, there is no empirical research on the organizational impact of these unusual questions. In this paper, we introduce Oddball Personality Questions (OPQs) and a theoretical model of its impact on recruitment. We test our theoretical model had in two studies. In study 1 (n = 275), we found that compared to traditional interview questions, people judged OPQs to be less useful, but more likable. The negative effect of decreased usefulness judgments on organizational attraction was offset by the positive effect of increased likability judgments. Participants were not more attracted to organizations that asked OPQs. In study 2 (n = 266), using a multi-wave time-lagged study, we find job seekers with a greater sense of humor reported more favorable reactions toward Oddball Personality Questions and subsequent attraction to the organization. Despite the double-edged nature of OPQs for recruitment, we believe that its limitations outweigh the benefits. Until the validity of OPQs as an assessment tool is established, its use in employment interviews remains dubious and cannot be recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although theories of stereotypes extend beyond judgment heuristics, representativeness heuristics are, nonetheless, linked to stereotype formation in social judgments (Bodenhausen, 1990)

  2. www.prolific.ac

References

  • 125 Common Interview Questions and Answers (With Tips). (2020). Indeed Career Guide. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/interviewing/top-interview-questions-and-answers

  • Abel, M. H. (2002). Humor, stress, and coping strategies. Humor–International Journal of Humor Research, 15(4), 365–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. G., Scotter, J. R. V., & Otondo, R. F. (2004). Recruitment communication media: Impact on prehire outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 143–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02487.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A., Melinat, E., Aron, E. N., Vallone, R. D., & Bator, R. J. (1997). The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(4), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297234003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artinger, F., Petersen, M., Gigerenzer, G., & Weibler, J. (2015). Heuristics as adaptive decision strategies in management. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S33–S52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvey, R. D., & Sackett, P. R. (1993). Fairness in selection: Current developments and perspectives. In Personnel selection. Jossey-Bass.

  • Arvey, R. D., Strickland, W., Drauden, G., & Martin, C. (1990). Motivational components of test taking. Personnel Psychology, 43(4), 695–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb00679.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Hillel, M., & Neter, E. (1993). How alike is it versus how likely is it: A disjunction fallacy in probability judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1119–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Dustin, S. L., Giluk, T. L., Stewart, G. L., Shaffer, J. A., & Swider, B. W. (2012). Candidate characteristics driving initial impressions during rapport building: Implications for employment interview validity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(2), 330–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, T. N., Maertz Jr., C. P., Dolen, M. R., & Campion, M. A. (1998). Longitudinal assessment of applicant reactions to employment testing and test outcome feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 892–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Sanchez, R. J., Craig, J. M., Ferrara, P., & Campion, M. A. (2001). Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the selection procedural justice scale (SPJS). Personnel Psychology, 54(2), 387–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blacksmith, N., Willford, J. C., & Behrend, T. S. (2016). Technology in the employment interview: A meta-analysis and future research agenda. Personnel Assessment and Decisions, 2(1), 2 http://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/pad/vol2/iss1/2 This.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhausen, G. V. (1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1(5), 319–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00226.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breaugh, J. A. (2013). Employee recruitment. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 389–416. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. E., Highhouse, S., Russell, S. S., & Mohr, D. C. (2003). Familiarity, ambivalence, and firm reputation: Is corporate fame a double-edged sword? Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 904–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A. (2013). In head-hunting, big data may not be such a big deal—The New York Times. New York Times.

  • Cable, D. M., & Turban, D. B. (2003). The value of organizational reputation in the recruitment context: A brand-equity perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(11), 2244–2266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. C., Campion, E. D., & Campion, M. A. (2019). Using practice employment tests to improve recruitment and personnel selection outcomes for organizations and job seekers. Journal of Applied Psychology., 104, 1089–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, R. D., & Jones, K. W. (1975). Effects of work load, role ambiguity, and type A personality on anxiety, depression, and heart rate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(6), 713–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, S. A. (2006). Applicant reactions to multiple selection procedures for the police force. Applied Psychology, 55(2), 145–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D., & Webster, J. (2006). Toward an integrated model of applicant reactions and job choice. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(6), 1032–1057. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190600696572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D. S., & Rowe, P. M. (2002). The influence of videoconference technology and interview structure on the recruiting function of the employment interview: A field experiment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(3), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D. S., & Zweig, D. I. (2005). Developing a nomological network for interview structure: Antecedents and consequences of the structured selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 58(3), 673–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00516.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G. M. (2012). Why do women write personal blogs? Satisfying needs for self-disclosure and affiliation tell part of the story. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J., & Peneno, G. (1999). Comparing structured interview question types: Construct validity and applicant reactions. Journal of Business and Psychology., 13, 485–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. (2008). Elucidating the bonds of workplace humor: A relational process model. Human Relations, 61(8), 1087–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Motta Veiga, S. P. (2016). Humor in job search and recruitment. In The Psychology of Humor at Work (pp. 121–132). Routledge.

  • Dalal, D. K., Sassaman, L., & Zhu, X. S. (2020). The impact of nondiagnostic information on selection decision making: A cautionary note and mitigation strategies. Personnel Assessment and Decisions, 6(2), 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana, J., Dawes, R., & Peterson, N. (2013). Belief in the unstructured interview: The persistence of an illusion. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(5), 512–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dipboye, R. L., Macan, T., & Shahani-Denning, C. (2012). The selection interview from the interviewer and applicant perspectives: Can’t have one without the other. The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Assessment and Selection, 323–352.

  • Dishman, L. (2016). These Are The 10 Weirdest Interview Questions Employers Are Asking. Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/3058290/these-are-the-10-weirdest-interview-questions-employers-ar

  • Duncan, W. J., & Feisal, J. P. (1989). No laughing matter: Patterns of humor in the workplace. Organizational Dynamics, 17(4), 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. B., Slaughter, J. E., Ellis, A. P., & Rivin, J. M. (2019). Gender and the evaluation of humor at work. Journal of Applied Psychology., 104, 1077–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G. R., Berkson, H. M., & Harris, M. M. (2002). The recruitment interview process Persuasion and organization reputation promotion in competitive labor markets. Human Resource Management Review, 17.

  • Fisher, P. A., Risavy, S. D., Robie, C., König, C. J., Christiansen, N. D., Tett, R. P., & Simonet, D. V. (2020). Selection myths: A conceptual replication of HR professionals’ beliefs about effective human resource practices in the US and Canada. Journal of Personnel Psychology, No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified., 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000263.

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, B., & Aron, A. (2004). The effect of a shared humorous experience on closeness in initial encounters. Personal Relationships, 11(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00071.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, G. L., Manson, G. E., Katzoff, E. T., & Pathman, J. H. (1942). The stress interview. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 37(4), 427–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiou, K., Gouras, A., & Nikolaou, I. (2019). Gamification in employee selection: The development of a gamified assessment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(2), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giang, V. (2013). If Interviewing With Warby Parker, Be Prepared To Explain Your Halloween Costume. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/if-interviewing-with-warby-parker-be-prepared-to-explain-your-halloween-costume-2013-10

  • Gillet, R., & Cain, A. (2017). Wacky interview questions of highly successful bosses—Business Insider. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/wacky-interview-questions-successful-bosses-2017-1

  • Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge university press.

  • Goldberg, C. B. (2003). Applicant reactions to the employment interview: A look at demographic similarity and social identity theory. Journal of Business Research, 56(8), 561–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harold, C. M., Holtz, B. C., Griepentrog, B. K., Brewer, L. M., & Marsh, S. M. (2016). Investigating the effects of applicant justice perceptions on job offer acceptance. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 199–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, E., VanEpps, E. M., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2021). The (better than expected) consequences of asking sensitive questions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 162, 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.10.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwell, C. J., Johnson, C. D., & Posthuma, R. A. (2019). Are we asking the right questions? Predictive validity comparison of four structured interview question types. Journal of Business Research, 100, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 45.

  • Henson, M. (2019). NFL Draft 2019: The colourful and controversial Combine questions faced by prospects. BBC Sports. https://www.bbc.com/sport/american-football/47818230

  • Highhouse, S. (2009). Designing experiments that generalize. Organizational Research Methods, 12(3), 554–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Highhouse, S., Lievens, F., & Sinar, E. F. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(6), 986–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Highhouse, S., Nye, C. D., & Zhang, D. C. (2019). Dark motives and elective use of brainteaser interview questions. Applied Psychology, 68(2), 311–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. (1996). Issues and non-issues in the fidelity-bandwidth trade-off. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(6), 627–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honer, J., Wright, C. W., & Sablynski, C. J. (2007). Puzzle interviews: What are they and what do they measure? Applied HRM Research, 11(2), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honkaniemi, L., Feldt, T., Metsäpelto, R.-L., & Tolvanen, A. (2013). Personality types and applicant reactions in real-life selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21(1), 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, K., Yeomans, M., Brooks, A. W., Minson, J., & Gino, F. (2017). It doesn’t hurt to ask: Question-asking increases liking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 430–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hysong, S. J., & Dipboye, R. L. (1999). Individual differences in applicants’ perceptions to employment interview elements. 14th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA.

  • Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. A., Shultz, J. W., & Chapman, D. S. (2006). Recruiting through job advertisements: The effects of cognitive elaboration on decision making. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(2), 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (2009). Categories of novelty and states of uncertainty. Review of General Psychology, 13(4), 290–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow (1st ed.). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

  • Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, 49, 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T.-Y., Lee, D.-R., & Wong, N. Y. S. (2016). Supervisor humor and employee outcomes: The role of social distance and affective trust in supervisor. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9406-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, L. S., & Dipboye, R. L. (1998). The effects of interview structure on recruiting outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(9), 821–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König, C. J., Klehe, U.-C., Berchtold, M., & Kleinmann, M. (2010). Reasons for being selective when choosing personnel selection procedures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(1), 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaHuis, D. M. (2005). Individual differences in applicant reactions: A job-search perspective. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(2), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0965-075X.2005.00309.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, M., König, C. J., & Krause, K. (2017). Examining digital interviews for personnel selection: Applicant reactions and interviewer ratings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(4), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., & Highhouse, S. (2003). The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company’s attractiveness as an employer. Personnel Psychology., 56, 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00144.x/abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., De Corte, W., & Brysse, K. (2003). Applicant perceptions of selection procedures: The role of selection information, belief in tests, and comparative anxiety. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(1), 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. Advances in Organizational Justice, 56(8).

  • Luan, S., Reb, J., & Gigerenzer, G. (2019). Ecological rationality: Fast-and-frugal heuristics for managerial decision making under uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal., 62, 1735–1759. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao, J.-Y., Chiang, J. T.-J., Zhang, Y., & Gao, M. (2017). Humor as a relationship lubricant: The implications of leader humor on transformational leadership perceptions and team performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(4), 494–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817707518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. M., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Anderson, N. R., Costa, A. C., & Ahmed, S. M. (2017b). Applicant Perspectives During Selection: A Review Addressing “So What?,” “What’s New?,” and “Where to Next?”. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1693–1725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316681846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. M., Bauer, T. N., Truxillo, D. M., Campion, M. C., Van Iddekinge, C. H., & Campion, M. A. (2017a). Using pre-test explanations to improve test-taker reactions: Testing a set of “wise” interventions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 141, 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesmer-Magnus, J., Glew, D. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2012). A meta-analysis of positive humor in the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(2), 155–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscoso, S. (2000). Selection interview: A review of validity evidence, adverse impact and applicant reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, M., Niessen, A. S. M., & Meijer, R. R. (2020). Implementing evidence-based assessment and selection in organizations: A review and an agenda for future research, Implementing evidence-based assessment and selection in organizations: A review and an agenda for future research. Organizational Psychology Review, 2041386620983419. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386620983419.

  • Newman, D. A. (2009). Missing data techniques and low response rates. Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Doctrine, Verity and Fable in the Organizational and Social Sciences, 7.

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(4), 250–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novel, C. P. E. R. E. (2020). The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi= Zhonghua Liuxingbingxue Zazhi, 41(2), 145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2017). Ha ha? Assessing individual differences in humor production ability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada, Y. (2015). Building rapport through sequentially linked joke-serious responses in Second Language job interviews. Pragmatics and Society, 6(4), 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.6.4.06oka.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, V. (2005). 301 smart answers to tough interview questions. Inc: Sourcebooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, T. M. (1969). The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5(1), 12–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overholser, J. C. (1992). Sense of humor when coping with life stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(7), 799–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. W., Jaworski, B. J., & MacInnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, N., Jin, B., & Jin, S.-A. A. (2011). Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy in Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1974–1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Gärling, T., & Slovic, P. (2006). Affect and decision making: A “hot” topic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(2), 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, K. W., Rothbard, N. P., & Dumas, T. L. (2009). To disclose or not to disclose? Status distance and self-disclosure in diverse environments. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 710–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P., & MacKenzie, S. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poundstone, W. (2003). Beware the Interview Inquisition. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2003/05/beware-the-interview-inquisition

  • Ryan, A. M., & Ployhart, R. E. (2000). Applicants’ perceptions of selection procedures and decisions: A critical review and agenda for the future. Journal of Management, 26(3), 565–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S. (2009). The research-practice gap in industrial-organizational psychology and related fields: Challenges and potential solutions. In S. Kozlowski (Ed.), Oxford handbook of industrial-organizational psychology. Oxford University Press https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1455968.

  • Slaughter, J. E., & Greguras, G. J. (2009). Initial attraction to organizations: The influence of trait inferences. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00447.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, J. E., Zickar, M. J., Highhouse, S., & Mohr, D. C. (2004). Personality trait inferences about organizations: Development of a measure and assessment of construct validity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, A. B., Christiansen, N. D., & Laginess, A. J. (2019). Social intelligence and interview accuracy: Individual differences in the ability to construct interviews and rate accurately. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12237, 27, 104, 128

  • Speer, A. B., Tenbrink, A. P., Schwendeman, M. G., & Wegmeyer, L. J. (2020). Individual differences in effective interview design: Factors affecting question choice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12297.

  • Steiner, D. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (1996). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 134–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockman, S., Van Hoye, G., & da Motta Veiga, S. (2020). Negative word-of-mouth and applicant attraction: The role of employer brand equity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118, 103368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, S. G., Miles, J. A., & Levesque, L. L. (2001). The effects of videoconference, telephone, and face-to-face media on interviewer and applicant judgments in employment interviews. Journal of Management, 27(3), 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00096-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunnafrank, M., & Ramirez, A. (2004). At first sight: Persistent relational effects of get-acquainted conversations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(3), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504042837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(4), 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tews, M. J., Michel, J. W., & Bartlett, A. (2012). The fundamental role of workplace fun in applicant attraction. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(1), 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorson, J. A., & Powell, F. C. (1993). Development and validation of a multidimensional sense of humor scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199301)49:1<13::AID-JCLP2270490103>3.0.CO;2-S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Truxillo, D. M., Bauer, T. N., Campion, M. A., & Paronto, M. E. (2006). A field study of the role of big five personality in applicant perceptions of selection fairness, self, and the hiring organization. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 14(3), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00351.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uggerslev, K. L., Fassina, N. E., & Kraichy, D. (2012). Recruiting through the stages: A meta-analytic test of predictors of applicant attraction at different stages of the recruiting process. Personnel Psychology, 65(3), 597–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01254.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasel, K. (2019). Unconventional job interview questions that actually work. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/19/success/job-interview-questions/index.html

  • Verplanken, B., Hofstee, G., & Janssen, H. J. (1998). Accessibility of affective versus cognitive components of attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vittengl, J. R., & Holt, C. S. (2000). Getting acquainted: The relationship of self-disclosure and social attraction to positive affect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500171003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmy, A., Kleinmann, M., König, C. J., Melchers, K. G., & Truxillo, D. M. (2016). How and why do interviewers try to make impressions on applicants? A qualitative study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C. W., Sablynski, C. J., Manson, T. M., & Oshiro, S. (2012). Why are manhole covers round? A laboratory study of reactions to puzzle interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(11), 2834–2857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00963.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. C., & Highhouse, S. (2018). Judgment and decision making in the workplace. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, C. Viswesvaran, & H. Sinangil (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology, volume 2: Organizational psychology (Vol. 1, 2nd ed., p. 23). Wiley New York.

  • Zhang, D. C., Highhouse, S., Brooks, M. E., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Communicating the validity of structured job interviews with graphical visual aids. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 26(2–4), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X. S., Dalal, D. K., Nolan, K. P., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (2021). Understanding the role of organizational personality and social identity concerns on initial recruitment outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 124, 103518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zibarras, L. D., & Patterson, F. (2015). The role of job relatedness and self-efficacy in applicant perceptions of fairness in a high-stakes selection setting. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 23(4), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful for John-Luke McCord, Amber LeBlanc, Sheryl Lobo, and Kevin Sullivan for their assistance in locating the OPQs and creating the survey material. I am also grateful for Susan Zhu and Vanessa Burke for their comments on earlier versions of the draft that made this paper more likable and material. I am also grateful for Susan Zhu and Vanessa Burke for their comments on earlier versions of the draft that made this paper more likable and less useless.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA

    Don C. Zhang

Authors
  1. Don C. Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Don C. Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 16 kb)

Appendices

Appendix 1. Full List of Interview Questions

Traditional

  1. 1.

    What are your major weaknesses?

  2. 2.

    What is one of the hardest decisions you’ve ever had to make?

  3. 3.

    Where do you see yourself in 5 years?

  4. 4.

    How would a friend or professor describe you?

  5. 5.

    What do you think are the most important qualities for someone to excel at work?

  6. 6.

    What do you expect from a job?

  7. 7.

    Give an example of a time you dealt with a high-pressure situation.

  8. 8.

    Describe a time you worked as a part of a team and how you helped the team succeed.

  9. 9.

    Tell me about yourself

  10. 10.

    What leadership experiences do you have?

Open-ended

  1. 1.

    Create an outfit that describes yourself.

  2. 2.

    If you could throw any party, what would be the theme?

  3. 3.

    How would you spend $1000?

  4. 4.

    What would the name of your debut album be?

  5. 5.

    What would you do if you found a penguin in the freezer?

  6. 6.

    If you were a brand, what would be your motto?

  7. 7.

    If you could be remembered for one sentence, what would it be?

  8. 8.

    If you could have 3 wishes what would they be?

  9. 9.

    What would you do in the event of a zombie apocalypse?

  10. 10.

    What would you do if it were your last day on earth?

  11. 11.

    What would you like inscribed on your headstone?

  12. 12.

    What do you think of lava lamps?

Preference

  1. 1.

    Would you rather fight 1 horse-sized duck or 100 duck-sized horses?

  2. 2.

    What is your dream car and why?

  3. 3.

    Which one of the seven dwarves would you be?

  4. 4.

    What kind of animal would you be and why?

  5. 5.

    What is your favorite store to shop at?

  6. 6.

    Are you a cat lover or dog lover?

  7. 7.

    What are your favorite TV shows?

  8. 8.

    What is your favorite movie?

  9. 9.

    What is your favorite color?

  10. 10.

    If you had a choice between two superpowers being invisible or flying which would you choose?

  11. 11.

    If you could be any tree, which tree would you be?

Biographical

  1. 1.

    What would the inside of your car look like if we were to go look inside of it right now?

  2. 2.

    Have you played the video game Borderlands?

  3. 3.

    What is the most embarrassing thing in your bedroom?

  4. 4.

    What is your most memorable travel experience?

  5. 5.

    What is the funniest thing that has ever happened to you?

  6. 6.

    What is your most embarrassing moment?

  7. 7.

    Did you get an allowance? Did you spend it right away or save it? What did you spend it on?

  8. 8.

    What was the last costume you wore?

  9. 9.

    What is the last time you did something for the first time?

Appendix 2

Table 6 Study 2 Procedure
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, D.C. Horse-Sized Ducks or Duck-Sized Horses? Oddball Personality Questions Are Likable (but Useless) for Organizational Recruitment. J Bus Psychol 37, 215–233 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09740-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09740-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation