Skip to main content
Log in

The Chief Marketing Officer: an antidote to myopic earnings management practices

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To meet short-term earnings targets, firms often engage in real earnings management practices (REM) such as reducing advertising expenses and running sales promotions. Since these practices can hinder Chief Marketing Officers (CMOs) in building and maintaining market-based assets of firms, the authors hypothesize that firms with CMOs will be less likely to engage in REM. Using publicly available secondary data, the authors show that CMO presence decreases a firm’s propensity for REM and that the CMO’s ability and willingness to deter REM depend on CEO power and market power of the firm, respectively. The authors also conduct a survey of marketing personnel to extend the first study by examining marketing expenditures other than advertising (e.g., market research) and the firm’s revenue management actions (e.g., sales promotions). The authors find that CMO presence reduces the propensity for REM by cutting marketing expenditures but has no impact on REM through sales promotions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We thank the review team for suggesting that all CMOs are not the same and that the CMO role may differ across industries.

References

  • Acharya, V., Myers, S., & Rajan, R. (2011). The internal governance of firms. The Journal of Finance, 66(3), 689–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahearne, M. J., Boichuk, J. P., Chapman, C. J., & Steenburgh, T. J. (2016). Real earnings management in sales. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(5), 1233–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, N., Joseph, K., Ma, M., & Wintoki, M. B. (2017). Do CMO incentives matter? An empirical investigation of CMO compensation and its impact on firm performance. Management Science, 63(6), 1993–2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhojraj, S., Hribar, P., Picconi, M., & Mcinnis, J. (2009). Making sense of cents: An examination of firms that marginally miss or beat analyst forecasts. The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 2361–2388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, A., & Grewal, R. (2011). The stock market in the driver’s seat! Implications for R&D and marketing. Management Science, 57(9), 1594–1609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Q., Lee, J., & Shevlin, T. (2016). Internal governance and real earnings management. The Accounting Review, 91(4), 1051–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Court, D. (2007). The evolving role of the CMO. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/marketing-and-sales/our-insights/the-evolving-role-of-the-cmo. Accessed 13 Jan 2021

  • Edeling, A., & Himme, A. (2018). When does market share matter? New empirical generalizations from a meta-analysis of the market share–performance relationship. Journal of Marketing, 82(3), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germann, F., Ebbes, P., & Grewal, R. (2015). The Chief Marketing Officer matters! Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Harvey, C., & Rajagopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40, 3–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunny, K. A. (2005). What are the consequences of real earnings management?.

  • Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1145–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition: Recent findings on the determinants and consequences of social power. Psychological Review, 110(10), 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, S. P., Mizik, N., & Roychowdhury, S. (2016). Managing for the moment: The role of real activity versus accruals earnings management in SEO valuation. The Accounting Review, 91(2), 559–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, G. V., & Visvanathan, G. (2007). Does the SOX definition of an accounting expert matter? The association between audit committee directors’ accounting expertise and accounting conservatism. Available at SSRN 866884.

  • Lee, S., Matsunaga, S. R., & Park, C. W. (2012). Management forecast accuracy and CEO turnover. The Accounting Review, 87(6), 2095–2122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizik, N. (2010). The theory and practice of myopic management. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(4), 594–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizik, N., & Jacobson, R. (2007). Myopic marketing management: Evidence of the phenomenon and its long-term performance consequences in the SEO context. Marketing Science, 26(3), 361–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C. (n.d.). The CMO Survey. The CMO Survey.

  • Nath, P., & Mahajan, V. (2008). Chief Marketing Officers: A study of their presence in firms’ top management teams. Journal of Marketing, 72(1), 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocasio, W. (1994). Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in U.S. Industrial Corporations, 1960–1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 285–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rappleye, E. (2017). 85% of American CEOs are promoted from within. Becker’s Hospital Review. https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/hospital-management-administration/85-of-american-ceos-are-promoted-from-within.html. Accessed 13 Jan 2021

  • Saboo, A. R., Chakravarty, A., & Grewal, R. (2016). Organizational debut on the public stage: Marketing myopia and initial public offerings. Marketing Science, 35(4), 656–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, W., & Cannella, A. A. (2002). Revisiting the performance consequences of CEO succession: The impacts of successor type, post-succession senior executive turnover, and departing CEO tenure. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 717–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, R., & Ramani, N. (2019). With power comes responsibility: How powerful marketing departments can help prevent myopic management. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 108–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zang, A. (2012). Evidence on the trade-off between real activities manipulation and accrual-based earnings management. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 675–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. (2006). The presence of a separate COO/president and its impact on strategic change and CEO dismissal. Strategic Management Journal, 27(3), 283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Preetinder Kaur.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 5.70 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaur, P., Ramaswami, S. & Bommaraju, R. The Chief Marketing Officer: an antidote to myopic earnings management practices. Mark Lett 32, 165–178 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-021-09560-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-021-09560-0

Keywords

Navigation