Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Benchmarking of AQM methods of network congestion control based on extension of interval type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy decision by opinion score method

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents a benchmarking and evaluation approach for active queue management (AQM) network congestion control methods, which are considered as a problem of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). In recent years, the development of MCDM methods has been studied from various perspectives. The latest one called fuzzy decision by opinion score method (FDOSM) has proved its efficiency in solving the concerns faced by other methods. However, the approach of FDOSM and its extension is based on fuzzy type-1, which suffers from issues, especially minimising the effect of data uncertainties. Therefore, this study extended FDOSM into a fuzzy type-2 environment that utilises interval type-2 trapezoidal (IT2T) membership, and then discusses the effectiveness of such membership on AQM method benchmarking. The methodology of this study involves two consecutive phases. The first phase is the construction of a decision matrix utilised in AQM method benchmarking based on a list of AQM methods and multiple evaluation criteria. The second phase is regarding the new method (IT2T-FDOSM), which illustrated two main stages, namely, data transformation unit and data processing. The findings of this study are the following: (1) Individual results of benchmarking which used six decision-makers are almost similar, with the AQM fuzzy GRED method ranked as the best. (2) The group benchmarking results show that a relatively similar order and fuzzy GRED method is the best as well. (3) IT2T-FDOSM can deal with the uncertainty problem properly. (4) The results show significant differences amongst the groups’ scores, which indicate the validity of the IT2T-FDOSM results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mliki, H., Chaari, L., & Kamoun, L. (2015). A comprehensive survey on carrier ethernet congestion management mechanism. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 47, 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Park, T., & Shin, S. (2020). Mobius: Packet re-processing hardware architecture for rich policy handling on a network processor. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 29(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chitra, K., & Padamavathi, D. G. (2010). Adaptive CHOKe: An algorithm to increase the fairness in Internet Routers. Int. J. Advanced Networking and Applications, 01(06), 382–386.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Albahri, O. S., et al. (2021). Multidimensional benchmarking of the active queue management methods of network congestion control based on extension of fuzzy decision by opinion score method. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 36, 796–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. M. Hamdi, S. A. Rashid, M. Ismail, M. A. Altahrawi, M. F. Mansor, and M. K. AbuFoul, "Performance Evaluation of Active Queue Management Algorithms in Large Network. In: 2018 IEEE 4th International Symposium on Telecommunication Technologies (ISTT), 2018, pp. 1–6: IEEE.

  6. Pei, L., & Wu, F. (2021). Periodic solutions, chaos and bi-stability in the state-dependent delayed homogeneous additive increase and multiplicative decrease/random early detection congestion control systems. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 182, 871–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baklizi, M., Abdel-Jaber, H., Abu-Shareha, A. A., Abualhaj, M. M., & Ramadass, S. (2014). Fuzzy logic controller of gentle random early detection based on average queue length and delay rate. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 16(1), 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sadek, B. A., El Houssaine, T., & Noreddine, C. (2020). Analysis and design of robust guaranteed cost active queue management. Computer Communications, 159, 124–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Dai et al. Feature selection of high-dimensional biomedical data using improved SFLA for disease diagnosis. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), 2015, pp. 458–463: IEEE.

  10. Rawat, J., Singh, A., Bhadauria, H., & Virmani, J. (2015). Computer aided diagnostic system for detection of leukemia using microscopic images. Procedia Computer Science, 70, 748–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abualhaj, M. M., Abu-Shareha, A. A., & Al-Tahrawi, M. M. (2018). FLRED: an efficient fuzzy logic based network congestion control method. Neural Computing and Applications, 30(3), 925–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. L. M. d. Campos, A. Cano, J. G. Castellano, and S. Moral, Bayesian networks classifiers for gene-expression data. In: 2011 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, 2011, pp. 1200–1206.

  13. Abbasov, B., & Korukoglu, S. (2009). Effective RED: An algorithm to improve RED’s performance by reducing packet loss rate. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 32(3), 703–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, J., Hu, C., & Ji, Z. (2010). Self-tuning random early detection algorithm to improve performance of network transmission. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2011, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hong, J., Joo, C., & Bahk, S. (2007). Active queue management algorithm considering queue and load states. Computer Communications, 30(4), 886–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stanojevic, R., Shorten, R. N., & Kellett, C. M. (2006). Adaptive tuning of drop-tail buffers for reducing queueing delays. IEEE Communications Letters, 10(7), 570–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. W. Chen, Y. Li, and S.-H. Yang, An average queue weight parameterization in a network supporting TCP flows with RED. In 2007 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, 2007, pp. 590–595: IEEE.

  18. Liu, S., Başar, T., & Srikant, R. (2008). TCP-Illinois: A loss-and delay-based congestion control algorithm for high-speed networks. Performance Evaluation, 65(6), 417–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Al-Haiqi, A., Kiah, M. L. M., Hussain, M., & Abdulnabi, M. (2015). Evaluation and selection of open-source EMR software packages based on integrated AHP and TOPSIS. Journal of biomedical informatics, 53(8), 390–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohammed, R. T., Zaidan, A. A., Yaakob, R., Sharef, N. M., Abdullah, R. H., Zaidan, B. B., & Abdulkareem, K. H. (2021). Determining importance of many-objective optimisation competitive algorithms evaluation criteria based on a novel fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency method. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 20, 1–47.

  21. Albahri, A., & Hamid, R. A. (2020). Detection-based Prioritisation: Framework of Multi-laboratory characteristics for asymptomatic COVID-19 carriers based on integrated entropy–TOPSIS methods. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 111, 101983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Hussain, M., Haiqi, A., Kiah, M. M., & Abdulnabi, M. (2015). Multi-criteria analysis for OS-EMR software selection problem: A comparative study. Decision Support Systems, 78(4), 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Abdullateef, B. N., Elias, N. F., Mohamed, H., Zaidan, A., & Zaidan, B. (2016). An evaluation and selection problems of OSS-LMS packages. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 248–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yas, Q. M., Zadain, A., Zaidan, B., Lakulu, M., & Rahmatullah, B. (2017). Towards on develop a framework for the evaluation and benchmarking of skin detectors based on artificial intelligent models using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 31(03), 1759002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zaidan, B., Zaidan, A., Karim, H. A., Ahmad, N. J. S. P., & Experience, . (2017). A new digital watermarking evaluation and benchmarking methodology using an external group of evaluators and multi-criteria analysis based on ‘large-scale data. Practice and Experience, 47(10), 1365–1392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zaidan, B., & Zaidan, A. (2017). Software and hardware FPGA-based digital watermarking and steganography approaches: Toward new methodology for evaluation and benchmarking using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers, 26(07), 1750116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. B. B. Zaidan, A. A. Zaidan, H. A. Karim, and N. N. Ahmad A New Approach based on Multi-Dimensional Evaluation and Benchmarking for Data Hiding Techniques. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 1–42.

  28. Qader, M., Zaidan, B., Zaidan, A., Ali, S., & Kamaluddin, M. (2017). A methodology for football players selection problem based on multi-measurements criteria analysis. Measurement, 111, 38–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jumaah, F., Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Bahbibi, R., Qahtan, M., & Sali, A. J. T. S. (2018). Technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution for solving complex situations in multi-criteria optimization of the tracking channels of GPS baseband telecommunication receivers. Telecommunication Systems, 68(3), 425–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. B. Rahmatullah, A. Zaidan, F. Mohamed, and A. Sali Multi-complex attributes analysis for optimum GPS baseband receiver tracking channels selection. In: 2017 4th international conference on control, decision and information technologies (CoDIT) 2017, pp. 1084–1088: IEEE.

  31. Salman, O. H., Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Naserkalid, Hashim, M., & Making, D. (2017). Novel methodology for triage and prioritizing using “big data” patients with chronic heart diseases through telemedicine environmental. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 16(05), 1211–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yas, Q. M., Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Rahmatullah, B., & Karim, H. A. (2018). Comprehensive insights into evaluation and benchmarking of real-time skin detectors: Review, open issues & challenges, and recommended solutions. Measurement, 114, 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tariq, I., et al. (2018). MOGSABAT: a metaheuristic hybrid algorithm for solving multi-objective optimisation problems. Neural Computing and Applications, 32, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zaidan, B., & Zaidan, A. J. M. (2018). Comparative study on the evaluation and benchmarking information hiding approaches based multi-measurement analysis using TOPSIS method with different normalisation, separation and context techniques. Measurement, 117, 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zaidan, A., et al. (2018). A review on smartphone skin cancer diagnosis apps in evaluation and benchmarking: coherent taxonomy, open issues and recommendation pathway solution. Health and Technology, 8(4), 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kalid, N., Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Salman, O. H., Hashim, M., & Muzammil, H. J. J. O. M. S. (2018). Based real time remote health monitoring systems: A review on patients prioritization and related" big data" using body sensors information and communication technology. Journal of medical systems, 422(2), 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Albahri, O., et al. (2020). Helping doctors hasten COVID-19 treatment: Towards a rescue framework for the transfusion of best convalescent plasma to the most critical patients based on biological requirements via ml and novel MCDM methods. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 196, 105617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. K. H. Abdulkareem et al. A new standardisation and selection framework for real-time image dehazing algorithms from multi-foggy scenes based on fuzzy Delphi and hybrid multi-criteria decision analysis methods.

  39. Abdulkareem, K. H., Arbaiy, N., Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Albahri, O. S., Alsalem, M. A., & Salih, M. M. (2020). A novel multi-perspective benchmarking framework for selecting image dehazing intelligent algorithms based on BWM and group VIKOR techniques. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 19(03), 909–957.

  40. Alaa, M., et al. (2019). Assessment and ranking framework for the English skills of pre-service teachers based on fuzzy Delphi and TOPSIS methods. IEEE Access, 7, 126201–126223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kalid, N., et al. (2018). Based on real time remote health monitoring systems: a new approach for prioritization “large scales data” patients with chronic heart diseases using body sensors and communication technology. Journal of medical systems, 42(4), 69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Albahri, O., et al. (2018). Systematic review of real-time remote health monitoring system in triage and priority-based sensor technology: Taxonomy, open challenges, motivation and recommendations. Journal of medical systems, 42(5), 80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. M. Alsalem et al. 2018 Systematic review of an automated multiclass detection and classification system for acute Leukaemia in terms of evaluation and benchmarking, open challenges, issues and methodological aspects. 42(11): 204

  44. Malik, R. Q., Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Ramli, K. N., Albahri, O. S., Kareem, Z. H., & Salih, M. M. (2021). Novel roadside unit positioning framework in the context of the vehicle-to-infrastructure communication system based on AHP—Entropy for weighting and borda—VIKOR for uniform ranking. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 20(1–34).

  45. Albahri, A. S., Alwan, J. K., Taha, Z. K., Ismail, S. F., Hamid, R. A., Zaidan, A. A., & Alsalem, M. A. (2021). IoT-based telemedicine for disease prevention and health promotion: State-of-the-Art. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 173, 102873.

  46. Albahri, O.S., Zaidan, A.A., Zaidan, B.B. et al. (2021). New mHealth hospital selection framework supporting decentralised telemedicine architecture for outpatient cardiovascular disease-based integrated techniques: Haversine-GPS and AHP-VIKOR. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-02897-4.

  47. Mohammed, T.J., Albahri, A.S., Zaidan, A.A. et al. (2021). Convalescent-plasma-transfusion intelligent framework for rescuing COVID-19 patients across centralised/decentralised telemedicine hospitals based on AHP-group TOPSIS and matching component. Applied Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-02169-2.

  48. Mohammed, K., et al. (2019). Real-time remote-health monitoring systems: A review on patients prioritisation for multiple-chronic diseases, taxonomy analysis, concerns and solution procedure. Journal of medical systems, 43(7), 223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Almahdi, E., Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Alsalem, M., Albahri, O., & Albahri, A. (2019). Mobile patient monitoring systems from a benchmarking aspect: Challenges, open issues and recommended solutions. Journal of Medical Systems, 43(7), 207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Alsalem, M., Albahri, O., Albahri, A., & Qahtan, M. (2020). Multi-agent learning neural network and Bayesian model for real-time IoT skin detectors: a new evaluation and benchmarking methodology. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(12), 8315–8366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Alsalem, M., et al. (2019). Multiclass benchmarking framework for automated acute Leukaemia detection and classification based on BWM and group-VIKOR. Journal of medical systems, 43(7), 212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Salih, M. M., Zaidan, B., Zaidan, A., & Ahmed, M. A. (2018). Survey on Fuzzy TOPSIS State-of-the-Art between 2007–2017. Computers & Operations Research, 104, 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Salih, M. M., Zaidan, B., & Zaidan, A. (2020). Fuzzy decision by opinion score method. Applied Soft Computing, 96, 106595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wu, D., & Tan, W. W. (2006). Genetic learning and performance evaluation of interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 19(8), 829–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Liao, T. W. (2015). Two interval type 2 fuzzy TOPSIS material selection methods. Materials & Design, 88, 1088–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Mendel, J. M. (2007). Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems: an overview. IEEE computational intelligence magazine, 2(1), 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Hu, H., Wang, Y., & Cai, Y. (2012). Advantages of the enhanced opposite direction searching algorithm for computing the centroid of an interval type-2 fuzzy set. Asian Journal of Control, 14(5), 1422–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Liang, Q., & Mendel, J. M. (2000). Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems: theory and design. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy systems, 8(5), 535–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Chen, S.-M., & Lee, L.-W. (2010). Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the ranking values and the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Expert Systems with applications, 37(1), 824–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Aliyeva, K. (2017). Multi-criteria house buying decision making based on type-2 fuzzy sets. Procedia Computer Science, 120, 515–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. L.-W. Lee and S.-M. Chen A new method for fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the arithmetic operations of interval type-2 fuzzy sets. In: 2008 International conference on machine learning and cybernetics, 2008, vol. 6, pp. 3084–3089: IEEE.

  62. Abdullah, L., Adawiyah, C., & Kamal, C. (2018). A decision making method based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets: An approach for ambulance location preference. Applied computing and informatics, 14(1), 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Jumaah, F., Zadain, A., Zaidan, B., Hamzah, A., & Bahbibi, R. J. M. (2018). Decision-making solution based multi-measurement design parameter for optimization of GPS receiver tracking channels in static and dynamic real-time positioning multipath environment. Measurement, 118, 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Albahri, A., Zaidan, A., Albahri, O., Zaidan, B., & Alsalem, M. (2018). Real-time fault-tolerant mHealth system: Comprehensive review of healthcare services, opens issues, challenges and methodological aspects. Journal of medical systems, 42(8), 137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Albahri, O., Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Hashim, M., Albahri, A., & Alsalem, M. (2018). Real-time remote health-monitoring Systems in a Medical Centre: A review of the provision of healthcare services-based body sensor information, open challenges and methodological aspects. Journal of medical systems, 42(9), 164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Zughoul, O., et al. (2018). Comprehensive insights into the criteria of student performance in various educational domains. IEEE Access, 6(4), 73245–73264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Salih, M. M., Zaidan, B., Zaidan, A., & Ahmed, M. A. (2019). Survey on fuzzy TOPSIS state-of-the-art between 2007 and 2017. Computers & Operations Research, 104, 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Albahri, A., et al. (2019). Based multiple heterogeneous wearable sensors: A smart real-time health monitoring structured for hospitals distributor. IEEE Access, 7, 37269–37323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Albahri, O., et al. (2019). Fault-tolerant mHealth framework in the context of IoT-based real-time wearable health data sensors. IEEE Access, 7, 50052–50080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Almahdi, E., Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Alsalem, M., Albahri, O., & Albahri, A. (2019). Mobile-based patient monitoring systems: A prioritisation framework using multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Journal of medical systems, 43(7), 219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Khatari, M., Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Albahri, O., & Alsalem, M. (2019). Multi-criteria evaluation and benchmarking for active queue management methods: Open issues challenges and recommended pathway solutions. International Jornal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 18(4), 1187–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Ibrahim, N., et al. (2019). Multi-criteria evaluation and benchmarking for young learners’ English language mobile applications in terms of LSRW skills. IEEE Access, 7(7), 146620–146651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Talal, M., et al. (2019). Comprehensive review and analysis of anti-malware apps for smartphones. Telecommunication Systems, 72(2), 285–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Napi, N. M., Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Albahri, O. S., Alsalem, M. A., & Albahri, A. S. (2019). "Medical emergency triage and patient prioritisation in a telemedicine environment: a systematic review. Health and Technology, 9(5), 679–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Enaizan, O., et al. (2020). Electronic medical record systems: Decision support examination framework for individual, security and privacy concerns using multi-perspective analysis. Health and Technology, 10(3), 795–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. O. Zughoul, Novel Triplex Procedure for Ranking the Ability of Software Engineering Students Based on Two levels of AHP and Group TOPSIS Techniques. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 2020.

  77. Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., Alsalem, M., Momani, F., & Zughoul, O. (2020). Novel multiperspective hiring framework for the selection of software programmer applicants based on AHP and group TOPSIS Techniques. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 18(4), 1–73.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Abdulkareem, K. H., et al. (2020). A novel multi-perspective benchmarking framework for selecting image dehazing intelligent algorithms based on bwm and group VIKOR techniques. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 19(3), 909–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. A. Alamoodi et al. A systematic review into the assessment of medical apps: motivations, challenges, recommendations and methodological aspect. Health and Technology, pp. 1–17, 2020.

  80. Mohammed, R., et al. (2020). Review of the research landscape of multi-criteria evaluation and benchmarking processes for many-objective optimisation methods: coherent taxonomy, challenges and recommended solution. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 19, 1619–1693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Albahri, A., et al. (2020). Multi-Biological Laboratory Examination Framework for the Prioritization of Patients with COVID-19 Based on Integrated AHP and Group VIKOR Methods. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 19(05), 1247–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Albahri, O., et al. (2020). Systematic review of artificial intelligence techniques in the detection and classification of COVID-19 medical images in terms of evaluation and benchmarking: Taxonomy analysis, challenges, future solutions and methodological aspects. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 13(10), 1381–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Dawood, K. A., Sharif, K. Y., Ghani, A. A., Zulzalil, H., Zaidan, A., & Zaidan, B. (2020). Towards a unified criteria model for usability evaluation in the context of open source software based on a Fuzzy Delphi Method. Information and Software Technology, 130, 106453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. M. Khatari Multidimensional Benchmarking Framework for AQMs of Network Congestion Control Based on AHP and Group-TOPSIS. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 2020.

  85. K. A. Dawood Novel Multi-Perspective Usability Evaluation Framework for Selection of Open Source Software Based on BWM and Group VIKOR Techniques. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 2020.

  86. K. H. Abdulkareem et al. A new standardisation and selection framework for real-time image dehazing algorithms from multi-foggy scenes based on fuzzy Delphi and hybrid multi-criteria decision analysis methods. Neural Computing and Applications 2020/05/26 2020.

  87. Mohammed, K., et al. (2020). Novel technique for reorganisation of opinion order to interval levels for solving several instances representing prioritisation in patients with multiple chronic diseases. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 185, 105151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Mohammed, K., et al. (2020). A uniform intelligent prioritisation for solving diverse and big data generated from multiple chronic diseases patients based on hybrid decision-making and voting method. IEEE Access, 8, 91521–91530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Abdulkareem, K. H. (2020). A novel multi-perspective benchmarking framework for selecting image dehazing intelligent algorithms Based on BWM and group VIKOR techniques. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 19(03), 909–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computing, Faculty of Arts, Computing and Creative Industry, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900, Tanjung Malim, Malaysia

    Mahmood M. Salih, O. S. Albahri, A. A. Zaidan, B. B. Zaidan, F. M. Jumaah & A. S. Albahri

  2. Department of Computer Science, Computer Science and Mathematics College, Tikrit University, Tikrit, Iraq

    Mahmood M. Salih

  3. National Child Development Research Center, NCDRC Complex, Sultan Azlan Shah Campus, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim, Perak, Malaysia

    A. A. Zaidan & B. B. Zaidan

  4. Future Technology Research Center, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 123 University Road, Section 3, Douliou, 64002, Yunlin, Taiwan, ROC

    B. B. Zaidan

  5. Informatics Institute for Postgraduate Studies (IIPS), Iraqi Commission for Computers and Informatics (ICCI), Baghdad, Iraq

    A. S. Albahri

Authors
  1. Mahmood M. Salih
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. S. Albahri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. A. Zaidan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. B. Zaidan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. M. Jumaah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. S. Albahri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Zaidan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salih, M.M., Albahri, O.S., Zaidan, A.A. et al. Benchmarking of AQM methods of network congestion control based on extension of interval type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy decision by opinion score method. Telecommun Syst 77, 493–522 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-021-00773-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-021-00773-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation