1 Correction to: J. Iron Steel Res. Int. (2019) 26:1199–1208 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42243-019-00312-z

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. Table 6 was incorrect. The corrected table is given below.

Table 6 Hydrogen permeation parameter of CSPS and CRS

The line 11 of page 1205 is revised as The diffusion coefficient of hydrogen in CSPS is 2.76×10−7 cm2/s, which is lower than that of CRS.

The line 17 of page 1206 is revised as “NT in CSPS is 3.47×1025 cm−3, which is much higher than that of CRS”.

Fortunately, the conclusions are still valid though the calculated parameters are revised.