Abstract
We examined the extent to which self-efficacy and growth mindsets predict reading comprehension growth in sixth grade and the moderating role of initial word reading. Students (N = 303) reported on their self-efficacy as well as domain-general and reading-specific mindsets at the beginning of sixth grade. They completed brief bi-monthly reading comprehension measures throughout the year and a multiple-choice reading comprehension measure at the end of the school year. Results from a series of latent basis growth models indicated that self-efficacy predicted the initial level but not growth in reading comprehension. In contrast, a domain-general growth mindset did not predict the initial level but did predict growth, which in turn predicted the end-of-year reading comprehension outcome. Unexpectedly, a reading-specific growth mindset predicted none of the reading comprehension outcomes, and the initial word reading skill did not moderate the relation between growth mindsets and reading comprehension growth. Our findings highlight the critical role that self-efficacy and a domain-general growth mindset play in promoting students’ reading comprehension development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We initially planned to administer Form O in April but decided to administer Form A instead because we noticed that the difficulties were not equated across the forms.
References
Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452–477. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.34.4.4
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Information Age.
Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020084
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
Bloom, H. S., Hill, C. J., Black, A. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2008). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1, 289–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802400072
Bong, M. (2001). Between-and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 23–34.
Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382
Burnette, J. L., O’Boyle, E. H., VanEpps, E. M., Pollack, J. M., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Mindsets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 655–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029531
Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (1997). A longitudinal study of beginning reading achievement and reading self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01244.x
Cho, E., Capin, P., Roberts, G., & Vaughn, S. (2018). Examining predictive validity of oral reading fluency slope in upper elementary grades using quantile regression. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51, 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417719887
Cho, E., Lee, M., & Toste, J. R. (2018). Does perceived competence serve as a protective mechanism against performance goals for struggling readers? Path analysis of contextual antecedents and reading outcomes. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.05.017
Cho, E., Toste, J. R., Lee, M., & Ju, U. (2019). Motivational predictors of struggling readers’ reading comprehension: The effects of mindset, achievement goals, and engagement. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32, 1219–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9908-8
Conradi, K., Jang, B. G., & McKenna, M. C. (2014). Motivation terminology in reading research: A conceptual review. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 127–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9245-z
Costa, A., & Faria, L. (2018). Implicit theories of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00829
Diseth, Å., Meland, E., & Breidablik, H. J. (2014). Self-beliefs among students: Grade level and gender differences in self-esteem, self-efficacy and implicit theories of intelligence. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 1–8.
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_12
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
Froiland, J. M., & Oros, E. (2014). Intrinsic motivation, perceived competence and classroom engagement as longitudinal predictors of adolescent reading achievement. Educational Psychology, 34, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.822964
Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Between-and within-domain relations of students’ academic emotions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 715–733. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.715
Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2003.09.002
Gunderson, E. A., Hamdan, N., & Sorhagen, N. S. (2017). Who needs innate ability to succeed in math and literacy? Academic-domain-specific theories of intelligence about peers versus adults. Developmental Psychology, 53, 1188–1205. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000282
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. III, pp. 403–422). Erlbaum.
Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 282–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.004
Hornstra, L., van der Veen, I., Peetsma, T., & Volman, M. (2013). Developments in motivation and achievement during primary school: A longitudinal study on group-specific differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.004
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kinlaw, C. R., & Kurtz-Costes, B. (2003). The development of children’s beliefs about intelligence. Developmental Review, 23, 125–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-2297(03)00010-8
Louick, R., Leider, C. M., Daley, S. G., Proctor, C. P., & Gardner, G. L. (2016). Motivation for reading among struggling middle school readers: A mixed methods study. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.027
Lüftenegger, M., & Chen, J. A. (2017). Conceptual issues and assessment of implicit theories. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 225, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000286
MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (4th ed.). Riverside Publishing Company.
Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concept: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129–149. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023001129
McArdle, J. J., & Epstein, D. (1987). Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models. Child Development, 58, 110–133. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130295
McCutchen, K. L., Jones, M. H., Carbonneau, K. J., & Mueller, C. E. (2016). Mindset and standardized testing over time. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.027
McKenna, M. C., Conradi, K., Lawrence, C., Jang, B. G., & Meyer, J. P. (2012). Reading attitudes of middle school students: Results of a US survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.021
Meltzer, L., Katzir-Cohen, T., Miller, L., & Roditi, B. (2001). The impact of effort and strategy use on academic performance: Student and teacher perceptions. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 85–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511065
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén.
Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mindset interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26, 784–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615571017
Petscher, Y., Otaiba, S. A., Wanzek, J., Rivas, B., & Jones, F. (2017). The relation between global and specific mindset with reading outcomes for elementary school students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21, 376–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1313846
Quihuis, G., Bempechat, J., Jimenez, N. V., & Boulay, B. A. (2002). Implicit theories of intelligence across academic domains: A study of meaning making in adolescents of Mexican descent. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2002, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.45
Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/271063
Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2011). On the effects of motivation on reading performance growth in secondary school. Learning and Instruction, 21, 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.11.001
Romero, C., Master, A., Paunesku, D., Dweck, C. S., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Academic and emotional functioning in middle school: The role of implicit theories. Emotion, 14, 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035490
Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (Dis) abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). Guilford Press.
Schiefele, U., Stutz, F., & Schaffner, E. (2016). Longitudinal relations between reading motivation and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.031
Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308219
Schunk, D. H., & Dibenedetto, M. K. (2016). Self-efficacy theory in education. Handbook of motivation at school, 2, 34–54.
Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp. 49–68). Routledge.
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 40–59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
Stipek, D., & Gralinski, J. H. (1996). Children’s beliefs about intelligence and school performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 397–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.397
Talsma, K., Schüz, B., Schwarzer, R., & Norris, K. (2018). I believe, therefore I achieve (and vice versa): A meta-analytic cross-lagged panel analysis of self-efficacy and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.015
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2012). Test of word reading efficiency: TOWRE-2 (2nd ed.). Pro-Ed.
Unrau, N. J., Rueda, R., Son, E., Polanin, J. R., Lundeen, R. J., & Muraszewski, A. K. (2018). Can reading self-efficacy be modified? A meta-analysis of the impact of interventions on reading self-efficacy. Review of Educational Research, 88, 167–204. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743199
Unrau, N., & Schlackman, J. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. The Journal of Educational Research, 100, 81–101. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.2.81-101
Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Butz, A. R., & Rojas, J. P. (2019). Perseverant grit and self-efficacy: Are both essential for children’s academic success? Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 877–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000324
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78, 751–796. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321456
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. A. (2010). TOSREC: Test of silent reading efficiency and comprehension. Pro-Ed.
West, M. R., Kraft, M. A., Finn, A. S., Martin, R. E., Duckworth, A. L., Gabrieli, C. F., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2016). Promise and paradox: Measuring students’ non-cognitive skills and the impact of schooling. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38, 148–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715597298
Wigfield, A., Cambria, J., & Ho, A. (2012). Motivation for reading information texts. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & S. L. Klauda (Eds.), Adolescents’ engagement in academic literacy (pp. 52–102). University of Maryland.
Wigfield, A., Gladstone, J. R., & Turci, L. (2016). Beyond cognition: Reading motivation and reading comprehension. Child Development Perspectives, 10, 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12184
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breath or their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kami, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Routledge.
Yeager, D. S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G. M., Murray, J. S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., … Dweck, C. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573, 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y
Yeager, D. S., Romero, C., Paunesku, D., Hulleman, C. S., Schneider, B., Hinojosa, C., Lee, H. Y., O’Brien, J., Flint, K., Roberts, A., & Trott, J. (2016). Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000098
Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.794676
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, E., Kim, E.H., Ju, U. et al. Motivational predictors of reading comprehension in middle school: Role of self-efficacy and growth mindsets. Read Writ 34, 2337–2355 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10146-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10146-5